Saturday, June 6, 2015

Have you noticed a trend with Hillary? She is chronically unavailable to answer questions about her record or her emails. As we at TPPCF have been reporting for the past few months, the scandal surrounding Hillary Clinton’s private email server, as well as her unwillingness to answer questions honestly and completely, illustrate just how non-transparent she has been with the American people. She has also resolutely refused to answer questions from Congress about the attack on our embassy in Benghazi, which occurred during her tenure as Secretary of State. She has avoided Congressional hearings, refused to turn over documents, and in general has not cooperated with the investigation.

And now it seems she is taking that same lack of transparency and unwillingness to answer questions to the campaign trail. As Daily Caller reported this week, Hillary Clinton’s campaign sent out a press release announcing “There will be NO opportunities to interview Hillary Clinton…. Her speech will be the interview.” Perhaps that smug attitude accounts for her declining poll numbers? More on her waning popularity can be found here: http://www.politico.com/story/2015/06/hillary-clintons-poll-numbers-signal-trouble-ahead-118567.html
illary Clinton won’t take your questions.   
WHY ARE BLACKS PROFILED ? WHY DO THEY GET ARRESTED, BEAT, TASED OR SHOT ? THIS IS A 19 MINUTE VIDEO BUT COULD HAVE BEEN 2 MINUTES. MOST OF THE VIDEO IS JUST A BUNCH OF BLACKS SCREAMING LIKE BANSHEES.
The actions of these animals after being stopped for going through a red light illustrates just what some police officers have to put up with. IF I WERE THE OFFICER, THE TASER WOULD HAVE BEEN OUT AFTER THE FIRST COUPLE OF MINUTES, AND USED !!
VIDEO: Traffic Stop Takes Insane Turn When Race Baiting Black Woman Loses It With Cops 
  A video was recently posted that gave a shocking look into the lives of police officers struggling to do their jobs in post-Ferguson America. Some are calling it PWW or “Policing While White.” 
  The video mentioned that its events took place Saturday in the resort town of Wildwood, N.J. A police officer had pulled the vehicle over after seeing it run a red light.


  When the officer approached the vehicle he noticed that none of the passengers were wearing seat belts. He then asked for ID … and that’s when the race baiting began.
   As the barrage of insults erupted from the vehicle, the officer tried to deescalate the situation. The individuals began to disobey orders and the officer realized he needed backup. 

  Chaos ensued when the backup arrived and police began to make arrests, causing outrage and insults to be vehemently launched at the officers.
  The current anti-police agenda is preventing officers from effectively doing their jobs, as race-baiting agitators refuse to follow orders — a sure fire way to get a cop to use force. Ferguson, Mo., is feeling this backlash, as well as Baltimore.
  It is becoming increasingly difficult for law enforcement to do what they were put in position to do, enforce the law. One thing is for certain: a lot is going to have to change if police officers are going to continue to protect the safety of American citizens.


Share this story to remind Americans of what their local police officers have to deal with every day and to silence the race-baiters.

Friday, June 5, 2015

NO POSTING TODAY, LONG DAY AT HOSPITAL, KIDNEY STONES BROKEN UP AND REMOVED, STINT INSERTED. ....ONLY GOOD POINT..... THE GREAT NURSES AT TEMPLE HOSPITAL IN PHILADELPHIA PA................... POST OP....PAIN...........

Thursday, June 4, 2015

What Waco Police Still Won't Reveal About the Biker-Gang Shootout
  The Atlantic
Waco Police Sgt. Patrick Swanton addresses the media as law enforcement continues to investigate the motorcycle gang related shooting at the Twin Peaks restaurant, Monday, May 18, 2015, in Waco, Texas, where nine were killed Sunday and over a dozen injured. About 170 gang members charged with engaging in organized crime are each being held on a $1 million bond and authorities say charges of capital murder are expected in the wake of the Central Texas shooting. © Jerry Larson/AP Photo Waco Police Sgt. Patrick Swanton addresses the media as law enforcement continues to investigate the motorcycle gang related shooting at the Twin Peaks restaurant, Monday, May…

