Friday, July 1, 2022

Here's your demoRat run cities and states......Philly Pa (my city) is the same way..multiple SHOOTINGS just about every day

Major Liberal City Drained by Mass Exodus – Small Businesses Are Quickly Fleeing Crime-Ridden Chicago  
By Adam Casalino|June 30, 2022

In recent years, we’ve heard about the “Great resorting.” Americans are fleeing certain parts of the country for greener pastures.

There appears to be no sign of that stopping. And we are learning many small businesses are fleeing this major blue city, for one big reason.

From Fox News:

A business owner in Chicago, Illinois tells Fox News Digital that skyrocketing crime in the city forced him to quit doing business in town adding to the list of individuals and businesses that have fled Illinois over the past couple of years amid surging crime…

“We would do thousands of jobs a year in the city, but as we got robbed more, my people operating rollers and pavers we got robbed, our equipment would get stolen in broad daylight and there would usually be a gun involved, and it got expensive and it got dangerous,” Rabine told Fox News Digital.

How unbelievable. Crime is getting so bad in Chicago that road workers were being robbed at gunpoint… in broad daylight.

Criminals stole expensive equipment, disrupting work as they robbed these employees.

Gary Rabine, who owned 13 businesses in the state, said enough is enough.

He, along with many other business owners, is leaving Chicago and the state.

This isn’t some odd coincidence. Both the left-leaning Governor of Illinois and the Mayor of Chicago have turned a blind eye to rising crime.

It’s getting so bad that a seemingly endless parade of residents is fleeing even nice parts of the state.

The costs related to all this crime were making jobs twice as expensive. That is unimaginable.

How can any leaders, regardless of party, allow this kind of thing from happening? How can Mayor Lightfoot just sit back and watch criminals get away with robbing law-abiding citizens?

But that is just what Democrats are doing, all over the country. Their “woke” politics are putting hardened criminals ahead of hard-working citizens.

And these leftists refuse to admit such policies are driving people away. There is only so much a person can take before they are forced to leave.

Nobody can blame them. The scary reality is, that wherever Democrats have power in state and local governments, this happens.

Unless serious law-and-order leaders take over, the trend will only continue.

Key Takeaways:
  • Numerous small businesses are fleeing Chicago due to rising crime.
  • In some cases, criminals are robbing workers in broad daylight.
  • The state’s left-wing governor and the city’s mayor are to blame.

Thursday, June 30, 2022

The End of Oil & Gasin Biden’s America  Forbidden Knowlege

America is already suffering a food shortage, which can be felt by rising costs and emptying shelves at the grocery store.

But this is a cakewalk. It's going to get much worse. The writing, as they say is on the wall. Any reasonable person can see that this is all being done deliberately.

Over 10,000 cattle just died and we are told that it was due to 100ºF weather. And in just the past 17 months, nearly 100 disasters have mysteriously befallen the American food industry; dozens of catastrophic fires burning down food processing plants, in multiple cases caused by small aircraft crashing into them, thousands of tons of meat destroyed.

Over 2 million turkeys have been destroyed, over 40 million chickens have been destroyed and with the rising cost of fuel, farmers are unable to harvest their crops and it's only just beginning.

Remember, Joe Biden promised he would shut down oil and gas. And they are making god with their radical promise – except there is no alternative energy plan.

The Biden administration is doing everything they can to shut down all fossil fuel in this country and not only will that stop people from driving, all public transportation, all shipping and all industry will come to a halt. Millions will lose their jobs and hundreds of millions will starve to death.

Whether you like it or not, civilization is dependent upon oil and gas and our government is turning it all off.

We are also suffering a baby formula and what little we do have is being sent to the open southern border for the tens of thousands foreigners being brought in unchecked and flown to already-struggling cities across America.

And after several countries suspended the Moderna vaxxine for adults due to safety concerns, the United States FDA just unanimously voted to inject your children with the deadly shot.

Your government is trying to kill you and if anybody thinks this is hyperbole or fear-mongering, they are not paying attention or they are in shock.

The only solution we are being offered is to vote, even though we have a rigged election system and two parties that work for the same corporate establishment.

Starvation is coming fast and people can only survive a few weeks without food.

And so, what exactly will we do if the so-called "Red Wave" this November fails to turn the tide?

Running Time: 4 mins

The latest video by Greg Reese.

