Hillary: Trump’s Inauguration Speech was A Cry From The White Nationalist Gut  September 11, 2017

Hillary Cries Racism on Trump’s Inauguration Speech

(Mobile Conservative) –In an interview, Clinton told CBS Sunday Morning, “And so there I was, on the platform, you know, feeling like an out-of-body experience. And then his speech, which was a cry from the white nationalist gut.”

We all know Hillary is a sore loser; but this takes the cake. Were we witnessing the same speech, or is this an episode of the twilight zone? For those who don’t remember, We urge you to rewatch Trump’s inaugural speech. Clinton is outright lying in an attempt to pander to all the bigoteers of the left.

Daily Caller:

“She also added, “He was quite successful in referencing a nostalgia that would give hope, comfort, settle grievances for millions of people who were upset about gains that were made by others.”
Host Jane Pauley responded, “What you’re saying is millions of white people?” to which Clinton confirmed, “millions of white people, yeah. Millions of white people.”
Clinton also said that in the days following her election loss, “I really struggled. I couldn’t feel, I couldn’t think. I was just gob-smacked, wiped out.”
Hillary has been making headlines once again as her new book, “What Happened,” is set to be released this week. Already, excerpts from the book have surface online.
In one excerpt, Clinton reignites an old feud with Bernie Sanders, accusing him of “causing lasting damage” by criticizing her and accusing his supporters of being “Bernie Bros” who “harassed” Clinton supporters online.”

An old article but pertinent today.....

A Simple Question  Thomas Sowell Posted: Mar 24, 2015 

      

It is amazing how a simple question can cause a complex lie to collapse like a house of cards. The simple question was asked by Bill O'Reilly of the Fox News Channel, and it was addressed to two Democrats. He asked what has Hillary Clinton ever accomplished.

The two Democrats immediately sidestepped the question and started reciting their talking points in favor of Hillary. But O'Reilly kept coming back to the fact that nothing they were talking about was an accomplishment.
For someone who has spent her entire adult life in politics, including being a Senator and then a Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton has nothing to show for all those years -- no significant legislation of hers that she got passed in the Senate, and only an unbroken series of international setbacks for the United States during her time as Secretary of State.

Long article... so I took some from the beginning and some from the end, read more to fill in the rest

The Real Sickness At The Heart Of American Culture  John Hawkins Posted: Sep 16, 2014

People don't like to talk about America's culture for the same reason that a man who just had a heart attack doesn't want to discuss the double bacon cheeseburger he's eating. He knows what he's doing is killing him, but it's easier not to deal with it. We’re in the same boat.
* We treat success as an accident or a cheat while defending people who make bad decisions, who won't educate themselves or who won't work.
* We've allowed pornography to become so accessible that it's practically universally viewed, even among teenagers.
* We love victims so much that people actually fake hate crimes to claim victim status.
* We celebrate losers and deviants by giving them their own reality shows. Meanwhile, Hollywood regularly portrays businessmen, Christians and soldiers as the worst people on earth.
* More children have died because of Roe v. Wade than were killed during the Holocaust.
* Marriage is falling apart and we’re encouraging that by pushing gay marriage.
* Our universities reward Communists, terrorists and blatant anti-American sentiment with professorships. Those are the last people who should be teaching impressionable young Americans.
* There's a whole grievance industry full of people who make a living claiming to be "offended" by things.
* Religion and morality are denigrated while nihilism and immorality are considered cool.
* Legalism has superseded morality and what's "right" and "wrong" has become secondary to what's "legal" and "illegal."
* We're the greatest, most powerful, most prosperous and most virtuous nation that has ever existed and despite all of that, we obsess over our nations faults instead of our achievements.
* Americans across the spectrum are being encouraged to separate themselves off from the larger culture and nurse grievances that barely would have been given a thought a few decades ago. 
If you're looking for signs that this country is in deep trouble, there are red flags galore waving in your face.

But this isn't just an economic problem, a spending problem or a leadership problem -- although those are all concerns. It's a cultural problem with our morals and what we value as a society on the most fundamental levels.
* In practice, our society focuses almost exclusively on the short term without thinking about the long-term consequences of our actions.
* We have a higher moral standard for the NFL than we do for our own leaders in Washington.
* We have a political party dedicated to the idea taking things from people who've worked for it and giving it to people who haven't.
* We make little effort to assimilate immigrants into our society and instead, encourage them to embrace the culture they fled for the United States.
* We've stopped acting as if we have to pay back the money we borrow.
* We treat the rule of law as optional, depending on who's impacted by it.
* We believe our children can grow up in a moral sewer and still turn out to be fine, upstanding citizens regardless.

