Friday, September 2, 2022
Democrat President Joe Biden was interrupted during his dark and divisive speech Thursday night by a heckler who repeatedly chanted obscenities at the beleaguered president.
The disruptions came as Biden repeatedly demonized millions of Americans as “extremists” who present a threat to the country.
“F*** Joe Biden,” the heckler chanted. “F*** Joe Biden.”
Biden gets absolutely HUMILIATED by savage heckler yelling "F**CK JOE BIDEN"
“Too much of what’s happening in our country today is not normal,” Biden said. “Donald Trump and the MAGA Republicans represent an extremism that threatens the very foundations of our republic.”
“There’s no question that the Republican Party today is dominated, driven, intimidated by Donald Trump and the MAGA Republicans. And that is a threat to this country,” Biden claimed. “MAGA Republicans have made their choice. They embrace anger. They thrive on chaos. They live not in the light of truth, but in the shadow of lies. Together, we can choose a different path.
If you missed the "SPEECH" and want to watch it (I don't know why anyone would) you can watch the entire speech BELOW
Biden delivers address outside Indendence Hall on 'extremist threat to democracy'
If you watch NOTHING else from Tucker...WATCH THIS, Tuckers breakdown of Bidens speech last night..!
Tucker Carlson: Does this make you nervous? Fox News
Wednesday, August 31, 2022
THINKS HE'S HEAD OF THE "GESTAPO" OR THE "KGB" ?? ALL these agencies seem to be CORRUPT !!
Garland said all communication with Congress must be handled by the Office of Legislative Affairs (OLA).
Per DOJ policy, “no department employee may communicate with Senators, Representatives, congressional committees, or congressional staff without advance coordination, consultation, and approval by OLA.”
“All congressional inquiries and correspondence from Members, committees, and staff should be immediately directed to OLA upon receipt,” says Justice Manual 1-8.000.
READ ON NN
Tuesday, August 30, 2022
We didn't run out of oil...can you say BIDEN??
THE TRUTH ABOUT ALASKAN OIL -
ALASKAN OIL <<< click link
ABBOTT: Good Subject. Terrible Times. It's 5.6%.
COSTELLO: That many people are out of work?
ABBOTT: No, that's 23%.
COSTELLO: You just said 5.6%.
ABBOTT: 5.6% Unemployed.
COSTELLO: Right 5.6% out of work.
ABBOTT: No, that's 23%.
COSTELLO: Okay, so it's 23% unemployed.
ABBOTT: No, that's 5.6%.
COSTELLO: WAIT A MINUTE. Is it 5.6% or 23%?
ABBOTT: 5.6% are unemployed. 23% are out of work.
COSTELLO: If you are out of work you are unemployed.
ABBOTT: No, Biden said you can't count the "Out of Work" as the unemployed. You have to look for work to be unemployed.
COSTELLO: BUT THEY ARE OUT OF WORK!!!
ABBOTT: No, you miss his point.
COSTELLO: What point?
ABBOTT: Someone who doesn't look for work can't be counted with those who look for work. It wouldn't be fair.
ABBOTT: The unemployed.
COSTELLO: But ALL of them are out of work.
ABBOTT:No, the unemployed are actively looking for work.
Those who are out of work gave up looking and if you give up, you are no longer in the ranks of the unemployed.
COSTELLO: So if you're off the unemployment roles that would count as less unemployment?
ABBOTT: Unemployment would go down. Absolutely!
COSTELLO:The unemployment just goes down because you don't look for work?
ABBOTT:Absolutely it goes down. That's how it gets to 5.6%. Otherwise it would be 23%.
COSTELLO: Wait, I got a question for you. That means there are two ways to bring down the unemployment number?
ABBOTT: Two ways is correct.
COSTELLO: Unemployment can go down if someone gets a job?
COSTELLO: And unemployment can also go down if you stop looking for a job?
COSTELLO: So there are two ways to bring unemployment down, and the easier of the two is to have people stop looking for work.
ABBOTT: Now you're thinking like a Democrat.
COSTELLO: I don't even know what the hell I just said!
