Rapper Who Funneled Millions In Illegal Donations to Obama Campaign Jailed    Martin Walsh26 minutes ago  CONSERVATIVE BRIEF  

This article may contain commentary which reflects the author's opinion

Grammy-winning rapper Prakazrel “Pras” Michel, a member of the Fugees, was sentenced to 14 years in prison for his role in illegally directing millions of dollars in foreign funds into Barack Obama’s 2012 re-election campaign. Michel, 52, declined to make a statement before U.S. District Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly announced the sentence on Thursday.

He was convicted in April 2023 after a federal jury found him guilty on 10 counts, including conspiracy and acting as an unregistered agent of a foreign government. The trial, held in Washington, D.C., included testimony from actor Leonardo DiCaprio and former Attorney General Jeff Sessions, the Independent reported.

Justice Department prosecutors said federal sentencing guidelines recommended a life sentence, asserting that Michel “betrayed his country for money” and “lied unapologetically and unrelentingly to carry out his schemes.”

“His sentence should reflect the breadth and depth of his crimes, his indifference to the risks to his country, and the magnitude of his greed,” they wrote in court filings.
Advertisement

Defense attorney Peter Zeidenberg said the 14-year sentence imposed on his client was “completely disproportionate to the offense,” and confirmed that Michel plans to appeal both his conviction and sentence.

Zeidenberg had urged the court to impose a three-year prison term. In a prior filing, Michel’s legal team argued that a life sentence — which prosecutors had indicated was possible — would be an “absurdly high” penalty, noting that such terms are typically reserved for individuals convicted of deadly terrorism or major drug cartel activity.
Advertisement

“The Government’s position is one that would cause Inspector Javert to recoil and, if anything, simply illustrates just how easily the Guidelines can be manipulated to produce absurd results, and how poorly equipped they are, at least on this occasion, to determine a fair and just sentence,” the defense team wrote.

Meanwhile, the former president said earlier this month that Democrats should embrace socialists as an important part of their political coalition.

Speaking on the “Pod Save America” podcast, Obama urged party leaders not to impose “litmus tests” on members with differing views and described newly elected New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani, a Democratic Socialist, as “part of a vision for the future.”

“Tuesday was nice, but we’ve got a lot of work to do. And your task is going to be not to impose litmus tests,” Obama said. “We had [Democratic Virginia Gov.-elect] Abigail Spanberger win and we had Zohran Mandani win and they are all part of a vision for the future. Our job is to say that we want everybody engaged.”

He added: “And we want to have a conversation about how to make sure that every person in this country is treated with dignity and respect, and there are ladders of opportunity, and that there’s the possibility of community, and that we’re getting along not in some cliché, phonied way, but in a genuine, deep way where we recognize, yeah, we have differences, and yes, there are fights that are going to have to be fought, but that deep down there is something core in us that we have in common that is extraordinary.”

Mamdani won the mayoral race on a left-wing socialist platform that included raising taxes on corporations and wealthy residents, implementing a citywide rent freeze, providing free bus service and childcare, and establishing city-owned grocery stores.

A recent Gallup poll released Sept. 8 found that only 42% of Democrats viewed capitalism positively, while 66% expressed a favorable opinion of socialism. The following day, NewsNation political contributor Chris Cillizza cautioned on his YouTube channel that the Democratic Party’s growing embrace of socialism could jeopardize its chances in the 2028 election.

“I guess it’s not terribly surprising, but I do think if I am a Democrat who wants to win the 2028 election … That would worry me candidly because socialism broadly will not sell,” Cillizza said. “You can call it democratic socialism. You can call it whatever you want. But the idea of socialism will not sell in the country.”

SO...This fiasco with Iran has been going on since the CARTER administration. lets see, that's 8 presidents (including Trump) and no one had the guts to do anything about them until it got to Trumps second term. NOW...  Trump is the BAD president for getting us into a war.

Why didn't ANY of the other presidents do anything? I  know a few of them were too busy making lots of money off  of Iran. We all know who they are! 

Melissa Steinberg Brodsky March 6 at 7:16 AM 

·Let’s get something straight, because this hasn’t been talked about enough. And I’m tired of seeing people grabbing headlines and posts that agree with their narrative instead of doing their own research.

