Saturday, February 18, 2017

NBC10 Philadelphia  FAKE NEWS.....    Yesterday at 10:50am
The President Donald J. Trump administration is considering a proposal to mobilize as many as 100,000 National Guard troops to round up unauthorized immigrants, including millions living nowhere near the Mexico border, according to a draft memo obtained by The Associated Press. The White House is denying the report.
 

nbcphiladelphia.com
White House Denies Guard May Be Used for Immigration Roundup
The Trump administration is considering a proposal to mobilize as many as 100,000 National Guard troops to round up unauthorized immigrants, but lawmakers said the document offers insight into the Trump administration's internal efforts to enact its promised crackdown on illegal immigration.
Administration officials said the proposal, which called for mobilizing up to 100,000 troops in 11 states, was rejected, and would not be part of plans to carry out President Donald Trump's aggressive immigration policy.
If implemented, the National Guard idea, contained in an 11-page memo obtained by The Associated Press, could have led to enforcement action against millions of immigrants living nowhere near the Mexican border. Four states that border on Mexico were included in the proposal — California, Arizona, New Mexico and Texas — but it also encompassed seven states contiguous to those four — Oregon, Nevada, Utah, Colorado, Oklahoma, Arkansas and Louisiana.
Despite the AP's public release of the document, White House spokesman Sean Spicer said there was "no effort at all to utilize the National Guard to round up unauthorized immigrants." A DHS official described the document as a very early draft that was not seriously considered
and never brought to Homeland Security Secretary John Kelly for approval.

READ ON
Blue Lives Matter

It should be noted that this "study" didn't involve law enforcement, but it's being pushed as a way to change law enforcement training.

americanmilitarynews.com
 
"No More Black Targets" Campaign Launched To Eliminate Black Silhouette Targets At Shooting Ranges
 
“Young black men are 3X more likely to be shot by trained shooters than their white peers,” the group’s website says. “A disturbing potential correlation: The most popular target for shooters to learn to use their firearm is a black silhouette. Unconscious bias can be deadly.”
The group has filed a petition to end the use of black silhouette targets and plans to call upon the International Association of Law Enforcement Firearms Instructors. They argue that a study by University of Illinois researchers that concluded shooters were more likely to fire at a black target and they have associated this to the use of black silhouette targets.
Yara Mekawi, a researcher in the study said, people were “quicker to shoot black targets with a gun relative to white targets with a gun. And…people were more trigger-happy when shooting black targets compared to shooting white targets.”
Similar petitions have been brought forth. In 2015, a Pennsylvania lawmaker wanted to ban the use of human silhouette targets except for law enforcement use, claiming they propagate violence. The No More Black Targets petition had 18 signatures as of Feb. 17.
No More Black Targets has designed alternative designs to be used as opposed to the traditional black silhouette targets.
 

Paul Ryan Did Something That Has Conservatives Up In Arms



For six years, Republicans have promised to repeal Obamacare.
And Donald Trump won the election, in part, on his promise to repeal the law.
But something Paul Ryan is doing is helping to keep Obamacare in place.
So far, Republicans have taken little action on repealing Obamacare.
Trump has exercised his authority to gut the law by signing an executive order instructing agencies not to enforce the mandate, penalties, and taxes where they can.
But fully repealing Obamacare will require Congressional action.
And Congress has so far punted.
Speaker Paul Ryan drives the agenda in the House and the inaction largely falls at his feet.
Congressional Republicans have refused to rally around a conservative approach to repealing the law.
Some want to leave the Medicaid expansion in place.
Others want to punt on repealing the Obamacare taxes until they can find a replacement.
But conservatives in the House are increasingly fed up with the leadership’s inaction.
They are putting their foot down and planning to move ahead on repealing Obamacare in response to the glacial pace of action on this issue.

Read More.
BUSTED! Spread far and wide since the media's not saying a word!!

thetruthdivision.com

"an impeachable offense..."

Massive Fake News Scandal Rocks Associated Press   02/18/2017    Source: AAN  by: Remington Strelivo

The Associated Press released a bombshell report—saying that President Donald Trump was planning to mobilize 100,000 National Guard troops to "round up" illegal immigrants, and deport them to their country of origins.

