Wow. President Trump slams Nancy Pelosi straight to her face. What happens next left every jaw hanging. [video from The Scoop]

And this was all before she was "American Indian".....

ALL THE DEMOCRAT  LIES & WHY THEY MATTER

LIZ WHEELER

The cyber world we live in today can stop me from doing things I want to on my own computer, So why can't our governments computer system BLOCK or STOP outside interferance with all the super minds doing the programming and constant system upgrading...???

As you see in Iowa...Our computer system can't even get election results, let alone block interferance

Senate Report Claims Obama Admin Wasn’t Prepared to Respond to Russian Hacking  February 6, 2020   

A new Senate report has indicated that the Obama administration what unprepared to respond to the hacking attempts of the Russians.

According to The Hill:

The Senate Intelligence Committee released a report Thursday that found that the U.S. government was “not well-postured” to counter Russian interference attempts in 2016, and strongly encouraged the Trump administration to take steps to prepare for future interference attempts.

The bipartisan report is the third volume released by the committee stemming from its three year investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 elections, examines how the Obama administration responded to reports of Russian interference, and how future administrations can improve on this response.

The committee found that the U.S. government did not have the policy options necessary to counter Russian interference in 2016. It also found that the Obama administration was partially constrained from responding to the hacking and disinformation targeting by Russian actors due to the concern that warning of election interference would undermine the public’s confidence in elections.

“The Committee found that the U.S. Government was not well-postured to counter Russian election interference activity with a full range of readily-available policy options,” the committee wrote in the report. “One aspect of the administration’s response–high-level warnings of potential retaliation–may or may not have tempered Moscow’s activity.”

The committee urged Trump and future presidents to not let personal politics keep them from addressing election security.

Shouldn't you have to pass a LITERACY test before becoming a senator or representative...???

Wolf Blitzer Had to Remind Senator Hirono that Trump Was Acquitted  Cortney O'Brien  Posted: Feb 07, 2020

Source: AP Photo/Susan Walsh

She was in the room on Wednesday when they counted the votes, and when Chief Justice John Roberts announced the Senate impeachment trial of President Trump had concluded. There weren't enough votes to convict him, so that was that. So it was pretty strange when Sen. Mazie Hirono (D-HI) argued with CNN's Wolf Blitzer on Thursday about how the president had been acquitted.

READ ON

PLEASE FORGIVE MY RANT ON PREVIOUS POST....

Bloombergs the reason they call NY...The NANNY state....He was also quoted as saying, "ORDINARY PEOPLE" shouldn't own guns.......Be carefull WHO you vote for.....

I'm guessing EVERYONE knows that Michael Bloomberg is "running for president". What they may not know or have forgotten or just don't care, is that Bloomberg is very much the TYRANT. you can read the article below to see just how much of one he is. Just one example...Ban Large Sodas

Judge halts Bloomberg’s large soda ban one day before it's set to go into effect    By Erin Durkin NEW YORK DAILY NEWS | Mar 12, 2013 

Mayor Bloomberg 's controversial ban on large, sugary sodas fell flat Monday when a judge shredded nearly every legal argument advanced by the mayor's lawyers and tossed the regulation out.

The sweeping ruling, a day before the ban was to take effect, was a stinging setback for Bloomberg, who won national acclaim in pushing the regulation — and condemnation that he was creating a nanny state.

Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Milton Tingling dismissed the rule as "arbitrary and capricious," with too many loopholes and exemptions, siding with soda companies and business groups that had taken the city to court.

READ MORE

AND THEN............

You should already know about his stance on FIREARMS. 

What is Bloomberg's stance on gun control?

180 views · View 13 Upvoters · Answer requested by Jerry Han

Ken Maus, lives in The United States of America

Answered Nov 10, 2019

To remove all guns of all types from law abiding citizens hands. He uses his site Everytown for Gun Safety to support his lies. He spends a lot on highly biased polls, surveys and “research” to support those lies. He gives more to politics then the NRA possibly could to support his remove all guns from law abiding citizens hands. The only guns he wants to keep are with the bodyguards for him and his family along with other rich Democrats.

