Sunday, January 12, 2025




KOMMONSENTSJANE – Michael Goodwin: The world has now seen the ‘Trump Effect’ on full display.kommonsentsjane                              


Ariel Kohane, 53, said he showed up to express his outrage. The Upper
West Side resident was wearing a red yarmulke with “Trump” written on the front.

“He’s not a convicted felon in our hearts and minds, even though he technically is on paper,” Kohane told me.

Start spreading the news as the song “New York” goes – The “Big Apple” – New York has been found to be “rotten” to the core. No more the New York we knew.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/opinion/michael-goodwin-the-world-has-now-seen-the-trump-effect-on-full-display/ar-BB1riIJ9?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=20df90b5881b42baaceb039f187e238c&ei=32

A glance across America and Europe leads to an unmistakable conclusion: Revolution is in the air.

The failures of democracies are sparking internal upheavals.

Thankfully, spasms of violence and bloodshed are few, but a toxic brew of overbearing governments, shrinking freedoms and undeniable decline is producing demands for big changes.

A common thread from California to Great Britain, France and Germany is that liberal underpinnings have morphed into sloppy socialism, unchecked immigration, cultural clashes and restraints on critical speech.

Collectively, the conservative blowback reveals that the time allotted for an indulgent detour has expired and a new consensus is taking shape, whether entrenched leftists like it or not.

You can thank Donald Trump and the 77 million Americans who elected him for this development.

Or blame them if you are on the losing side of this remarkable
moment.

Either way, Trump is, with apologies to Reggie Jackson, the straw that stirs the drink. Charting a new path

His landslide election was a clear vindication of his first term, but it is turning out to be far more consequential than he could have imagined.

To the millions of people around the world who are clamoring for a Trump of their own, he personifies the demand for a government that serves its citizens and not the other way around.

When even Los Angeles’ uber-Democrats demand the heads of their mayor and governor for mismanaging water resources during the devastating wildfires, you know the hunger for change has reached new levels.

In the early days after his election, Trump said he got more than 200 congratulatory phone calls from business leaders and politicians from around the world.

Not bad for the candidate whose rabid, dishonest opponents declared him the new Hitler and a threat to democracy.

Judge Juan M. Merchan poses in his chambers in New York, March 14, 2024. AP
A defining image of the time since are the pilgrimages to see him at Mar-a-Lago, with many wealthy wise men and women bearing gifts.

These included promises of enormous investments from Japan and Arabia and bullish statements from US bankers and industrialists.

Italy’s prime minister, Giorgia Meloni, visited and came away impressed by Trump’s commitment to preventing “other global players” from taking over areas of “strategic interest” to America and Europe.

It’s in that spirit that even the leaders of Greenland now say they want to talk to Trump about his effort to make it part of America!

Regarding the extraordinary Trump Effect, Axios put it this way: “It’s rare, if not unprecedented, for a newly elected leader to have so many world leaders and CEOs shift their policies or posture so blatantly during the transition to curry favor with a new president.”

Of course it’s rare, but there’s never been someone like Trump or a moment like this.

And while no doubt many of the visitors aim to curry favor, the larger truth is that they know what Trump wants, and by giving it to him, are doing right for America and freedom everywhere.

Chief among these is the pledge from Mark Zuckerberg to Trump that Meta would immediately end its censorship of speech on all its platforms.

This is a breakthrough that goes beyond borders and confirms the wisdom of Elon Musk’s decision to stop censorship on X.

The move helps to put pressure on governments from Iran to Europe to get out of the way of free speech. Dems’ misinfo wars

Not surprisingly, doddering Joe Biden denounced the idea.

And had he or Kamala Harris won the election, Zuckerberg would have been pressured to tighten existing restrictions and there would have been a US move to copy much of Europe and actually criminalize speech.

That’s because progressives, whatever their nationality, define misinformation as any speech they don’t like.

Meanwhile, the clearest way to see the contrast between what’s dying and what’s being born is through events last Friday in a lower Manhattan courtroom.

There the soon-to-be most powerful man in the world was learning his sentence after being convicted in a shoddy criminal case that amounted to a partisan fever dream.

The case itself should be a crime, its genesis straight out of the playbook of Joseph Stalin’s secret police chief.

“Show me the man and I’ll show you the crime,” Lavrentiy Beria said.