It would be a massive story—if it were true.

Unfortunately for the AP,
it was fake news.

The Department of Homeland Security hit back hard on the AP—saying that the allegations were completely false, and that they are "not considering mobilizing the National Guard.”

White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer also denied the allegations, saying, emphatically: "There is no effort at all to round up, to utilize the National Guard to round up illegal immigrants."

The AP’s story originated with a DHS memo that outlined a plan for use of the National Guard, which the AP claimed was written by DHS Secretary John Kelly.

DHS explained that the AP was incorrectly reporting on an early, pre-decisional draft of the memo—one which was never considered a serious proposal by staff. They added that the memo was also neither written nor approved by Kelly.

Without approval from Kelly, the memo never would have even made it close to the desk of President Trump.
As of 3:30pm on Friday, the Associated Press has not yet issued a retraction—and the article remains on their website.
 Source: AAN

Read more at
HERE
     Donald J. Trump
 
The FAKE NEWS media (failing @nytimes, @NBCNews, @ABC, @CBS, @CNN) is not my enemy, it is the enemy of the American People
 
 

Friday, February 17, 2017

Trump's Anger Over Leaks Could Prompt Prosecutions
 
President Donald Trump's fury over the flood of leaks plaguing his administration could spark criminal prosecutions, Politico is reporting.
The most serious leaks center around the contents of phone conversations the government intercepted between Russian Ambassador Sergei Kislyak and Michael Flynn, who was just forced to resign as national security adviser, experts tell the website.
"If somebody disclosed the contents of intercepted phone conversations to a reporter, I could see a prosecution, for sure," said Ed MacMahon, a northern Virginia defense attorney. "That is plainly a felony."
A law aimed at stopping leaks of intelligence-related intercepts imposes a prison term of up to 10 years for each violation. As recently as 2009, a Hebrew contract translator for the FBI was charged with revealing classified communications intelligence to a blogger and eventually sentenced to 20 months in prison, Politico noted.
Trump has made no secret of his frustration over the leaks, denouncing "low-life leakers" and vowing they will be caught.
"I've gone to all of the folks in charge of the various agencies ... I've actually called the Justice Department to look into the leaks. Those are criminal leaks," Trump said.
But political veterans and those inside the intelligence community said the number of leaks is not terribly unusual.
"I deplore it," said retired Adm. James Stavridis, a former NATO commander. "It is illegal."
But he added: "I don't see an unusual level of leaks," he said. "I have yet to see anything that really shocks me."
While the risk of potential prosecutions grows, there is a question of whether a jury would actually convict someone who appeared motivated by concern that Trump aides were too close to Russian officials, according to Politico.
"Leak prosecutions just depend on whose ox is being gored …" said attorney MacMahon. "The government can destroy somebody's life in one of these cases. It just comes down to whether the government wants to prosecute the case."
Steven Aftergood, head of the Project on Government Secrecy at the Federation of American Scientists, told The Washington Post: "…even if the leaks are potential crimes, it may not be possible or practical to prosecute them. Investigators and prosecutors only pursue a fraction of the leaks that are reported to them."
Hillary Clinton Made An Unbelievable Statement About The Election     
             


You Won’t Believe Who Is Behind The Latest Threat To President Trump’s Life…



It’s no secret, liberals are not a fan of President Trump.
Ever since Trump was elected, liberals have been wailing in the streets holding protests and rallies, chanting things like “Not My President” and “Love Trumps Hate”.
In fact, many protesters have even resorted to acts of violence and rage to demonstrate their bitter hatred towards Trump.
But while liberals have made their distaste for President Trump well known, this magazine has finally crossed the line by threatening to assassinate the President of The United States.

On the front cover of Village, President Trump’s face is shown in the middle of a rifle’s crosshairs with the caption “Why Not”.
But there’s more.

This latest threat goes beyond normal partisan games, as the magazine article suggests readers take things into their own hands by taking out President Trump, literally.