What’s happening right now in Iran is not Israel’s war. It’s not a Jewish vendetta, it’s not a Middle East skirmish that has nothing to do with the rest of us, and contrary to Tucker Carlson, it has nothing to do with Chabad. You need to know what’s actually going on.

Washington severed diplomatic ties with Iran under the Carter administration after Iranian students stormed the U.S. embassy in Tehran and held 52 Americans hostage. That was 1979.
Since then, EVERY administration, Carter, Reagan, Bush (senior), Clinton, Bush (junior), Obama, Biden, and Trump, has said that a nuclear-armed Iran is unacceptable. The White House recently documented 74 separate instances of Trump making that case, calling it “longstanding, bipartisan American policy.” This isn’t a new position. It isn’t a right-wing position. It’s what every administration has believed for half a century.

So why did it take until now? Because Iran kept moving the goalposts, and the world kept letting them.

By May 2025, the IAEA reported that Iran’s cache of near-weapons-grade enriched uranium had surged by roughly 50 percent in just three months, putting Tehran one step away from having enough material for ten nuclear weapons.

That’s not some little vague threat. That’s a countdown.
The head of U.S. Central Command testified that if Iran decided to sprint toward a nuclear weapon, it could produce enough weapons-grade material for a simple device in one week, and enough for ten weapons in three weeks.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio put it plainly: “They have everything they need to build nuclear weapons.” When you’ve built the engine, loaded the fuel, and pointed the car at the wall, it doesn’t matter much whether you’ve pressed the gas yet.
Iran spent years insisting its program was civilian. All the while, it was moving toward weapons capability. According to reporting sourced by the Institute for International Political Studies, Khamenei had authorized development of miniaturized nuclear warheads for ballistic missiles as recently as October 2025.

Now let’s talk about China, because this piece of the picture is pretty darn critical.

China is not a bystander in this story. Iran is central to Beijing’s entire overland trade and energy strategy. Iran sits at the heart of China’s Belt and Road Initiative, the infrastructure network connecting East Asia to Europe through land-based transport and Persian Gulf energy routes. Without stable access through Iranian territory, Beijing’s supply chains have no viable alternative. Iran exported more than 520 million barrels of crude oil to China in 2025 alone. Only Saudi Arabia supplied more. China buys over 80 percent of Iran’s oil. This isn’t ideological solidarity. It’s a dependency that neither side wants disrupted.

Which brings us to the Strait of Hormuz.
Roughly 13 million barrels of oil per day moved through the Strait in 2025, about 31 percent of all seaborne crude in the world.

About 45 percent of China’s oil imports pass through it. Iran has threatened to close it. And here’s what that threat actually produced: China is now in direct talks with Iran, pressing Tehran to allow crude oil and LNG vessels safe passage and to hold off on targeting tankers or key export hubs. When Beijing’s energy supply is on the line, the anti-American posturing has real limits.

Here’s what this all adds up to.

The United States didn’t stumble into this war because Israel asked nicely. It acted on a threat that five decades of American presidents acknowledged and mostly kicked down the road.

Iran was weeks away, not years, from having the material needed for nuclear weapons. It had long-range ballistic missiles capable of reaching U.S. bases and allies throughout the region. It had a weapons development program it had been lying about for years.

Calling this Israel’s war ignores fifty years of American policy, multiple rounds of failed diplomacy, and a nuclear program that was running out of road.

The world needed someone to act. The better question isn’t why it happened. It’s why it took this long.
(c) 2026 Melissa Brodsky
Creative Property of Melissa Brodsky

 GREAT RESPONSE !!  I know it's probably NOT real bu I still like it..

  I never heard the "manifesto" before this and after reading it, I'm not at all surprised it was a HATE crime against whites. 

FBI Finally Releases Maifesto Docs From Nashville Catholic School Shooter – It’s As Bad As We Suspected  Jonathan Davis  December 31, 2025  POLITICS

Earlier this week, reports revealed that Audrey Hale, the shooter at the Covenant School, used federal student aid money to purchase the weapons she used to kill six people at the Christian school. Notably, she was a former student of the Catholic school in Nashville that was attacked last year. The tragic incident resulted in the deaths of three students and three staff members, with two others sustaining injuries

Hale, a transgender individual, was shot and killed by law enforcement during the incident. The police department declined to publish Hale’s manifesto, likely fearing it would negatively impact the perception of the LGBTQ community. Recently, the FBI has made available documents that provide insight into Hale’s motives, revealing why the Biden administration and law enforcement chose to keep this information from the public

According to The New York Post, Hale even went so far as to write out a chilling “pros-and-cons” list before carrying out the attack.