READ MORE

The Fraud Goes On  Thomas Sowell Posted: Jun 28, 2016

Last week the Supreme Court of the United States voted that President Obama exceeded his authority when he granted exemptions from the immigration laws passed by Congress.
But the Supreme Court also exceeded its own authority by granting the University of Texas an exemption from the Constitution's requirement of "equal protection of the laws," by voting that racial preferences for student admissions were legal.
Supreme Court decisions in affirmative action cases are the longest running fraud since the 1896 decision upholding racial segregation laws in the Jim Crow South, on grounds that "separate but equal" facilities were consistent with the Constitution. Everybody knew that those facilities were separate but by no means equal. Nevertheless, this charade lasted until 1954.
The Supreme Court's affirmative action cases have now lasted since 1974 when, in the case of "DeFunis v. Odegaard," the Court voted 5 to 4 that this particular case was moot, which spared the justices from having to vote on its merits.
While the 1896 "separate but equal" decision lasted 58 years, the Supreme Court's affirmative action cases have now had 42 years of evasion, sophistry and fraud, with no end in sight.

Seeming to ban racial preferences, while letting them continue under another name, was clever politically. But the last thing we need in Washington are nine more politicians, wearing judicial robes.

READ ON

No Amnesty Is a Good Amnesty  Ann Coulter Posted: Sep 13, 2017

Donald Trump is being told that amnesty for "Dreamers," or DACA recipients, will only apply to a small, narrowly defined group of totally innocent, eminently deserving illegal immigrants, who were brought to this country "through no fault of their own" as "children." (Children who are up to 36 years old.)
Every syllable of that claim is a lie, and I can prove it.
To see how DACA will actually work, let's look at another extremely limited amnesty that was passed in 1986.
Farmers wanted temporary guest-worker permits for their cheap labor, so that they could continue pretending that the Industrial Revolution never happened and refuse to mechanize. (And, boy, did that work! We haven't heard a peep about "crops rotting in the fields" since then.)
The agricultural amnesty was supposed to apply to -- at most -- 350,000 illegal aliens. It would be available only to illegals who were currently in the country doing the back-breaking farm work that no American would do. Without them, crops would wither on the vine. They were saving us from starvation!
Talk about deserving. Are any Dreamers saving us from starvation?

READ MORE

President Trump took to Twitter late Wednesday to slam Hillary Clinton's CNN interview on why she lost the November election, saying that "the 'deplorables' came back to haunt Hillary."
The president tweeted: "Crooked Hillary Clinton blames everybody (and every thing) but herself for her election loss. She lost the debates and lost her direction!" and "The 'deplorables' came back to haunt Hillary. They expressed their feelings loud and clear. She spent big money but, in the end, had no game!"
In a lengthy interview with Anderson Cooper, Clinton blamed her election loss on Russian meddling and former FBI Director James Comey's reopening of the agency's probe into her private email server late in the campaign — among other factors.

While we get mad at athletes .. THIS

IS OUR GOVERNMENT! SHARE

this and SHAME these traitors

Watch What Happened When Diamond and Silk Visited The View

The Viewers View

Published on Sep 8, 2017

Diamond and Silk have been anxious to get Whoopi Goldberg and the ladies from The View straighten out because they've gotten a lot of stuff twisted.

AND BY THE WAY, THESE KIDS BEING DEPORTED AREN'T 6-10 YEAR OLDS, MOST ARE NOW 20-30 YEARS OLD. WHY HAVEN'T THEY APPLIED FOR CITIZENSHIP ???

CLOSE TO HOME .....When is enough, enough ? Everything is offensive to someone. These people who want the mascot changed, would be better off channeling their efforts to something really constructive, instead of trying to change what has been in place for 70 years......

Petition calls on Council Rock school board to change Council Rock North mascot   By Chris English, staff writer 

About Council Rock North and its mascot

The Indian has been the mascot at a Council Rock high school since the district was formed in 1946, according to the district website.The school district itself is named for a large rock at the site of Bucks County Community College's campus in Newtown Township where Lenape Indians used to hold councils, or meetings.The district's first high school was located in the Richboro section of Northampton, then at the present site of Newtown Middle School in Newtown Township before it moved to its current location on Swamp Road in the same township.Council Rock High School became Council Rock High School North when Council Rock South opened in Northampton in 2001. The mascot of South's sports teams is the Golden
Hawks

...................................................................................................
PETITION TO REMOVE

Keeping the Indian as the mascot for Council Rock High School North in Newtown Township is offensive and perpetuates racial stereotypes, according to an online petition that has drawn close to 700 signatures. 

"And tomahawk chops and war cries by fans and marching bands are racist as well," reads the petition asking for a change. "If we had an animal or object for a mascot, than all students and members of the community would be able to use our mascot's imagery to create school pride."

