Sunday, June 25, 2017

BREAKING: Barrels Removed From Clinton Property Contained Parts From 3 Missing Women   June 22, 2017 

Three women who all went missing in the mid-1970s have turned up, at least parts of them, in a steel industrial 55-gallon drum buried on the Clinton estate in Chappaqua, New York. The barrel, which contained the arms, legs and heads of the three women, was filled with what the medical examiner calls a “crude preservative.”
That means that whoever put them in there wanted to be able to visit them later. Investigators were hoping to find the torsos in the second barrel recovered but found nothing but women’s shoes inside, all brand new in boxes withy the tags still on them. One investigator called it “the weirdest thing he’s ever seen.”
The three women, all of whom were in their late teens or early 20s, were hitchhiking their way from California to New York in 1974 when they disappeared. Their last known location before heading back onto the road was a motel just outside of Little Rock.
Is it a coincidence that three pretty young girls who disappeared so long ago from Arkansas ended up dead and buried on a property in upstate New York? It does if you talk to the Clintons PR people:
“Bill and Hillary Clinton have nothing to do with this and welcome any investigation with open arms. They have offered the DOJ their full cooperation. You people and your conspiracy theories that everyone who dies in America must have had a run-in with Hillary or Bill Clinton need to sit down.”
Investigators say while they don’t yet have enough to charge Bill Clinton, they certainly have enough evidence to question him. When they approached the house to do their jobs, they were met by a team of lawyers and Secret Service personnel and told that unless they have some real evidence, Mr. Clinton was unavailable.

They added that he felt really bad for those girls but hoped at least now their families have closure. Clinton will use ignorance and the 5th amendment to once again try to get away with murder.

Wednesday, June 21, 2017

Now we are getting threats from London Englands mayor ?

London's Islamic Mayor WARNS Trump: Drop your Travel Ban Or Face Terrorist Attacks -
London’s Muslim mayor is making waves in US politics by warning Trump that his “ignorant view of Islam” could invite a terrorist

Here’s Mr Khan’s full quote: “Donald Trump’s ignorant view of Islam could make both of our countries less safe – it risks alienating mainstream Muslims around the world and plays into the hands of extremists.”

This is the constant refrain from the left over the years.  According to them, the only reason Islamic radicals are waging jihad against innocents is that we don’t understand them.  It’s really our fault because we hold an “ignorant view of Islam.” Apparently, the only way to not “alienate mainstream Muslims” is to drop a travel ban that is specifically designed to prevent terrorists from reaching our shores.  And if we refuse?  Then apparently we’re bringing the trouble on ourselves.  Ok, GOT IT!  We deserve what we get.
This is just one of the many troubling statements from London’s first Islamic mayor, Sadiq Khan.  He is also known for his outrageous comments while in New York City that Islamic terrorism is just, “part and parcel of life in a big city.”  Can anyone imagine a more disgusting affront to New Yorkers who lived through 9/11?
Here’s some analysis from FFS:
London’s new Mayor, Sadiq Khan, has found himself embroiled in one controversy after another, many involving President Donald Trump. Khan, himself a Muslim, has responded to Trump’s travel restrictions branding them “ignorant” after the President had congratulated the mayor on his victory.
Khan is seen as a good choice for London Mayor, but some of his divisive statements are leaving many Londoners feeling isolated and left behind and questioning whether Khan is looking out for the interests of ALL residents.
Some of the Mayors more concerning comments include suggestions that if Donald Trump doesn’t moderate his stance on Muslims, they will launch more terror attacks. This is worth thinking about for a second. Is Khan suggesting that Muslims are so fragile that a travel ban will force them into justified terrorism? Or is he saying that people who would otherwise commit terrorist acts would be mollified into becoming perfect citizens if only The Donald showed them some love?
Khan has also stated that terrorist bombing are just part of living in a big city. Really? Because they never used to be. There has been a shift in not only political attitudes, but also in the willingness to take on an Islamic threat. By rolling over and accepting terrorist bombings (that actually kill a lot of Muslims), then one particularly violent strain of Islam is being allowed to flourish with all others cast aside.
This is all part of the larger narrative of the worldwide awakening of Islam.  Islam used to dominate much of the world.  There are elements that want that dominance back.  They are using all the means at their disposal to advance the cause; education, politics,media,as well as terrorism.  Whether Khan is a part of this remains to be seen.  At the very least he is a dupe who is making the advance of radical Islam easier.