That list reportedly spelled out what Hale viewed as the “advantages” and “disadvantages” of targeting another school she had previously attended—before ultimately deciding against it for one disturbing reason: the school’s student body was “mostly black.”

READ MORE HERE

JD VANCE RUSHED TO SENATE - ALL HELL BREAKS LOOSE OVER TIED VOTE

A studio technician has leaked the unedited audio of a DNC meeting where leaders discussed "manufacturing" a protest to stop Vance’s vote. The radical Democrats are terrified because they know they can't stop the MAGA momentum in the Senate. The level of fear in D.C. proves that the establishment is losing its grip on the country. Trump is speaking for the silent majority, and the establishment can't handle the transparency. The reckoning for the shadow government is moving faster.   

 

Commen

No Kings explained for people who think they're fighting fascism.  Ken Blackwell

No Kings explained for people who think they're fighting fascism.

500 groups. Three billion dollars in revenue. Pre printed signs stacked and shipped before you even knew what you were supposed to be mad about.

That is not a spontaneous uprising. That is infrastructure.
That is planning. That is money. That is message discipline.
And that is what you walked into on Saturday.
You looked around, saw the crowd, saw the slogans, felt the energy, and told yourself this was democracy. “No Kings.” It sounded clean. It sounded righteous. It felt like you were part of something organic.
But the signs were ready before your outrage was.

That should bother you.

Because you are not living under a king. You are living in a constitutional republic with elections, term limits, and a press that has spent years attacking the most powerful figures in the country without consequence. No one is being arrested for calling a president a fascist. No one is being silenced for dissenting.

That is not tyranny.

And yet you are being told it is.
You are being trained to see normal functions of a country as authoritarian. Loving your country becomes suspicious. Wanting a secure border becomes immoral. Believing parents should have a say in their children’s lives becomes dangerous. Asking basic questions about elections becomes taboo.

That is not clarity. That is conditioning.

Every country on Earth enforces its borders. Most require identification to vote. That is not controversial anywhere else. It is only controversial here because you have been told it should be.

And you believed it.

Meanwhile, look at the people who actually hold power and how long they have held it:

Chuck Schumer. 46 years. Longer than Stalin.

Steny Hoyer. 45 years. Longer than Mao.

Mitch McConnell. 42 years. 5x more than Napoleon.

Nancy Pelosi. 39 years. Longer than Henry VIII.

Maxine Waters. 35 years. Longer than Mussolini.

Bernie Sanders. 35 years. Triple Hitler’s entire reign.

That is what entrenched power looks like.
Decades. Not months. Not a single term. Decades.
But you are told the threat to democracy is the outsider who disrupted that system for a brief window of time.

You are told he is the king.

No. What you are reacting to is not monarchy. It is loss of control.
You do not hate kings. You hate kings that are not yours.
Because when power consolidates on your side, you justify it.
A sitting president steps aside. Within days, a replacement is effectively crowned without a real contest, without a meaningful debate, without voters having a say in a process that is supposed to belong to them.

No primary. No debate. No ballot.

And you said nothing.

Three days before you marched, lawmakers aligned with your movement rejected voter identification requirements. At the same time, you lived through a period where you had to show documentation to participate in basic parts of life.

You needed proof to eat, to travel, to work.

But asking for proof to vote is suddenly oppression.
That contradiction should stop you cold. Instead, it gets waved away.
Look at how power is actually maintained.

Non citizens are counted in the census. Census numbers determine representation. Representation determines power. Remove verification, expand the count, and you increase influence without ever needing a crown.That is how modern systems entrench themselves.

Then look at speech.

There is written evidence of government officials pressuring platforms like Facebook to suppress information. Not just misinformation. Information that later proved to be accurate. Scientists were sidelined. Doctors were ignored. Even humor and satire were targeted.

Humor.

When people in power are deciding which jokes are allowed, you are not dealing with a healthy system.
That control did not come through loud decrees. It came through quiet coordination with corporations that act as extensions of political authority.
That is far more effective than any throne.

And it does not stop at speech.

Across the country, institutions are redefining the relationship between parents and children, sometimes making life altering decisions without transparency or consent. The state is stepping into spaces that used to belong to families.