ABBOTT: Now you're thinking like Biden.
Monday, August 29, 2022
The long-awaited release of the “affidavit” of probable cause in support of the Trump raid is finally here. Oh, there are plenty of redactions; more than 20 out of 38 pages are full or partial redactions. Even the list of reasons for the redactions is completely redacted except for a couple of “Agent Safety” references.
A heavy redaction is not surprising. What is surprising is what we are left with in the unredacted portions, which does nothing to support the justification for the warrant nor the manner in which the warrant was executed. We can now see more clearly why the DOJ did not want to release the affidavit.
Plain and simply, the affidavit appears to have forgotten to include the legal and factual basis to establish probable cause that President Trump illegally removed or possessed highly classified documents in his home. For the warrant to withstand constitutional scrutiny, the redacted portions have a lot of work to do to articulate a very dark and sinister set of facts describing how Trump took top secrets of the United States that he did not declassify and that he did so with the intent to harm the United States or profit on the sensitive information. Otherwise, it is hard to fathom the decision to pursue a former president of the United States and current leader of the opposing political party in the manner that the DOJ and FBI have in this case.
Without more, the unredacted portions leave objective Americans with a stronger concern that this case is more about the DOJ and FBI disagreeing with Trump’s lawyers on what the former president could legally keep and subsequently taking matters into their own hands.
First, let’s address the apparent shortcomings of the affidavit in terms of establishing the necessary probable cause to secure a warrant. The Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution protects citizens against the unreasonable search of their person or property, as well as their seizure (arrest). To comply with the Fourth Amendment, the government must establish probable cause that a crime has been committed and that the location to be searched contains specific evidence of that crime. The search can be determined unreasonable when the law does not clearly articulate an applicable crime, the facts do not justify the search, or the scope of the search exceeds the basis upon which the search warrant was granted.
To this end, conjecture does not probable cause make, and yet, from the unredacted portion, conjecture appears to be what scored the FBI a warrant to search Trump’s home.
The FBI’s affidavit does not establish probable cause to find that Trump was complicit in the removal of classified materials from the White House, or the subsequent improper storage of the same in his home at Mar-a-Lago. This bald assertion is based on allegations that 15 boxes were presented to the National Archives from Mar-a-Lago earlier this year pursuant to the Presidential Records Act, and that some of the documents therein were classified. The FBI’s request for a warrant to search Trump’s residence was predicated on their assumption that Trump probably sent these documents from Mar-a-Lago, and that this means there is probable cause that there are more classified documents at this location, that Trump is in possession of these documents, and that illegal actions have been taken around these documents.
Nowhere in the redacted affidavit is there a presentation of facts to establish that probable cause exists that classified documents remained at Mar-a-Lago nor that Trump was aware or personally in possession of the documents.
Moreover, the FBI’s affidavit presents no facts to suggest that the alleged classified documents were possessed illegally or otherwise subject to illegal activity. The affidavit glossed over credible legal defenses supporting the legality of Trump’s alleged possession and failed to address whether it possessed the authority to...
Sunday, August 28, 2022
Breaking: Mar-a-Lago Affidavit Released with 11 Pages Completely Blacked Out By Richard Moorhead August 26, 2022The Department of Justice has released the affidavit underlying the unprecedented FBI raid of former President Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago residence.
The federal government released the heavily redacted document on Friday pursuant to court proceedings in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida.
Judge Bruce Reinhart this week rejected the DOJ’s argument that releasing the affidavit would compromise an ongoing investigation.
More than half of the document is redacted. Eleven pages — mostly in the middle of the document — are redacted in their entirety.
In the affidavit, the government claims to have previously obtained documents from Trump marked with various identifiers of classification. These included 67 documents marked as “confidential,” 92 documents marked as “secret,” and 25 documents marked as “top secret.”
These documents were obtained through a voluntary turnover of 15 boxes from Trump in January. The former president provided the documents in response to a series of requests from the National Archives and Records Administration.
The finding of these documents eventually spurred the Mar-a-Lago raid. Federal authorities claim it justified suspicions that Trump possessed more classified documents.