Breitbart reported:
Read More
Image may contain: one or more people, meme and text

I guess this is what you call a "constitutional scholar"

ABC News chief political analyst: Trump undermines Constitution by not calling on mainstream media



Apparently, knowledge of the Constitution isn’t a requirement for political analysts at ABC News. On Wednesday, the Daily Caller reported that ABC News chief political analyst Matthew Dowd actually argued that President Donald Trump is undermining the First Amendment to the Constitution by not calling on operatives of the Democrat-media complex, formerly known as “reporters” in the so-called “mainstream media.”

According to the Daily Caller:

During Wednesday’s press conference, Trump limited questions to two non-mainstream media outlets: the Christian Broadcasting Network and Townhall.

Dowd argued that Trump is “shutting down part of the First Amendment by not taking questions that are going to be any way antagonistic in this.”

“I think he thinks relying on his Twitter feed, and sending it out to the millions of people that subscribe to it, and then dealing with very cozy press in this is going to be the way to get through this,” Dowd said.

Here’s video posted to Twitter by ABC:

So what, exactly, does the First Amendment say? Why, here it is:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

A post at
Cornell explains:

The First Amendment guarantees freedoms concerning religion, expression, assembly, and the right to petition. It forbids Congress from both
promoting one religion over others and also restricting an individual’s religious practices. It guarantees freedom of expression by prohibiting Congress from restricting the press or the rights of individuals to speak freely. It also guarantees the right of citizens to assemble peaceably and to petition their government.

Funny, I don’t see anything that requires the president — or anyone else — to take questions from certain media outlets.


Read full article here:
http://conservativefiringline.com
Image may contain: 1 person, text
Image may contain: text
Image may contain: one or more people and text

Thursday, February 16, 2017

Massive ISIS Terror Attack     02/16/2017  Source: Hindustan Times by: Imtiaz Ahmad













                          At least 70 people were killed and more than 150 others injured when a suspected suicide attacker blew himself up at a Sufi shrine in Pakistan’s southern Sindh province on Thursday, the latest in a string of terror attacks in the country this week.

“At least 72 are dead and over 150 have been injured,” senior police officer Shabbir Sethar told Reuters, adding that the death toll was likely to rise..

The Islamic State claimed responsibility for the bombing, the terror group’s news agency Amaq reported.

The explosion occurred at the Lal Shahbaz Qalandar shrine in Sehwan town when a large number of people had gathered for ‘dhamaal’ (a Sufi ritual), Pakistani media reported.
      
 Source: Hindustan Times

Major Criminal Investigation About To Rock Trump Administration   



        








The media has been breathlessly reporting about one scandal swirling around the Trump administration.
And now there could be a series of criminal inquiries made into the conduct of members in the government.
But the targets may shock you.
A series of leaks concerning intercepted communications between National Security Advisor Michael Flynn and the Russian Ambassador led to his resignation.
Flynn maintained he only discussed sanctions with Russia in general terms and never proposed lifting the sanctions, nor had let on that Trump planned adopt a softer position toward Russia.
Much of the reporting on the topic confirmed Flynn’s claims.
The Wall Street Journal reported:
“U.S. intelligence services routinely intercept and monitor conversations with Russian diplomats, officials have said. The transcripts of the conversations don’t show Mr. Flynn made any sort of promise to lift the sanctions once Mr. Trump took office, the officials said. Rather, they show Mr. Flynn making more general comments about relations between the two countries improving under Mr. Trump, people familiar with them said.” 
The Washington Free Beacon reported that the source of these illegal leaks came from Obama loyalists in and out of government:


READ ON
Is Trump being too soft on Russia ?
   Donald J. Trump  Yesterday at 8:33am


And the public? They loved Trump's press conference: The Donald was GREAT !

Instead of Press Conference, Donald Trump Hosts Media Roast   02/16/2017   Source: American Action News  by: AAN Staff

THIS IS JUST A SAMPLING OF TWEETS AFTER TODAYS "PRESS CONFERENCE". IT'S AMAZING HOW 2 FACED SOME OF THESE REPORTERS ARE, ESPECIALLY CHUCK TODD. HE IS ABSOLUTELY OBNOXIOUS, HE TALKS DOWN TO EVERYONE, AS IF ONLY HE IS INTELLIGENT  ENOUGH TO UNDERSTAND WHAT IS GOING ON. ...WHY IS IT , AFTER EVERY PRESIDENTIAL SPEECH, PRESS CONFERENCE, ETC. THE MEDIA ALWAYS SPENDS A 1/2 HOUR OR SO TO "TELL YOU WHAT YOU HEARD" or WHAT THEY WANT YOU TO THINK YOU HEARD.