History has seen that pattern before.

Then there is the selective 

During lockdowns, small businesses were shut down. Churches were closed. Families were kept from their lovenforcement of rules.ed ones in their final moments.

At the same time, large scale unrest that caused billions in damage and cost lives was treated as justified or even necessary.

One standard for one group. A completely different standard for another.
That is not equal application of law. That is power deciding what counts.
And when it comes to political violence, the conversation is selective.
When Charlie Kirk spent years walking onto campuses trying to engage in debate, he represented something fundamental about open discourse. The ability to show up, speak, and be challenged.

But increasingly, one side is met not with argument but with shutdowns, intimidation, and sometimes violence. Data that complicates the dominant narrative gets buried because it is inconvenient.
One side talks. The other side tries to silence.
And you are told which one is dangerous.

Look at who you marched alongside.

Organizations like the Party for Socialism and Liberation were not hiding. They were present, organized, and clear about their goal: revolution, not reform.

That ideology has already been tested in the real world. It does not produce freedom. It produces control.

And yet they had signs ready for you.

Hundreds of groups. Billions in funding. A coordinated message. And money that traces back to figures like Neville Roy Singham, a billionaire operating out of Shanghai with ties to networks aligned with the Chinese Communist Party.\

You thought you were fighting for democracy.

You were participating in something far more organized than you realized.
Even institutions that once stood firmly for civil liberties are raising concerns. The American Civil Liberties Union built its legacy defending speech for people it disagreed with because it understood that once you start carving out exceptions, the entire principle collapses.
Now even that standard is eroding.

Look at the shift over time.

Bill Clinton stood before the country and said illegal immigration was wrong and received a standing ovation. He expanded policing. He talked about limiting government. He operated within a framework that assumed borders, law enforcement, and free speech were foundational.

Today, many of those same positions would get him labeled extreme by his own party.

That is how far the ground has moved.

So when you chant about kings, understand what you are actually defending and what you are actually ignoring.
Historians look for patterns when evaluating systems of power. Suppression of opposition. Disregard for process. Acceptance of political violence. Enforcement of ideology through institutions. Alignment between corporate and state power.

Ask yourself honestly where those patterns are showing up.

Because the answer is not as simple as the slogan you were handed.
You marched against kings.

But what you are actually enabling is a system that does not need a crown to control you.

You think you’re resisting control while helping construct it.

From Woodsterman 

 

NEW: Major Breakthrough Emerges Amid DHS Shutdown Standoff

Published

 3 days ago 

on

 March 24, 2026

Senate Republicans are scrambling to break the five-and-a-half-week partial government shutdown, floating a plan to fund most of the Department of Homeland Security while cutting out some of the most politically charged immigration programs, according to senior GOP sources familiar with the talks.

The framework began to take shape after a White House meeting late Monday and is expected to dominate discussions at Tuesday’s GOP Conference luncheon on Capitol Hill.

Sources told Fox News reporter Chad Pergram that the Senate could begin moving on a proposal to reopen DHS “as early as tonight.”

Under the emerging plan, Republicans would keep funding for ICE investigations targeting cartels, human traffickers and child predators. But they would leave “enforcement and removal” operations unfunded — a move that mirrors past Democratic demands to strip ICE-related provisions from broader funding bills.

That irony isn’t lost on Republicans, who privately acknowledge they are adopting a version of their opponents’ playbook to force a resolution.

“This is the only way out,” one GOP source said of the strategy, describing it as a way to corner Democrats. Republicans argue they are now “calling the Democrats bluff.”

“We’re going to have to move forward and give them what they want,” said one Senate Republican source.

The gamble carries risk. The plan would still need Democratic support to reach the 60-vote threshold required to break a filibuster — and there’s no guarantee Democrats will go along, even though the concept aligns with their past proposals.

The effort also isn’t coordinated with House Republicans, complicating the path forward. Both chambers would need to align on a final deal to reopen DHS.

Meanwhile, anxiety is rising on Capitol Hill over the prolonged shutdown, with lawmakers increasingly worried about national security vulnerabilities and disruptions like long airport lines.

Behind the scenes, Republicans are also trying to sideline a separate fight over the SAVE America Act.

GOP leaders are hoping to secure a commitment from Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, to pause pushing the bill until after the Easter and Passover recess. The legislation currently lacks the votes to pass in the Senate.