As the Texas shootout that killed 9 motorcyclists fades from national headlines, local newspapers and a few larger media organizations have broken a series of small stories that prompted one alert Houston Press journalist to predict,“in the coming years, the Waco authorities' handling of the Twin Peaks biker gang shootout will become a textbook example of how not to handle an emergency situation.”
Two weeks later, Waco authorities still aren’t telling how many of the dead bikers were shot by police officers, how many cops fired their weapons, or how many total rounds they discharged.
Yahoo News filed public records requests to try to learn more, but reported last night that Waco authorities have asked state officials for permission to withhold documents.
Police haven’t released any video of the shoot-out to the public.
But a few news outlets have seen footage from one security camera. The New York Daily News sums it part of it: “Most of the leather-clad patrons ran away from the shooting or ducked under tables to dodge violence, video showed. Some bikers tried to direct other people to safety. One camera angle showed people piling into the men’s bathroom for cover. When there was no more room left, the bikers dashed toward the kitchen.” That doesn’t much sound like everyone present was conspiring to fight.
And Brian Doherty argues that the AP’s coverage of the video it saw raises questions about police behavior. “Despite police reports that the fighting and shooting began inside the restaurant and spilled out, closed-circuit footage of the restaurant seen by AP and reports from the restaurateurs indicate the shooting began outside, which is where the police already were,” he writes. “Police were already surrounding the restaurant in force, ready for action. How and why they began firing on the bikers and what happened before then should not necessarily be trusted merely from their mouths.”

Jenner Gets Gold Medal for Bravery

  • Armour: Applaud Bruce Jenner for bravery in opening up
     www.usatoday.com.
    Bruce Jenner's greatest achievement is no longer his Olympic gold medal. In acknowledging what many have long suspected, that the 1976 decathlon champion ...
    Bruce Jenner Caitlyn Jenner
    Gets a medal for what ? GROWING TITS ?

    STORY    if you want to read it

  • It should be noted that this school has a history of black violence:

     High School Gang Members Allegedly Threatening To Shoot White Children JUNE 2, 2015  V  SAXENA
                                                                                            







      



    We know this courtesy the daughter of Bridget Vannoy, who was told that this is allegedly going to happen.

    “I’ve decided not to let my daughter go to school next week because of this,” Vannoy told reporters. “Don’t know whether it’s a sick prank or whether it’s true whether it’s rumors that kids have made up.”

    This could very well just be a prank. Still, the racial aspect makes it an extraordinarily disturbing prank — one that would be getting covered by every single liberal mainstream media news outlet right now had a black student been told that gang members intended to shoot black kids.

    STORY


    I figured he would rewrite it into something else, different, but the same


     
     
    With Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell’s attempt to sabotage the tepid surveillance “reform” bill known as the USA Freedom Act with toxic amendments going down to defeat, Emperor Obama has won again. On Tuesday night Obama signed the new bill into law over the caterwauling of big government fascists and the whining of sore loser McConnell. The Senate voted 67-32 to approve the bill – Lindsey Graham skipped the vote – and send it to Obama’s desk. Despite all of the hoopla this is not nearly the “sweeping” reform of the United States of Big Brother that the media trumpets it as but it’s a start and represents the first time that spying laws have actually been loosened since 2001.
    According to a Reuters report “Obama signs bill reforming surveillance program”:
    Read More

    Whether it's mooshelle or barak, it's always about them, I've never heard so many "me's" and " I's" ...Besides, I didn't realize she was elected to ANY office."

    Michelle Obama Promises To CONFISCATE ALL FIREARMS Before Leaving The White House  03 June, 2015 Daily Dose reports:
    reagancoalition.com
    Michelle Obama Promises To CONFISCATE ALL FIREARMS Before Leaving The White House

    Well it appears that Michelle Obama is not yet done championing her own agenda. According to recent reports, Michelle recently decided to appear in Chicago to beg for more gun control. Chicago was an interesting choice for the venue, given that they have both the strictest urban gun control laws, as well as the highest homicide rate in the nation.
     
