Monday, January 21, 2019


Byron York is an American conservative columnist for the Washington Examiner, Fox News contributor, and author who lives in Washington, D.C.

Image may contain: text

Just one more reason why the U.S. is so DEEP in debt....

Judge Jeanine Opening Statement Fox News January 19 2019

"President Trump has been at the White House virtually every day working and waiting, and trying to make a deal bending, compromising and offering solutions. [The Dems] not only disrespect him, they sometimes don’t even show up. They’ve refused his every overture, put a stake in the ground, proving that politics are more important than putting people back to work." 

                  Image may contain: text
I saw this this morning on my wifes face-book page and thought, "you know, I can't remember him ever being ahead either"

          Image may contain: text

Sunday, January 20, 2019

"borrowed" from WOODSTERMAN

Speaker Pelosi claims to have as much power as the President, is swiftly fact-checked back down to Earth

Trump: so here’s the deal…  Jazz Shaw January 19, 2019

I’ll confess that when I wrote about the President’s expected immigration and border wall offer this morning I left open the idea that he might declare a national emergency just to throw everyone a curve ball. That didn’t happen. Instead, he went with Option B which I also mentioned. He’s putting a DACA/TPS offer on the table and seemingly daring Nancy Pelosi and the Democrats to turn it down. (NBC News)

Speech was a fair summary of an offer. Question going forward is if Dems pay because they make no counteroffer. Without media pressure on them maybe not.

As I responded to John, there will be no media pressure. It will simply be “not good enough.” They’ll seek to continue placing the blame on Trump even though he offered a bounty of riches the Dems desired. Pelosi won’t cave on any money for the wall because she believes that her continued leadership in her party depends on defeating Trump rather than getting anything done.

These Republicans Are Joining Forces with Pelosi to Promote a National Gun Registry   By: Teresa Mull | Jan 14, 2019

Last week, when Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi introduced H.R. 8, her national gun registration scheme, five Republican House Members signed on to her bill.

A handful of Republican lawmakers are joining forces with Nancy Pelosi to advance her universal background check bill, which would, if passed, create a national gun registry.

"Five Republican House members have joined the Democrat push to criminalize private gun sales," reports. "The five are Reps. Peter King (R-NY), Brian Fitzpatrick (R-PA), Fred Upton (R-Mich.), Chris Smith (R-NJ), and Brian Mast (R-FL)."

    Background checks are nothing more than a firearms registration system, which has historically been a precursor to full-fledged firearms confiscation. Many point to Nazi Germany as one of the best examples of what comes of gun registration. Most people probably do not know that it was not the Nazis nor Hitler who initiated gun registration. It actually was the preexisting Weimar government's initiative put into law because of their fears of the Communists and Nazis. The Weimar government implemented laws that the Nazis would later use to oppress the German people, namely, German Jews. 
Although Hitler rapidly expanded upon what the Weimar government had instituted, this historical event reminds us that well-intentional laws passed by good people can be used by the next round of political operatives to devastating effect. This is why it is so important to stop any hint of universal background checks: such a measure could open the door to a disastrous future..

Immediately after Pelosi, along with Rep. Mike Thompson (D-CA) and former Rep. Gabby Giffords, unveiled their universal background check bill (H.R. 8), the National Association for Gun Rights (NAGR) said in a release the law would:

*** OUTRIGHT BAN all private firearms sales -- 
       requiring every gun purchase to be pre-
       approved by the federal government at YOUR 
*** MAKE IT ILLEGAL to let your friend or even
       family member borrow your firearm on a 
       hunting trip.
*** FORCE all firearm purchases to be registered 
       through the Brady-NICS registration system.

read more

    Image may contain: text that says '"The melting pot used to be people coming here wanting to become Americans. Now it seems like people are coming here trying to erase America -- and many who live in America are actually doing the erasing." - Rush Limbaugh'

Didn't take long, I'm guessing they had it all ready to bring up, more important to them than fixing the SHUTDOWN....!!

Feinstein’s Scattershot Anti-Gun Bill Badly Misses the Mark    By Kelly- Jan 20, 2019

Democrats promised that if they retook control of the House, gun control would be a top priority. They have wasted little time in seeking to restrict the rights of law-abiding citizens to keep and bear arms.

Sens. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif.; Chris Murphy, D-Conn.; and Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., introduced the latest version of the so-called assault weapons ban with 26 other Democrats as co-sponsors.

The firearms banned under Sen. Dianne Feinstein’s bill are not military-grade at all, even if they mimic military appearances.