Donald Trump held a press conference today that sent the mainstream media into a tizzy. It was supposed to be about his new his nominee for Secretary of Labor. It turned into an all out media roast. 

Here's Trump taking shots at the press coverage, and just absolutely abusing poor Jim Acosta.

The media is absolutely furious about this. Because Trump stood there and answered their questions, it seems:

John Podhoretz
@jpodhoretz
MEDIA: WE NEED LOTS OF PRESS CONFERENCES
TRUMP: OK, I'LL TALK FOR TWO HOURS
MEDIA: THIS IS DISGRACEFUL AND UNPRECEDENTED!
NBC's Chuck Todd is leading the charge:.....THIS S.O.B. IS THE EPITOME OF THE WORD "PRICK" AND "HYPOCRITE"

Chuck Todd   
@chucktodd
This not a laughing matter. I'm sorry, delegitimizing the press is unAmerican
Media outlets simply haven't figured out how to cover Trump, and how to ask relevant, interesting q
uestions. They're just lining up, butthurt, to quiz Trump on things like crowdsize, the electoral college tallies, and other assorted nonsense. Because they refuse to ask any questions relevant to the national interest, the American public refuses to listen to them. It's a vicious cycle, and it's bad for democracy. Trump is mocking them because they're worthy of mockery.

Top Intel Official Reveals Obama Officials Behind War on Trump    02/16/2017  Source: AAN  by: AAN Staff


Wow. Here's Lt. Col. Tony Schaffer going absolutely nuclear with Deirdre Bolton. As Townhall notes:
Former CIA analyst and U.S. Army Reserve Lt. Col Tony Schaffer was pretty straightforward in his Fox Business appearance today, where he said that Obama officials were definitely behind the leaks—and even named a few of them (via Free 
Beacon):

"Risk and Reward" host Deirdre Bolton asked Shaffer whether he thought leaks from the Obama administration were "the problem."

"Absolutely," Shaffer answered, saying the Obama administration was "directly involved" with the leak.


Shaffer said the blame lay "squarely at the feet of" the former CIA director John Brennan, former director of National Intelligence Jim Clapper, and former deputy national security advisor Ben Rhodes.

Schaffer added that Flynn was a smart guy and probably didn’t discuss the area about Russian sanctions in the manner that’s been portrayed by the Left because he knew those calls would be analyzed and reviewed somewhere down the road. He agreed that what Flynn said was probably no different than when President Obama said told then-Russian President Dmitry Medvedev would have more flexibility once the 2012 election was over, which was an example cited by Bolton.
Whether or not Schaffer is right, it's clear that there are rogue elements of the national security state that are attempting to undermine our democracy. They must be dealt with. 
 

A World Leader Just Issued A Dire Warning To Donald Trump



Democrats want to throw open our borders to unvetted Islamic refugees.
Donald Trump wants to stop the program until he can institute extreme vetting.
One world leader just issued a dire warning about the refugee program and it confirms Donald Trump’s suspicions.
Strongman Bashar al-Assad is the President of Syria.
He was interviewed by Yahoo News and was questioned about Trump’s indefinite freezing of the Syrian refugee program.
Assad responded that while he would take no side on the matter, he did declare that terrorists were among the refugees.
Yahoo reported:
“In an exclusive interview with Yahoo News at a presidential office in Damascus, Assad said President Trump’s freeze on admitting refugees from his country — part of an executive order that has drawn widespread protests and is being challenged in federal court — “is an American issue” on which he would not take sides. But asked I  f some of those who fled are “aligned with terrorists,” Assad quickly replied, “Definitely.”
  Read More.