And so it was with the case at hand, the work of Democratic operatives in the White House and the Manhattan District Attorney’s office who concocted a witches’ brew to charge Trump with 34 felonies.

The guilty verdict was engineered by a machine judge who ought to be prosecuted and disbarred.

Because there was no sentence–no restrictions, no fine, no probation — the result underscored how trivial the entire exercise was.

It’s hard to remember now, but the case represented the vanguard of Dems’ demonic plan to protect a decrepit Biden by persecuting Trump.

The goal was to take him off the playing field by locking him up and, if that failed, dirtying him up enough that he would lose.

It failed, though the media is celebrating the ability to call him a convicted felon.

But even that has backfired, with many voters supporting Trump precisely because they agreed he was being treated as a political enemy of the state. Warfare ends in defeat

Which explains why Friday’s exercise took on the aura of a funeral, with the casket holding only the corpse of a corrupt system while the target was preparing to return to the Oval Office.

Turnabout has never been more important or warranted.

No cameras were allowed, but the recorded remarks showed Judge Juan Merchan, who did the corrupt bidding of the Democratic Party and the state’s judiciary, stayed on message.

He called the circumstances surrounding the trial “extraordinary,” but claimed, presumably with a straight face, that the trial itself was “no more special or unique” than any other trial in the same building.

That’s absurd because had the defendant’s name not been Trump, no charges would have been filed and there would have been no trial.

A prosecutor named Joshua Steinglass also attempted to put lipstick on the pig, but inadvertently revealed the strongest argument for Trump’s election.

“This defendant has caused enduring damage to public perception of the criminal justice system,” Steinglass moaned, as if the miscarriage of justice he helped create was not responsible for destroying public confidence.

To his warped view, the decline of credibility stems from a defendant who dares to fight unfair charges, denounce his tormenters — and win the presidency.

Yea, that’s the problem.

Trump could have skipped the theater, but chose to appear by video.

He declared his innocence and summarized the big picture beautifully:

“The people of our country got to see this firsthand, and then they voted and I won . . . all seven swing states . . . and won the popular vote.”

He might have added:

Take that, New York!

******

kommonsentsjane

Friday, January 3, 2025

The Powers To Be Said No Connection

Non Labeled Americans  Ronda Dockstad

bbbbbnnnnn
Nothing to see here......Fort Bragg.
*
1995, Fort Bragg:
Sgt. William J. Kreutzer Jr. ,guilty again of murder and attempted murder in the 1995 shooting spree of 19 Soldiers of the 82nd Airborne Division.
*
Both Shamsud-Din Jabbar (Killer in New Orleans) and Matthew Livelsberger (Bomber in Las Vegas) served at Fort Liberty (Formerly called "Fort Bragg").......
*
What is "Fort Liberty", "Fort Bragg" specialized in, you ask?
The answer is, and I quote,..."Psychological Operations (PO) personnel"
*
The "officials" say these three terrorists had nothing in common.......but they cant explain Fort Bragg.....the common denominator..... "Psychological Operations (PO) personnel".....
*
If you were an enemy of this nation...where would you radicalize people to kill our citizens?

Thursday, January 2, 2025

 What happened to all the drone sightings?? OH, THOSE...The FBI says only 100 out of 5000 sightings know what a drone is. Only 100 sightings are credible.

Mystery drone ban in New Jersey extended as congressman warns 'something's wrong'   Story by Michael Moran 

The enigma of drones swarming New Jersey skies has led to an escalated clampdown on the use of the craft. In recent weeks, throngs of residents have reported sightings of unexplained aerial phenomena across the state.

Authorities have moved swiftly to appease public concern, saying that these incidents present no national security risk. Yet in a move that has stirred suspicions, the Federal Aviation Authority (FAA) has expanded its drone ban. It initially affected 22 local jurisdictions but has since been extended to an additional nine areas.

Although reports of drone sightings seem to be waning lately, fresh clips of such occurrences across Somerset, Ocean, and Bergen counties keep surfacing online, fueling ongoing intrigue. And the precise reasonings behind the new FAA restrictions remain elusive.








When pressed for clarity, the FAA directed inquiries to the Department of Homeland Security, which then redirected them back to the FAA. Commenting on the matter,  an FBI representative said that from around 5,000 logged reports, roughly 100   were considered "credible."

Despite the amplified measures and heightened scrutiny, federal officials maintain that the drones do not threaten national security or public safety.