    Also true to the Obama way, Michelle decided to make herself the focal part of the story. When she spoke of Hadiya Pendleton, the teenage girl who performed at the Obama’s Second Inauguration and was shortly after killed by gun-fired, she couldn’t help making the story about her own struggles.

    “Hadiya Pendleton was me and I was her,” Michelle told the audience, “But I got to grow and go to Princeton and Harvard Law School and have a career and a family and the most blessed life I could ever imagine. And Hadiya, well we know that story. Just a week after she performed at my husband’s inauguration, she went to a park with some friends and got shot in the back.”
    WHO SAYS CATS DON'T LIKE WATER ?

        

    Wednesday, June 3, 2015

    Obama’s DOJ To Circumvent Congress With ‘More Than A Dozen’ New Gun Controls 02 June, 2015 Breitbart reports:

    According to The Hill, “the regulations range from new restrictions on high-powered pistols to gun storage requirements” and the issuance of “new rules expanding criteria for people who do not quality for gun ownership.” 
        Part and parcel to this new “criteria” will be an ATF-implemented ban on gun ownership for anyone “convicted of a misdemeanor domestic violence.” Gun Owners of America’s Michael Hammond warns that under this rule the person barred from gun ownership “could be [someone] who spanked his kid, or yelled at his wife, or slapped her husband.” 
       The new regulations will also include ATF enlargements on mental health-based gun ownership bans. Hammond summed this up by saying, “The Obama administration is trying very hard to disqualify people from owning a gun on the basis that they are seeing a psychologist.” And the NRA pointed out that because most mentally ill persons pose no threat to society, the new regulations will actually become “snares [for] masses of mostly harmless individuals.” 

     

    The NRA added: “Not only is this unjust and stigmatizing, it creates disincentives for those who need mental health treatment to seek it, increasing whatever risks are associated with untreated mental illness.” 
       In other words, people who might actually need some minor mental health attention may refuse to pursue it for fear of losing their guns. 
       The ATF is also working on “rules that would require gun dealers to report gun thefts, provide gun storage and safety devices.” 
       In March the NRA warned that then Attorney General nominee Loretta Lynch would be Eric Holder 2.0.” Yet in April, ten Republican Senators sided with Democrats and confirmed Lynch as AG.
    Lynch’s DOJ now has the Second Amendment in its sights.
      
                                     

    Jim Thorpe's Sons Ask Supreme Court to Allow Moving Sport Star's Body From Pennsylvania  By Michael Rubinkam   
     (Published Wednesday, Jun 3, 2015)
     

    The sons, along with the Sac and Fox Nation, asked the Supreme Court to decide that the town of Jim Thorpe, which named itself for the athlete in a deal with his third wife, falls under a 1990 law intended to rectify the historic plundering of American Indian burial grounds. Such a ruling would allow them to pursue repatriation.

    "This case represents a long struggle by Indian people and tribes to have their religious practices, burial customs, culture and beliefs respected," one of their lawyers, Stephen Ward, said Tuesday.

    end subsidies, end obamacare

    Supreme Court will decide whether to end Obamacare subsidies for 6.4 million Americans
     
         © Andrew Harrer/Bloomberg Demonstrator Nell Robinson, a medical student from George Washington University, holds a sign in favor of to U.S. President Barack Obama's health-care law, Obamacare.
       Approximately 6.4 million Americans could lose Obamacare subsidies if the Supreme Court rules against the health law this month.
    The Obama administration released new data Tuesday detailing how many people signed up through the health law's marketplaces this year. The data shows that in total, 10.2 million people had signed up and paid for plans as of March 2015.
       Of those, 7.5 million had purchased coverage through Healthcare.gov, the federally run marketplace. Of thosepeople, 6.4 million are getting a federal subsidy to help cover their Obamacare premium. On average, they are getting $272 each month to help cover their premiums.
       These subsidies are at the heart of the Supreme Court case against Obamacare. In King v. Burwell, the challengers argue that the federal marketplace does not have the authority to distribute financial help. So if that case goes against Obamacare, there are 6.4 million people who will lose these subsidies.
       Without subsidies, private insurance will become unaffordable for millions of Americans. Separate analysis shows that without the subsidies, premiums would jump 256 percent. Healthy people would likely drop their coverage, and only the people who are very sick — and therefore very expensive to insure — would keep their plans.
       This sets up the classic insurance "death spiral." By putting coverage out of financial reach for so many people, it would undermine the entire purpose of the Affordable Care Act.