Sitting presidents have broad authority to declassify federal documents. Trump has pointed to his use of a standing order allowing for the declassification of documents in his possession, potentially negating the DOJ’s claims that the documents are classified.
The DOJ is likely to argue that Trump’s declassification process was insufficient and that all declassified material needs to be identified as such.
Trump had sought the full release of the affidavit. In a Friday Truth Social post, the former president slammed the DOJ investigation into his presidential documents.
“Affidavit heavily redacted!!!” he wrote. “Nothing mentioned on ‘Nuclear,’ a total public relations subterfuge by the FBI & DOJ, or our close working relationship regarding document turnover – WE GAVE THEM MUCH.”
DOJ leaks to The Washington Post indicated that the FBI searched for documents related to nuclear weapons at Mar-a-Lago. Nothing that’s unredacted in the affidavit references nuclear weapons, although it’s possible the redacted content contains such information.
“Judge Bruce Reinhart should NEVER have allowed the Break-In of my home. He recused himself two months ago from one of my cases based on his animosity and hatred of your favorite President, me. What changed? Why hasn’t he recused himself on this case? Obama must be very proud of him right now!”
Trump has filed a motion seeking the appointment of a special master to investigate the DOJ’s use of his seized material.
Biden ADMITS It: “We’ll make sure NO ONE ever steals an election ever again!” by noah 5 hours agoOne of the prophets, I think it may have been Timothy Dixon, said that soon Biden and his “regime” would soon start saying things that they couldn’t even control.
The truth would just start to be spoken out of their mouth.
You know, kind of like when your parents tell you it’s best to just tell the truth so you don’t have to remember all the lies?
Eventually you can’t remember all the lies.
Eventually you get dementia.
The feeling is mutual Joe…
But let’s take a moment to pause and realize exactly what you hate so much.
MAGA literally stands for Make America Great Again.
When someone tells you who they are…listen to them!
These people hate America.
They don’t want to see it great.
They want to see it destroyed.
Now watch that clip again and realize he’s telling the truth for all to hear…
To Don, From Joe: "I wasn't in my right mind....it was stolen!" WeLoveTrump...by NOAH Published July 19, 2021Oh my goodness, this is absolutely CLASSIC!
I always say the Deplorables are the most creative, funny people out there!
And this one REALLY takes the cake.
Which one of you did this?
This is a Cameo starring the incomparable Kevin Sorbo delivering an apology from Joe to Don.
In other words, from the Fake 46 to the Real 45.
You catch my drift?
This is absolutely hilarious!
Watch here on Telegram and if that doesn’t work for you scroll down for Rumble.
love how he even did a shout out at the end to NoahReport!
Kevin Sorbo….you are officially the man!
When two dozen or more FBI agents searched former President Trump’s residence three weeks ago, most Americans initially were left wondering what in the world must Trump have done. After all, a prodigious FBI search logically indicates an equally prodigious violation of some federal statute; therefore, it must be really serious. One former Department of Justice (DOJ) official told Politico that the evidence sought “was likely so pulverizing in its force” that it would “eviscerate” the possibility of the optics for such an invasive law enforcement action not being good.
Unsealed Mar-a-Lago search warrant affidavit reveals the government has no case against Trump© Provided by The Hill
Well, it’s now pretty official: The optics aren’t good.
Everyone in America, from plumber to president, is constitutionally protected from a government search that lacks adequate cause.
We now know why the DOJ wanted the affidavit — which is supposed to articulate the probable cause needed for a legitimate search — to be kept under seal. After the magistrate who authorized the search forced the DOJ to unseal a redacted version, two realities came into better focus.
First, the affidavit confirmed that the FBI’s investigation was triggered in January 2022 at the request of the National Archives, which wanted certain documents, especially classified documents, that it considered to be presidential records to be turned over to it by Trump. Second, from what I have seen, I don’t believe the affidavit articulates how a federal law was or is being broken. For those who hold out hope that the affidavit’s redacted sections fill that gap, there is almost no chance that they do. (More on that below.)