Wednesday, September 28, 2016

pictures

Wasn't there something about "glass houses and stones" ?
 
This Is Why We Cannot Compromise On The Second Amendment

 
Incrementalism will destroy the Second ammendment

Of course, "good ole Harry Reid" would be the one to vote WITH obama

Senate Overrides Obama's 9/11 Veto, Only One Senator Votes to Sustain It     Cortney O'Brien  Sep 28, 2016
 
Senate Overrides Obama's 9/11 Veto, Only One Senator Votes to Sustain It
UPDATE: The House just voted to override Obama's JASTA veto as well, Fox News is reporting.
***Original Post***
In a vote of 97-1 (the only rebel being Minority Leader Harry Reid), the Senate voted to override President Obama's veto of the Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism Act (JASTA). The bipartisan bill allows the families of 9/11 victims to sue Saudi Arabia for its alleged support of terrorism. It is the first time Obama has faced a veto override in his presidency.

READ MORE

A transgender deer hunt

Since deer season is approaching, I thought I'd throw this in......

 Deer leaps into SUV door after being struck         
 
 

 
Published on Sep 28, 2016
 
OH DEER: Police dashcam footage captured the moments a deer circled back and attacked a the driver on an SUV right after it was struck. The deer strikes as the woman is opening her door to speak with the officer, and nearly makes his way inside.

When Hillary Clinton said one thing during the debate, Rudy Giuliani went off on her after it was all over. He took her down and proved once and for all that she is unfit to be president.
donaldtrumpnews.c

o
 
 
Rudy Giuliani really can give us a great sound bite. Difference between he and the liberals is that what he says matters and isn’t a lie.
The debate last night gave us drama and shouting, but the opinions and analysis afterwards are giving us greater insight into what each candidate said. We may have missed something as the format and both candidates spoke quickly and moderator Lester Holt kept things moving at a swift pace. There’s also the chance that you tuned in at a certain time and missed a lot of the debate. Or you just missed it entirely.
Rudy Giuliani was watching and what he saw in Hillary was pure fantasy. She is not fit to run this country!
 

BUSTED: Lester Holt’s Pre-Planned Hit On Trump Just Got Exposed To The Entire Country 


 
If viewers were paying attention at all last night, it was perfectly clear that Lester Holt’s moderation was nothing more than an attempted hit on Trump under the guise of being fair
and balanced.

It was discovered beforehand, but the mainstream media refuses to talk about it.

Infowars reports,
Before the debate, Robby Mook, Clinton’s campaign manager, heaped pressure on Holt to constantly interrupt Trump, arguing that the debate was a “special circumstance,” that allowed him to “fact check” Trump on a whim, despite the fact that only candidates are allowed to challenge each other according to the Commission on Presidential Debates.
NBC insiders also let slip that Holt was “not going to be a potted plant” – in other words – he was going to insert his own bias into the debate rather than just moderating it fairly.
“I don’t think it’s a good idea to get the moderator into essentially serving as the Encyclopedia Britannica,” the executive director of the Commission on Presidential Debates, Janet Brown, told CNN on Sunday.
Yet that’s exactly what Holt did.
He also allowed the audience to laugh at four separate jokes made by Hillary while urging them to be silent after one Trump joke.
While it would be easy for Hillary supporters to dismiss all this as whining, the list of issues that Holt managed to avoid when he had an opportunity to question Clinton is longer than a grocery list.
 

Instead, the moderator spent an inordinate amount of time discussing Trump’s tax returns and the “birther conspiracy,” hardly key issues when it comes to the future of the country.

“Holt went for the birther issue with Trump, which isn’t off the table but has very little relevance to what faces our next president,”
wrote Stephen Kruiser. “Had Hillary brought it up it would have been fine. For Holt to interject it during what was supposed to be a substantive discussion on race relations made it seem as if he were being fed questions directly from Clinton HQ.”

Holt also failed to “fact check” Hillary on her
biggest lie of the night, her claim that she was against the Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP).
Even with the incredible amount of bias shown by Holt in Hillary’s favor, CNN still had to rig its own poll in order to announce that Hillary had won the debate.
Clearly the leftist media did everything they could to rig the debate against Trump. Rudy Giuliani was extremely vocal about it on Fox & Friends this morning saying Holt should be ashamed of himself for how me handled the debate and we couldn’t agree more with Giuliani.

Paul Joseph Watson predicted the entire thing many hours before the debate…

 

THEY WANT "REPARATIONS" BUT DON'T KNOW WHY....Know nothing about the Civil war ??