Not so, counters another petition in favor of keeping the mascot that has drawn more than 3,600 signatures.

READ MORE

Reading wife's  facebook  page, came across this gem.......really funny ! But TRUE !!!

No matter which side you are on in the matter of renaming the Washington Redskins, this is funny. Here is an e-mail sent to Clarence Page of the Chicago Tribune after an article he published concerning a name change for the Washington Redskins.

Dear Mr. Page: 

I agree with our Native American population. I am highly insulted by the racially charged name of the Washington Redskins. One might argue that to name a professional football team after Native Americans would exalt them as fine warriors, but nay, nay. We must be careful not to offend, and in the spirit of political correctness and courtesy, we must move forward.

Let's ditch the Kansas City Chiefs, the Atlanta Braves and the Cleveland Indians. If your shorts are in a wad because of the reference the name Redskins makes to skin color, then we need to get rid of the Cleveland Browns.

The Carolina Panthers obviously were named to keep the memory of militant Blacks from the 60's alive. Gone. It's offensive to us white folk.

The New York Yankees offend the Southern population. Do you see a team named for the Confederacy? No! There is no room for any reference to that tragic war that cost this country so many young men's lives.

I am also offended by the blatant references to the Catholic religion among our sports team names. Totally inappropriate to have the New Orleans Saints, the Los Angeles Angels or the San Diego Padres.

Then there are the team names that glorify criminals who raped and pillaged. We are talking about the horrible Oakland Raiders, the Minnesota Vikings, the Tampa Bay Buccaneers and the Pittsburgh Pirates!

Now, let us address those teams that clearly send the wrong message to our children. The San Diego Chargers promote irresponsible fighting or even spending habits. Wrong message to our children.

The New York Giants and the San Francisco Giants promote obesity, a growing childhood epidemic. Wrong message to our children.

The Cincinnati Reds promote downers/barbiturates. Wrong message to our children.

The Milwaukee Brewers. Well that goes without saying. Wrong message to our children.

So, there you go. We need to support any legislation that comes out to rectify this travesty, because the government will likely become involved with this issue, as they should. Just the kind of thing the do-nothing Congress loves.

As a diehard Oregon State fan, my wife and I, with all of this in mind, suggest it might also make some sense to change the name of the Oregon State women's athletic teams to something other than "the Beavers "(especially when they play Southern California. Do we really want the Trojans sticking it to the Beavers?

I always love your articles and I generally agree with them. As for the Redskins name I would suggest they change the name to the "Foreskins" to better represent their community, paying tribute to the pecker heads in Washington DC.

POLITICIZE THE MISS AMERICA PAGEANT.....Ask questions detrimental to Trump

Miss America Contestants Were Asked Politically-Charged Questions Last Night   Christine Rousselle Posted: Sep 11, 2017

On Sunday night, Miss North Dakota Cara Mund became the first-ever Miss North Dakota to be crowned Miss America. Mund, a 23-year-old from Bismarck, North Dakota, is a graduate of Brown University and recently interned for Sen. John Hoeven (R-ND). Mund is the first Ivy League graduate to win Miss America since 1954, and plans on attending Notre Dame Law School after her reign.
While Mund's win is fairly uncontroversial, what raised some eyebrows last night were the amount of politics-related questions that were asked to the beauty queens prior to the crowning. Of the questions asked to the top five, four of them were explicitly political. 
First up, Miss Missouri was asked if she thought that President Donald Trump had colluded with Russia during the presidential campaign. She said that she would have to say that he was innocent of collusion, as there is not currently enough evidence that he is guilty. She also believed that the investigation into the collusion should continue.

READ MORE

National Reciprocity Reportedly Going Nowhere Due To Paul Ryan    September 11, 2017 by Tom Knighton

Share on Twitter 

Republicans are supposed to be pro-gun. Not only is that how Democrats paint them, but it’s how Republican lawmakers paint themselves. After all, the Second Amendment is a sacred right and must be defended.

Following the shooting of Rep. Steve Scalise at the hands of a deranged liberal terrorist, Rep. Thomas Massie introduced a bill for national reciprocity. This bill would make it so concealed carry license would be treated like marriage licenses or drivers licenses; a permit in one state would be recognized in every other state.
The bill, however, has stalled, and Massie points the finger for this squarely at Speaker of the House Paul Ryan.

READ ON

SOCIAL SECURITY

The Social Security check is now (or soon will be) referred to as a "Federal Benefit Payment?" I'll be part of the one percent to forward this. I am forwardi...ng it because it touches a nerve in me, and I hope it will in you. Please keep passing it on until everyone in our country has read it.

