WELL... He followed through with a video titled "ABSOLUTE PROOF"...2 hrs. long.
I can't download the video, but below is a link to it
Saturday, February 6, 2021
Molly Ball, Time Magazine. How They "fortified" The Election. Steve Bannon Feb 6, 2021 Grant Locki
With Trump under heavy pressure to defend his claims in the Senate, which he can do convincingly, this amazing article tries to preempt that and lessen the shock to the public.
This reveals the two fundamental flaws that the Billionaires and the Chinese Communist Party found in the American constitution.
ONE - The USA voting system is totally controlled by amateurish and malleable Local Governments.
TWO - It is too late to go back, even if Biden is removed, Kamala Harris or Nancy Pelosi etc., etc., will be President. The Supreme Court will not or can not reverse it or order a new election. As my late father often said "Too late! She shrieked and waved her wooden leg."
Still done believe it? This Brilliant and definitive report itemizes in fine detail how the 2020 presidential election was rigged - The Navarro Report(s) - http://navarroreport.com/ https://www.dropbox.com/s/584r7xtnnga...
Friday, February 5, 2021
Tucker Carlson BLOWS THE WHISTLE! Reveals ‘Bank of America’ Handed Over Bank Records After Capitol Protests Feb 4, 2021 Chris Donaldson
Following the January 6th protest for election integrity that resulted in the brief occupation of the U.S.capitol by Trump supporters and provocateurs, Democrats and their media partners seized the opportunity to redefine dissent as domestic terrorism and are enlisting corporations in their battle.
MOST ALREADY KNEW THIS....
Explosive TIME Magazine Investigation: “Well-Funded Cabal” Worked To Change Election Laws, Control Flow Of Information BY RUSTY WEISS FEBRUARY 5, 2021
TIME Magazine has published an extraordinary investigative piece titled, “The Secret History of the Shadow Campaign That Saved the 2020 Election,” detailing how an extensive network of powerful and wealthy people ran a “shadow” campaign in order to save the election.The column, authored by Molly Ball, lays out a scenario involving “a well-funded cabal of powerful people” who worked in concert to change election laws and control the dissemination of information before and after the election.
And now they seemingly want credit for their actions.
Those entities “want the secret history of the 2020 election told, even though it sounds like a paranoid fever dream,” the column reads.
“A well-funded cabal of powerful people, ranging across industries and ideologies, working together behind the scenes to influence perceptions, change rules and laws, steer media coverage, and control the flow of information.”
The piece notes that former President Donald Trump had observed a shift in behavior in corporate America even as he sought to challenge the results of the 2020 election.
“It was all very, very strange,” TIME quotes Trump as saying in early December. “Within days after the election, we witnessed an orchestrated effort to anoint the winner, even while many key states were still being counted.”
The magazine observes: “In a way, Trump was right"
“There was a conspiracy unfolding behind the scenes, one that both curtailed the protests and coordinated the resistance from CEOs,” Ball writes, referencing a desire to keep the peace over the election after many months marred by racial tension and riots.“
Both surprises were the result of an informal alliance between left-wing activists and business titans.”
A study conducted by the Media Research Center in November suggests slanted media coverage may have tilted the election in favor of President Joe Biden.
tweet from
MediaResearchCenter@theMRC
BREAKING: The media's refusal to cover basic reports dramatically changed election results.
If voters knew about ANY of these key stories the media failed to cover, would have won with 311 electoral votes.
Full poll and analysis here:
The left-wing news media didn’t just poison the information environment with their incessantly negative coverage of President Trump going into the 2020 election. They also refused to give airtime to...newsbusters.org
The Dems. bring on the old double standard AGAIN..! Greene (R)...Swalwell (D) which is the WORSE offense..??
Defend Or Rebuke? House GOP Faces Difficult Vote Over Greene
 |
Rep. Eric Swalwell (D-Calif.) is still serving on the House intelligence committee. After an affair with an alleged Chinese spy
During his second term, Swalwell served on the United States House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, and as ranking member of its Central Intelligence Agency Subcommittee. He also retained his seat on the United States House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology.
Report: Biden’s Communications Team Asked Reporters For Questions In Advance By Hank Berrien• Feb 1, 2021 DailyWire.com•
According to The Daily Beast, President Biden’s communications team has asked reporters what questions they plan to ask White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki at press briefings.