Instead, Republicans are eyeing a fallback strategy: folding parts of the SAVE America Act into a budget reconciliation package, which would allow passage with a simple majority and bypass a filibuster.

But that path comes with its own hurdles. Senate rules limit reconciliation to fiscal matters, not broad policy changes.

GOP sources say lawmakers may try to focus on the bill’s financial provisions, such as withholding federal funds from states that don’t require photo ID. Even then, the plan could run into resistance from Senate Parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough, who has the authority to strip out provisions deemed out of bounds under reconciliation rules.

If she rules those elements noncompliant, Republicans could be forced back to the drawing board — prolonging an already messy standoff with no clear end in sight.

Give 'Em Hell Coach!

BREAKING: Sen. Tommy Tuberville just told leftists to SCREW OFF after they got triggered he called Muslims "the enemy inside the gates" Q: "Do you have any regrets?" TUBERVILLE: "NO, I don't have ANY regrets whatsoever! I meant every word I said!" THAT'S how you do it, senator! "The enemy is inside our gates. We got them here. Joe Biden and Barack Obama brought them here by the thousands. It's a disgrace!" "You know, if you preach or teach Sharia law, you need to go home!" "You don't fit in the United States of America. We're a Christian country. If you pray to the Quran, the Quran speaks 'kill all infidels.' And infidels are people that are not Muslims. And that means all Americans and all Christians that are not Muslims. So I have no regrets!" Tuberville represents a red state and he acts like it. This is what every GOP senator should do.

From an article on X (Twitter) by Dinesh D'Souza

We Just Don't Get it: It’s a Deliberate Attempt to Destroy America for Good.

Dinesh D'Souza@DineshDSouza

I was watching Fox News the other day—I’m not a regular, but I happened to be watching—and they were talking about how Mamdani is ruining New York. A predictable story!

But then one of the hosts said something interesting. She said, “Doesn’t he understand that what he’s doing is not good for the city? Doesn’t he understand that it’s going to make people want to leave?”

“Doesn’t he understand?” I call this the “they just don’t get it” approach. It is the standard approach that we Republicans—we on the Right—use with the Left and the Democrats.

I hear it all the time, on social media, on podcasts, on right-wing talk radio. Don’t the Democrats realize that voter ID is essential to election integrity? Doesn’t the Left realize that illegals take away jobs from American citizens?

We heard the same refrain through the Biden years. Doesn’t Joe Biden know—or maybe I should say, Don’t the people running the autopen know that they are letting in criminals and terrorists through their porous border policies?

But I even heard the same rhetoric from conservatives during the Obama years. Obama doesn’t understand that giving Iran pallets of money and a green light on nuclear weapons is dangerous for our security. Obama doesn’t realize that Obamacare will make our health care system more expensive and more bureaucratic. Obama doesn’t seem to get it that he is making race relations worse, not better.

“They just don’t get it.” That’s our underlying framework. Let’s spell it out some more. Our basic assumption is that the Left and the Democrats do bad things, not because they are bad people, or because they are after self-serving and destructive ends. They do bad things because they don’t know better. They are ignorant, and it’s our job to educate them.

Hey, Obama, let me explain to you how there are bad actors in the world and the mullahs are in that group. Hey, Biden gang, we need to educate you about why you shouldn’t use the weaponry of the government to go after your political opponents. Hey, Democrats, let us help you figure out that the SAVE Act—mandatory voter ID—is good for democracy and good for our country.

I want to argue that this is a completely wrong-headed way to think about Democrats and the Left. But before I do, let’s trace the history of this “you just don’t get it” philosophy. It actually goes back to the ancient Greeks.

The ancient Greeks believed—Socrates is a typical example—that vice is folly. Vice is the result of ignorance, and virtue arises out of knowledge. People do wrong things because they don’t know better. If they knew better, they wouldn’t do these things. Our job, and the job of philosophy, is to educate them.

contrast the Socratic approach with the apostle Paul. Paul writes, “The good that I would, I do not. The evil that I would not, that I do.” Paul is saying that even though I know better, I do bad and evil things. For Paul, the problem is not ignorance. The problem is with the will. The will is guided by lust, hatred, ambition. The will refuses to be bound by reason; instead, the will uses reason to achieve its self-serving and wicked ends.