     

    PHOTO: Conservation staffers found a 13-foot oarfish on a Catalina Island beach, June 1, 2015.
    A walk on the beach turned into a surprising discovery for two conservation staffers in California.
    A “fairly rare” 13-foot oarfish washed up on the shores of Catalina Island on Monday where staffers from the Catalina Island Conservancy stumbled upon it, the organization said.
    Oarfish usually live in the open ocean anywhere from 500 to 3,000 feet deep, which makes seeing them a relatively rare occurrence, Matt McClain, the conservancy's director of marketing and communication, told ABC News today.



    Most of what scientists know about the fish, McClain said, comes from the ones that wash up on beaches around the world.
    “Researchers have found some washed ashore in San Diego and New Zealand, too,” said McClain. “They’re definitely not common to see but also not super-duper rare."
    Monday’s discovery comes just 18 months after Catalina Island had an 18-foot long oarfish wash onto its shores.
    The conservation staffers found the fish near Emerald Bay while out surveying bird breeding.
    The fish was turned over to researchers, who performed a necropsy –- the animal version of an autopsy -- and sent the remains to be further researched at Cal State Fullerton, McClain said. The scientists want to check whether other factors were involved in the fish's death, he added.
    The conservancy said ancient mariners sometimes mistook oarfish for sea serpents because of their “long, slender, silvery bodies.”
    And Samuel Taylor Coleridge, in his 1834 poem "The Rime of the Ancient Mariner," wrote of "water-snakes" whose beauty spurred the Ancient Mariner to pray -- thus causing the albatross to slip from his neck.

    Tuesday, June 2, 2015

    Pa. Paper Prints Letter Calling For Obama’s Execution            01 June, 2015 Downtrend reports:

        The Daily Item of Sunbury  published a letter on Memorial Day, no less, that called for the death of President Obama by “guillotine, firing squad” or “public hanging.”
        The author was listed as “W. Richard Stover” of Lewisburg, Pennsylvania. It’s a diatribe against the President’s leadership, calling him the “lead-from-behind coward-in-chief,” and blames him for the rise of ISIS in the Middle East. He then calls for a violent insurrection:
      

      To the families of those fallen heroes whose blood lies on the sands of Iraq; don’t you think it might be time to rise up against an administration who has adequately demonstrated their gross incompetence?
       I think the appropriate, and politically correct, term is regime change. Forgive me for being blunt, but throughout history this has previously been accompanied by execution by guillotine, firing squad, public hanging.

       I have absolutely no reason to expect that current practice should be any different. The end result is elimination of the problem, the method is superfluous. When society dictates, the end always justifies the means, otherwise the action would not be taken.

      In an editorial three days later, the paper apologized for letting the paper slip into their pages.
      There is no excuse for the letter The Daily Item published on Memorial Day. We did something we shouldn’t have and the readers who called us on it deserve accountability,” they write. “Our readers and critics have reacted in force, as they should have. We accept their judgment and embrace the calls for heightened awareness and a higher standard for civil discourse.
       The Daily Item apologizes for our failure to catch and remove the inappropriate paragraphs in the letter directed at President Obama. We will strive to do better in the future.”