BEWARE BIDEN’S SURE-TO-COME GUN CONTROL AGENDA By Kelly Feb 3, 2021 Article By Bob Barr
Photo By Pete Souza
The new Commander in Chief remains a clear and present danger to our Second Amendment rights, and with Democrat majorities in both houses of Congress, it is only a question of when and how boldly he will move his gun control agenda forward, not if he will do so.Even by most Democrat Party standards, many of the Biden campaign’s gun control proposals were extreme. The former vice president is too sly and too experienced from his long tenure in the Senate to believe he will succeed in quickly accomplishing every item on that wish list.
But, by having set the bar so high with his campaign’s radical gun control agenda, now as President he can make his Administration appear magnanimous and willing to “compromise” with the GOP by adopting the agenda bit by bit (a façade that always appeals to “moderate” Republicans).
To paraphrase Shakespeare’s Hamlet, “there may be method to his madness.”
The start of any real action on guns almost certainly will take place within the regulatory environment, which is where Biden’s old boss, Barack Obama, found the most fertile soil for gun control. Here, the Biden Administration can work mostly in the shadows under the cloak of regulatory interpretation and rulemaking, largely hidden from the media and without attention-drawing hearings and floor votes. Rather than having to squabble with Republicans and moderate Democrats, like West Virginia Sen. Joe Manchin, Biden would be dealing with career bureaucrats who share his zest for regulatory control generally, and for gun control in particular. To them, sidestepping Congress and the Constitution is their natural way of doing business.
The initial vehicle of choice for the Biden-Harris cabal likely will be the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF), but they will not hesitate to use other bureaucracies as well, including Health and Human Services, IRS, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the Departments of State and Defense, and the host of other agencies that previous Democrat administrations brought to the gun control playing field.
One proposal we may see sooner rather than later is a new ATF rule requiring owners of modern semi-automatic sporting rifles (as well as pistols like the AR-9, which the ATF is considering reclassifying as rifles) are registered with the ATF under the National Firearms Act. This is no small measure, as registering each such firearms would require a $200 tax stamp. The obvious financial burden this would create on citizens leaves some to speculate Biden may temporarily waive the tax, not because he is genuinely concerned about its impact on working class gun owners, but rather to show the public he remains the “nice guy” willing to meet Republicans part way. “But wait, there’s more,” as the late-night TV ads remind viewers.
National Gun Registry
read more
The Achilles heel of gun confiscation schemes has long been the lack of a national gun registry. This was the problem that manifested itself last year in New Zealand, where, as in the United States, the government had no clear idea how many guns, and what types of firearms it sought to confiscate, were actually owned by citizens. Their confiscation- masquerading-as-a-buy-back program depended largely on the willingness of citizens to voluntarily surrender their firearms.
Thursday, February 4, 2021
BREAKING: Trump Legal Team SHUTS DOWN Perjury Trap Set By Democrats In Scathing Letter by Clayton Keirns
Since Democrats cannot prove that President Trump “incited” the January 6th “siege” of the Capitol, they are trying to trip him up through a perjury trap.
Earlier today, far-left Democrat impeachment managers requested that former President Trump testify under oath at his trial before the Senate next week.
“If you decline this invitation, we reserve any and all rights, including the right to establish at trial that your refusal to testify supports a strong adverse inference regarding your actions (and inaction) on January 6, 2021,” Rep. Raskin said in his letter.
As many on the right pointed out, this is a CLASSIC “perjury trap”. They can’t prove Trump did anything wrong, so they need to weasel their way around the law and figure out another way to “get him”.
The Trump legal responded to the blood-thirsty Democrats in a scathing letter.
“We are in receipt of your latest public relations stunt. As you certainly know, there is no such thing as a negative inference in this unconstitutional proceeding,” they began.
“Your letter only confirms what is known to everyone: you cannot prove your allegations against the 45th President of the United States, who is now a private citizen,” they wrote.
“The use of our constitution to bring a purported impeachment proceeding is much too serious to try to play these games,” they concluded.
Much has been made of the unconstitutionality of this impeachment charade.
Earlier today, Senator John Barrasso slammed the Democrats’ impeachment charade on Fox Business.
“I believe it’s unconstitutional…If this were even legitimate, Stewart, you would have the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court presiding. But we don’t.”
Ahead of the trial, Trump senior advisor Jason Miller says Trump is in good spirits:
Since Democrats cannot prove that President Trump “incited” the January 6th “siege” of the Capitol, they are trying to trip him up through a perjury trap.
Earlier today, far-left Democrat impeachment managers requested that former President Trump testify under oath at his trial before the Senate next week.