The bill would prohibit the future sale, transfer, manufacture, and importation of “military-style assault weapons” and “high-capacity” magazines—in other words, it would keep law-abiding Americans from buying many of the most popular firearms used for hunting, shooting sports, and self-defense.

The bill appears to be similar to ineffective legislation passed in 1994, in California and in Canada. If passed, it would have the same ineffective results.

The bill’s text is not yet available to the public, but the senators’ press release indicates that the bill would prohibit, among other things, the purchase or transfer of:
  • 205 firearms by name.
  • Any firearm that has a detachable magazine, plus one or more “military” characteristic, like a pistol grip, barrel shroud, or telescoping stock.
  • Magazines capable of holding more than 10 rounds.
  • Bump stocks.
  • Pistols that weigh more than 50 ounces (per the 1994 ban).
  • Pistol-stabilizing braces.

Charlie Kirk: Trump has Pelosi, Schumer on the defensive. He must keep up the fight for the border wall     By Charlie Kirk | Fox News

Conway: Trump sees the issues at the border as a humanitarian crisis

night President Donald Trump made his first national prime-time address from the Oval Office. It was a direct message to the American people about the urgent need for $5.7 billion in funding for a barrier on our southern border. He had to face the nation because Democrats have refused to provide the funding, and thereby have partially shut down the government.

The confrontation has spawned a full-frontal assault of propaganda from the mainstream media, and a continuous flow of lies and disingenuous claims from Democratic politicians.

As has been the case since his election, it seems as though our president is all alone out there fighting this fight. But he must not forget that this wall was the original and driving force behind his supporters’ loyalty to him in the first place. And he must keep fighting for it.

There are a couple of different ways to look at this epic clash. The first is through a political lens; the second is through the lens of leadership.

Regarding the political, President Trump has the Democrats in a position they are not accustomed to – the defensive.

Tuesday night’s Democratic response to the president, delivered by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, was a classic example of Democrats trying to explain how they are for border security, but simultaneously against securing the border. It also showed how anxious they are to spend our taxpayer money on all their favorite programs, but unwilling to spend $5 billion on border security.

Consider these select tidbits from Speaker Pelosi’s remarks:

“The president has chosen fear. We want to start with the facts. The fact is, on the very first day of this Congress, House Democrats passed Senate Republican legislation to reopen government and fund smart, effective border security solutions … The fact is, President Trump has chosen to hold hostage critical services for the health, safety and well-being of the American people and withhold the paychecks of 800,000 innocent workers across the nation — many of them veterans … The fact is, we all agree that we need to secure our borders, while honoring our values.”

Interesting to note Speaker Pelosi’s concern for “facts” when just last week she interrupted Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen during a report to Congress by saying “I reject your facts.”

Saturday, January 19, 2019

Let’s get this straight. Our President didn’t cancel The Democrats trip. He stopped them from using taxpayer money during the shutdown!
That’s what business LEADERS DO!

Image may contain: 1 person, suit

Purposely no names....This was copied from a facebook post..Do you believe it ?? .....I DO...!!!