    ‘By Any Means Necessary’

    Baltimore DA Caught on Tape Promising in Church to Get Justice for Black Community ‘By Any Means Necessary’

     
    Lawyers defending the police accused in the Freddie Gray case have asked that their clients’ trials be moved outside of Baltimore so that the accused officers can have at least some chance of a fair trial.
    In a just-filed petition to the court, they also once again asked Baltimore District attorney Marilyn Mosby to recuse herself from the trial citing her extreme anti-cop bias that she has displayed.
    The defense petition comes at the same time a new video has come to light showing Mosby preaching in a black Baltimore church while the investigation into Freddie Gray’s death had not even been concluded.
    First, Mosby tells those gathered that the criminal justice system had “historically and disproportionately” affected communities of color.
    Then, speaking of the riots, she said that the images seen in the news were due to that “frustration.”
    Mosby then promised, “So we will pursue justice by any and all means necessary.”
    According to legal analyst Judge Andrew Napolitano, those remarks alone should raise serious questions if Mosby can fairly try the case against the accused officers no matter where the case is ultimately tried.
    Student seeks court order to don eagle feather at graduation

    Native American Clovis High senior says school won't let him wear feather
    Native American Clovis High senior says school won't let him wear feather
    Congress Gives Takata an Earful on Capitol Hill Over Defective Air Bags
    SAN FRANCISCO (AP) — A Native American student who sued his California school district because it's refusing to let him wear an eagle feather to his high school graduation will ask a judge for an order permitting the sacred item.
    Christian Titman's lawyers are expected to argue in court Tuesday that the student's rights to freedom of expression and religion in the state constitution are being violated.
    Titman, 18, a member of the Pit River Tribe, said he wants to attach the 5-inch feather he received from his father to the tassel on his cap at the Clovis High School ceremony set for Thursday. Clovis is about 10 miles northeast of Fresno.
    He wants. to mark his achievement and honor his Native American heritage, according to the lawsuit filed in state court Monday. The tribe considers eagle feathers sacred and symbolic of a significant accomplishmentSTORY
    Here’s Why You Probably Shouldn't Strap A Jet Engine To A Mini Cooper     Yeah, it wasn't great     yahoo.com

    In life, we’re told to applaud the creative. Even if what they create turns out to be useless, a pat on the back is a prerequisite for thinking outside of the box. Except in the case of the jet-powered Mini Cooper. That’s just plain stupid. 
    At Snetterton raceway in Norfolk, England, on what looks to be a delightfully British summer’s day, the man with the jet strapped to the back of his Mini lines up for his glorious demonstration run. As he approaches the first turn, gaining speed magnificently, he promptly, and rather predictably, slides wide, into — and then through — the steel barriers. 
    “Who thought that was a good idea,” says the bemused British chap watching on. “Didn’t I say there wasn’t enough road?” There is never enough road when your small hatchback boasts a six-foot-long jet engine protruding out of the trunk. It is, then, impossible to give the driver a slap on the back and say, “good on ya for trying.” The more pertinent question would probably be, “what the hell were you thinking?”
     
    AMERICAN - STRONG!'s photo.

    Why Would a Devout Muslim Want to Work at Abercrombie and Fitch? -Breitbart  Jun 2, 2015
    The Supreme Court ruled Monday in favor of Samantha Elauf, a Muslim woman who sued for discrimination after not being hired by Abercrombie & Fitch, because her insistence on wearing the Muslim hijab conflicted with their dress code.
      Justice Antonin Scalia said of the 8-1 ruling, “This is really easy” – but neither he nor the Justices who voted with him showed any indication of realizing what was really at stake in this case.
    She won an award of $20,000 in 2011, but a Court of Appeals overturned that, with the judge explaining: “Ms. Elauf never informed Abercrombie before its hiring decision that she wore her head scarf, or ‘hijab,’ for religious reasons.” The Supremes should have taken the hint. They didn’t.
    Why didn’t she? It wasn’t inconsequential, at least not for her. She spent the ensuing years suing, losing, suing again, appealing until her case reached the highest court in the land. So why didn’t she mention it? What was her agenda? That is perfectly clear now.
    I ask you: what devout Muslim girl would want to work for a firm that peddles erotic, sexy clothes and soft-porn images? Their catalogue is not allowed in many homes. Many parents have rightly judged that it is too racy for their teenage daughters. So what is the pious hijabed one Samantha Elauf doing wanting a job like that?
    STORY

    Monday, June 1, 2015

    Obama nemesis freed from nightly confinement Published: 7 hours ago
                    By   Jerome R. Corsi
    FULL STORY

    Fondling and feeling up....is that what the TSA is about ?