“If you decline this invitation, we reserve any and all rights, including the right to establish at trial that your refusal to testify supports a strong adverse inference regarding your actions (and inaction) on January 6, 2021,” Rep. Raskin said in his letter.
As many on the right pointed out, this is a CLASSIC “perjury trap”. They can’t prove Trump did anything wrong, so they need to weasel their way around the law and figure out another way to “get him”.
The Trump legal responded to the blood-thirsty Democrats in a scathing letter.
“We are in receipt of your latest public relations stunt. As you certainly know, there is no such thing as a negative inference in this unconstitutional proceeding,” they began.
“Your letter only confirms what is known to everyone: you cannot prove your allegations against the 45th President of the United States, who is now a private citizen,” they wrote.
“The use of our constitution to bring a purported impeachment proceeding is much too serious to try to play these games,” they concluded.
Much has been made of the unconstitutionality of this impeachment charade.
Earlier today, Senator John Barrasso slammed the Democrats’ impeachment charade on Fox Business.
“I believe it’s unconstitutional…If this were even legitimate, Stewart, you would have the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court presiding. But we don’t.”
Ahead of the trial, Trump senior advisor Jason Miller says Trump is in good spirits:
AOC Accused of Lying About her Capitol Hill Sob Story: She Wasn’t Even There February 4, 2021 AAN Staff
In an unhinged and melodramatic 90-minute video posted to Instagram Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez ranted at length about how she felt her life was in danger during the January 6th Capitol riot and having to hide inside her office bathroom.But the radical Democrat representative is now under fire after her story about being trapped in her office while rioters threatened her life nearby has begun to quickly fall apart.
Democrats Are The Party Of Make Believe BY J. Peder Zane REALCLEARWIRE FEB 3, 2021
Through their domination of the media, academia, Hollywood, and growing swaths of corporate America, they successfully peddle propaganda as reality.
They insisted President Trump was a dictator and a treasonous ally of Vladimir Putin who refused to denounce white supremacy.
They dismissed questions about the business dealings of President Biden’s family as “Russian disinformation” that had been “totally discredited.”
When investigations and fact checks revealed those claims to be false, they just kept on repeating them. Tell a lie long and loud enough and many accept it as truth.
Having secured the White House and control of the Senate in the last election, Democrats and their allies are adding a strong dose of intimidation to their campaign of deceit.
They are using social media to silence dissent from their views while creating blacklists to make it difficult for their opponents to find gainful employment.
Through their domination of the media, academia, Hollywood, and growing swaths of corporate America, they successfully peddle propaganda as reality.
They insisted President Trump was a dictator and a treasonous ally of Vladimir Putin who refused to denounce white supremacy.
They dismissed questions about the business dealings of President Biden’s family as “Russian disinformation” that had been “totally discredited.”
When investigations and fact checks revealed those claims to be false, they just kept on repeating them. Tell a lie long and loud enough and many accept it as truth.
Having secured the White House and control of the Senate in the last election, Democrats and their allies are adding a strong dose of intimidation to their campaign of deceit.
They are using social media to silence dissent from their views while creating blacklists to make it difficult for their opponents to find gainful employment.
As cancel culture spreads, they gaslight the public by denying that it is happening. At the same time they argue that Republicans must be silenced and even “deprogrammed” because they are delusional liars.
To conservative ears, the national discourse often boils down to this: Are you going to believe us or your lying eyes?
The caricature of conservatives certainly describes some people on the right. Sen. Mitch McConnell has spoken out against his party’s lunatic fringe.
But there is little evidence they enjoy meaningful support. The Jan. 6 criminal assault on the Capitol was a disgrace, but it was also widely condemned by Republicans – a stark contrast to Democrats who have largely ignored or even celebrated the repeated violence perpetrated by antifa.
Casting that action as an attempted coup – pretending the mob could have gained control of the government – is deceitful propaganda aimed at smearing 74 million Trump voters.
May as well use "1984" as the "playbook".....then they don't even have to think...!
NY Times Calls For Biden To Be Fully Fascist, Appoint “Reality Czar” To Censor Information by A.M. Smith
The Left-wingedia has dropped their fight against “fascism” and have now wholeheartedly embraced it.
The New York Times has amplified claims by “experts” who are calling for Joe Biden to appoint a “reality czar,” prompting critics to compare the idea to the Ministry of Truth in George Orwell’s 1984.
