A Shocking Letter Surfaces About The 2020 Election - The Dan Bongino Show Ep. 1561 The Dan Bongino Show Published July 13, 2021

A stunning letter emerges which will make you look at the 020 election differently. In this episode, I discuss the letter and I address a Politico article about the left’s disturbing push to read your text messages. Are your emails next?

 

 Judicial Watch 

BREAKING: Judicial Watch announced today that it received 75 pages of records from the Department of Veterans Affairs detailing the adverse reactions veterans had to the COVID-19 vaccines.

As of April 2021, Veteran’s Health Services reported 895 serious reactions which included: 20 cardiac arrests, 36 strokes, 15 cases of deep vein thrombosis, 10 heart attacks, and 19 pulmonary embolisms. They also reported over 26,000 less serious reactions. The agency withheld individual report details, citing alleged privacy and related issues.

“Despite the censorship and suppression by the Biden administration and Big Tech, the American people benefit from more, not less, information about the safety and efficacy of the COVID-19 vaccines,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “These new documents show that politics and a pernicious Critical Race Theory approach infects VA decision-making on the allocation of health resources to veterans.”

READ: http://jwatch.us/TiHMdW

#judicialwatch #veterans #veteransaffairs #vaccines #covid #bigtech #bidenadministration #biden

I included the disclaimer from facebook which everyone knows is total BS...!It's common knowledge that"WE THE PEOPLE" are the testers and guinea pigs for ALL the covid vaccines...There wasn't time to do long term testing, so I don't understand the constant lying and saying they were fully tested before use on the public...

politics

 

Babylon Bee

I don't understand the Cubans protesting in the USA...Do they expect us to invade Cuba on their behalf...??

RICHARD MILHOUS NIXON

 

 President Trump Reacts to ‘Bombshell’ Election Fraud Evidence Uncovered in Fulton County Audit   by Kyle Becker

President Trump has reacted to disturbing new evidence coming out of Fulton County, Georgia pointing to 2020 election malfeasance.

“The news coming out of Georgia is beyond incredible. The hand recount in Fulton County was a total fraud! They stuffed the ballot box—and got caught. We will lose our Country if this is allowed to stand.”

“According to the just released report from Garland Favorito and the highly respected Voter GA, in Fulton County the hand recount was wrong by 60%; 100,000 tally sheets for ballots were missing; they duplicated thousands of extra votes for Joe Biden; and fabricated vote counts of 100-0 for Biden, many times!”

“Ballot batch sheets fraudulently showed multiple unanimous 100-0 counts for Biden, as well as 150-0, and 200-0,” he went on. “Are we now in a Third World country? What else will they find once the full Forensic Audit takes place?”

“This means Brad Raffensperfer certified the 2020 Presidential Election Scam despite it being ‘riddled with massive errors and provable fraud’,” Trump continued. “This proves what Suzi Voyles, who worked Fulton elections for decades, suspected, that fraudulent photocopied ballots were counted for Biden. This is on top of the 35,000 illegal votes recently found in Georgia, and the over 100,000 obsolete voter registrations, plus thousands of dead people, deleted AFTER the election.”

“Will the Attorney Generla of Georgia Chris Carr finally act?” he asked. “How has Governor Brian Kemp allowed this to happen?”

READ MORE

The hand of GOD at work.....

Witnesses: George Floyd mural at Summit and Lagrange destroyed by lightning strike 

     

Tucker: These 'morons' on TV know how it works and they're lying  Jul 9, 2021  Fox News

Fox News' Tucker Carlson and Mark Steyn discuss the SA surveilling the host and the media's reaction. #FoxNews #Tucker

In Lie Filled Speech, Biden Again Makes False Claims of Jim Crow 2.0  Katie Pavlic|sted: Jul 13, 2021

Townhall.com

@townhallcom

BIDEN: "21st century Jim Crow assault is real. It's unrelenting, and we're going to challenge it vigorously."

Speaking in Philadelphia Tuesday afternoon, President Joe Biden doubled down on false claims Republican governors are enacting Jim Crow "voter suppression" laws in states across the country.

Biden also warned voter integrity measures like voter identification and bans on ballot harvesting are a threat not seen since the Civil War.

BIDEN: "I've said it before. We're facing the most significant test of our democracy since the Civil War. That's not hyperbole." pic.twitter.com/hNg2OfO6ky— Townhall.com (@townhallcom) July 13, 2021

Biden's speech was meant to pressure Senate Democrats to eliminate the filibuster in order to federalize local elections and solidify permanent power for the left. Senators Joe Manchin and Kyrsten Sinema have maintained they will not vote to remove it as a legislative tool, which is used by Republicans and Democrats.

Back in March the Washington Post gave Biden four Pinocchios for false statements bout Georgia's election integrity law, which was recently held up in court. Further, the Supreme Court just handed Arizona a victory on their latest efforts to secure local elections.

White House Supports Vaccine Mandates Pushed by Local Leaders  WENDELL HUSEBØ  12 Jul 2021

VIDEO

White House press secretary Jen Psaki said Monday President Joe Biden would support vaccine mandates if they are implemented by local governments. (He's OK with it as long as he doesn't get the BLAME)

“Does President Biden agree with Dr. Fauci that at the local level there should be more vaccine mandates?”, a Fox News reporter asked White House press secretary Jen Psaki, supplementing his question with a quote from Dr. Anthony Fauci, who said, “I remain of that opinion, that I do believe at the local level, there should be more mandates. There really should be.”

Psaki answered that the federal government is not in charge of local government vaccine mandates, but if a municipality decides to burdens their residents with mandates, the White House would support them.