John Kirby, National Security Council spokesman, said: "We have not identified anything anomalous or any national security or public safety risk over the civilian airspace in New Jersey or other states in the Northeast.

READ ON


Tuesday, December 24, 2024

Morning Glory: President Biden's politburo strikes again
Opinion by Hugh Hewitt• 6h • 8 min read







"He’s an addled, demented old man," Senator Tom Cotton declared about President Joe Biden on my program Monday, Christmas Eve eve.

The senator is right. It is not harsh or cruel to make such a statement, especially because its predicate was the announcement Monday morning that President Biden commuted the death sentences of 37 of 40 killers on death row in federal prison. Biden’s handlers were apparently indifferent to the feelings of the survivors of the murderers who will get the news about the killers of their loved ones during Christmas week, so why should anyone be concerned about the feelings of the president’s family and friends? Bravo Senator Cotton for stating the awful truth clearly and concisely. Joe Biden is addled and infirm. He isn’t making coherent decisions. He’s doing what he’s told to do. He’s being managed. By whom we don’t know.

Monday, December 23, 2024

Despite bombshell report, is it possible the FBI still spying on Republicans to aid Democrats?      by: Pat Droney  2024-12-23 Source: Law Enforcement Today









Former FBI Director Jim Comey by is licensed under NBC

WASHINGTON, DC—There is a reason Democrats and their complicit media have been trying to kneecap Kash Patel, President-elect Trump’s choice to replace DC swamp rat Christopher Wray as head of the FBI, and Pam Bondi, his choice for Attorney General. According to The Federalist, the Department of Justice has been on a years-long mission to undermine those who oversee executive branch agencies. A recently released Justice Department Inspector General report revealed this disturbing news.











According to The Federalist, the result was an evisceration of the separation of powers, undermining civil liberties and violating any modicum of transparency. This has been going on for at least seven years. 

According to the IG report, the beginning of this scheme coincided with the Russiagate scandal. An unauthorized source from within the Justice Department apparently leaked classified information to friendly media, such as CNN, The New York Times, and The Washington Post, concerning Donald Trump and Russia. 

One of the leaks revealed that a FISA warrant had been issued to conduct surveillance on Trump’s foreign policy adviser, Carter Page. Those warrants ended up being renewed four times, the IG found. The leaks painted Page as a Russian asset, which was accomplished by omitting “critical exculpatory information” and relying on the now-debunked Steele dossier, which federal agents never corroborated. Former FBI attorney Kevin Clinesmith was eventually indicted and pleaded guilty to making a false statement in connection with the bogus FISA application. 

All of this was undertaken to frame Trump as a Russian agent and ended up destroying Page’s reputation while violating his Constitutional rights, all part of a “fishing expedition” designed to undermine Trump. And, that was accomplished by haunting the Trump administration for the first two years of his first term. 

The IG said federal investigators then undertook a “mole hunt” for the Russiagate leaker, issuing subpoenas for non-content records of phone numbers and email addresses targeting two members of Congress and 43 staffers, including Republicans and Democrats. This was based on the grounds that they may have been the source of the classified information that made its way to the media. 

In many cases, the IG report said, the justification was mainly “the close proximity in time between that access and the subsequent publication of the news articles.” 

Targeted information included “text message logs, email recipient addresses, and call detail records indicating who initiated communications, with which numbers, dates, times, durations, etc., which “would have provided a map to the professional and personal lives” of those under surveillance, The Federalist wrote. 

Federal investigators also applied for court non-disclosure orders, which prevented communication companies such as Verizon, AT&T, etc., from informing members of Congress and staffers that their records had been subpoenaed. This allowed them to keep those being surveilled “in the dark.” 

The Department of Justice obtained 40 NDOs, 30 of which were renewed at least once, and most were repeatedly renewed for four years. 

Among those targeted was Jason Foster, a top staffer for Sen. Charles Grassley (R-Iowa), who was then the ranking Member of the Senate Judiciary Committee. At that time, the Senate Judiciary Committee was investigating the Trump-Russia investigation. 

Aside from Grassley, then-Rep. Devin Nunes (R-Calif.), chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, was also targeted. One of his top investigators was Kash Patel, who also had his records subpoenaed. Patel helped expose the feds’ abuses regarding the Carter Page warrants via the “Nunes Memo” as well as much of the other corruption undertaken by the Russiagate investigators. Do you wonder why they are so afraid of Kash Patel? Here is your answer. 