So who describes the Left and the Democrats better, Socrates or Paul? To me the answer is obvious. It’s Paul.

Where, then, do we get this naïve idea that the Left does what it does because of ignorance, because it doesn’t know better? I believe we get it from the naivete of the Reagan years. In the Reagan years, we generally believed that the differences between the parties—the difference between us and them—were differences not of ends but only of means.

In that Reaganite framework, the Right and the Left both want a strong, safe, prosperous America. We all want to go to the same place. We have some disagreements, such as how our prosperity should be shared—how to carve up the pie—but these are disagreements within a shared vision.

Therefore, the two sides are really on the same side. Politically speaking, we are friends and not enemies. If they go in a different direction than us, our job is to show them that they are misguided. Today’s Republicans—today’s Right—have inherited that same framework from the Reagan era. “They just don’t get it, and it’s our job to educate them, to show them where their interests truly lie.

There’s a huge fallacy here, and it can be illustrated with the example of a gang of bank robbers who go around holding up banks. Imagine saying to the robbers, “This is not a good idea. Banks rely on public trust in order to stay in business. If people regularly robbed banks, then banks would go out of business, and people would no longer deposit money in them. So this bank robbery thing is counter-productive, because it ends up destroying the banking system itself.”

Obviously the robbers wouldn’t care. Why? Because they want money for themselves, and they don’t care what the effect is on the banking system. And I think the same logic applies to the Democrats. Obama didn’t care that he was making Iran stronger and America weaker—in fact that was his goal

This was the point of my book “The Roots of Obama’s Rage” and my first film, “2016: Obama’s America.” My theme was that Obama was driven by a Third World anti-colonial vision in which America is the bad guy and the people fighting America are the good guys. Obama wanted to take America down a notch, and he did. He wanted to diminish America’s power in the world, and he did.

All our attempts to educate Obama, to instruct him, to make him see the light, failed miserably, not because we are poor educators, but because Obama knew exactly what he was doing. He understood his objectives much better than we did. He moved purposefully to achieve them. We misunderstood Obama, because we falsely presumed he shared our objectives. We offered him a lot of helpful instruction that he considered to be completely useless.

The other day, through some idle scrolling on social media, I happened upon a meeting of the Oakland City Council. What a menagerie! I saw a bunch of complete dirtballs and losers, people who seemed utterly indifferent to what makes a city run well, in effect running the city. And of course the city is in shambles. It looks like a Third World country which, to some extent it is. San Franciso and New York are headed the same way.

Now imagine saying to these city council people: “Hey guys! You simply don’t know how to run a city. You don’t get it. Let us show you how to attract entrepreneurs. Let us show you how to reduce tax rates and regulation. Let us offer you some practical tips on making the city safer. There are many good ways to improve education and make public services more efficient.” Blah, blah, blah.

You can try this approach, but I predict it will be a total failure. They have no interest in doing any of this. Why would they want to make public services more efficient, when their friends all run programs that are looting public services? Why would they want to streamline the homeless industry, when it provides huge funding to nonprofits that are their political allies and help them win elections?

The Oakland City Council doesn’t care if Oakland becomes a wasteland, as long as they can stay in power and feast on its carcass. And the same can be said about the Democrats who run San Francisco, Chicago, Minneapolis and every other blue city. They are termites who can be counted on to protect termite interests.

Here’s the big picture. A fearful, dependent population is one that relies on the Democratic Party to keep it fearful and dependent. These are the Left’s most reliable voters. The last thing they want is an educated, upwardly-mobile population in Oakland or anyplace else. As soon as

We need to stop with the “They just don’t get it.” It doesn’t work. It doesn’t work because they know exactly what they are doing. They are building their political networks and extending their political power. They wouldn’t have such a grip on our culture and politics if they were as ignorant and incompetent as we imagine them to be. In reality, we are the ones who are ignorant and incompetent. We have not taken the measure of our opponents. We don’t get it.

Politics is a contest of power. The Left understands this better than we do. If we want to stop the Left and the Democrats, we have to outvote them, out-organize them, out-fund them, out-maneuver them, in short, we have to defeat them politically. Let’s stop with the useless tutorials, the endless educational jibber-jabber. The Democrats operate just like termites, just like the bank robbers, and we can’t talk them out of doing what they do.

