Sunday, February 19, 2017

Here's The BOMBSHELL Hillary/Russia Uranium Story That The Media Refused To Cover Posted February 17th  2017  by Staff

The Nearness Of You Benefit Concert
During his marathon press conference on Thursday afternoon, President Donald Trump lashed out at the media for it's failure to adequately cover a 2015 bombshell report about then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. The report in question suggested that Secretary Clinton allowed 20% of the United States's Uranium production capacity to be acquired by Russian interests while at the same time millions of dollars in cash flowed not only to the Clinton foundation, but also directly into the pockets of Bill and Hillary.
"We had Hillary Clinton give Russia 20 percent of the uranium in our country," Trump said during aThursday's press conference. "You know what uranium is, right? It's a thing called nuclear weapons and other things. Like lots of things are done with uranium, including some bad things."
The story to which Trump was referring was originally reported on by The New York Times. However, as with most stories that were unflattering to Mrs. Clinton, the media quickly lost interest.

Gateway Pundit  February 16 By Cristina Laila

President Donald Trump held a fiery press conference and he didn’t hold back. He ripped the dishonest media and took another shot at CNN calling them ‘very fake news’. He brought up Russia and absolutely destroyed Hillary Clinton.|

We had Hillary Clinton give Russia 20% of the Uranium in our country!…Nobody talks about that. I didn’t do anything for Russia. I’ve done nothing for Russia.
Hillary Clinton gave them 20% of our Uranium!
Donald Trump even mocked Hillary Clinton when she presented that ‘reset’ button to Russia (It actually said overcharge).
Hillary Clinton did a reset. Remember with the stupid plastic button that made us all look like a bunch of jerks?

J I said previously, The Poster Boy For Term Limits..."How could Trump possibly win when I COULDN'T"

'That's How Dictators Get Started': McCain Defends the Free Press     Feb 18, 2017

Sen. John McCain says a free press is vital "to preserve democracy as we know it." And he cautions about efforts to muzzle a free press, saying "that's how dictators get started."
The Arizona senator was asked in an interview for NBC's "Meet the Press" how he felt about President Donald Trump's tweet criticizing "the fake news media" that said "it is the enemy of the American people."
McCain tells "Meet the Press," ''The fact is, we need you."
He adds: "When you look at history, the first thing dictators do is shut down the press." 
McCain says he isn't saying Trump is trying to be a dictator but "we need to learn the lessons of history."

Donald Trump Takes on the Lamestream Media 02/19/2017   Source: Daily Mail   by: Kaileen Gaul

Donald Trump once again doubled down on the media, telling a cheering crowd in Florida: ‘I want to speak to you without the filter of the fake news.’

The president was introduced in front of a crowd of 9,000 in Melbourne by Melania Trump, who led them in The Lord’s Prayer after she and her husband stepped off Air Force One on Saturday afternoon.

The First Lady, after embracing the president, promised to ‘stay true to myself and be truthful to you’ and told the audience, ‘my husband is creating a country of great safety and prosperity’.

The 'Make America Great Again Rally' was almost identical in rhetoric to his 2016 campaign events that focused on bringing back jobs and increasing national security. Unsurprisingly, this rally had a heavier focus on bashing press coverage than before.
Daily Mail

If I were Trump,...the last "press conference" would have been my LAST least until the "press" starts treating him fairly. The press, the democrats and some republicans can't STAND it because Trump won the presidency...HOW DARE HE !!

OK, media; War you wanted, war you got   Published by: Herman Cain on Sunday February 19th, 2017