Obama DHS Secretary: We Offered to Help The DNC Combat Russian Hacking, They Declined  Katie Pavlich   Posted: Jun 21, 2017 

Obama DHS Secretary: We Offered to Help The DNC Combat Russian Hacking, They Declined

Testifying in front of the House Intelligence Committee Wednesday morning, former Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson revealed assistance from his department was offered to the Democrat National Committee to combat Russian hacking during the 2016 presidential election, but was rejected.
"I pressed my staff to know whether DHS was sufficiently proactive, and on the scene helping the DNC identify the intruders and patch vulnerabilities. The answer, to the best of my recollection, was not reassuring. The FBI and the DNC had been in contact with each other months before about the intrusion, and the DNC did not feel it needed DHS’s assistance at that time,” Johnson said.
Just before Election Day last year, Wikileaks published thousands of emails belonging to DNC Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman-Schultz, DNC staffers, Hillary Clinton, John Podesta and other high profile Democrats. The emails showed collusion between CNN's Donna Brazil and Hillary Clinton ahead of a presidential debate and revealed Wasserman-Schultz did her best to rig the primary system against socialist candidate Bernie Sanders.
The DNC also reportedly refused to turn over servers to the FBI, whose agents investigated the email hacking. Intelligence agencies point to Russia as the original hacks of the documents.
"The FBI repeatedly stressed to DNC officials the necessity of obtaining direct access to servers and data, only to be rebuffed until well after the initial compromise had been mitigated. These actions caused significant delays and inhibited the FBI from addressing the intrusion earlier," CNN reported last year.
During his testimony Johnson reiterated that although the Russian government did meddle in the 2016 presidential election with a number of online propaganda campaigns, the Kremlin didn't change votes. 
For months Democrats have claimed the Russians are the biggest threat to our Democracy since the founding of the country, yet didn't seem concerned about the threat in the aftermath of hacks. It was only when President Trump won the White House that it became a major concern.

VIDEO: Texas ranchers battle 10 foot gator   By  D.E 

Roping a gator is just like roping cattle, except you aim lower.
At least that’s what three Hawkins, Texas cattle ranchers learned when they had to take down a ten-foot-long alligator that apparently hoped to make a hearty meal of their calves.
The showdown was caught on video.
Texas ranchers have seen, and can deal with, nearly everything, so they simply roped the beast.  The video shows one rancher expertly lassoing the hissing animal with a whip of the wrist.
“He was a dangerous one,” rancher Hal Conover told FOX 4. “But he was leaving the place — dead or alive.”
In the process of tying down the gator, one rancher was bitten.  Even with the most powerful bite of any animal on Earth, at a literal bone-crushing 3,000 pounds per square inch, he suffered only a flesh wound.
“He done bit me to the bone.  Oh, well,” the man says.
The animals was hauled away to a local gator farm by a licensed wrangler.
When Is It Time to Get the Pitchforks?
Via David

The Deep State attacks President Trump and his associates with accusations of Russian connections impacting the election. It does not matter that there is no proof offered. It does not matter that the man in charge of the investigation is a close friend of Comey. It does not matter that this drumhead trial in the media has no legal basis. What matters to the American people are the charges against Obama, Clinton, Rice and a host of domestic enemies that have not been brought forth. The facts exposed by Wikileaks, the DNC hack, public records and miscarriages of justice have brought no prosecution against these criminals.

But the coup de grace has now taken place: all information regarding their illegal activities have been transferred to the “Obama Library”. This means that they now cannot be seen for five years. So I ask the American people: have you had enough yet?
More @ NC Renegade