    All this time we've been subjected to searches by an agency that "ain't worth a damn"

    Investigation: Undercover agents snuck fake explosives, banned weapons past TSA Published June 01, 2015  FoxNews.com

    Undercover agents were able to sneak fake explosives and banned weapons through Transportation Security Administration checkpoints, in an investigation that revealed a massive, system-wide security failure at America's airports. 
    The findings were part of a DHS inspector general probe. The report is still classified, but Fox News has confirmed the investigation found security failures at dozens of airports. 
    Homeland Security officials confirmed to Fox News that TSA screeners failed 67 out of 70 tests -- or 96 percent -- carried out by special investigators known as "red teams." 
    In one case, an undercover agent with a fake bomb strapped to his back set off a magnetometer -- but the screener still failed to find it.

    STORY



    THE FIRST AIR FORCE ONE......video 

     INTERESTING MATERIAL & PICTURES.

    RECEIVED AS E-MAIL

    53-46 vote

     Finally...some good news but the numbers still spell trouble if we don't get off our butts and elect the right "Constitutionally Oriented" people; The 2nd Amendment Saved..
     

    HOORAY – a 53-46 vote   
     
    The U.N. Resolution 2117 lists 21 points dealing with firearms control, but perhaps of most interest is point number 11. It: “CALLS FOR MEMBER STATES TO SUPPORT WEAPONS COLLECTION and DISARMAMENT of all UN countries”.

     
    By a 53-46 vote - The U.S. Senate voted against the U.N. resolution. HOORAY.
     This is that brief, glorious moment in history when everyone stands around...reloading.
     Now, Which 46 Senators Voted to Destroy Us? Well, let their names become known ! See below . If you vote in one of the states listed with these 46 “legis..traitors”… vote against them.
     In a 53-46 vote, the Senate narrowly passed a measure that will stop the United States from entering into the United Nations Arms Trade Treaty. The Statement of Purpose from the Senate Bill reads: "To uphold Second Amendment rights and prevent the United States from entering into the United Nations Arms Trade Treaty." The U.N. Small Arms Treaty, which has been championed by the Obama Administration, would have effectively placed a global ban on the import and export of small firearms. The ban would have affected all private gun owners in the U.S. and had language that would have implemented an   international gun registry, now get this, on all private guns and ammo.
    Here are the 46 out of our 100 United States Senators were willing to give away our Constitutional rights to a foreign power.

    Baldwin (D-WI)   
    Baucus (D-MT)
    Bennett (D-CO)   
    Blumenthal (D-CT)
    Boxer (D-CA)   

    Brown (D-OH)
    Cantwell (D-WA)  

    Cardin (D-MD)
    Carper (D-DE)   

    Casey (D-PA)  This guy has been in power too long         
    Coons (D-DE)   
    Cowan (D-MA)
    Durbin (D-IL)  
    Feinstein (D-CA)  Franken (D-MN)   

    Gillibrand (D-NY)  
    Harkin (D-IA)  
    Hirono (D-HI)
    Johnson (D-SD)   

    Kaine (D-VA)
    King (I-ME)  

    Klobuchar (D-MN)
    Landrieu (D-LA)  

    Leahy (D-VT)  
    Levin (D-MI)   
    McCaskill (D-MO)
    Menendez (D-NJ)  

    Merkley (D-OR)
    Mikulski (D-MD)  

    Murphy (D-CT)
    Murray (D-WA)
    Nelson (D-FL)
    Reed (D-RI)  

    Reid (D-NV)      
    Rockefeller (D-WV)   
    Sanders (I-VT)
    Schatz (D-HI)  

    Schumer (D-NY)
    Shaheen (D-NH)  

    Stabenow (D-MI)
    Udall (D-CO)  Udall (D-NM)
    Warner (D-VA)  Warren (D-MA)
    Whitehouse (D-RI)  
    Wyden (D-OR)  

    Folks: This needs to go viral. These Senators voted to let the UN take OUR  guns. They need to lose their next election. We have been betrayed.
     
     46 Senators Voted to Give your 2nd Amendment Constitutional Rights to the U.N.