Don't like it? Then don't start one.
We told you in September that the public’s trust in the news media is at an all-time low of 31 percent, according to a Gallup poll. I suspect that if you took another one today it would be even lower. And while it may be true that Donald Trump has had something to do with that, it’s only because he’s brought out the fullness of the behavior that proves just how untrustworthy they are.
President Trump’s press conference on Thursday was a truly astonishing event. He kicked it off with more than half an hour’s worth of updates on the progress he’s been making on issues that matter to the American people. This is substantive news, and you’d think you’d hear about it after the president discussed it at length in a press conference
But you didn’t. What you heard is:
Trump assails media!
Trump unhinged!
Trump is a racist!
Trump won’t answer Russia questions!
Trump rants and raves!
This came days after the mainstream media had a cow because, during a joint appearance with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, the president called on only two reporters – one from Townhall and one from the Christian Broadcasting Network. The left-wing MSMers got totally shut out, and most of them took to social media to express their rage about it.
Too bad!
Here’s what’s happened to the media, and this is entirely of their own doing: During the presidential campaign, they declared absolute war on Donald Trump. It was not Trump’s idea for this war to happen. It was theirs. They did everything they could think of to persuade the American public not to elect Trump president, calling him a danger to the republic and the most unprepared man ever to seek the office. They abandoned all pretense of objectivity and went into full battle mode against Trump.
They declared war. So . . . if it’s war you want, it is war you will get. Trump did not simply take their attacks lying down. He fought back. Hard. And he won.
Trump’s win proved something that has the media terrified, and it should. It proved that you can take them on, run for president without their favor, and still win. It proved that you can refuse to give them an inch or do even the slightest thing to placate them, that you can draw their fire completely and totally, and it won’t matter.
He proved that the media do not have the influence they want everyone to think they have. And for them, that is terrifying.
But have they learned their lesson? Not at all. As we’ve seen in the aftermath of this press conference, they have continued to ignore real, substantive news in favor of anything and everything they can use to make Donald Trump look bad. That is why Trump is going over their heads and updating the American people directly on the work he’s doing, even as he attacks the media for their dishonesty and reminds everyone of how little trust the people have in them anymore.
They think they can take him down now, just as they thought they could take him down during the campaign. It failed then. It will fail now. No one is listening to them. The president is accusing them of being liars, and the public largely believes him.
They have never faced a counterattack like this from a Republican president – a species they are used to walking all over and facing no consequences whatsoever. With this Republican president, they pushed too hard and went too far, and it is not turning out well for them.
War they wanted. War they got. War is hell. Maybe they should have thought of that before they fired the first shots.
Get your copy of Herman Cain’s new book, The Right Problems Solutions, here!

Saturday, February 18, 2017

NBC10 Philadelphia  FAKE NEWS.....    Yesterday at 10:50am
The President Donald J. Trump administration is considering a proposal to mobilize as many as 100,000 National Guard troops to round up unauthorized immigrants, including millions living nowhere near the Mexico border, according to a draft memo obtained by The Associated Press. The White House is denying the report.
White House Denies Guard May Be Used for Immigration Roundup
The Trump administration is considering a proposal to mobilize as many as 100,000 National Guard troops to round up unauthorized immigrants, but lawmakers said the document offers insight into the Trump administration's internal efforts to enact its promised crackdown on illegal immigration.
Administration officials said the proposal, which called for mobilizing up to 100,000 troops in 11 states, was rejected, and would not be part of plans to carry out President Donald Trump's aggressive immigration policy.
If implemented, the National Guard idea, contained in an 11-page memo obtained by The Associated Press, could have led to enforcement action against millions of immigrants living nowhere near the Mexican border. Four states that border on Mexico were included in the proposal — California, Arizona, New Mexico and Texas — but it also encompassed seven states contiguous to those four — Oregon, Nevada, Utah, Colorado, Oklahoma, Arkansas and Louisiana.
Despite the AP's public release of the document, White House spokesman Sean Spicer said there was "no effort at all to utilize the National Guard to round up unauthorized immigrants." A DHS official described the document as a very early draft that was not seriously considered
and never brought to Homeland Security Secretary John Kelly for approval.

Blue Lives Matter

It should be noted that this "study" didn't involve law enforcement, but it's being pushed as a way to change law enforcement training.
"No More Black Targets" Campaign Launched To Eliminate Black Silhouette Targets At Shooting Ranges
“Young black men are 3X more likely to be shot by trained shooters than their white peers,” the group’s website says. “A disturbing potential correlation: The most popular target for shooters to learn to use their firearm is a black silhouette. Unconscious bias can be deadly.”
The group has filed a petition to end the use of black silhouette targets and plans to call upon the International Association of Law Enforcement Firearms Instructors. They argue that a study by University of Illinois researchers that concluded shooters were more likely to fire at a black target and they have associated this to the use of black silhouette targets.
Yara Mekawi, a researcher in the study said, people were “quicker to shoot black targets with a gun relative to white targets with a gun. And…people were more trigger-happy when shooting black targets compared to shooting white targets.”
Similar petitions have been brought forth. In 2015, a Pennsylvania lawmaker wanted to ban the use of human silhouette targets except for law enforcement use, claiming they propagate violence. The No More Black Targets petition had 18 signatures as of Feb. 17.
No More Black Targets has designed alternative designs to be used as opposed to the traditional black silhouette targets.