What Happened With Megyn Kelly Was Something No One Predicted

Megyn Kelly’s new show is off to a rocky start.
A controversial interview only added to her woes.
And the aftermath led to a shocking turn of events.
Megyn Kelly faced relentless liberal media pressure because she interviewed InfoWars host Alex Jones.
Sponsors boycotted the program and Kelly’s crew re-edited the piece to make Jones look bad.
The New York Post reported:
“Megyn Kelly has completely overhauled her Sunday night show featuring Alex Jones, inviting Sandy Hook families on the program and editing her interview with Jones to be tougher on him, following all the backlash this week.”
Kelly even sold the interview as trying to take down Jones because he supported Donald Trump in the 2016 election.
But this only added more fuel to the fire.
Jones one-upped Kelly by releasing audio of their conversations in the run up to the interview.
These clips showed Kelly to be a two-faced reporter who tried to butter up her subject to get him to agree to an interview.
Kelly even promised to let Jones get an advanced look at the piece to make sure it passed muster.
Deadline reports:
“Interspersed with Jones’ chest-thumping commentary from behind his mic on his Austin Infowars soundstage, Kelly is heard saying she wanted to show a more personal side of Jones, to both his followers and “the left” that will watch NBC. No word from NBC News on that remark.
“But I will promise you, to personally look at any clips we want to use of you, and have a producer run by you whether we are taking it in context and what you are saying about it,” Kelly vows at one point to the Sandy Hook mass shooting denier.”
After the interview aired, Jones called on NBC and Kelly to release the full, unedited tape of their interview.
To the surprise of many, Jones was joined in with this demand by Fox News Channel’s Sean Hannity.

CNN’s far-left, Fox News hating media reporter Brian Stelter jabbed at Hannity.

When it was pointed out that Stelter falsely accused Hannity of praying for Clinton’s death during the 2016 campaign, Hannity fired back and put CNN’s so-called “media critic” in his place.

Megyn Kelly’s show is a ratings disaster.
Now she’s being labeled as fake news by a former colleague.
Things have gotten so bad that one talk show host claimed NBC wants out of its contract with her.

Now, this is the only report of this nature to surface, so it could be inaccurate.
But given Kelly’s decline in ratings, no one would be surprised to see her show canceled for good.
Ed Klein: 'Trump Derangement Syndrome' to Cost Dems in 2018
Democrats are suffering from "Trump Derangement Syndrome" and pressing ahead with their misguided mission to take down President Donald Trump – despite the fact it will end in serious losses for them in the 2018 elections, veteran political writer Ed Klein told Newsmax TV.
"I think they're all demented – absolutely demented," Klein, former editor-in-chief of The New York Times Magazine and author of "The Amateur" said.  
"This 'Trump Derangement Syndrome' that they're victims of . . . is leading them down a path that I think will ultimately be a disaster in 2018.
"Because I think the vast majority of Americans – not only on the East and West coasts but throughout America – realize that the Democrats have absolutely nothing to offer except no, no, no to Donald Trump."
Klein called the Democrats' targeting of Trump "a real threat to our democracy."

When Obama said: “We’re going to punish our enemies and reward our friends” he was actually telling the truth   By  Kelly 

Remember the Barack Obama Administration’s Internal Revenue Service (IRS) scandal? The media really wish you wouldn’t, which is why they never really reported on it while it occurred. And, in many ways, the IRS scandal continued well past its initial exposition date.
Here’s a (re)fresher:
IRS Targeting Scheme is a Scandal with No End in Sight: “When the Senate Finance Committee released its findings on the Internal Revenue Service scheme targeting conservative organizations a couple of weeks ago, the initial determination was clear….
“(T)he evidence shows partisan political animus resulted in the unwarranted targeting of conservative groups because of their political beliefs….
“(Top IRS official Lois) Lerner called Republican critics ‘evil and dishonest’ – even ‘hateful.’
“She lashed out following an appearance before the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee in 2014: ‘Yesterday was a doozy. They called me back to testify on the IRS “scandal,” and I tool (sic) the 5th again because they had been so evil and dishonest in my lawyer’s dealings with them….’”
This was weaponizing government in a way of which Richard Nixon or any other president never even dreamed. But this was just one of myriad ways the Obama Administration turned the very many arms of the Leviathan against we less government types – and/or in favor of their big government political cronies.
When Obama said “We’re going to punish our enemies and reward our friends” – it was an administration manifesto.

learn more
Democrats Seethe After Georgia Loss: ‘Our Brand Is Worse Than Trump’

Democrats seethed, second-guessed and sought to regroup on Wednesday after a disappointing special election defeat in Georgia, with the party’s campaign chief in the House of Representatives outlining alternative paths to taking power, and some lawmakers questioning anew the leadership and political strategy of Nancy Pelosi, the Democratic minority leader.
By fiercely contesting a congressional race in the conservative Atlanta suburbs, Democrats had hoped to make an emphatic statement about the weakness of the Republican Party under President Trump. Their candidate, Jon Ossoff, raised about $25 million, largely in small donations, and assertively courted right-of-center voters with promises of economic development and fiscal restraint.