Shared on Facebook by a teacher in California who sees firsthand the destruction of America.
"Nine hundred teachers just got laid off from the Los Angeles Unified School District. They are $650,000 over their annual budget. The following comments by an English teacher help to explain one area that looms large over California's educational crisis. I hope each person receiving this mail will read it carefully, all the way to the end.
It is sad what is happening to our great country, all because our politicians are afraid they will miss out on a vote. What a travesty!
This English teacher has phrased it the best I've seen yet and it should make everyone think, be you Democrat, Republican or Independent.
From a California school teacher....
As you listen to the news about the student protests over illegal immigration, there are some things that you should be aware of: I am in charge of the English-as-a-second-language department at a large southern California high school which is designated a Title-1 school, meaning that its students average in the lower socio-economic and income levels.
Most of the schools you are hearing about are Compton, South Gate High, Bell Gardens, Huntington Park, etc., where their students are protesting – these are also Title-1 schools.
Title-1 schools are on the free-breakfast and free-lunch program. When I say free breakfast, I'm not talking about a glass of milk and a roll. But a full breakfast and cereal bar with fruits and juices that would make the Marriott proud.
The waste of this food is monumental, with trays and trays of it being dumped in the trash uneaten. (Our tax dollars at work!)
I estimate that well over 50% of these students are obese or at least moderately overweight. About 75% or more have cell phones.
The school also provides day care centers for the unwed teenage pregnant girls (some as young as 13) so they can attend class without the inconvenience of having to arrange for babysitters or having family watch their kids (More of our tax dollars at work!)
I was ordered to spend $700,000 on my department, or risk losing funding for the upcoming year even though there was little need for anything.
My budget was already substantial, but I ended up buying new computers for the Computer Learning Center, half of which, one month later, were carved with graffiti by the appreciative students who obviously feel humbled and grateful to have a free education in America. (More and more of our tax dollars at work!)
I have had to intervene several times for young substitute teachers whose classes consist of many illegal immigrant students here in the country less than 3 months, who raised so much hell with the female teachers, calling them putas (whores) and throwing things,
that the teachers were in tears.
Free medical care, free education, free food, free day care, etc., etc., etc. Is it any wonder they feel entitled not only to be in this country, but also to demand rights, privileges and entitlements?
To those who want to point out how much these illegal immigrants contribute to our society, because they happen to like their gardener and/or housekeeper, and they like to pay less for tomatoes, I say:
Spend some time in the real world of illegal immigration and see the true costs. Higher insurance, medical facilities closing, higher medical costs, more crime, lower standards of education in our schools, overcrowding, new diseases, etc., etc., etc. For me, I'll pay more for tomatoes.
Americans, we need to wake up. The guest worker program will be a disaster because we won't have the guts to enforce it. Does anyone in their right mind really think they will voluntarily leave and return?
It does, however, have everything to do with culture: A third-world culture that does not value education, that accepts children getting pregnant and dropping out of school by age 15, and that refuses to assimilate, plus an American culture that has become so weak and worried about "political correctness", that we don't have the will to do what is needed.
If this makes your blood boil, as it did mine, forward this to everyone you know including your Congressman and Senators.
Cheap labor? Isn't that what the whole immigration issue is about? Business doesn't want to pay a decent wage. Consumers don't want expensive produce. Government will tell you "Americans don't want the jobs".
But the bottom line is cheap labor. The phrase "cheap labor" is a myth, a farce, and a lie. There is no such thing as "cheap labor".
Take, for example, an illegal alien with a wife and five children. He takes a job for $5.00 or $6.00/hour. At that wage, with six dependents, he pays no income tax, yet at the end of the year, if he files an income tax return, he gets an "earned income credit"
of up to $3,200 free.
1- He qualifies for Section-8 housing and subsidized rent;
2- He qualifies for food stamps;
3- He qualifies for free (no deductible, no co-pay) health care;
4- His children get free breakfasts and lunches at school;
5- He requires bilingual teachers and books;
6- He qualifies for relief from high energy bills;
7- If they are, or become aged, blind or disabled, they qualify for SSI;
8- Once qualified for SSI they can qualify for Medicare (All of this at taxpayer's {our} expense);
9- He doesn't worry about car insurance, life insurance, or homeowner’s insurance;
10- Taxpayers provide Spanish language signs, bulletins and printed material;
11- He and his family receive the equivalent of $20.00 to $30.00/hour in benefits;
12- Working Americans are lucky to have $5.00 or $6.00/hour left after paying their bills and his;
13- The American taxpayers also pays for increased crime, graffiti and trash clean-up.
14- Free Child Care (i.e., free babysitting from 6 AM – 6 PM
15- Free ‘mommy makeovers’ after having their children ( includes: tummy tuck and breast lift)
Cheap labor? Yeah right! Wake up people!
These are the questions we should be addressing to the Presidential candidates for either party. We must take action or we will all go down the drain because a few don't care.
And if you think this is bad, just wait until a Democrat becomes President and the redistribution of wealth becomes the norm in this ex-Democracy. The estimated annual cost now, for state, local and federal, is nearly $400 billion dollars a year.

SO....We pay for Pelosi and freinds European vacation and also feed them and pay for them to get DRUNK ??