Paul Ryan Did Something That Has Conservatives Up In Arms

For six years, Republicans have promised to repeal Obamacare.
And Donald Trump won the election, in part, on his promise to repeal the law.
But something Paul Ryan is doing is helping to keep Obamacare in place.
So far, Republicans have taken little action on repealing Obamacare.
Trump has exercised his authority to gut the law by signing an executive order instructing agencies not to enforce the mandate, penalties, and taxes where they can.
But fully repealing Obamacare will require Congressional action.
And Congress has so far punted.
Speaker Paul Ryan drives the agenda in the House and the inaction largely falls at his feet.
Congressional Republicans have refused to rally around a conservative approach to repealing the law.
Some want to leave the Medicaid expansion in place.
Others want to punt on repealing the Obamacare taxes until they can find a replacement.
But conservatives in the House are increasingly fed up with the leadership’s inaction.
They are putting their foot down and planning to move ahead on repealing Obamacare in response to the glacial pace of action on this issue.

Read More.
BUSTED! Spread far and wide since the media's not saying a word!!

"an impeachable offense..."

Massive Fake News Scandal Rocks Associated Press   02/18/2017    Source: AAN  by: Remington Strelivo

The Associated Press released a bombshell report—saying that President Donald Trump was planning to mobilize 100,000 National Guard troops to "round up" illegal immigrants, and deport them to their country of origins.

It would be a massive story—if it were true.

Unfortunately for the AP,
it was fake news.

The Department of Homeland Security hit back hard on the AP—saying that the allegations were completely false, and that they are "not considering mobilizing the National Guard.”

White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer also denied the allegations, saying, emphatically: "There is no effort at all to round up, to utilize the National Guard to round up illegal immigrants."

The AP’s story originated with a DHS memo that outlined a plan for use of the National Guard, which the AP claimed was written by DHS Secretary John Kelly.

DHS explained that the AP was incorrectly reporting on an early, pre-decisional draft of the memo—one which was never considered a serious proposal by staff. They added that the memo was also neither written nor approved by Kelly.

Without approval from Kelly, the memo never would have even made it close to the desk of President Trump.
As of 3:30pm on Friday, the Associated Press has not yet issued a retraction—and the article remains on their website.
 Source: AAN

     Donald J. Trump
The FAKE NEWS media (failing @nytimes, @NBCNews, @ABC, @CBS, @CNN) is not my enemy, it is the enemy of the American People

Friday, February 17, 2017

Trump's Anger Over Leaks Could Prompt Prosecutions
President Donald Trump's fury over the flood of leaks plaguing his administration could spark criminal prosecutions, Politico is reporting.
The most serious leaks center around the contents of phone conversations the government intercepted between Russian Ambassador Sergei Kislyak and Michael Flynn, who was just forced to resign as national security adviser, experts tell the website.
"If somebody disclosed the contents of intercepted phone conversations to a reporter, I could see a prosecution, for sure," said Ed MacMahon, a northern Virginia defense attorney. "That is plainly a felony."
A law aimed at stopping leaks of intelligence-related intercepts imposes a prison term of up to 10 years for each violation. As recently as 2009, a Hebrew contract translator for the FBI was charged with revealing classified communications intelligence to a blogger and eventually sentenced to 20 months in prison, Politico noted.
Trump has made no secret of his frustration over the leaks, denouncing "low-life leakers" and vowing they will be caught.
"I've gone to all of the folks in charge of the various agencies ... I've actually called the Justice Department to look into the leaks. Those are criminal leaks," Trump said.
But political veterans and those inside the intelligence community said the number of leaks is not terribly unusual.
"I deplore it," said retired Adm. James Stavridis, a former NATO commander. "It is illegal."
But he added: "I don't see an unusual level of leaks," he said. "I have yet to see anything that really shocks me."
While the risk of potential prosecutions grows, there is a question of whether a jury would actually convict someone who appeared motivated by concern that Trump aides were too close to Russian officials, according to Politico.
"Leak prosecutions just depend on whose ox is being gored …" said attorney MacMahon. "The government can destroy somebody's life in one of these cases. It just comes down to whether the government wants to prosecute the case."
Steven Aftergood, head of the Project on Government Secrecy at the Federation of American Scientists, told The Washington Post: "…even if the leaks are potential crimes, it may not be possible or practical to prosecute them. Investigators and prosecutors only pursue a fraction of the leaks that are reported to them."
Hillary Clinton Made An Unbelievable Statement About The Election     