The Dumbing Down of America Is Complete!
Published on Feb 4, 2016



We are doomed...
Iran Atomic Chief Sees No Threat to Nuclear Deal If Trump Becomes U.S. President

A landmark nuclear accord sealed last year between Iran and six world powers will not be in danger if Donald Trump wins the U.S. presidential election in November, the head of Iran's Atomic Energy Organization said on Wednesday.
Republican presidential candidate Trump has called the accord "the worst deal ever negotiated" and said it could even lead to "nuclear holocaust", although he has also conceded it would be hard to rip up a deal enshrined in a U.N. resolution.
Trump has also blasted his Democrat rival Hillary Clinton for her role as Secretary of State in 2009-13 in helping to pave the way for the talks culminating in the deal, which curbs Tehran's nuclear activities in exchange for sanctions relief.
However, Iran's Ali Akbar Salehi played down the possibility that Trump might turn his back on the accord.
"I think whoever gets into the ... office of the president in the United States will have to move according to the realities on the ground," he told a panel discussion in Vienna.
"You can (use) many words, slogans, but then at the end of the day you are constrained by the realities."
Salehi said the accord included necessary mechanisms for dealing with the contingency of one side breaching it.
"I don't think (the nuclear deal would receive) any serious impact (from Trump). It may go a little bit up and down, it may delay certain things, but it will not seriously detract (from the deal)."
© 2016 Thomson Reuters. All Rights Reserved.

THIS IS CLINTONS TRANSPARENCY ??

Clinton Campaign Mgr. Can’t Answer Questions - ‘Why Are You Here Then?’



Published on Sep 21, 2016
Video Transcript:

Hillary Clinton's campaign manager Robby Mook looked foolish on MSNBC by refusing to answer any foreign policy questions.

WILLIE GEIST: What's her biggest regret about the way Syria's been handled?

MOOK: Well, obviously she's been out of office for some time now.


GEIST: She was there when it started. Yeah. I understand, Robby. What about in Syria, though? She supported the drawings of the red line. Obviously she was out of her office when Assad used chemical weapons. Was it a mistake to draw the red line if the president was not willing to go, to do something about it when it was crossed?

MOOK: Well, as you pointed out, the decision regarding that was made after she was out of office so I think you'd have to ask President Obama.

GEIST: Was she disappointed that the president didn't act when the line was crossed?

MOOK: I think you'd have to ask her about that question, how she would characterize it.

GEIST: You're here to speak for her, Robby. You haven't discussed that at all?

MOOK: Look, what matters is what she is going to do as president. You can go on our website and read the full plan there.


MIKE BARNICLE: How would Secretary Clinton respond to somewhat of a version of the following question, we've had a relief convoy bombed, potentially a war crime, leading into Aleppo. What would you do, Secretary Clinton, about providing food, water, and medicine to the citizens of eastern Aleppo today, right now, differently than what the Obama Administration is doing? What would she do differently?

MOOK: Again, I think you're going to have to ask her that question. That's a matter of policy and I'm going to leave it for her.

JOE SCARBOROUGH: We love you, buddy, but what are you here for if you can't answer basic questions? I mean, I don't know if there's a — I mean, we may be tiptoeing into Gary Johnson territory here if you don't know the answer to that basic of a question - What is the response to Aleppo? Then why do we have you here?


MOOK: I think — look, you're asking new policy questions. You would have to ask the secretary.

SCARBOROUGH: New? Aleppo's been around for — Syria's been around for some time. The red line being drawn has been around for some time. I'm not being difficult here at all. These are basic questions.


HILLARY CLINTON: I've been the most transparent public official in modern times as far as I know
Judge Napolitano: FBI Was Told To Exonerate Hillary ‘At All Costs To Run Against Trump’


Published on Sep 27, 2016
Video Transcript:

While Hillary Clinton was busy suggesting Donald Trump is hiding something in his taxes…

CLINTON: Why won't he release his tax returns? First, maybe he's not as rich as he says he is. Second, maybe he's not as charitable as he claims to be. I have no reason to believe that he's ever going to release his tax returns because there's something he's hiding.

Judge Napolitano said the FBI helped hide Clinton's crimes to keep her in the presidential race.
NAPOLITANO: Why the FBI would look the other way in the face of the destruction of evidence and obstruction of justice is very telling. It tells me, and those of us that watch these things, that somewhere from above - the White House - they were told, "Exonerate her at all costs, no matter what you see, because she's got to be available to run against Donald Trump."

The evidence that the FBI has revealed since Director Comey's statement, "We're not going to request an indictment," which happened on July 5th, two months ago, has been so damning. It is far more damning than what we knew about the case beforehand.

A lot of Americans are unsatisfied with the result of the FBI investigation because they know that a lot of people have been prosecuted for these crimes and there's a lot of them: espionage, perjury, misleading Congress, destruction of evidence, obstruction of justice. A lot of Americans have been prosecuted for these crimes with a lot less evidence than they found about Mrs. Clinton.