Image may contain: 1 person, text

Wednesday, February 15, 2017

BREAKING: American Muslim Professor Defends Slavery, Rape     02/15/2017  American Action News  by: Remington Strelivo

                          
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
                  A Muslim professor at Georgetown University in Washington, DC, is a-ok with rape and slavery.

Jonathan Brown, a 39-year-old professor who converted to Islam, gave a lecture entitled "Islam and the Problem of Slavery” at the International Institute of Islamic Thought in Herndon, Virginia.

But Brown apparently spent most of his 90 minute lecture talking about slavery in the United States, which ended in 1865, rather than slavery in Islam, which continues to this day.

"It’s not immoral for one human to own another human,” Brown said, explaining, shockingly, that employee-employer relations are really no different than slave-master relationships—leaving out that only one of those relationships is actually consensual and mutually-beneficial.

Umar Lee, who writes for Student Voices, attended the lecture—and reported on Brown’s startling pro-slavery comments:

"When discussing slavery in [Western nations], Brown painted slavery as brutal and violent (which it certainly was),” wrote Lee. "When the conversation would briefly flip to historic slavery in the Arab and Turkish World slavery was described by Brown in glowing terms. Indeed, according to Brown, slaves in the Muslim World lived a pretty good life.”

The conversation then switched to rape, after a woman in the audience asked Brown a question about the legality of sex with slaves.

"Consent isn’t necessary for lawful sex,” Brown told her, going on to explain that sexual consent was a Western concept.

Lee explained in his article that he was “deeply troubled” by Brown’s comments, and accused Brown of "hideously exploiting Georgetown’s commitment to be inclusive” by hiding behind Islam—because a Christian or Jewish professor making similar comments would have been undoubtedly fired amid national outrage from students, staff, and administrated.

"Brown constructs a world where the wrongs of the West excuse any wrongs (if he believes there are any) in the Muslim World,” Lee explained.
"I thought the Muslim community was done with this dishonest North Korean style of propaganda,” he added. "Obviously not."
Instead of fixing the dam, Gov. Brown spent $25 billion per year on illegals!   Gateway Pundit 13 hrs
California Governor Spends $25 Billion Per Year On Illegals, Officials Warned Dam Failing 12 Years Ago
 
READ ON

Breaking: Muslim Spy Ring Just Discovered Inside Federal Government, It’s Happening [Details]  News by Chris Reynolds

muslim spy ring 
It’s scary to think that for eight years, right in the midst of the West’s deadly global fight against radical Islamic terrorist organizations such as ISIS, we had as our President a person from a Muslim family in Kenya.

It should come as no surprise, then, that we had such a dramatic spike in domestic terrorism during Obama’s tenure in the White House. Reporter Maria Bartiromo recently uncovered a spy ring of three Muslim brothers who were working for Obama’s Democrats in Congress.
Said Maria, “These three Muslims were barred from computer networks at the House of Representatives on Thursday because they accessed Congressmen and Congress people’s computer networks unauthorized. At a minimum they were fired.”

She continued, “At a minimum we know that they accessed computers unauthorized and they did so in foreign intelligence, foreign affairs and intelligence committees…. they were getting very important information, government information. They accessed these computers.”
Asked Maria, “How is it possible that 3 brothers are hired, Muslim brothers…just saying, to work in Congress and deal with our most intelligent and sensitive information, number one? They were all making $160,000! Why were they paid so much? 22 years old…one of the guys, the other was 25. They’re making $160,000, $161,000 and $165,000. And one of them has a criminal background!” Isn’t it terrifying how poorly Obama protected us from radical Islamic terrorism while he was President? Watch below:



3 man I.T. SPY ring busted in Congress! Maria Bartiromo goes Ballistic.
Published on Feb 9, 2017
Chiefs of staff for dozens of Democratic lawmakers who employed the four were informed last week that a criminal probe was underway into their use of congressional information technology systems, including the existence of an external server to which House data was being funneled, and into the theft of and overbilling for computer equipment.

Brothers Imran, Abid, and Jamal Awan and Hina Alvi, Imran’s wife, each made $160,000 a year as information technology workers for the House. Their salaries and time were shared among dozens of Democratic members, including former Democratic National Committee Chairman Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz of Florida. The lawmakers also include members of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence and the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.