“That is not our intention from the federal government.” she said, but if local governments “decide to make that [mandate] decision, we support them in that step.”

The Fox News reporter then pointed to March 11, when Biden said to “listen to Dr. Fauci” in all aspects of coronavirus vaccines.

“Is he [Biden] saying don’t listen to Dr. Fauci?” Fox News reporter pressed.

Psaki responded by first chuckling and smiling before saying “welcome back” to the reporter, noting that “decision[s] are made by local leaders on how they can keep their community safe.”

The White House’s position on not interfering in local government rules comes as Fauci said Sunday on CNN he believes the coronavirus “is serious business. So I am in favor of that [local vaccine mandates].”

“Why are we having red states and places in the South that are very highly ideological in one way not wanting to get vaccinations? Vaccinations have nothing to do with politics,” Fauci continued.

“It’s a public health issue. It doesn’t matter who you are. The virus doesn’t know whether you’re a Democrat, a Republican or an independent,” Fauci explained. “And yet there is that divide of people wanting to get vaccinated and not wanting to get vaccinated, which is really unfortunate, because it’s losing lives.”

Biden said on March 11 that Americans should “Listen to Dr. Fauci, one of the most distinguished and trusted voices in the world. He has assured us the vaccines are safe.”

Does this set a precedent ? Can we now SUE auto manufacturers (Ford Chevy, Chrysler) if an accident leaves someone maimed or dead as a result of being hit by one of their cars...?? Is this Judge a demoRat ???

California judge rules shooting victims can sue Smith & Wesson NEWS
Plaintiffs alleged the gunmaker used misleading marketing to attract 'impulsive young men with military complexes,' leading to a 2019 synagogue shooting   PHIL SHIVER July 13, 2021
 

A San Diego judge ruled last week that the victims of a 2019 shooting in a California synagogue can sue Smith & Wesson, the gun manufacturer that made the weapon used in the assault, for damages.

Judge Kenneth Medel of the Superior Court for San Diego County rejected an argument made by Smith & Wesson claiming lawsuits are prohibited under the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA), Reuters reported.

The federal law is meant to provide protection to firearms manufacturers and retailers when their products are used in criminal activity. But in their June 2020 lawsuit, the plaintiffs argued that Smith & Wesson shouldn't be shielded by the regulation because it broke state law by designing the M&P15 rifle to be easily modified into an "assault weapon."

In his ruling, Medel agreed that the gunmaker's alleged misleading marketing violated California's unfair competition law.

According to Reuters, plaintiffs argued the company used marketing "that attracted impulsive young men with military complexes who were particularly likely to be attracted to the unique ability of AR-15 style weapons."

Plaintiffs noted the "M&P" in the name stands for "military and police," but argued the gun was largely sold to civilians, including the alleged shooter, then 19-year-old John Earnest.

Last month, Earnest, now 21, signed a conditional plea agreement that is now in the hands of U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland, according to the San Diego Union-Tribune.

Earnest is accused of opening fire in a synagogue in Poway, California, in April 2019, killing one person and wounding three others. There were reportedly 54 people in the synagogue at the time of the shooting.

Earnest may still face the federal death penalty for his crimes, but plaintiffs in the Smith & Wesson case want punishment for his crimes to extend to the gun industry, as well.

"Today's judgment is a victory, and an important step on the road to justice for the victims of the shooting at Chabad of Poway Synagogue, and all Americans who believe that the gun industry is not above the law," said Jonathan Lowy, a lawyer for the plaintiffs, in a statement. "We look forward to proving our case in court, and working to prevent future tragedies."

The lawsuit reportedly seeks unspecified damages in addition to an injunction against Smith & Wesson requiring the gunmaker to cease its allegedly deceptive marketing campaigns.

The Blaze reached out to Smith & Wesson seeking comment on the recent ruling but has not yet received a response.

Another freakin demoRat idiot ...!!             We should BAN ALL assault weapons..!!..I just can't teii you what they are...

Bring TRUMP back and drain the rest of the swamp

Democrat Hank Johnson claims that originalists read the Constitution based on race   Nicholas Rowan 3 hrs ago 

© Provided by Washington Examiner

Rep. Hank Johnson on Monday claimed that some originalist judges read the Constitution based on race.

During a House Judiciary Committee hearing about diversity on the federal bench, the Georgia Democrat defined originalism as "white males interpreting the Constitution through the eyes of a white male who existed back when the Constitution was written." Johnson added that this school of thought was outmoded and dangerous for minorities who find themselves in court.

"It's scary to people who go to court, and all they see is white males on the bench," Johnson said.

Originalism is a school of textual interpretation whose adherents attempt to understand the Constitution as it was understood at the time when it was written. Since the 1980s, originalism has been associated with the legal conservative movement, but in recent decades, it has become the dominant school of thought in the Supreme Court and many circuit courts.

Originalism explicitly rejects race-based or identitarian readings of the Constitution. Since President Joe Biden has taken office, however, Democrats have claimed that former President Donald Trump used originalist judges as an excuse to keep the federal judiciary's composition overwhelmingly white and male.

Trump's three Supreme Court nominees, Justices Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett, are all originalists, broadly speaking, and gave the term new notoriety.

But legal conservatives do not have a monopoly on originalism. One of former President Barack Obama's Supreme Court nominees, Justice Elena Kagan, during her 2010 confirmation hearings, famously declared that "we are all originalists now."

Kagan, who does not identify as originalist herself, meant that the court has in recent years become more attentive to the actual text of the Constitution.

Original Author: Nicholas Rowan