And that’s the way I see it.people can make do for themselves, they no longer need the Democratic Party to make it happen for them. In a way, the dirtballs on the Oakland City Council understand perfectly well what keeps them in power.

We need to stop with the “They just don’t get it.” It doesn’t work. It doesn’t work because they know exactly what they are doing. They are building their political networks and extending their political power. They wouldn’t have such a grip on our culture and politics if they were as ignorant and incompetent as we imagine them to be. In reality, we are the ones who are ignorant and incompetent. We have not taken the measure of our opponents. We don’t get it.

Politics is a contest of power. The Left understands this better than we do. If we want to stop the Left and the Democrats, we have to outvote them, out-organize them, out-fund them, out-maneuver them, in short, we have to defeat them politically. Let’s stop with the useless tutorials, the endless educational jibber-jabber. The Democrats operate just like termites, just like the bank robbers, and we can’t talk them out of doing what they do.

And that’s the way I see it.

Article...X

 Saw this video on my phone   today and  thought, "everyone   should see this" again and   again!! And...call your   congressman ! 

 !

Jun 30, 2022 #jessewattersprimetime #FoxNews

How the greatest generation handled ELECTION FRAUD! Making & taking a stand!

The Historian's Den

In August 1946, the small town of Athens, Tennessee, was controlled by a corrupt political machine that had ruled for years through intimidation, rigged elections, and a network of deputies who abused their power.

 
When Election Day arrived, these deputies arrested poll watchers, beat citizens, and seized ballot boxes, hauling them into the county jail to count in secret. What the officials didn’t expect was that dozens of World War II veterans, men who had just fought fascism overseas had returned home determined not to let tyranny take root in their own backyard. They had already formed a reform ticket, but when the deputies began arresting voters, the veterans realized the election was being stolen in broad daylight.

Fed up and unwilling to back down, the veterans armed themselves with rifles and surrounded the jail where the ballots were held. A tense standoff followed, with gunfire exchanged through the night as the veterans demanded the ballots be released.

 
By dawn, the corrupt officials surrendered, and the ballot boxes were opened and counted publicly, revealing the veterans’ candidates had won. The event became a rare moment in American history when ordinary citizens, many fresh from the battlefields of Europe and the Pacific, took up arms not against a foreign enemy but to defend the integrity of their own democracy.

#Defiance    Ron Schwartz

Judicial Tyranny vs. the Rule of Law

 The Framers rejected the idea that the courts should be the final arbiters of the law or the Constitution. Judicial review, as we now know it, was not granted in the Constitution. The concept was discussed, and rejected on the floor of debate.

However, it was later asserted by Chief Justice John Marshall in his judicial opinion regarding Marbury v. Madison (1803). Over time, political elites and the legal class accepted that assertion, and the judiciary gradually elevated itself above the other branches.

As a result, we have drifted into the same trap the colonists faced under the British Empire: believing that a black robe confers superior wisdom and that judges exist to define the law rather than apply it.

The Rule of Law is not merely a collection of statutes or the text of the Constitution. As Thomas Jefferson wrote in the Declaration of Independence, it is grounded in “the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God.” The Rule of Law is a moral and legal order that pre-exists government and stands above the will of rulers, judges, or shifting public opinion.

It is a framework rooted in objective moral reality, binding on both the governed and those who govern. It is the law not invented by man but discovered by him. It is a moral order observable in human nature and the natural order of things. It is Divine Law, which is a transcendent moral authority acknowledged by the Founding Fathers as the ultimate source of rights and duties. The Rule of Law is not whatever a legislature enacts or a judge declares. It is the alignment of human law and the pre-existing moral architecture of the universe and of the Cre Himself.ator

canadafreepress.com
Judicial Tyranny vs. the Rule of Law
Ron Schwartz

SCOTUS

“You seem...to consider the judges as the ultimate arbiters of all constitutional questions; a very dangerous doctrine indeed, and one which would place us under the despotism of an oligarchyOur judges are as honest as other men, and not more so...and their power [is] the more dangerous, as they are in office for life and not responsible, as the other functionaries are, to the elective control…The Constitution has erected no such single tribunal, knowing that to whatever hands confided, with corruptions of time and party, its members would become despots.”