Mr. Ossoff’s supporters showed their dismay after results came in showing Karen Handel in the lead at a viewing party at the Westin Atlanta Perimeter North, on Tuesday night.
Mr. Ossoff’s supporters showed their dismay after results came in showing Karen Handel in the lead at a viewing party at the Westin Atlanta Perimeter North, on Tuesday night.

Jon Ossoff, the Democratic candidate, was joined by his fiancée, Alisha Kramer, as he addressed his supporters after his defeat in Georgia’s Sixth Congressional District special election on Tuesday night.
Jon Ossoff, the Democratic candidate, was joined by his fiancée, Alisha Kramer, as he addressed his supporters after his defeat in Georgia’s Sixth Congressional District special election on Tuesday night. 
Some lawmakers are questioning anew the leadership and political strategy of Nancy Pelosi, the Democratic minority leader.
Some lawmakers are questioning anew the leadership and political strategy of Nancy Pelosi, the Democratic minority leader. 
Representative John Lewis spoke at the viewing party for Mr. Ossoff.
Representative John Lewis spoke at the viewing party for Mr. Ossoff.

Mr. Ossoff’s supporters showed their dismay after results came in showing Karen Handel in the lead at a viewing party at the Westin Atlanta Perimeter North, on Tuesday night.

But as the returns came in and Mr. Ossoff remained stubbornly behind Karen Handel, a veteran local officeholder, Democratic frustrations burst into full view. Lawmakers and strategists fretted about the party’s inchoate message, and some called the race a sign that Democrats should not bet too heavily on converting red-tinged suburbs to win a majority in the House.
Representative Tim Ryan of Ohio, who has been a vocal critic of his party’s overarching political strategy, said Democrats needed to recognize that they were “toxic” in huge parts of the country.
“Our brand is worse than Trump,” said Mr. Ryan, who urged Democrats to make forging a clear economic agenda an urgent priority. “We can’t just run against Trump.”


Tuesday, June 20, 2017

Why So Much Rage?  Cal Thomas Posted: Jun 20, 2017

Why So Much Rage?

"Why do the heathen rage and the people imagine a vain thing?" (Psalm 2:1 KJV)

That didn't take long. Less than 48 hours after the shooting rampage targeting Republican members of Congress and their staff on a baseball field in Alexandria, Virginia, followed by the picture of Republicans and Democrats kneeling in prayer at Nationals Park before their annual charity game, things returned to normal ... or abnormal.
On Friday, the Drudge Report ran these headlines: "Shots fired at a truck flying 'Make America Great Again' flag;" "Starbucks staff harasses Trump supporting customer;" "Time Warner defends funding 'assassination play,'" in which Julius Caesar is presented as a Trump look-alike in Shakespeare's classic.
Can it get any worse? Probably. Should it? No.
How do we turn this caustic and crude language and behavior around? That is the ultimate question. I am not sure anyone can provide the answer. If they could, they would have by now. Or would they? There is money to be made, TV ratings to be gained and power to be preserved by keeping the pot stirred.

Alex Jones Gets Jump On Megyn Kelly - Leaks Recordings "To Set The Record Straight"

Why not move the cross as close as possible on a site of PRIVATE PROPERTY ? F**KING ATHEISTS

Federal Judge Rules Cross Violates Law and Must Be Removed Todd Starnes  Posted: Jun 20, 2017