Based on his actions, Michal Bloomberg strongly prefers very restrictive gun control (see Moms Demand Action, Everytown for Gun Safety, and MAIG for starters)
READ GUN CONTROL

APPEALS COURT: Democrats CANNOT Sue Trump Over Emoluments Claims 2020-02-07  Source: TTN  by: TTN Staff 

President Trump secured a major court victory on Friday when the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that Congressional Democrats cannot sue President Trump over emoluments claims.

According to The Hill:

A federal appeals court in Washington threw out a lawsuit accusing President Trump of illegally profiting off his private businesses while in office, ruling that the Democratic lawmakers who brought the suit lack standing to sue.

A three-judge panel on the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals on Friday said in a brief 12-page decision that the dispute centering around the Constitution's emoluments clauses has no place in the court system.

"The Members can, and likely will, continue to use their weighty voices to make their case to the American people, their colleagues in the Congress and the President himself, all of whom are free to engage that argument as they see fit," the judges wrote. "But we will not—indeed we cannot—participate in this debate."

The decision is a major win for Trump, who unlike every recent president, has refused to relinquish control over his business assets by placing them in a blind trust. And it comes just two days after the president's acquittal in his three-week long impeachment trial over accusations that he had sought help from the Ukrainian government in investigating former Vice President Joe Biden, a potential rival in the 2020 presidential race.

The case was originally brought in 2017 by 200 Democrat senators and representatives. The decision against the Democrats was unanimous.

A shame something couldn't be put in place to stop the HARRASSMENT that we all know is going to continue thru Trumps 2nd term (if he's re-elected)....It needs to STOP...!!

Impeachment 2.0? Democrats line up possible new charges against Trump           By Rowan Scarborough - The Washington Times   Thursday, February 6, 2020 

---

Democrats already have lined up possible charges if they choose to pursue impeachment 2.0.

Still pending is a wide-open probe launched by Rep. Adam B. Schitt  California Democrat. Mr. Schiff has been investigating President Trump, his family and businesses, the Trump Organization, over the congressman’s suspicions of blackmail, money laundering and bribery.

Republican staffers say the inquiry was put on hold last fall pending the Ukraine impeachment proceedings led by Mr. Schiff. But there is no sign Mr. Schiff has given up trying to prove Mr. Trump is corrupt, and if the president is impeached again, the charges would likely come from this probe, informed sources said.

Mr. Trump alluded to a new impeachment push Thursday.

“So we will probably have to do it again, because these people have gone stone-cold crazy, but I have beaten him all my life and I will beat him again if I have to,” Mr. Trump said at a post-Senate acquittal celebration at the White House. “But what they are doing is very unfair.”

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, California Democrat, said Thursday that Trump investigations will go on.

Meanwhile, House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler of New York said after Wednesday’s Senate acquittal that it’s “likely” the Ukraine probe will go on. His committee also has been investigating any Trump-Russia election conspiracy.

Mr. Trump said of Mr. Nadler: “I always beat him, and I had to beat him another time and I will probably have to beat him again because if they find that I happen to walk across the street and maybe go against the light or something, let’s impeach him.”

“Of course, they’re going to try again,” said Pam Bondi, a former Florida attorney general and member of the president’s Senate trial defense team, on Fox News.

“The unwillingness of the Democrats to accept the results of their gross abuse of their constitutional power is a crime against the public trust,” John M. Dowd, Mr. Trump’s former defense counsel, told The Washington Times.

READ MORE

If you don't read anything else on this blog, please read this and repost everywhere you can....Pappy

 

MAYBE...???

Lawmakers File Ethics Complaint, Resolution Condemning Pelosi For Ripping Up Speech    By Ryan Saavedra DailyWire.com

Multiple lawmakers indicated on Wednesday that they were taking action against House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) for ripping up President Donald Trump’s State of the Union Address last night.

Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-FL) wrote on Twitter: “BREAKING: I’m filing an ethics complaint against @SpeakerPelosi for destroying @realDonaldTrump’s State of the Union speech. Her conduct was beneath the dignity of the House, and a potential violation of law (18 USC 2071).

Pelosi said many times.....

 Nobody is above the law. not even the President She must be held accountable.”

In a letter addressed to Ethics Committee Chairman Ted Deutch (D-FL), Gaetz requested that the Committee open an investigation “into Speaker Pelosi’s flagrant violation of decorum, as defined in clauses 1 and 2 of House Rule XXIII, and request a criminal referral for her potential violation of 18 U.S.C. §2071 (Concealment, removal, or mutilation of documents), following President Trump’s recent State of the Union address of February 4, 2020. Her unseemly behavior certainly warrants censure.”
READ MORE

You all know this will probably NEVER be followed up on.....

(a)  Whoever willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, or destroys, or attempts to do so, or, with intent to do so takes and carries away any record, proceeding, map, book, paper, document, or other thing, filed or deposited with any clerk or officer of any court of the United States, or in any public office, or with any judicial or public officer of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.

(b)  Whoever, having the custody of any such record, proceeding, map, book, document, paper, or other thing, willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, falsifies, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both;  and shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office under the United States.  As used in this subsection, the term “office” does not include the office held by any person as a retired officer of the Armed Forces of the United States.

Ex-Romney Aide Reveals Why Mitt Voted To Charge Trump During Impeachment   Martywalsh   Posted February 5, 2020
The Republican-controlled Senate voted on Wednesday to officially acquit the president on both articles of impeachment.

The Republican-controlled Senate voted on Wednesday to officially acquit the president on both articles of impeachment.

On the first article of impeachment, “abuse of power,” 52 Republicans voted to acquit the president, but GOP Sen. Mitt Romney joined all 47 Senate Democrats and voted to convict the president.

Romney was the only Republican to vote against the president.

The vote on the second article of impeachment, “obstruction of Congress,” concluded with all 53 Republicans voted to acquit the president and all 47 Senate Democrats voted to convict the president.

Romney sided with Republicans to acquit the president on the charge of obstruction of Congress.

Now, a former spokesman for Romney’s unsuccessful 2012 presidential campaign is speaking out to say that the senator’s vote that Trump was guilty of impeachable offenses “was motivated by bitterness and jealousy.”
“Mitt Romney is forever bitter that he will never be POTUS. He was too weak to beat the Democrats then so he’s joining them now,” he tweeted. “He’s now officially a member of the resistance & should be expelled from the GOP.”

READ ON

Ever wonder why Virginia, all of a sudden came out with outrageous gun laws..???

IT'S BECAUSE THEY THEMSELVES, THE "LEADERS" OF THE STATE, ARE CROOKS AND LAWBREAKERS. The Governor went either "blackface or KKK" not sure which,(there are pictures) the Lt. Governor was accused of being inappropriate with women and the Attorney General was another "blackface". All have admitted to having done things in the past that if not illegal they're at the least immoral.....Now there's another one......

KARMA...???

Liz Warren Finishes In 5th Place In Pocahontas County, Iowa74   Dailycaller.com

2020 presidential candidate Sen. Elizabeth Warren finished in fifth place in Pocahontas County, Iowa.

The Iowa Democratic Party released the first partial vote count from Monday night’s Iowa caucuses Tuesday showing former South Bend Mayor Pete Buttigieg holding a slight lead over Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders. The partial vote count also showed Warren, of Massachusetts, in fifth place in Pocahontas County, Iowa with all precincts reporting.

Buttigieg received 34% of the delegates in Pocahontas County, according to the Detroit Free Press, while Sen. Amy Klobuchar and former Vice President Joe Biden had 22%. Sen. Bernie Sanders took 10%, followed by Warren with 8%.

News of Warren’s placement in Pocahontas County comes after years of President Donald Trump calling Massachusetts senator “Pocahontas” — a reference to Warren’s claim that she has Cherokee ancestry.