Forbidden Knowledge TV 

Jovan Pulitzer June 27th  Arizona Forensic Testimony

On Monday, Jovan Pulitzer testified about the staggering, preliminary findings of his team's ongoing forensic investigation of the 2020 General Election in Maricopa County, Arizona.

This included a highly-detailed video presentation, which begins at roughly 1 hour and 15 minutes into this full video of Right Side Broadcasting's livestream of the event.


During his live presentation, he describes how every conceivable form of fraud was deployed; digital, mail, Social Security, mules, dead voters, phantom voters, COVID, etc., etc.

COVID was first reported in the US in January. July 4th was the first holiday where people were told to stay home. By August, 38 states decided to go all-in on mail-in ballots.

But back on March 1st, Runbeck Election Services, a government contractor placed the largest order in history for ballot envelope stuffing machines. This was two weeks before the infamous "Two weeks to flatten the curve" emergency was even declared. Jovan asks, "How did they know?"

Jovan describes the US Postal Service's Mail Cover system, which snaps photographs of the front and back of all pieces of mail sent, storing the images for 6 years for investigational purposes.

He says that the USPS stopped its Mail Cover program on April 1st and image storage was changed from 6 years to 30 days. After Biden was installed, it was turned back on, indicating that this fraud went up to the highest levels of the US Government.

Jovan says, "If I wanted to buy every politician in the country making these decisions, there's about 7,000 of them. And if I made a deal with them, 'I'm going to pay $1 million a year if you look the other way', it's going to cost me $7, where's the money and how is it hidden?...We discovered 10,000 people using the exact same Social Security Number...

"See if this one rings true: You take an illegal, you bring 'em in. They sign a piece pf paper promising to pay taxes. What they get is a Social Security Number, so the employers can take out the taxes...

"Here's what they do...they will bring in hundreds of illegals. They will spread them out all over these plants and factories, giving them jobs. They're all using the same Social Security Number. The IRS, unconnected are names from 
the Social Security Number, now, when you look it up, it just pings to see if there's an employer. If there is, it says it's good, it validates it.

"Why do they do that? Because all of these factories are giving them Social Security Numbers, the Government turns its back on it, as soon as you have a Social Security Number and you go over to Motor Voter, pass the driver's test, you get a driver's license... that's how they pack the rolls.


Tuesday, June 28, 2022

McEnany: The border is open, but where are MSNBC, CNN?   Fox News

'Outnumbered' panelists debate the issues at the border after nearly 50 migrants were found dead in a truck in Texas. #FoxNews

Tucker Carlson: This is a manufactured disaster  Fox News

Fox News host Tucker Carlson weighs in on the state of the American economy and inflation as he says companies pay for women to travel and get abortions on 'Tucker Carlson Tonight.' #FoxNews #tucker

Monday, June 27, 2022

This is a little DEEP for me but what I got from it is that Vice Pres. Pence DID have the authority to reject Electoral College votes he deemed questionable.

We Need More Lawyers Like Prof. John Eastman  George Rasley, CHQ Editor 4 days ago

Former law professor and outside counsel to President Trump John Eastman is under attack from Democrats and the Far Left for advising then-President Trump on strategies for challenging the Electors certified after the disputed 2020 election, including proposing that the Vice President had the power (if not the responsibility) to reject ballots cast by disputed Electors.

Prof. Eastman’s detractors, including anti-Trump “conservatives,” have alleged that his advice to the then-President amounted to insurrection or sedition and that the respected attorney and constitutional scholar, after being hounded from his teaching position, should be “cancelled” by being disbarred and possibly thrown in jail for offering what they claim is a baseless theory of the Vice President’s powers.

Even the center-right Wall Street Journal endorsed the claim made by former federal appeals judge J. Michael Luttig, who testified that “There was no basis in the Constitution or laws of the United States at all for the theory espoused by Mr. Eastman”; and Greg Jacob, a lawyer for Mr. Pence, who testified that “We examined every single electoral vote count that had happened in Congress since the beginning of the country. . . . No Vice President in 230 years of history had ever claimed to have that kind of authority.”

