Tucker Carlson: They have lost control Jun 29, 2021 Fox News
Wednesday, June 30, 2021
By Jim Hoft Published June 28, 2021
And it doesn’t matter if this is inside or outside the Capitol Building.
Americans continue to be gaslighted by corrupt leaders.
Politico’s Ryan Reilly reported on the arrest without a hint of disgust. The left condones this.
Lois Lynn McNicoll was charged with “knowingly entering or remaining in any restricted building or grounds without lawful authority and violent entry and disorderly conduct on Capitol grounds.”
JUST HOW ROGUE HAS THE FBI GONE? NEW DETAILS PROVIDE ANSWERS YOU’RE NOT GONNA WANT TO HEAR Jun 21, 2021 By Duncan Smith
But we don’t think like tyrants around here.
Still, as bad as this practice is, stunning new information indicates the bureau is a lot more ‘off the farm’ than even we suspected.
Becker News reports:
The Federal Bureau of Investigation knowingly violated the Constitution to track down potential 'racially motivated violent extremists.' But the FBI didn't conduct its unconstitutional dragnet following the January 6th Capitol riots, it actually started its probe in November — in the midst of a contested election.
A newly declassified report shows that the FBI pursued extremists in November that would fit the profile of future Capitol rioters by tapping into a National Security Agency database that trawls and records Americans' communications.
'The FBI's requests for access to masses of electronic communications harvested by the National Security Agency (NSA) is revealed in a newly declassified report from the United States' secret surveillance court,' the Daily Mail reported in recent days, revealing that, of course, the FBI didn't act alone.
'It shows the FBI has continued to perform warrantless searches through the NSA's most sensitive databases for routine criminal investigations, despite being told by a federal judge in 2018 and 2019 that such a use was an unconstitutional breach of privacy,' the outlet added.
Without question, the FBI is no longer a federal law enforcement agency. It’s a political organization targeting patriots and conservatives and it must be broken up.
Now, a 2020 interview with Sign has surfaced in which he revealed “death threats” after he broke the Clinton story.
“My family received significant death threats shortly after breaking this story,” said Sign, who added that he and his wife had prepared their three young kids with “secret code words” in case anything were to happen to them, adding that “they know what to do.”
“That’s why I came back to… Birmingham because when I was enduring the death threats it was my former Alabama football family – my teammates, my coaches – who circled around me,” Sign said at the time.
Over the weekend, we reported that Christopher Sign, the reporter who broke the story of Bill Clinton secretly meeting with Loretta Lynch on a tarmac in Phoenix in 2016, had been found dead in an alleged suicide. Now, the coroner has revealed some new details about his death.
The Jefferson County Coroner/Medical Examiner’s Office stated that Sign, 45, was found dead in his Hoover home at 8:14 a.m. on Saturday, June 12, 2021.
The coroner’s report stated that Sign was found dead by family members, according to The Trussville Tribune. While the cause of death has yet to be released, Hoover Police believe the death was a suicide.
Judicial Watch Obtains Records Showing NIAID under Dr. Fauci Gave Wuhan Lab $826k for Bat Coronavirus Research From 2014 to 2019 Yesterday at 4:00 PM Judicial Watch
today announced that it obtained 280 pages of documents from the Department of Health and Human Services revealing that from 2014 to 2019, $826,277 was given to the Wuhan Institute of Virology for bat coronavirus research by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), which is headed by Dr. Anthony Fauci.
The multi-million-dollar investment will create a much-needed “pipeline of diverse professionals,” the HHS secretary added, assuring that it will help the country better prepare for “future public health emergencies.” The COVID-19 pandemic exacerbated pervasive health and socioeconomic inequities, according to HHS, by, among other things, exposing gaps in the government’s public health reporting and data analysis around race and ethnicity-specific data. The administration aims to improve future public health responses in minority communities with data collection involving infection, hospitalization and mortality rates that also considers social vulnerabilities, race and ethnicity, age, gender, and other variables. “Representation is important,” Becerra said, referring to the need for diversity to tackle pressing healthcare challenges.
Tuesday, June 29, 2021
The Biden administration is spying on us': Tucker Carlson claims a whistleblower told him the NSA is monitoring his communications in a bid to get his show taken off the air
Carlson on Monday claimed the National Security Agency spied on his show
The Fox News host said he was alerted by a whistleblower on Sunday
Carlson said th the NSA wanted to take his show off the air
He described their alleged behavior as 'incompatible with democracy'
Carlson has for several weeks been claiming the FBI was behind the Capitol riot
He said that the intelligence agencies were infiltrating every aspect of life
By HARRIET ALEXANDER FOR DAILYMAIL.COM| UPDATED:
Tucker Carlson has claimed that the National Security Agency is spying on his show, in a bid to take him off the air.
The Fox News host said on Monday night that a whistleblower had approached the show the day before and informed them of the espionage.
'It is not just political protest the government is spying on,' Carlson told his viewers.
The China Spy Story Erupts. Where Is He? - The Dan Bongino Show Ep. 1548 Published June 23, 2021
Rumble — For show notes, visit https://bongino.com/ep-1548-the-china-spy-story-erupts-where-is-he
This show is brought to you by Express VPN https://www.expressvpn.com/bongino
Is the Biden administration hiding a Chinese communist party spy? Why can’t anyone pinpoint his location? In this episode, I discuss the scandal and I address the dangerous influence of “Zuckerbucks” in our elections.
The DOJ is Lying about the Ashley Babbitt case The force was excessive so the DOJ punts on "willfulness" Techno Fog Apr 14 2021issued a press release explaining their decision to not prosecute the officer who shot and killed unarmed protester (and veteran) Ashli Babbitt on January 6, 2021.