At that time, former Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein threatened to subpoena Patel’s communications and those of Patel’s colleagues in January 2018, only weeks before the memo's release, “over their vigorous investigating of the investigators.” 

However, unknown to Patel, those records had already been retrieved under subpoena, with requests dating back to at least Dec. 1, 2016. Neither Foster nor Patel knew their records had been subpoenaed until the Biden administration, when communications companies could finally disclose the secret subpoenas. 

Worse yet, the DOJ’s NDO applications to the courts didn’t advise that those who would be kept uninformed were members of Congress or their staff. According to the IG, the NDOs “relied on general assertions about the need for non-disclosure rather than on case-specific justifications. Department policy at the time did not require including information in applications about whose records are at issue.” DOJ policy permitted (and still does) “prosecutors to make boilerplate statements in NDO applications.” 

It wasn’t until they were caught during the Biden administration that the DOJ issued a “new congressional investigations policy ostensibly requiring greater scrutiny of and higher-level approvals for subpoenas and NDOs, while still not requiring approval from or notification of the attorney general and deputy attorney general.” This past September, after reviewing the IG report, the DOJ finally created rules mandating that prosecutors notify the court when an NDO involves a congressional office or staffer.

One interesting revelation in the IG report is that it is harder to subpoena communications records from media members than legislative branch members, which differs from the Congressional Investigations policy, which has no “exhaustion requirement.” In that case, prosecutors don’t need to exhaust “all other reasonable means of identifying the sources of the unauthorized disclosures” before seeking a subpoena. In the case of the media, however, the feds must request “Attorney General authorization.” 

Yet, despite modifying the Congressional Investigations Policy, the IG report wrote that it’s not clear that the policy covers illegal leaks. The policy is in a chapter of the DOJ’s Justice Manual called “Protection of Government Integrity. " The first provision states that the chapter deals with crimes “including bribery of public officials and accepting a gratuity, election crimes, and other related offenses.” Unauthorized disclosures appear nowhere on the list. 

The IG report found no evidence of “retaliatory or political motivation” for issuing the subpoenas. Yet, it warned that such efforts risk “chilling Congress’s ability to conduct oversight of the executive branch” while, at a minimum, creating “the appearance of inappropriate interference…in legitimate oversight authority.” 

The IG notes that no leaker was ever charged despite the apparent malfeasance in these incidents. 

For these reasons, Kash Patel and Pam Bondi must be confirmed. The swamp knows they will get to the bottom of the corruption in the DOJ and other federal agencies, and the rats will be identified, flushed out, and hopefully prosecuted. 


The Paul Festivus Report: A Great Start for DOGE Dec 23, 2024 THE AMERICAN CONSERVATIVE By Jack Hunt
Paul says in the report, “As always, taking the path to fiscal responsibility is often a lonely journey, but I’ve been fighting government waste like DOGE before DOGE was cool.”
With the knowledge of what’s in this report, and how offensive it is to our sensibilities and our wallets, Rand Paul and the Department of Government Efficiency should take chainsaw to this God-forsaken and untenable federal government, Javier Milei–style: Take no prisoners. Do America a favor  and

The Paul Festivus Report: A Great Start for DOGE


For many years, Senator Rand Paul has published his annual “Festivus Report” on December 23, a fictional, humorous holiday imagined by the popular 1990’s television series Seinfeld on which celebrators share an “airing of grievances.”

For Paul, those grievances are the absolutely asinine things the federal government spends our tax dollars on.


And there are many.

As we inch closer to Donald Trump’s second term, Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy are set to lead a new commission, the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), which vows to radically cut government spending and waste, with Musk even eyeing $2 trillion in cuts.

Paul has said he’s been consulting “weekly” with DOGE using his “Festivus Report” as a place for the agency to start. When Paul, Musk, Ramaswamy and others banded together last week to kill the original, 1,500 page plus, pork-laden spending bill, backed by Republican House Speaker Mike Johnson, Paul called Johnson weak and even suggested that Musk could be a good replacement for him.

How much this fiscally conservative cast of characters might accomplish remains to be seen, but as Paul releases his 2024 edition of his “Festivus Report” today, there is plenty of low-hanging fruit.

READ MORE