In an article entitled ‘How the Biden Administration Can Help Solve Our Reality Crisis’, the NYT’s Kevin Roose cites “experts” who are calling on “the Biden administration put together a cross-agency task force to tackle disinformation and domestic extremism, which would be led by something like a “reality czar.”
The job of this “reality czar” would be to head up “a centralized task force could coordinate a single, strategic response” to things like COVID-related and election fraud “conspiracy theories.”
“This task force could also meet regularly with tech platforms, and push for structural changes that could help those companies tackle their own extremism and misinformation problems. (For example, it could formulate “safe harbor” exemptions that would allow platforms to share data about QAnon and other conspiracy theory communities with researchers and government agencies without running afoul of privacy laws.) And it could become the tip of the spear for the federal government’s response to the reality crisis,” states the article.
While the Orwell comparison has become something of a cliché, in this instance its the best available.
In the book, the Ministry of Truth decides what is “truth” in Oceania no matter what the actual truth may be, and exercises this monopoly over reality by falsifying the nature of historical events.
The Ministry of Truth also uses this power monopoly to redefine the very word “truth” under the rubric of Newspeak, so “truth” becomes whatever the government-approved version of events is in that moment.
What the “experts” cited by the New York Times are calling for and what Orwell portrayed in his book are so similar, even Kevin Roose admits, “It sounds a little dystopian.”
But if “conspiracy theories” really do pose a deadly threat to society, who is responsible for pushing the most egregious disinformation?
The NY Times itself has pushed false information and conspiracies around the shootings of Michael Brown and the Russian collusion hoax, but I am sure they won’t be held accountable by the “Reality Czar” they are calling for.
any of this sound familiar...?
A SHORT HISTORY LESSON
Ever heard of the French Revolution’s “Reign of Terror”, a time in which hundreds of thousands were arrested, over 15,000 death sentences (mostly by guillotine) were handed out. Many thousands also died in prison. This was all overseen by the aptly named French Committee of Public Safety. (Nice, huh? How many of the people bought into the rhetoric?) After all, there had been a revolution, and then counter-revolutions so, as Wikipedia tells us, “The members of the [leadership] were determined to avoid street violence such as the September Massacres of 1792 by taking violence into their own hands as an instrument of government.”One of the leaders of the Committee of Public Safety, who was pro-gullotine for the public safety (of course, always for the public safety), was Robespierre. He seems to have believed that terror was virtuous, saying, “Terror is nothing more than speedy, severe and inflexible justice.” Since those in charge believed their rule was the will of the people, anyone against their rule must be pro-tyranny. (Tell me where I've heard this before?) Thus, the opposition must be purged! Since the new leaders "represented the people", and the aristocracy (the wealthy) and the religious were suspect, being part of the old order, the wealthy and the religious had to be purged. “Science!” and "reason" would be the rule. (Thus, they scientifically removed people’s heads.)
As always, the leaders (not the people) desired and granted themselves unprecedented powers to do what they wished. And, as always happens, the leaders began fighting amongst themselves. When power has to answer to no one, every evil leader wants that power. Robespierre ended up getting caught between those who thought him not harsh enough and those who thought his methods were a bit too harsh.
Robespierre ended up losing his head to the guillotine as well.
That's the end of our bedtime history lesson
Wednesday, February 3, 2021
And, It will only get bigger....11
National news reporter shocked to find Trump's support growing outside D.C. By Bob Unruh Published February 1, 2021 at 8:49pm
'There's a huge disconnect between Washington and the rest of the country'
President Donald J. Trump delives remarks in support of the Farmers to Families Food Box distribution program Monday, Aug. 24, 2020, at Flavor First Growers and Packers in Mills River, North Carolina. (Official White House photo by Shealah Craighead)
Since leaving office, the support for Donald Trump from his base is even stronger, a Politico reporter discovered after a trip outside the Beltway.
Evangelist Franklin Graham, a noted supporter of the former president, hopes Washington is paying attention.
"Here's a Washington reporter who went to Wyoming and was surprised at the 'huge disconnect between Washington and the rest of the country,'" Graham wrote on Facebook. "I think she is right. She shared the observation that former President Trump has actually gained—not lost—political clout since leaving office. When it comes to the impeachment, it does nothing for the American people, it only continues to fuel more disunity.