The government is now referring to our Social Security checks as a "Federal Benefit Payment." This isn't a benefit. It is our money paid out of our earned income! Not only did we all contribute to Social Security but our employers did too. It totaled 15% of our income before taxes.
If you averaged $30K per year over your working life, that's close to $180,000 invested in Social Security.
If you calculate the future value of your monthly investment in social security ($375/month, including both you and your employers contributions) at a meager 1% interest rate compounded monthly, after 40 years of working you'd have more than $1.3+ million dollars saved!
This is your personal investment. Upon retirement, if you took out only 3% per year, you'd receive $39,318 per year, or $3,277 per month.
That's almost three times more than today's average Social Security benefit of $1,230 per month, according to the Social Security Administration. (Google it – it’s a fact).
And your retirement fund would last more than 33 years (until you're 98 if you retire at age 65)! I can only imagine how much better most average-income people could live in retirement if our government had just invested our money in low-risk interest-earning accounts.
Instead, the folks in Washington pulled off a bigger "Ponzi scheme" than Bernie Madoff ever did. They took our money and used it elsewhere. They forgot (oh yes, they knew) that it was OUR money they were taking. They didn't have a referendum to ask us if we wanted to lend the money to them. And they didn't pay interest on the debt they assumed. And recently they've told us that the money won't support us for very much longer.
But is it our fault they misused our investments? And now, to add insult to injury, they're calling it a "benefit", as if we never worked to earn every penny of it.
Just because they borrowed the money doesn't mean that our investments were a charity!
Let's take a stand. We have earned our right to Social Security and Medicare. Demand that our legislators bring some sense into our government.
Find a way to keep Social Security and Medicare going for the sake of that 92% of our population who need it.
Then call it what it is: Our Earned Retirement Income.

Is there anything real about the democrats these days?......UPDATED: DREAMER LAUDED BY THE LEFT IS A FRAUD

Judge Jeanine Pirro has Fans

CLICK HERE TO VIEW DOCUMENTS

The illegal immigrant featured in a teary video discussing her plight is a business owner who voted illegally in the last election.

Updated to add: Undocumented journalists from /pol have uncovered evidence that the illegal immigrant Caudillo donated to a PAC called ‘actblue’, which is prohibited activity for foreign citizens, by federal law.

Karen Caudillo hasn’t eaten breakfast since the Trump adminisration announced the end of an Obama-era immigration program that shielded young immigrants like herself from deportation.

“I’ve been fighting for so long to be able to sustain myself, to go to school, to be productive,” she said in an tearful interview at the Capitol on Wednesday. “And it just feels like everything is going to waste because I could go back to Mexico.”
Undocumented journalists at /pol captured screenshot evidence from Caudillo’s own social media that she is the owner of a business, Caudillo Cleaning LLC, and recovered proof that the company incorporated in compliance with Florida law.

Claims that she has never been to Mexico, the country where she holds legal citizenship, are refuted with evidence of GoFundMe campaigns supporting excursions to Mexico.
Trump’s repeal of DACA stands to benefit Mexico enormously. Karen is one of 800 000 highly productive, entrepreneurial citizens who could be returning to Mexico to invigorate both the culture and economy, for the benefit of all citizens of Mexico.

PETA Wants Bacon Banned In America, Republican Senator Fires Back With Epic Response

PETA Wants Bacon Banned In America, Republican Senator Fires Back With Epic Response

MAGA "o-k" Hand Symbol Is Code for White Power, Says MSM Journalist

Liberals Are Saying The "OK" Symbol Is RacistLiberals are convinced that the "okay" hand sign really means "white power..."
They are more desperate than ever.

MEME: Liberal Double Standard On Personal Choice Exposed

By Phoenix Brooks |  

Caution: there is some salty language in the following meme, but it is a great example of the hypocrisy of the Liberal agenda:

The concept of personal freedom and personal responsibility is a foreign thing when it comes to the Progressive agenda of modern times, that is of course, unless it helps to accomplish said agenda. It’s the reason why a literal Socialist has made it so far in the election process, and came to stand so close to achieving the highest office in the land.

On the one hand, the Left is demanding women be given the right to end the life of a baby, firstly arguing that it is just a clump of cells, and secondly, arguing that it is the mother’s right to do so. They never address the rights of the infant inside the womb, nor do they address the emotional impacts that such an act has on the mother.
Their argument, essentially, is, “The baby is inside her body, so it’s hers to do with as she sees fit. If she wants to kill it, so be it because it’s none of your business and why do you hate women?”

On the other hand, Democrats have worked to ban Happy Meals and large sodas to fight obesity.

Their argument in that case, seems to be, “It is not your body to do with as you see fit, and so we will tell you what you cannot put inside of it because we know better than you.”
How can those two extremely polar opposite positions ever come from the same party? –Source