Thomas Jefferson (Stated in a letter to William Jarvis, Sept. 28, 1820)
Unfortunately, Jefferson’s warning proved to be all too accurate.
Sixty-plus years ago, the progressive, liberal left in America decided the best way, possibly the only way, to impose their will on the American people was not at the ballot box or through the Legislative Branch of our government; it was through the Supreme Court.
To do so, they would only need five of the nine members.

The inappropriate belief that the Supreme Court had supreme power over all government decisions would allow only five unelected people to impose and enforce their will over 300,000,000 Americans! ...
No entity or group has allowed more evil into America than the Supreme Court.
As Phillip Jauregui points out (The Parable of the Prodigal Court) so clearly in this critical book, only five individuals were needed to remove God and His principles from American schools, our government, and the public square. They trampled on constitutional rights, made the right to murder babies the law of the land, and overruled the will of the people in thirty states, who agreed with God that marriage was between one man and one woman.

On June 26, 2015, five Justices decided they had the right to redefine a 6,000-year-old definition of marriage–a definition clearly given by God, mind you–and redefine this covenant He instituted!

Just let that sink in: five people (two of whom had participated in gay wedding ceremonies, yet refused to recuse themselves), arrogantly granted themselves the “authority” to overrule God…and the American people.
The deception and arrogance of this was mind-numbing.

The late Justice Scalia stated, regarding this:
“I write separately to call attention to this Court’s threat to American democracy...
Today’s decree says that my Ruler, and the Ruler of 320 million Americans coast-to-coast, is a majority of the nine lawyers on the Supreme Court...

“This practice of constitutional revision by an unelected committee of nine, always accompanied [as it is today] by extravagant praise of liberty, robs the People of the most important liberty they asserted in the Declaration of Independence and won in the Revolution of 1776–the freedom to govern themselves…

To allow the policy question of same-sex marriage to be considered and resolved by a select, patrician, highly unrepresentative panel of nine is to violate a principle even more fundamental than no taxation without representation: no social transformation without representation.”
Regarding this usurpation, Justice Alito said:

“Today’s decision usurps the constitutional right of the people to decide whether to keep or alter the traditional understanding of marriage...

“All Americans, whatever they’re thinking on that issue, should worry about what the majority’s claim of power portends.”
It is time to break this un-constitutional and inappropriate belief that the Supreme Court has supreme power over all government decisions.
The inappropriate belief that the Supreme Court has supreme power over all government decisions allows only five unelected people to impose and enforce their will over 300,000,000 Americans!

R*n S******z

Going to get your voter ID......

PresidentialReviews    By Hugh Janus, TDS News

CLEVELAND, OH — In a groundbreaking feat that has left feminists everywhere scratching their heads, local Ohio resident Annie Rection has shattered glass ceilings by becoming the first woman in recorded history to legally acquire a photo ID. “It was a grueling process,” Rection admitted, wiping sweat from her brow. “I had to walk all the way to the DMV, fill out a form, and wait in line for what felt like 15 whole minutes. But hey, I did it—proving once and for all that women aren’t delicate flowers who crumble at the sight of bureaucracy.”

Experts are already sounding the alarm: If the SAVE Act passes, requiring voters to show ID at the polls, Rection could very well be the only woman casting a ballot in the upcoming midterms. “This is a catastrophe for democracy,” warned Democratic strategist and professional pearl-clutcher, Wilma Dikfit. “Women simply can’t be expected to handle something as insurmountable as getting an ID. What next? Asking them to tie their own shoelaces? It’s voter suppression on steroids!”

Critics of the SAVE Act, mostly blue-haired activists and cable news pundits, insist that mandating photo ID is akin to building an invisible force field around polling places that only repels the fairer sex. “Women have jobs, families, and Netflix queues—how on earth are they supposed to squeeze in a trip to get an ID?” lamented one anonymous source, who apparently forgot that millions of women already have driver’s licenses, passports, and even those fancy Costco cards that require a photo.

But Rection, now a national hero (or villain, depending on your Twitter feed), begs to differ. “If I can do it, any woman can,” she said, flexing her newly minted ID like a trophy. “Heck, I even renewed my library card on the same day. Ladies, rise up—against the nonsense that we’re too helpless to function in the real world!”

As the midterms approach, TDS News will continue monitoring this developing story. Will more women defy the odds and obtain IDs? Or will polling places become ghost towns echoing with the faint sobs of disenfranchised damsels? Stay tuned—and remember, folks, satire is the best disinfectant for political absurdity.