"I hope the leaders in Washington pay attention to this reporter, because the disconnect is there—it’s true all over the country, not just in Wyoming," said Graham, the CEO and president of both Samaritan's Purse and the Billy Graham Evangelistic Association.
he reporter, Tara Palmeri, was at a rally last week led by Rep. Matt Gaetz, R-Fla., against Wyoming Republican Rep. Liz Cheney, who enraged her constituents by voting to impeach Trump. Cheney has been censured by a GOP committee in the state and already has a primary challenger for the 2022 election.
The reporter spoke with Wyoming voters about Trump.
"People don't want to hear anything against Trump," Palmeri said in an MSNBC interview. "Actually, the more he stays out of the media, the more that he becomes this martyr, this looming figure over the GOP."
In fact, Trump is "way more popular" in Wyoming than Cheney, she said.
"I actually went out of my way to try to find someone who would defend [Cheney] and I really could not," Palmeri said.
The reporter said the Trump base "is getting stronger, truly."
"I think an impeachment [conviction] would make him even more powerful," she said.
Voters in the mountain state were distrustful of COVID mandates and other measures, she noted.
"It feels like another world," Palmeri said. "But that's what's on the ground, and I don't think that we can ignore it. And I'm really happy that I went out there and saw it, because I think that there's a huge disconnect between Washington and the rest of the country."
Content created by the WND News Center is available for re-publication without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact licensing@wndnewscenter.org.
Trump not allowed to have presidential library? Rush Limbaugh goes on offense By Bob Unruh Published February 2, 2021
Talk-radio host Rush Limbaugh on Tuesday explained why establishment Democrats and Republicans are so terrified of President Trump.
It's gotten so bad that a Washington Post columnist even urged Congress to deprive him of a presidential library.
But the Washington "swamp" has to discredit him because they fear what he represents: "an uprising of the people of this country against Washington, against the establishment," Limbaugh told his listeners.
The movement has been building since Ross Perot's run for president in 1992, he said.
Oh, yeah, it predated Trump. The Tea Party was part of this. Trump was just the first guy to come along and actually weaponize it, in a political sense," he explained. "But the Trump movement existed before there was Trump, and then he built it and grew it to the point of 75, 74 million voters."
In fact, there are indications that Trump's popularity has been growing since he left office.
Limbaugh said the "same cabal" that pushed the debunked Russia-collusion claims against Trump are pushing the second impeachment.
And they are "doing everything they can," because, he said, they fear him and what might happen if he were to return to politics.
'It would become the biggest tourist attraction in the country'
It's gotten so bad that a Washington Post columnist even urged Congress to deprive him of a presidential library.
But the Washington "swamp" has to discredit him because they fear what he represents: "an uprising of the people of this country against Washington, against the establishment," Limbaugh told his listeners.
The movement has been building since Ross Perot's run for president in 1992, he said.
Oh, yeah, it predated Trump. The Tea Party was part of this. Trump was just the first guy to come along and actually weaponize it, in a political sense," he explained. "But the Trump movement existed before there was Trump, and then he built it and grew it to the point of 75, 74 million voters."
In fact, there are indications that Trump's popularity has been growing since he left office.
Limbaugh said the "same cabal" that pushed the debunked Russia-collusion claims against Trump are pushing the second impeachment.
And they are "doing everything they can," because, he said, they fear him and what might happen if he were to return to politics.
Huckabee pushes impeachment ... for Kamala Harris By Bob Unruh Published January 20, 2021
Cites her support for 'rioters and looters'
During President Trump's tenure in the White House, Democrats in Washington impeached him twice, the first time for what he said during a phone call and the second during a speech.Now former Arkansas governor and political analyst Mike Huckabee says Kamala Harris should have her turn at being impeached.
Kamala Harris at the 2020 Democratic National Convention on Aug. 19, 2020 (Video screenshot)
During President Trump's tenure in the White House, Democrats in Washington impeached him twice, the first time for what he said during a phone call and the second during a speech.
Now former Arkansas governor and political analyst Mike Huckabee says Kamala Harris should have her turn at being impeached.
"If we’re going to impeach Donald Trump for what he said, then we’d better impeach Kamala Harris for saying the things she did last summer about the rioters and the looters. And even establishing a monetary fund to get them out of jail on bail so they could get back to the riots," Huckabee said Saturday on Fox Business.
"If we're gonna play this game, everybody should have a turn," he said.
The Washington Examiner explained he was talking about Harris' advocacy for a group raising funds to pay bail for rioters and protesters involved in last summer's riots following the death of George Floyd in Minnesota.
The fund helped a number of "violent felons," including "a man accused of raping a young girl," the report said.