Atheists across the fruited plain are rejoicing after a federal judge declared that a cross erected in a Florida park violated the law and must come down.
“I am aware that there is a lot of support in Pensacola to keep the cross as is, and I understand and I understand and respect that point of view,” U.S. District Judge Roger Vinson wrote in his ruling. “But, the law is the law.”
The lawsuit was filed in 2016 by the notorious Freedom From Religion Foundation and the American Humanist Association on behalf of four Pensacola citizens.  Click here to view photos of the cross.
The judge pointed out that park has hosted tens of thousands of people for roughly 75 years without causing anyone offense – until now.
“When a city park serving all citizens – nonreligious, Jewish, Hindu, Buddhist, Muslim and Christian – contains a towering Latin cross, this sends a message of exclusion to non-Christians, and a corresponding message to Christians that they are favored citizens,” said Annie Gaylor, the organization’s perpetually offended co-founder.
The original cross was erected in 1941 in Bayview Park. It was replaced with a 34-foot, white “Latin Cross” in 1969 by the Pensacola Jaycees.
Judge Vinson noted in his ruling the “Bayview Cross” is “part of the rich history of Pensacola and Bayview Park in particular.”
He said the cross had been the focal point for Memorial Day and Veteran’s Day services – not to mention Easter Sunrise services.
“However, after about 75 years, the Bayview Cross can no longer stand as a permanent fixture on city-owned property,” the Reagan-appointed judge ruled.
He directed the city of Pensacola to remove the cross within 30 days. He also ordered the city to pay the aggrieved plaintiffs one dollar in damages. That comes out to a quarter apiece.
The American Humanist Association celebrated the judge’s ruling.
 “We are pleased that the Court struck down this cross as violative of the First Amendment,” attorney Monica Miller said in a statement. “The cross was totally unavoidable to park patrons, and to have citizens foot the bill for such a religion symbol is both unfair and unconstitutional.”
Judge Vinson based his ruling on a court case involving a similar cross that suffered the same fate in Rabun County, Georgia.
“If the cross under review in Rabun County violated the First Amendment and had to be removed, the cross here must suffer the same fate,” the judge wrote.
Oddly, Judge Vinson seemed rather reluctant to rule against the cross.
“The historical record indicates that the Founding Fathers did not intend for the Establishment Clause to ban crosses and religious symbols from public property,” he wrote. “Indeed, ‘the enlightened patriots who framed our constitution’…would have most likely found this lawsuit absurd. And if I were deciding this case on a blank slate, I would agree and grant the plaintiffs no relief. But, alas, that is not what we have here.”
As I wrote in my book, “The Deplorables Guide to Making America Great Again,” people of faith are facing unrelenting attacks from a ruthless bunch of godless atheists -- hell-bent on eradicating Christianity from the public.
Should Christian citizens be relegated to some sort of second-class citizenship? Should they be directed to keep their beliefs hidden inside the church house?
Will they demand that city leaders rename Los Angeles and San Francisco? Should The Ten Commandments be chiseled off the doors of the Supreme Court? Should references to God be sandblasted from our national monuments?
Just how far do the atheists intend to go in this cultural jihad on our Judeo-Christian values?
Judge Narrows Injunction Against Trump Travel Ban
U.S. District Court Judge Derrick Watson has cut back the injunction he issued against President Donald Trump's revised travel ban order, Politico is reporting.
Watson's move comes after the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals upheld his injunction, but noted portions that blocked the administration from reviewing vetting procedures were too broad, according to the website.
The judge narrowed the injunction clearing the way for the administration to conduct internal reviews of other nations' vetting procedures for visa applicants while the case is being reviewed by the U.S. Supreme Court, CNN reported.
Homeland Security Secretary John Kelly has called the move a "big win," but others were more cautious.
"Procedurally, this is a narrow, but significant, victory for the government," said Steve Vladeck, CNN legal analyst and professor of law at the University of Texas School of Law.
"But it may have the opposite effect substantively. The stated purpose of the entry ban was to allow the government to conduct this internal review. If it's now able to conduct that review while the ban itself remains on hold, that may undermine the justification for the ban in the first place."

One Year Later: “No Proof Of Russian Collusion Exists”

One Year Later: “No Proof Of Russian Collusion Exists” 

The 11-month-old investigation into a potential Trump-Russia collusion is going nowhere, according to one Democratic Representative on the House Intelligence Committee. Last year, members of Trump’s campaign were accused of sharing information with Russian officials that may or may not have influenced the election – but these were merely liberal allegations.
One year later, there has still been no evidence found connecting President Trump to Russian officials, contrary to what liberals and their ‘fake news’ stories continue to report