You Won’t Believe Who Is Behind The Latest Threat To President Trump’s Life…

It’s no secret, liberals are not a fan of President Trump.
Ever since Trump was elected, liberals have been wailing in the streets holding protests and rallies, chanting things like “Not My President” and “Love Trumps Hate”.
In fact, many protesters have even resorted to acts of violence and rage to demonstrate their bitter hatred towards Trump.
But while liberals have made their distaste for President Trump well known, this magazine has finally crossed the line by threatening to assassinate the President of The United States.

On the front cover of Village, President Trump’s face is shown in the middle of a rifle’s crosshairs with the caption “Why Not”.
But there’s more.

This latest threat goes beyond normal partisan games, as the magazine article suggests readers take things into their own hands by taking out President Trump, literally.

Breitbart reported:
Read More
Image may contain: one or more people, meme and text

I guess this is what you call a "constitutional scholar"

ABC News chief political analyst: Trump undermines Constitution by not calling on mainstream media

Apparently, knowledge of the Constitution isn’t a requirement for political analysts at ABC News. On Wednesday, the Daily Caller reported that ABC News chief political analyst Matthew Dowd actually argued that President Donald Trump is undermining the First Amendment to the Constitution by not calling on operatives of the Democrat-media complex, formerly known as “reporters” in the so-called “mainstream media.”

According to the Daily Caller:

During Wednesday’s press conference, Trump limited questions to two non-mainstream media outlets: the Christian Broadcasting Network and Townhall.

Dowd argued that Trump is “shutting down part of the First Amendment by not taking questions that are going to be any way antagonistic in this.”

“I think he thinks relying on his Twitter feed, and sending it out to the millions of people that subscribe to it, and then dealing with very cozy press in this is going to be the way to get through this,” Dowd said.

Here’s video posted to Twitter by ABC:

So what, exactly, does the First Amendment say? Why, here it is:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

A post at
Cornell explains:

The First Amendment guarantees freedoms concerning religion, expression, assembly, and the right to petition. It forbids Congress from both
promoting one religion over others and also restricting an individual’s religious practices. It guarantees freedom of expression by prohibiting Congress from restricting the press or the rights of individuals to speak freely. It also guarantees the right of citizens to assemble peaceably and to petition their government.

Funny, I don’t see anything that requires the president — or anyone else — to take questions from certain media outlets.

Read full article here:
Image may contain: 1 person, text
Image may contain: text
Image may contain: one or more people and text

Thursday, February 16, 2017

Massive ISIS Terror Attack     02/16/2017  Source: Hindustan Times by: Imtiaz Ahmad

                          At least 70 people were killed and more than 150 others injured when a suspected suicide attacker blew himself up at a Sufi shrine in Pakistan’s southern Sindh province on Thursday, the latest in a string of terror attacks in the country this week.

“At least 72 are dead and over 150 have been injured,” senior police officer Shabbir Sethar told Reuters, adding that the death toll was likely to rise..

The Islamic State claimed responsibility for the bombing, the terror group’s news agency Amaq reported.

The explosion occurred at the Lal Shahbaz Qalandar shrine in Sehwan town when a large number of people had gathered for ‘dhamaal’ (a Sufi ritual), Pakistani media reported.
 Source: Hindustan Times