Saturday, September 17, 2022

Tucker Carlson: Is anyone noticing this?  FOX NEWS

Fox News host Tucker Carlson calls out Democrats for not welcoming the illegal migrants on to Martha's Vineyard on 'Tucker Carlson Tonight.' #FoxNews #tucker

Friday, September 16, 2022




All this wailing and gnashing of teeth from a community that has prided itself on being a “sanctuary” for illegals is quite a spectacle.

Martha's Vineyard Declares 'Humanitarian Crisis,' Ted Cruz Has Perfect Response    Sept 16, 2022

When just 50 illegal aliens showed up on the doorstep of the ultra-rich left-wingers at tony Martha’s Vineyard in Massachusetts this week, it was deemed a “humanitarian crisis.”

But Texas Republican Sen. Ted Cruz had the perfect response to the shrill declaration of a “crisis” at the playground of the rich and powerful.

On Wednesday, Florida Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis sent
two planeloads of illegal aliens from Venezuela to the affluent island of Martha’s Vineyard, which has styled itself as a “sanctuary destination,” according to The Associated Press.

Once the illegals arrived in the liberal enclave, local activists flew into a tizzy.

On Thursday morning, Heather Arpin, public information officer for the Dukes County Emergency Management Association, sent out an update on the island’s “humanitarian response.”

The Marth’s Vineyard Chamber of Commerce shared the news release on Twitter, saying, “To our Island community, here is an update on current humanitarian crisis on Martha’s Vineyard.”

But Cruz quickly clapped back at the proclamation of a “crisis” with a perfectly worded retort.

“If 50 constitutes a humanitarian crisis in Martha’s Vineyard, what the hell is 4.2 MILLION?” he tweeted.

Folks on Martha’s Vineyard are describing the burdens from 50 illegal immigrants. 

To put that in perspective, the small town of Del Rio, TX has about 30,000 residents. I was there when 15,000 Haitian illegal immigrants were crossing in to Del Rio IN A SINGLE DAY. 

15,000 > 50

We Noticed Astonishingly Creepy Details in Biden's Latest Executive Order - What Are They Planning?  
By Samantha Chang September 16, 2022

Democrats are aggressively re-engineering society in alarming ways, as evidenced by President Joe Biden’s efforts to fundamentally transform the United States by pushing “equity,” lab-grown Franken “meat” and climate alarmism.

On Monday, the 79-year-old career politician signed an executive order whose objective is “advancing biotechnology and biomanufacturing” by implementing policies focused on fighting climate change, promoting race-based hiring and eradicating meat consumption.

Predictably, Biden did not state these objectives in clear language but masked them with confusing jargon and hollow platitudes.

“It is the policy of my Administration to coordinate a whole-of-government approach to advance biotechnology and biomanufacturing towards innovative solutions in health, climate change, energy, food security, agriculture, supply chain resilience, and national and economic security,” the executive order said.

Biden said the principles of “equity, ethics, safety, and security” are central to his taxpayer-funded program.

The order takes a truly dystopian turn, however, with a call to “write circuitry for cells” and “program biology” in the same way computers are programmed.

“The COVID-19 pandemic has demonstrated the vital role of biotechnology and biomanufacturing in developing and producing life-saving diagnostics, therapeutics, and vaccines that protect Americans and the world,” the executive order said.



Kamala Harris Gets Rude Awakening as 100 Illegal Immigrants Show Up at Her Residence After She Declared the Border 'Secure'    Sept 15, 2022 

Vice President Kamala Harris declared on national television that the U.S. border is secure last Sunday, Texas Republican Gov.Abbott

After Vice President Kamala Harris declared on national television that the U.S. border is secure last Sunday, Texas Republican Gov. Greg Abbott sent two buses carrying 101 illegal immigrants to her residence.

Fox News reported that the migrants were dropped off at the gate outside Harris’ Naval Observatory residence on Thursday morning. The group had been picked up in Eagle Pass, Texas, and included people from “Venezuela, Uruguay, Colombia and Mexico,” the report said.

Fox reporters asked “multiple migrants” if they think the border is open. Unlike our disingenuous border czar, they do.