FBI coup against Trump? Who Is Leading It Will Surprise You

What if the FBI wanted Trump gone?  What would they do to make it happen?
After Trump got rid of former FBI Director James Comey, and now is threatening to fire the special prosecutor Robert Mueller, just what would they do to protect themselves and their agency?
A new report suggests they are teaming up to get Trump out.
This is nothing more than an attempted coup by law enforcement.
The news first appeared in Big League Politics:
“Russia” special counsel Robert Mueller has formed a political team with his friend, fired FBI director James Comey, and the current FBI director Andrew McCabe to work together against President Donald Trump.
But Mueller and Comey are not the ringleaders. Surprisingly, it’s McCabe.
An inside source told Big League Politics that McCabe is “running the show,” and “he’s the key.”
“Mueller and McCabe are assembling a better political operation than Hillary had in the campaign. The trio of Mueller/McCabe and Comey are all creatures of the swamp,” the source explained.
“I think McCabe is the most politically savvy given how he navigated the controversy with his wife’s campaign donations and the Clinton investigation,” the source continued.
Read More.

God Bless Texas: Lone Star State legalizes open carry of massive knives   By D.E 

Photo credit: Flicker, KAZ
The Bowie knife is synonymous with Texas.  The massive blade, which Jim Bowie carried at the Alamo, has even been proposed by lawmakers as an official state symbol.
“The bowie signifies a spirit of individualism, aggression, and resourcefulness, of adventure and an inflamed sense of honor that is part of the idea of Texas,” Texas Monthly magazine wrote in 1988. “In the fierce blade of the bowie knife is a souvenir of the merging of civilized society with the wild frontier and of the westward march of history that drew many of us here in the first place.”
But it was illegal for Texans to actually carry one, until now. 
Gov. Greg Abbot last week signed legislation repealing an 1871 ban on carrying blades over 5.5 inches, unless they are part of a ceremony or historical reenactment.
The bill, HB 1935, overturns the ban on “Bowie knives, daggers, dirks, stilettos, poniards, swords, and spears,” but maintains prohibitions on carry in schools, correctional facilities, bars and places of worship, or by those under 18 years of age.
Even Texas Democrats supported knife carry, with the bill passing the State House 131-1 and the State Senate 30-1.
“It has been a shame that for so long Texans have been unable to carry a knife bearing the name of one of the defenders of the Alamo. The Texas legislature has restored a small part of our state pride,” said gun rights activist CJ Grishman of Open Carry Texas.
While the rest of the world goes down the tubes, Texas just keeps getting freer.
Or, as David Crockett put it, “You may all go to Hell. I’ll go to Texas.”

The Mainstream Media Won't Report This!

Trump Supporter Stabbed 9 Times by Middle Eastern Gang Members   06/19/2017   by: Remington Strelivo

Trump Supporter Stabbed 9 Times by Middle Eastern Gang Members

A California man was viciously stabbed by the members of a Middle Eastern gang—simply for being a Trump supporter.

27-year-old Tony Foreman had attended a free speech rally in California with friends, followed by an evening at a local bar.

Upon leaving the bar—still wearing his pro-Trump clothing—Foreman saw another vehicle ram through the automated parking gate and smash into his car in the bar’s parking lot.

The driver of the other car was an Armenian gang member, in a car with other gang members. The driver was initially looking to exchange insurance information for the accident, they quickly noticed Foreman’s conservative bumper stickers—including a Gadsden flag, an American flag, and other pro-republics messages.

Upon seeing the stickers, the driver walked back to his car—and his fellow gang members exited the car, wielding knives. As one of the gang members shouted, “I’m going to shank you, white boy,” Foreman was stabbed a total of nine times.

The police, when asked for comment, said that the attack didn’t appear to be pre-meditated but it was “racially-charged.”

Foreman remains in the hospital, and has already endured twelve hours of surgery.

“We always hear about violence from the left, but I never thought it would happen to me,” Foreman said. “Next thing I know, I woke up in a hospital bed with 9 stab wounds for having patriotic stickers on my car. It really makes me sad to be attacked for my beliefs and who I am. I don’t wish this upon anyone, no matter your political views, and I hope my experience will help wake people up and stop this nonsense.”