Warren has claimed throughout her academic career that she has Cherokee ancestry. She listed herself as “Native American” on a Texas state bar registration form in April 1986 and as a minority in the Association of American Law Schools directory from 1986 to 1994.

She taught at Harvard Law School before she became a politician, and as recently as 1996, the school referred to her as Harvard Law School’s only Native American professor

VIDEO: John Kerry Says Entire Obama Regime Conspired to Eliminate Ukrainian Prosecutor Viktor Shokin       Feb 5, 2020 By Shane Trejo  6 hours ago

The whole Obama gang was apparently in on it!



While appearing at a recent presidential campaign event for former Vice President Joe Biden, former Secretary of State John Kerry confirmed that the entire Obama administration was plotting to depose Ukrainian Prosecutor Viktor Shokin.

“I will tell you, because as Secretary of State I was deeply involved in this, all of us in the administration were trying to get rid of that prosecutor, from Obama to the Secretary of State to the Vice President, all of us were working on that, the Ambassador,” Kerry explained.

“And… and… We knew if Ukraine was going to survive and win the revolution in the end – the maidan – they had to get rid of that prosecutor, and they did,” he added.
The entire clip can be seen here:

John Kerry on a former Ukrainian prosecutor Viktor Shokin: I was deeply involved in this, all of us in the administration, were trying to get rid of that prosecutor: from Obama, to the Secretary of State, to the Vice President. All of us were working on that. pic.twitter.com/y74TwmEGWz

READ ON

Los Angeles Doctor SLAMS Sleepy Schiff Over Homeless Crisis: He’s Failed His Town Like He’s Failed Impeachment!
 by Doyle Alexander 3 days ago

              Senate impeachment trial manager Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., is “asleep at the wheel” when it comes to his own district and is ignoring issues that matter, like the state’s homeless crisis, Dr. Drew. Pinsky said Thursday.

Appearing on “Fox & Friends” with hosts Steve Doocy, Ainsley Earhardt and Brian Kilmeade, Pinsky said he started thinking that maybe he should run against Schiff because, every day he doesn’t do something, three more homeless people die in the county of Los Angeles.

While Pinsky said he is “categorically not running” for Schiff’s seat, he couldn’t ignore the crisis unfolding in front of him.

“My God, if coronavirus were killing three people a day in our country, do you not think people would be in absolute outrage and panic?” he asked. “But, for some reason, this mental health crisis that is homelessness – because people have mental illness and are living on our streets – somehow we step over them and they die right in front of us.”

“For God’s sake, we’ve absorbed 1.5 million undocumented workers in California. None of them are on the street,” Pinsky remarked.

According to the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), there was a 16.4 percent increase in California’s homeless population from 2018 to 2019 and in January of 2019 53 percent of all recorded unsheltered in the U.S. were living in the Golden State. – 

READ MORE

LOCK HER UP.....THE DRUNKEN OLD BAG !!!!

House Speaker Pelosi Rips Up Trump's SOTU Speech Live On National Television, And In Doing So Commits A Federal Offense

"By tearing up (“mutilating”) the House copy of the President’s SOTU address, Pelosi, as custodian of the record, has violated the U.S. Code, below. She has forfeited her office, should be fined, AND imprisoned.

18 U.S. Code § 2071:

(a) Whoever willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, or destroys, or attempts to do so, or, with intent to do so takes and carries away any record, proceeding, map, book, paper, document, or other thing, filed or deposited with any clerk or officer of any court of the United States, or in any public office, or with any judicial or public officer of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.

(b) Whoever, having the custody of any such record, proceeding, map, book, document, paper, or other thing, willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, falsifies, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both; and shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office under the United States. As used in this subsection, the term “office” does not include the office held by any person as a retired officer of the Armed Forces of the United States."

***************************

THE QUESTION I WANT ANSWERED...ON 2/5/2020, WHEN TRUMP IS DECLARED NOT GUILTY, WILL PELOSI RESIGN AS PROMISED