h/t M**y E***n M*W******s. This is what the PRINCESS is all wonder she doesn't care about those who are laid off
Robert Paul Doran...........
“Judicial Watch announced today that it obtained documents through the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit against the Air Force detailing $134,587.81 plus $50,000 for an advance of funds for an “escort officer” for a total of $184.587.81 for then-House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi’s (D-CA) Congressional delegation (CODEL) to Italy and Ukraine in 2015.
The documents show that from July 30 to August 6, Pelosi took a trip to Milan, Rome and Naples, Italy, and Kiev, Ukraine, for herself, her husband, several members of congress and their spouses. The Italy trip included Milan, Rome and Naples with visits to the Vatican Museum, Sistine Chapel, Duomo and viewing Da Vinci’s “Last Supper.”
The documents also show the Air Force’s negative response to a Pelosi staff request for a specific crew for Pelosi’s flight. An official notes that it: “would be a disastrous precedent to set even if it were possible.” The Air Force further points out: “Our ARC crews have plenty to balance already with military duties and their civilian employers.”
Judicial Watch previously uncovered that Pelosi’s military travel cost the United States Air Force $2,100,744.59 over one two-year period — $101,429.14 of which was for in-flight expenses, including food and alcohol. Judicial Watch’s work exposing Pelosi’s travel abuses resulted in her successor John Boehner declining to use Air Force luxury jets to travel to his Ohio congressional district.
Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton: “Speaker Nancy Pelosi has a demonstrated record of abusing the perks of office that give her access to military luxury travel paid for by taxpayers.”

FINALLY...Someone willing to report some of thhe FALSEHOODS spewing from the DEMORATS mouths. Not enough But at least a start....!!!

Examining Shutdown Claims from Democrats   D'Angelo Gore 

The weekslong partial government shutdown has led to around 800,000 federal employees not working or working without pay. It also has led to some false or questionable claims from Democrats about the shutdown’s impact on a host of federal services.
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi raised “security concerns” due to the shutdown as a reason to suggest postponing the State of the Union address. But 83 percent of Secret Service employees are exempt from the shutdown.

Some Democrats, including Sen. Jeff Merkley, have falsely claimed that the government shutdown affects Social Security and Medicare recipients and workers.

Friday, January 18, 2019

         Image may contain: 1 person, text that says 'A Lesson in History! NEWWORLDR.ADICA On December 17, 1903 the Wright Brothers Flew 852 feet. That's 852 feet farther than Nancy Pelosi flew on January 17, 2019'


Media Reality Check
Occasional compilations and studies, from the Media Research Center's News Analysis Division, documenting distorted coverage and/or media omissions. Archive on has the full text posts of Media Reality Checks from 2015 and earlier.

STUDY Networks Trashed Trump 

With  90% Negative Spin in 2018, 

But Did It Matter?

At the midpoint of Donald Trump’s first term, the 
establishment media’s obvious hostility shows no signs of
 relenting: 90% negative, vs. just 10% positive, matching
 the historically bad press we documented in 2017. But 
polls show this negative coverage has had no discernible
 impact on the public’s attitudes toward the President. 
Instead, the media's partisan approach has earned them 
high marks from Democrats, while alienating most 

Once valid, the Democratic Party has become a cartoon version of its former self    By Kelly - Jan 10, 2019
There was a time long, long ago in which the national Democratic Party actually stood for something. Real ideas. Not necessarily good ideas, but substantive ideas nonetheless. The Party was led by men and women who actually articulated substantive programs. John Kennedy formulated meaningful tax policies, and launched America’s conquest of the Moon. His successor, Lyndon Johnson, proposed and pushed through the Congress massive and far-reaching federal support programs that still are costing us today. During the 1970s and into the 80s there were Democratic Members of the Congress who articulated well-considered social policies for welfare recipients and working families; New York Sen. Daniel Patrick Moynihan comes to mind.

But no more. Today in the Democratic caucus, a substantive idea would land with an echoing thud on the floor and be quickly swept away; barely noticed amid the vitriol that consumes the nation’s senior national political party.

While Democrats nowadays prefer the moniker “Progressive” to “Liberal” as a descriptor for their Party and its members, there is nothing remotely progressive about this once proud political movement. Today’s Democratic Party has become not only a hollowed-out shell of its former incarnation, but as revealed in just the past four months, now is a cartoon version of what it used to be.

In what previous era in the real world, for example, would a Senator sitting on that body’s Judiciary Committee, label himself “Spartacus” after a movie character, when posing a question to a nominee to the Supreme Court of the United States? New Jersey Sen. Cory Booker did precisely that; with a straight face, nonetheless. In this Democratic Bizarro World, that very same Cory Booker is considered a serious contender for his Party’s 2020 nomination for President

Whereas in decades past when the Democratic Party controlled the levers of power in the House or the Senate, leaders like Tip O’Neill would demand at least some level of decorum and decency from its membership. Today, neither Speaker Nancy Pelosi nor Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer dares to – or cares to – step in and insist on even a nominal degree of professionalism. In such an environment, it is then hardly surprising that another freshman Congresswoman proudly uses the foulest of language in public to describe the President of the United States and receives nary the slightest rebuke from Speaker Pelosi.