Tesla Owner Experienced EV Nightmare When He Found Out He'd Have to Pay $26,000 to Unlock Car       CLICK TEXT TO SEE ARTICLE


Most Trumpian thing a Trump judge has ever said: Aileen Cannon's ruling shocks MSNBC host​  Raw Story - Yesterday 10:38 PM

Judge Cannon rejected the premise that the classified materials seized were actually classified.


'Tear apart' DOJ and FBI: Devin Nunes implores Republicans to act on John Durham bombshell      
Daniel Chaitin - Yesterday 

Republicans in Congress need to "tear apart" the Justice Department, a former chairman of the House Intelligence Committee declared in reaction to explosive new claims by special counsel John Durham.

'Tear apart' DOJ and FBI: Devin Nunes implores Republicans to act on John Durham bombshell

© Provided by Washington Examine Devin Nunes, who is now CEO of former President Donald Trump's media venture, Trump Media and Technology Group, made the statement Thursday when reacting to the prosecutor's claim in court that the alleged source for disgraced former British spy Christopher Steele's infamous anti-Trump dossier was a paid confidential human source for the FBI.

"I'll tell you: Now more than ever, if the Republicans get control of Congress, this is going to be a monumental task that they have — to tear apart the Department of Justice and the FBI," Nunes said during an interview on Real America's Voice.

The alleged source is Igor Danchenko, a U.S.-based Russian lawyer who is charged with five counts of making false statements tied to what he told the bureau about the dossier. Danchenko has pleaded not guilty to the charges, and his trial begins in the coming weeks. In filings, Durham has also alleged the FBI botched a counterintelligence investigation into Danchenko that stretched from 2009 to 2011.

Nunes said the "key component" from what Durham has said is how the special counsel has presented what he believes is "the strongest evidence that we've seen that they obstructed — the FBI, DOJ, et al. obstructed Congress's investigation back in 2017."

"If you recall, they were coming after me, saying that people were going to die if important assets — Putin assets were going to die. It was all nonsense," Nunes said. "The dude was, like, a few blocks from here working at Brookings at one point as a Democratic operative. I mean, nobody — nobody — cared. This is the best evidence that I have seen that these guys were conspiring to do this."

Nunes, who as a congressman was a lead investigator of what has become known as the Russiagate controversy, argued there is a group of high-level officials dating back to the Obama administration who are out to get Trump.

This "crew," Nunes said, has been involved in several high-profile cases — including special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation, the Jan. 6 investigation, and the Mar-a-Lago raid — and has been "very clever to use the Department of Justice, specifically the National Security Division of the Department of Justice, to then hide under what's called 'counterintelligence investigation' because it allows them to wall everyone off, and then they're using these 
confidential human sources as a way to to keep that from Congress."

Wednesday, September 14, 2022

Ephesians 6-12
For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.

Tuesday, September 13, 2022

Welcome to Mogadishu. Now Give Us All Your Cash!

Tucker Carlson Tonight 9/13/22|FOX Breaking News Trump September 13,2022   Risty

NY POST Expose: “The FBI Knew RussiaGate Was A Lie…”  WLT by noah 1 day ago

The NY Post has historically done some of the most honest reporting out there.

Fair and balanced most of the time.
And they sure did get it right with this one…

"The FBI knew RussiaGate was a lie — but hid that truth"

That’s exactly right!

And that’s the story published by their Editorial Board, which is another way of saying this is what the Editors of the paper believe after seeing all the evidence.

Here’s a portion of what the NY Post had to say:

The FBI knew the Trump-Russia collusion narrative was utter bunk even as it suggested otherwise to Congress, the courts and the public early in 2017. Evidence revealed by special counsel John Durham proves it beyond dispute.

At RealClearInvestigations, Paul Sperry lays out the case.

Declassified for Durham’s probe, a March 2017 memo prepared by Lisa Page for FBI head James Comey’s meeting with Congress’ “Gang of Eight” — the bipartisan House and Senate leaders who oversee the most classified stuff — was a total cook-up job.