Let us first dispense with the claim that there is no legal or historical basis for Prof. Eastman’s position that the Vice President’s role in counting the Electoral College votes is not merely ministerial. As Mr. Eastman explained in a letter to the Wall Street Journal:

     The Journal’s reliance on these authorities introduces the distortion intended by the committee. Start with Mr. Jacob. What he is quoted as saying is not true. Here is what he wrote in a Dec. 8, 2020, memo he prepared for the vice president:

“There is some historical evidence that Adams and Jefferson both resolved issues over the validity of electoral votes in their own favor, and in 1857 the President of the Senate (a role filled by Senator John Crittenden, as the Vice Presidency was then vacant) personally overruled an objection to the counting of Wisconsin’s electoral votes, and asserted that it was his responsibility to make the validity determination in the first instance, while suggesting that the House and Senate might thereafter jointly overrule him.”

As for Judge Luttig, he appears to be unfamiliar with the scholarly and historical support of my position. As I have publicly stated many times, it is an “open question” whether or not the vice president has the power to judge the validity of disputed electoral votes. In the case at hand, I advised the vice president that, whether or not he had such a power, he would be foolish to exercise it.

As to the argument that the Constitution grants the vice president this power, to mention a few of the sources I relied on: Edward Foley, director of Election Law at Ohio State University’s Moritz College of Law, acknowledged in a 2019 law review article that this argument has a “significant historical pedigree.” In an earlier article, Mr. Foley had noted, along with a coauthor, that “[d]uring the first period, from 1789 to 1821, the power [to count and/or determine the validity of votes] was generally thought vested in the states or the President of the Senate” rather than the two houses of Congress.

University of California, Berkeley, law professor John Yoo and University of St. Thomas law professor Robert Delahunty advanced this same position in an important article published at the American Mind in October 2020. From the other end of the ideological spectrum, Yale Law Professor Bruce Ackerman and George Washington University Law Professor David Fontana advanced a similar position in their 2004 article addressing Thomas Jefferson’s decision to count “obviously defective” electoral votes from Georgia in the 1800 election.

Another scholarly article cites Chancellor Kent’s statement in his influential treatise, Commentaries on American Law: “The Constitution does not expressly declare by whom the votes are to be counted and the result declared. In the case of questionable votes, and a closely contested election, this power may be all-important; and I presume, in the absence of all legislative provision on the subject, that the President of the Senate counts the votes, and determines the result, and that the two houses are present only as spectators, to witness the fairness and accuracy of the transaction, and to act only if no choice be made by the electors.”

Mr. Jacob acknowledged all this in his Dec. 8, 2020. memo: “Some scholars argue that under the text of the Twelfth Amendment, it is the sole responsibility of the Vice President to count electoral votes, and that it is accordingly also the Vice President’s sole responsibility to determine whether or not disputed electoral votes should be counted.”

There was substantial legal scholarship and historical support for the argument long before I advanced it in 2020…


Justice Samuel Alito’s Brilliant Rejection Of ‘Raw Judicial Power"   George Rasley, CHQ Editor  Updated: 11 hours ago   

It is vanishingly rare in human history that, once a political leader obtains power that leader
chooses to voluntarily surrender it, and even rarer for a leader to assert that even though he or she sits in a position of authority he lacks the power to grant the wishes of a substantial constituency.

But that is exactly what Justice Samuel Alito did in his brilliantly written opinion in the case of Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, which overturned the Roe and Casey decisions creating a “right” to an abortion:

We hold that Roe and Casey must be overruled. The Constitution makes no reference to abortion, and no such right is implicitly protected by any constitutional provision, including the one on which the defenders of Roe and Casey now chiefly rely—the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. That provision has been held to guarantee some rights that are not mentioned in the Constitution, but any such right must be “deeply rooted in this Nation’s history and tradition” and “implicit in the concept of ordered liberty.” Washington v. Glucksberg, 521 U. S. 702, 721 (1997) (internal quotation marks omitted).

The right to abortion does not fall within this category. Until the latter part of the 20th century, such a right was entirely unknown in American law. Indeed, when the Fourteenth Amendment was adopted, three quarters of the States made abortion a crime at all stages of pregnancy. The abortion right is also critically different from any other right that this Court has held to fall within the Fourteenth Amendment’s protection of “liberty.” Roe’s defenders characterize the abortion right as similar to the rights recognized in past decisions involving matters such as intimate sexual relations, contraception, and marriage, but abortion is fundamentally different, as both Roe and Casey acknowledged, because it destroys what those decisions called “fetal life” and what the law now before us describes as an “unborn human being.”

Justice Alito’s opinion was it its purest form a rejection of the liberal conceit that judges have untrammeled power to act as a super legislature, do whatever they want, and impose those views on the rest of the country.