It states that DOJ officials, along with the Metropolitan Police Department’s Internal Affairs Division, “conducted a thorough investigation of Ms. Babbitt’s shooting.” This included reviewing video footage, getting statements from officers and other witnesses, collecting physical evidence, and the results of Ms. Babbitt’s autopsy.
“As members of the mob continued to strike the glass doors, Ms. Babbitt attempted to climb through one of the doors where glass was broken out. An officer inside the Speaker’s Lobby fired one round from his service pistol, striking Ms. Babbitt in the left shoulder, causing her to fall back from the doorway and onto the floor.”
You’ll notice there’s no mention of a verbal warning to Ms. Babbitt or other efforts to subdue her without the use of deadly force.
Continuing on, the DOJ maintains that the “focus of the criminal investigation was to determine whether federal prosecutors could prove that the officer violated any federal laws, concentrating on the possible application of 18 U.S.C. § 242, a federal criminal civil rights statute.”
The press release focused on the term “willfully”:
The DOJ concluded:
“The investigation revealed no evidence to establish beyond a reasonable doubt that the officer willfully committed a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 242. Specifically, the investigation revealed no evidence to establish that, at the time the officer fired a single shot at Ms. Babbitt, the officer did not reasonably believe that it was necessary to do so in self-defense or in defense of the Members of Congress and others evacuating the House Chamber.”
This conclusion should be no surprise. Not because of the law or the facts, but because of the people in charge of the Department of Justice. The U.S. Capitol Police, like the Park Police, have always had a special relationship with the DOJ – one that includes preferential treatment. This case is no different.
For starters, the three basic elements to a prosecution under 18 U.S.C. § 242 are that the defendant (1) acting under color of law; (2) willfully; (3) deprived the victim of a federally protected right.
Excessive force is easy to establish. The Supreme Court has held that the government must introduce evidence that the action of the officer in shooting to kill Babbitt was “excessive in relation” to a legitimate government objective. Kingsley v. Hendrickson, 135 S. Ct. 2466, 2473-2474 (2015). This is an objective standard – the force must be objectively unreasonable when viewed from the standpoint of a reasonable officer at the scene. Here, Babbitt was unarmed, was climbing through a window and not attacking anyone. In response, she is shot and killed. Easily excessive.
This brings us to “willfulness.”
We have serious doubts about the DOJ position that there was “no evidence” to establish beyond a reasonable doubt that the officer willfully violated Section 242. As an initial matter, the DOJ press release neglects to mention whether the officer used excessive force, instead going right to an analysis on willfulness. We believe this reveals their intent to soften the blow of the press release.
As to willfulness, 18 U.S.C. applies “when the defendant understands that he is unjustifiably invading a legally protected interest, or acts in reckless disregard of the law.” However, the defendant need not have been “thinking in constitutional terms,” as long as his “aim was not to enforce local law but to deprive a citizen of a right and that right was protected by the Constitution.” Screws v. United States, 325 U.S. 91, 106 (1945).
Here, the DOJ exaggerates - and at worst, lies - about its “willfulness burden.” We doubt the DOJ couldn’t prove willfulness in this case.
In fact, the DOJ has brought Section 242 prosecutions with less egregious facts.
As the DOJ has argued in other cases, the officer’s prior training on the use of force could be viewed “as evidence that his conduct was willful.” Are we to think that this officer didn’t have training on when force became excessive?
In another case, the DOJ argued to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals that to establish “willfulness,” the jury was required to find that the defendant “intended to use more force than was reasonable under the circumstances – i.e., force that violated [the victim’s] well-established due rights as a pretrial detainee.”
What makes the Babbitt case different? The victim and the location.
This case should have gone to the jury. If this killing took place in Minnesota or Chicago the results would have been different.
Monday, June 28, 2021
CONFIRMED: Biden Approves Of Olympian Disrespecting The Flag, Says He “Respects” Her by Collin Rugg about 2 hrs agoMonday, White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki confirmed that President Joe Biden supports Olympic hammer thrower Gwen Berry who turned her back on the American flag at the medal ceremony in Oregon during the Olympic trials.
Psaki explained that Biden is “incredibly proud to be an American and has great respect for the anthem and all that it represents, especially for our men and women serving in uniform all around the world.”
The press secretary then promoted anti-American propaganda when she explained that Biden “would also say, of course, that part of that pride in our country means recognizing there are moments where we are, as a country, haven’t lived up to our highest ideals, and that means respecting the rights of people, granted to them in the Constitution, to peacefully protest.”
Check out what the Daily Wire reported:
As the Daily Wire reported Sunday, athlete Gwen Berry said she felt as though she was “set up” when the “Star-Spangled Banner” played while she was on the podium receiving her third-place medal for the hammer throw — and award that qualifies her to participate in the Tokyo Olympic Games.
“As the National Anthem began to play with the winners standing on the podium, Berry turned away from the flag so that she was facing the stands. Toward the end of the anthem, she pulled up a black t-shirt with the words ‘Activist Athlete’ on the front to cover her head,” the Daily Wire noted.
Berry says she was told the anthem would play sometime before she was on the podium receiving her medal. USA Track and Field, which handled the Olympic qualifier event, said that the anthem is scheduled to play daily at 5:20, per a “previously published schedule,” and that the hammer throw athletes happened to be on the podium at the right time.
“I feel like it was setup,” a clearly deranged Berry told The Washington Post. “I feel like they did that on purpose, and I was pissed, to be honest. I was thinking about what should I do. Eventually, I just stayed there and just swayed. I put my shirt over my head. It was real disrespectful. I know they did that on purpose, but it’ll be all right. I see what’s up.”