It advised Comey to present accusations that Trump’s campaign chair Paul Manafort and foreign policy adviser Carter Page were working with the Russian government as coming from a confidential Russia-based source with real intel-community chops. In fact, the FBI had already established that the root source was US-based former Brookings flunky Igor Danchenko’s utterly speculative gossip with an ex-girlfriend and a Democratic Party hack.

DOJ Stopped Talking With Trump After Raiding His Home

( After the FBI raided the former president’s home in Mar-a-Lago in early August, court filings submitted by his lawyers allege that the Department of Justice never reached out to them after the event, according to The Epoch Times.

His lawyers claim that it has never before been the case that a movant, the party making a motion before a court, has not been contacted by the DOJ, further prompting criticism that the agency is behaving in a partisan, untrustful way.

“All of this in the context of a unilateral filter team operation that to-date has never made any contact with counsel for the Movant, another historic first for DOJ,” the filing stated.

The filing comes after the DOJ tried to argue that a special master, or neutral third-party, was not needed for the review of the alleged classified materials that the FBI confiscated during their raid. Prosecutors said that the DOJ “filter team” already carried out that task.

The government tried to argue against having a third-party review its investigation, arguing that it would impede their “ongoing criminal investigation and—if the special master were tasked with reviewing classified documents—would impede the Intelligence Community from conducting its ongoing review of the national security risk that improper storage of these highly sensitive materials may have caused and from identifying measures to rectify or mitigate any damage that improper storage caused.”

The same filing includes a photo that the DOJ took of alleged classified material scattered on the floor found at Trump’s residence, labeled “TOP SECRET.” Trump took to social media to say that the picture appeared to be staged, and then accused the DOJ and FBI of deception.

“There seems to be confusion as to the ‘picture’ where documents were sloppily thrown on the floor and then released photographically for the world to see, as if that’s what the FBI found when they broke into my home,” the former president wrote on Truth Social. “Wrong! They took them out of cartons and spread them around on the carpet, making it look like a big ‘find’ for them.”

Trump then went on to say that his lawyers were not able to witness what they were doing, but that they were told to wait outside. His lawyers further claim that the FBI forcefully entered the residence with bookbags and demanded that the cameras in the home be shut off.

 Iceberg Ahead  By Pat Cross


Trump Predicts “DOJ Will Impugn, Leak” If Special Master Is Not Picked

( )- The lawyers for former president Donald Trump renewed their request for a special master to examine the documents found during the raid of his home in a new application submitted. They will later challenge the constitutionality of the search in court.

Reports show that the attorneys’ most recent petition stated that left unchecked, the DOJ would impugn, leak, and broadcast some aspects of their inquiry with no remedy for Movant other than to trust the restraint of the uncontrolled investigators.

The “gratuitous” publication of images from the Mar-a-Lago search was cited in the motion as evidence that the Department of Justice cannot be relied upon to handle the paperwork taken from Trump’s residence.

The motion explained the facts and stated that a search warrant had been executed at the house of a president. It was undertaken as the former President and NARA (National Archives and Records Administration) were exchanging standard back-and-forth communication regarding the contents of presidential libraries. The Movant allowed DOJ attorneys and FBI agents to visit his residence and offer security recommendations.

According to the motion, an attorney general stood up to address the audience for the first time in history and declared their desire to unseal a search warrant and a property receipt. However, he grudgingly handed out a heavily redacted document.

The government’s statement gratuitously featured an image of supposedly secret information, ripped from a container and scattered across the floor for dramatic effect like a pack of bitchy teen girls would do.

According to reports, the attorneys concluded that there was no reason for fear since Trump was the president of the United States and had control over the records from his administration.

The filing ended by criticizing President Joe Biden’s Justice Department and Attorney General Merrick Garland for going after their political rival. It stated that the government pretends these are not historically significant events. It informed the court that it not only opposes a Special Master but that the movant should have no chance to argue any part of this behavior and decision-making. Rule 41 is in place for a cause, and the Movant requests the court uphold sufficient fairness and openness to lawfully pursue redress under that Rule. An impartial DOJ that upholds the most outstanding ethical standards would, and should, agree.