Nancy Pelosi Stunned Everyone When She Crossed This Line

The left has come under fire for their overheated rhetorical attacks on Donald Trump.
After the shooting of House Majority Whip Steve Scalise by a Bernie Sanders supporter, Trump and other politicians preached that hateful political rhetoric must end.
But Nancy Pelosi ignored that advice and shocked observers with her comments.
Pelosi was pressed about the hyperbole Democrats employ when talking about Trump and other Republicans.
Rather than accept fault for creating a climate of hate, Pelosi lashed out.
She blasted Republicans as “sanctimonious” for daring to ask that Democrats cut out hate-filled attacks and drop the conspiracy theories that drove a paranoid madman to try and assassinate Republican members of Congress.
And, of course, Pelosi threw in a shot at Donald Trump.
Breitbart reports:
Thursday at her weekly news conference, when asked about negative discourse playing a role in the shooting of Republicans practicing for a congressional charity baseball game, which critically injured House Majority Whip Steve Scalise (R-LA), Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) said Republicans began the current level of coarse political rhetoric attacking President Bill Clinton in the 1990s.
She then pointed to then-candidate Donald Trump joking at a campaign rally, “I could stand in the middle of 5th Avenue and shoot somebody and I wouldn’t lose voters.”
Pelosi said, “Let’s all say, let’s examine our conscience, let’s see how we can rid ourselves of our negative attitudes that go to a place that is like this. We’ve had—it didn’t used to be this way. Somewhere in the 1990s, Republicans decided on the politics of personal destruction as they went after the Clintons and that is the provenance of it and is what has continued. Again, I feel as if we’re having a family moment that is very, very serious and we’re talking about things that we can say, the discussion—save the discussion for another day. When you have a president that says, I can shoot somebody on 5th Avenue and nobody would care, when you have people saying, beat them up and I’ll pay their legal fees, when you have all the assaults that are made on Hillary Clinton, for them to be so sanctimonious is something. I really am almost sad that I had to go down this path with you, because I don’t think it’s appropriate for us to have the fullest discussion of it. And it will be for another day. It will be for another day.”
But Trump and the Republicans did not inspire this madness.
The shooter hated Trump.
He shared a link calling Trump a traitor.
And the pumps that fed his rage were primed by daily stories in the so-called “mainstream” media that falsely claimed Trump and his team were in cahoots with Russians.
Democrats have to own the hatred they are stoking in their base.
Liberal journalist Michael Tracey wrote on Medium:
“If you deny that the kind of overblown rhetoric that Democrats have specialized in over the past months—warning about traitorous subterfuge and foreign infiltration—can have any trickle-down effect on regular people, you’re deluding yourself.”
Democrats have never believed in personal responsibility.
But now it’s going beyond the Democrats’ belief that people are entitled to government handouts, they are excusing their own role in fostering an environment where a member of their party thought political assassination was an acceptable means to achieving political ends.

Monday, June 19, 2017

Sen Tom Cotton Unloads On Russia Investigation, Asks Where Is The Evidence?

Republican Senator Rips Democratic Colleagues On Russian Collusion Chatter: Where's The Evidence?  Matt Vespa Posted: Jun 18, 2017

Republican Senator Rips Democratic Colleagues On Russian Collusion Chatter: Where's The Evidence?

Attorney General Jeff Sessions testified this week before the Senate Intelligence Committee to discuss the Russian meddling during the 2016 election. Sen. Tom Cotton (R-AR) noticed something glaring about the questions asked by his Democratic colleagues:

So, a very simple question that should be asked is did Donald Trump or any of his associates in the campaign collude with Russia in hacking those emails and releasing them through the public. That’s where we started six months ago. We have now heard from six of the eight Democrats on this [Senate Intelligence] committee and to my knowledge, I don’t think a single one of them asked that question. They’ve gone down lots of other rabbit trails, but not that question.

Flashback: Russian Ambassador Visited Obama White House 22 Times
Matt Vespa

Flashback: Russian Ambassador Visited Obama White House 22 Times

Prior to the testimony given by Attorney General Jeff Sessions before the Senate Intelligence Committee this week, there was a lot of chatter about his third undisclosed meeting with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak. Depending on whom you read, like the LA Times or the Associated Press, Sessions denied the third meeting, while NBC News says the attorney general said it was “conceivable” a third rendezvous occurred, but he cannot recollect what happened. He did stress that nothing improper had occurred.

The visitor logs, which Obama made public in 2009 in a push for transparency, show that the long-time Russian ambassador to the United States visited the White House at least 22 times between 2009 and 2016.