Despite the generous salaries, the four were involved in multiple suspicious mortgage transfers and a debt-evading bankruptcy. Abid had more than $1 million in debts following a failed business called Cars International that he ran in Falls Church, Va., from November 2009 to September 2010. Business associates said in court documents that Abid had stolen money and vehicles from them.

It’s unclear how Abid found time to run an automotive business while working full-time for Congress. He had been on the congressional payroll since 2005. A congressional credit union repossessed two of his personal cars before the business folded.

CNN takes bribes from foreign countries to lie

CNN Reporter Admits They Are Paid By Obama To 'LIE' LIVE ON AIR Amber Lyon: 15th February 2017 @ 1.20pm © press By: Daniel Newton |@NeonNettle

CNN reporter claims that the company takes bribes from foreign countries to lie. CNN reporter Amber Lyon blew the lid on the media network's practices claiming that the company takes bribes from foreign countries to lie. SCROLL DOWN FOR VIDEO Awarding winning reporter, Lyon, claimed that CNN “is paid by the U.S. government for reporting on some events, and not reporting on others.” The reporter also claimed that the network was a tool for the former Obama administration to manipulate information the American public actually gets to see. Lyon was also interviewed by Joe Rogan where she explained that she and a female colleague were part of a team sent by CNN to Bahrain in 2011 only to discover that the US government had been supplying over $1 billion worth of arms to the oppressive Bahraini regime.

 
Amber Lyon, a former CNN correspondent, says authoritarian regimes including Bahrain pay the news network to provide favorable coverage and censor its content.
Normally intercepts of U.S. officials and citizens are some of the most tightly held government secrets. This is for good reason. Selectively disclosing details of private conversations monitored by the FBI or NSA gives the permanent state the power to destroy reputations from the cloak of anonymity. This is what police states do.   bloomberg.com|By Eli Lake
 

The national security adviser was the appetizer. Trump is the main course.
 
READ STORY
Cartoon

National Security

The Political Assassination of Michael Flynn  By

Eli Lake is a Bloomberg View columnist. He was the senior national security correspondent for the Daily Beast and covered national security and intelligence for the Washington Times, the New York Sun and UPI.

If we are to believe the Trump White House, National Security Adviser Michael Flynn just resigned because he lied about his conversations with Russia's ambassador to the vice president. As White House senior counselor Kellyanne Conway told NBC's "Today Show" on Tuesday: "Misleading the vice president really was the key here."

That sounds about as credible as when the president told CIA employees that the media had invented the story about his enmity toward the spy agency, not even two weeks after he had taken to Twitter to compare the CIA to Nazis. It's about as credible as President Donald Trump's insistence that it didn't rain during his inauguration. Or that millions of people had voted illegally in the election he just won.
The point here is that for a White House that has such a casual and opportunistic relationship with the truth, it's strange that Flynn's "lie" to Pence would get him fired. It doesn't add up.
It's not even clear that Flynn lied. He says in his resignation letter that he did not deliberately leave out elements of his conversations with Ambassador Sergey Kislyak when he recounted them to Vice President Mike Pence. The New York Times and Washington Post reported that the transcript of the phone call reviewed over the weekend by the White House could be read different ways. One White House official with knowledge of the conversations told me that the Russian ambassador raised the sanctions to Flynn and that Flynn responded that the Trump team would be taking office in a few weeks and would review Russia policy and sanctions. That's neither illegal nor improper.

What's more, the Washington Post reported Monday night that last month Sally Yates, then the acting attorney general, had informed the White House that Flynn discussed sanctions with Kislyak and that he could be susceptible to blackmail because he misled Pence about it. If it was the lie to Pence that sunk Flynn, why was he not fired at the end of January?

A better explanation here is that Flynn was just thrown under the bus. His tenure as national security adviser, the briefest in U.S. history, was rocky from the start. When Flynn was attacked in the media for his ties to Russia, he was not allowed by the White House to defend himself. Over the weekend, he was instructed not to speak to the press when he was in the fight for his political life. His staff was not even allowed to review the transcripts of his call to the Russian ambassador.



