Judge Jeanine: I've never seen a president treated this way
Published on Jan 13, 2017
'Justice' host gives her take on national negativity towards Trump
“CNN has reviewed a 35-page compilation of the memos, from which the two-page synopsis was drawn. The memos originated as opposition research, first commissioned by anti-Trump Republicans, and later by Democrats. At this point, CNN is not reporting on details of the memos, as it has not independently corroborated the specific allegations. But, in preparing this story, CNN has spoken to multiple high-ranking intelligence, administration, congressional and law enforcement officials, as well as foreign officials and others in the private sector with direct knowledge of the memos.”While CNN only reported on the memos, it was the anti-Trump website BuzzFeed who originally published the memos.
“Already, former aides are revamping Organizing for Action, the group formed out of his old campaign structure. No longer about backing up Obama’s agenda in the White House, it will be a nexus for training activists and candidate recruitment, reshaped both by Trump’s win and some of the factors that contributed to Hillary Clinton’s loss.READ ON
Though OFA has been mostly quiet over the last two months and made no formal announcements, its Chicago headquarters has been filling up with new hires, including several old campaign aides, who are planning to focus on the mechanics of campaigns, from running Obama-style persuasion programs, integrating data and running paid canvassing operations. Though the first goal is designing the program for what they’ll aim to make hundreds of workshops nationwide, there’s already talk moving toward endorsing candidates.”
“Disrespect invites disrespect. Violence incites violence. When the powerful use their position to bully others, we all lose….We need the principled press to hold power to account — to call him on the carpet for every outrage [applause] That’s why our founders enshrined the press and its freedoms in our Constitution.”Two of the only two non-Communists in Hollywood — Vince Vaughn and Mel Gibson — had looks on their faces during Meryl Streep’s rant that said it all:
British intelligence reportedly provided a vital tipoff to the US in 2015 about the extent of Russian hacking on the presidential election.While it will never be pointed out by the corrupt establishment media, the question must be asked that if it was allegedly known in 2015 then why did the DNC get caught with their pants down around their ankles once the emails were dumped and why weren’t early efforts made to contain the damage?
The report on the UK’s involvement came after US intelligence agencies published an unclassified version of their finding that Vladimir Putin ordered a multi-pronged operation to interfere in the election in favour of Donald Trump.
The New York Times, citing “two people familiar with the conclusions” of the report, said British intelligence was “among the first” to raise the alarm in autumn 2015 that Moscow had hacked the computer servers of the Democratic National Committee.
The UK’s role suggests that the compromise of email exchanges among senior Democrats was spotted when voice intercepts, computer traffic or agents picked up content of the emails flowing towards Moscow.
Over the course the campaign, British officials were as alarmed as their US counterparts over the extent of contacts between Trump advisers and Moscow and by Trump’s consistently pro-Russian stance on a range of foreign policy issues.