"If you’re able to, chip in now to the @MNFreedomFund to help post bail for those protesting on the ground in Minnesota," Harris said on social media.
MOST CERTAINLY IS...!!
Poll shows Americans believe Biden is further dividing nation By Bob Unruh Published January 28, 2021
Skeptical he can 'unify' fractured populace around far-left agenda
But that's "more fig leaf than honest invitation," contends New York Post columnist Michael Goodwin.
"We should ignore the unity talk because everything he had done leans far left," the columnist wrote.
"Knitting together a fractured America around a far-left agenda was never going to work. And Biden knows it."
It appears voters know it, too, with a Rasmussen poll showing 80% of Republican voters don't believe Biden can unite Americans. Among "other" voters, that number is 62%. In contrast, 75% of Democrats believe Biden can unify the nation.
In fact, 44% of likely voters believe Biden is "more to blame for the division in America." The same figure, 44%, blame all "his political opponents."
Military Experts Worry Biden Defense Cuts Leave America Open To AI Attack Drones by Doyle Alexander
From day one, President Joe Biden has sought to undue every effort former President Donald Trump achieved. One of those achievements was reestablishing America’s military strength after being severely depleted during the Obama years.
Conservative voices warned Biden would seek to strip our military back to its former Obama weakness, and he shows signs of doing just that in haste. Military experts now predict that Liberal policies on defense spending and military advancement will leave America vulnerable to the future landscape of war, AI controlled drone attacks.
Military experts predict the future of warfare will include artificially intelligent attack drone swarms that are too massive and too fast for humans to combat or control.
General John Murray, who leads U.S. Army Futures Command, said if faced with an incoming attack from a drone swarm, a person may need to decide initially how to respond, but drones would likely need to take it from there.
“When you are defending against a drone swarm, a human may be required to make that first decision,” Murray said, “but I am just not sure any human can keep up.”
Once the drone battle is on, drones would be making the decisions. Such swarms could contain thousands or millions of drones.
“If you have to transmit an image of the target, let the human look at it, and wait for the human to hit the ‘fire’ button, that is an eternity at machine speed, one anonymous scientist and defense expert told Forbes magazine. “If we slow the AI to human speed …we’re going to lose.”
Conservative voices warned Biden would seek to strip our military back to its former Obama weakness, and he shows signs of doing just that in haste. Military experts now predict that Liberal policies on defense spending and military advancement will leave America vulnerable to the future landscape of war, AI controlled drone attacks.
Military experts predict the future of warfare will include artificially intelligent attack drone swarms that are too massive and too fast for humans to combat or control.
General John Murray, who leads U.S. Army Futures Command, said if faced with an incoming attack from a drone swarm, a person may need to decide initially how to respond, but drones would likely need to take it from there.
“When you are defending against a drone swarm, a human may be required to make that first decision,” Murray said, “but I am just not sure any human can keep up.”
Once the drone battle is on, drones would be making the decisions. Such swarms could contain thousands or millions of drones.
“If you have to transmit an image of the target, let the human look at it, and wait for the human to hit the ‘fire’ button, that is an eternity at machine speed, one anonymous scientist and defense expert told Forbes magazine. “If we slow the AI to human speed …we’re going to lose.”
Chuck Schumer Handed A Bone-Rattling Defeat By His Own Party!
Politics have never been more divided and tumultuous. Party politics have become so polarized in the past decade that loyalty can no longer be expected or relied upon.
Chuck Schumer was riding high. He was ready to push through a far-Left agenda now that he’s the most powerful man in the Senate, even though his party doesn’t have a majority.
But first, he needs to change one thing about the Senate—and he just saw his hopes go up in smoke.
Chuck Schumer and Mitch McConnell both have 50 seats in the Senate. A rule called the filibuster lets one party stop a bill from coming up for a final vote until 60 senators support it.
If there were no filibuster, then any bill that got all 50 Democratic votes would become law after Vice President Kamala Harris broke the 50-50 tie.
That could clear the way for anything Schumer wants to do: Higher taxes, more Obamacare regulations, open borders, abortion until birth—as he said, “Everything is on the table.”
The first thing on the chopping block has to be a 215-year-old rule.
Schumer has a problem, though. His plan is so radical that even some of his fellow Democrats don’t want anything to do with it. And they just handed Schumer his first bone-rattling defeat.
“I will not vote to bust the filibuster under any condition, on anything that you can think of,” said Sen. Joe Manchin, D-W.V.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