Trump Is Suddenly Recognized As The President In CALIFORNIA As Liberal State BEGS For His Help

California Asks For Trump’s Help After Repeated Attacks

After repeatedly attacking and criticizing President Trump, the State of California is officially asking for his help as they have run short of resources in wake of severe weather that has caused significant damage in the state.
From Fox40:
Gov. Jerry Brown has asked President Trump to declare a major disaster for California because of damage from January storms.
The letter sent Friday says the relentless series of storms caused flooding, mudslides, evacuations, erosion, power outages and at least eight deaths. Northern California was hardest hit.
Brown says the storm system was so severe and widespread that state and local governments need federal assistance to continue dealing with the problems it created.
Governor Brown has made his disgust for President Trump known in the past as Breitbart reports that back in March of 2016 Governor Brown said “If Trump were ever elected, we’d have to build a wall around California to defend ourselves from the rest of this country,” which Brown later said was “a joke.”
In addition to snarky comments made from Brown, add in the hateful rhetoric of Maxine Waters who is calling for Trump’s impeachment because in her words, “This is the most outrageous and ridiculous President that this country has ever had.” That statement pretty much embodies how most of the politicians in California feel about President Trump.
Also consider Calexit. There is a growing movement in California to leave the rest of the United States since the state has become so liberal that it doesn’t come even close to where most states are at politically.
Then throw in the ruling of the Ninth Circuit Court (located in CA) this last week which put the country at risk by blocking Trump’s Travel Ban and now President Trump has a decision to make.
President Trump will almost certainly provide aide if it is needed in the state as it is the right thing to do but Californians should be careful about viciously attacking the President and then turning around and asking for a handout.

Tuesday, February 14, 2017

Someone worked out how much Fed money goes to Sanctuary cities - it's a lot.

Just as California threatened to secede to protest the election of Donald Trump then demanded Federal aid to fix its dams, so sanctuary cities that defy the law on illegal immigrants are still want to suck at the teat of the federal government. 
Three weeks ago, President Trump issued an Executive Order denying federal funding to sanctuary cities who choose not to comply with federal laws regarding deportation of illegal entrants.
Until this week no-one really knew what that would mean in terms of dollar amounts. But an outfit called America Transparency worked it out. 
No wonder Miami, FL and Dayton, OH just changed their policies on harboring illegal immigrants.
There's a lot of taxpayers' money in play here. 

Click here to learn more

REPORT: The Real Reason General Michael Flynn Resigned Should Absolutely Terrify You      02/14/2017 Source: AAN by: AAN Staff 

When General Michael Flynn resigned his position as Donald Trump's national security advisor, the reason given was that he had mislead the administration in regards to certain conversations with the Russian government. But the real reason for his ouster might be something far more nefarious.

In an explosive report, Adam Kredo of the Washington Free Beacon lays out what really happened: Flynn was forced out by Obama loyalists in the intelligence community who were doing everything in their power to salvage the horrific Iran deal.
Per Kredo:
...multiple sources closely involved in the situation pointed to a larger, more secretive campaign aimed at discrediting Flynn and undermining the Trump White House. "It's undeniable that the campaign to discredit Flynn was well underway before Inauguration Day, with a very troublesome and politicized series of leaks designed to undermine him," said one veteran national security adviser with close ties to the White House team. "This pattern reminds me of the lead up to the Iran deal, and probably features the same cast of characters."

 READ ON
If Kredo's reports are true, and we have no reason to believe they aren't, then Trump needs to act swiftly to drain the swamp and bring the national security state to heal. The American people voted for a very specific agenda when they elected Trump, and    if   members of the intel community don't like that, they can resign. An agenda that empowers Iran is something the American people fiercely reject. 

Isn't she doing almost exactly what she is protesting against ?...hypocrites !!