Tuesday, September 27, 2016

WATCH – Trump Releases THIS Amazing New Ad – Hillary Will LOSE If People See It!   September 27, 2016

“Why aren’t I 50 points ahead, you might ask,” Hillary Clinton recently screamed into a microphone, hands flailing, while addressing a group of union members via satellite.

ml 5
Why They Won't Make Jokes About Hillary Clinton... JEFF DUNHAM


Published on Sep 22, 2016
Achmed the Dead Terrorist, Walter, Peanut and Bubba J have been poking fun at Donald Trump’s campaign for President. So, why won’t they make jokes about Hillary Clinton? The guys tackle this subject head on in this Public Service Announcement!
Military Train Rolls Thru Denver Monday Aug, 29, 264 pieces

Published on Aug 29, 2016

August 29 2016 Military Train Spotted in Downtown Denver, CO, A convoy of over 264 different pieces of equipment after I started recording I don't know how much of the train had passed before I started.

Tanks, armored personnel carriers, howitzer cannons, ammunition boxes, personnel carriers with loaded trailers, communications vehicles, giant fuel carriers, excavating equipment, insignia marks covered up, why?

Vehicles look like they were loaded with everything they need to go into combat, including water and plenty of ammo lockers. Yesterday I saw another fully-loaded military train heading south thru Denver. I don’t see Military trains very often. This looks odd and peculiar!
Image may contain: 1 person , text

Monday, September 26, 2016

Primal Studios's photo.

Primal Studios's photo.
Primal Studios's photo.





Is this statuetory rape?
Or is it just a moosedemeanor?
Stop laughing! This is serious

Judge Jeanine Dropped A Massive Truth Bomb On Hillary That She’ll Never Recover From  By Blair Patterson

A lot has been said about Hillary Clinton during this election cycle. Things like: she’s a liar, she’s a murderer [Benghazi], she’s not fit to be president. These and many other things are being debated highly by people at all levels of the government and the media. But there’s one thing that’s indisputable.

Judge Jeanine went on her show and in her opening statement dropped a bomb so large that it cannot be ignored by the media, the government, or even the courts. For the first time in American history, we have a candidate for the President of the United States that is under federal (read: criminal) investigation.

Watch Judge Pirro SKEWER Hillary and make sure the world knows the kind of scum she really is!

This is something we all need to know about. This is something that’s being swept under the rug. Yes, the media is talking about it, but not in the right context. Hillary is the only candidate ever to run that is under federal investigation and that is 100% unacceptable.


National ICE Council Anounces First-Ever Presidential Endorsement In Its History

Unprecedented...
Early Monday morning, the National Immigration and Customs Enforcement Council made a huge announcement that rocked the political world.
   We hereby endorse Donald J. Trump, and urge all Americans, especially the millions of lawful immigrants living within our country, to support Donald J. Trump, and to protect American jobs, wages and lives,” the organization’s president, Chris Crane, wrote in a statement published at DonaldJTrump.com.
   What made the endorsement so stunning was that the National ICE Council had never before in its history made an endorsement for a candidate running for an elected office.           Plus,the council represented 7,600 federal immigration officers and law enforcement support staff members.
   Yet this time around, the council chose to have a vote, and according to the results of that vote, GOP candidate Donald Trump received the vast majority of the council members’ support.
   “This first-ever endorsement was conducted by a vote of our membership, with Hillary Clinton receiving only 5 percent of that vote,” Crane’s statement clarified.
   In explaining why council members disliked Democrat candidate Clinton so much, Crane pointed to her support of “the most radical immigration proposal  in U.S. history.”
   He also claimed that her plan had been crafted with the assistance of “special interests and open-borders radicals.”
   “Her radical plan would result in the loss of thousands of innocent American lives, mass victimization and death for many attempting to immigrate to the United States, the total gutting of interior enforcement, the handcuffing of ICE officers, and an uncontrollable flood of illegal immigrants across U.S. borders,” his statement went on.
   The Democrat candidate would also expand executive amnesty, expand catch-and-release and prioritize the non-enforcement of America’s federal immigration laws, Crane wrote.
   Trump’s plan, on the other hand, would “restore immigration security” by, among other things, cancelling President Barack Obama’s executive amnesty, putting an end to sanctuary cities and providing immigration agents with the tools and resources they need to effectively carry out their jobs.
   “America has been lied to about every aspect of immigration in the United States,” Crane continued.
   “We can fix our broken immigration system, and we can do it in a way that honors America’s legacy as a land of immigrants, but Donald Trump is the only candidate who is willing to put politics aside so that we can achieve that goal,” he concluded