 
"A fascist is someone who's organizing a mass movement that's attacking women, immigrants, black people, other minority groups in a movement of genocide."
Yvette Felarca, who helped organize the protests at UC Berkeley two weeks ago, is calling for similar protests at universities across the country when there are guest speakers she believes are "fascists."        insider.foxnews.com
 
 
Berkeley Riots Organizer Proud of Shutting Down 'Fascist' Milo
She said that Milo Yiannopoulos, the subject of the Berkeley riots, is a fascist because he whips up a "lynch mob mentality" among his supporters and incites violence.
Noting that Felarca's group's name calls for fighting fascists "by any means necessary," Tucker pressed her on what level of violence they are willing to use.
"To what extent would you go to stop [a] person from spreading 'genocidal propaganda'?" Tucker asked.
Felarca said she would call on others to stand up, counter-protest and "shut down" that person.
"What do you mean by 'shut down'?" Tucker asked. "What if I want to keep talking? I'm saying something you find appalling, but I've got a First Amendment right. I'm an American. What would you do?"
 
 

QUESTION....HOW IS IT THE "BLACK LIVES MATTER" IS GOOD but THE KKK IS BAD....AREN'T THEY THE SAME, JUST REVERSED


Valentine's Day Special: KKK Hearts  This Democrat 02/14/2017 Source: AAN by: AAN Staff

Keith Ellison is the favorite to become the DNC Chair. The Minnesota representative has a long and controversial history. He has in the past supported reparations for slavery, the establishment of a segregated ethnic state, and the notion that 9/11 was an inside job. He was a close associate and admirer of Louis Farrakhan, the anti-white, anti-semitic leader of the Nation of Islam. He only renounced those ties when they became politically inconvenient, and he lied about them.

So in short: the future head of the DNC is a racist conspiracy theorist. And now, he's got an admirer: The former head of the KKK, David Duke. As
World Net Daily reports:
David Duke wants the world to know that he supports Minnesota Rep. Keith Ellison’s attempt to become the next chairman of the Democratic National Committee.
The former leader of the Ku Klux Klan likely complicated Mr. Ellison’s professional goals Monday by backing his efforts while alluding to claims by critics that he is anti-Semitic.
“Keith Ellison, Sally Boynton Brown or Jehmu Greene would all be excellent choices — I really like Keith though… I mean, at least he knows,” Mr. Duke tweeted.
How many future Democratic leaders have the support of both Chuck Schumer AND David Duke? Pretty wild if you ask us.

GEE....Who would have ever thought................

Busted: 75 Percent Of Illegal Aliens Rounded Up Over The Weekend Had Criminal Records Matt Vespa Posted: Feb 14, 2017

Busted: 75 Percent Of Illegal Aliens Rounded Up Over The Weekend Had Criminal Records
Over the weekend, immigration enforcement agents rounded up hundreds of illegal aliens from across the country. It was not a Trump initiative—the wheels for these raids were set in motion before he was sworn in—but it was certainly in the spirit of one. Immigration activists noted that the nature of these raids was harsher—whatever that means. The Department of Homeland Security said that 75 percent of those who were rounded up had criminal records (via The Hill):
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) on Monday said that 75 percent of the people detained last week in Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) raids were “criminal aliens.”In a press release, Homeland Security Secretary John Kelly said the department arrested 680 people in New York, Atlanta, Los Angeles, Chicago and San Antonio “who pose a threat to public safety, border security or the integrity of our nation’s immigration system.”
President Trump last month signed an executive order calling for the construction on his proposed U.S.-Mexico border wall to begin. Another order ended the “catch and release” policy, which allowed people who crossed the border to return to Mexico without being detained.
The new order also expanded the definition of “criminal alien” to include individuals who entered the country without authorization, which was originally considered a misdemeanor offense. Immigrants who have "committed acts that constitute a chargeable criminal offense" are now priorities under the order, even if they have yet to be convicted.
The deportation of criminal aliens isn’t an unpopular proposal. In fact, it’s exactly what immigration enforcement officers should do. The fact that 75 percent who were arrested this weekend shows—unsurprisingly—that Obama and the Democrats don’t care about enforcing of federal immigration laws. After eight years of dithering or outright negligence, you can see how this—and many other issues—could give rise to a political outsider, like Trump, to win an election. When a Democrat, like New York City Mayor Bill De Blasio, says that illegals wouldn’t be deported if they were caught drunk driving, you see why voters trust Republicans on law and order and national security issues.
Of course Bill DeBlasio is an IDIOT