WHY....Because some of the students were wearing MAGA hats, which automatically connected them to TRUMP, The story has since taken a different direction but...you may not hear too much of it because it sort of VINDICATES the students

Even Joy Behar made this statement......Joy Behar: We jumped to conclusions about the Covington Catholic kids because we desperately want Trump out of office Hotair

Why Do Conservatives Care So Much About the Covington Catholic Controversy?

Guy Benson  Posted: Jan 22, 2019

Source: AP Photo/Bryan Woolston

As the national firestorm over the Covington Catholic 

'harassment' story rages on, liberal MSNBC host Chris 

Hayes took to Twitter to make an observation. From his

 perspective, he hasn't seen the American center-right 

coalition as united or energized over any story since 

Justice Kavanaugh's confirmation hearings (which House

 Democrats may soon try to re-litigate). The reason, he 

suspects, is that conservatives are furious and alarmed 

by the online mob's ideological bloodlust, which short-

circuits fundamental values and virtues:

READ ON

I CAN'T STAND THIS "ANDREA" WOMAN but this is the only place I saw this headline

Trump Will Deliver State Of The Union Jan 29, Dismissing Pelosi’s Postponement | Andrea Mitchell | MSNBC

The White House is moving forward with plans to deliver the State of the Union at the Capitol on January 29, dismissing Speaker Pelosi’s proposed postponement of the speech.

                       

        

        

              

 

Pelosi’s F-rious As Melania Steps In & Exposes ‘Real Motive’ For Shutdown

Does Pelosi Have an Immigration Solution? By: Bill O'ReillyJanuary 21, 2019

The Democrats not budging on a border barrier and President Trump proposing a DACA deal has led to the question, what specifically has Nancy Pelosi put forth as a solution to border security? In addition to a lack of a solution, Bill refers back to the murder of Kate Steinle and the lack of compassion presented by Ms. Pelosi despite the fact that she was the Congresswoman for the Steinle's California district.

These bible verses sound as though they wrere written explicitly for President Donald Trump

When I read Psalm 56 this morning versus 5-7 it sounded like the people against the president.(Common English Bible)

                    

SO, THE LETTER IS THE EVIDENCE, NOW WHAT WILL BE DONE ???

Byron York is an American conservative columnist for the Washington Examiner, Fox News contributor, and author who lives in Washington, D.C.

Just one more reason why the U.S. is so DEEP in debt....

            

Judge Jeanine Opening Statement Fox News January 19 2019

"President Trump has been at the White House virtually every day working and waiting, and trying to make a deal bending, compromising and offering solutions. [The Dems] not only disrespect him, they sometimes don’t even show up. They’ve refused his every overture, put a stake in the ground, proving that politics are more important than putting people back to work." 

                 

I saw this this morning on my wifes face-book page and thought, "you know, I can't remember him ever being ahead either"

         

"borrowed" from WOODSTERMAN

Speaker Pelosi claims to have as much power as the President, is swiftly fact-checked back down to Earth

January 4, 2019 | Frieda Powers 

Nancy Pelosi may have reclaimed her position as Speaker of the House, but many feel she should go back to school on the U.S. Constitution.

In a historic return, the California Democrat was elected as speaker for the second time in 12 years, putting her in position to be next in line for the presidency should anything happen to President Donald Trump and then Vice President Mike Pence.

But in a New York Times interview published on Thursday, the 78-year old liberal showed how dangerously ignorant she is of the Constitution that she is sworn to uphold.

In the interview, Pelsoi recalled wondering, “Doesn’t anybody listen to a woman in the room?” at a White House dinner when men were speaking over her.

“Hopefully that will become a thing of the past now that we have so many women in Congress — and with the gavel,” she said. “The gavel makes a big difference.”

Pelosi was asked by Sheryl Gay Stolberg in The New York Times interview if she considered herself to be equal to Trump.

“The Constitution does,” she replied, according to piece which called her an “icon of female power.”

READ MORE

Trump: so here’s the deal…  Jazz Shaw January 19, 2019



I’ll confess that when I wrote about the President’s expected immigration and border wall offer this morning I left open the idea that he might declare a national emergency just to throw everyone a curve ball. That didn’t happen. Instead, he went with Option B which I also mentioned. He’s putting a DACA/TPS offer on the table and seemingly daring Nancy Pelosi and the Democrats to turn it down. (NBC News)

John Podhoretz

✔ @jpodhoretz

Speech was a fair summary of an offer. Question going forward is if Dems pay because they make no counteroffer. Without media pressure on them maybe not.

188

4:25 PM - Jan 19, 2019

As I responded to John, there will be no media pressure. It will simply be “not good enough.” They’ll seek to continue placing the blame on Trump even though he offered a bounty of riches the Dems desired. Pelosi won’t cave on any money for the wall because she believes that her continued leadership in her party depends on defeating Trump rather than getting anything done.

READ ON

These Republicans Are Joining Forces with Pelosi to Promote a National Gun Registry   By: Teresa Mull | Jan 14, 2019

Last week, when Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi introduced H.R. 8, her national gun registration scheme, five Republican House Members signed on to her bill.

A handful of Republican lawmakers are joining forces with Nancy Pelosi to advance her universal background check bill, which would, if passed, create a national gun registry.

"Five Republican House members have joined the Democrat push to criminalize private gun sales," Breitbart.com reports. "The five are Reps. Peter King (R-NY), Brian Fitzpatrick (R-PA), Fred Upton (R-Mich.), Chris Smith (R-NJ), and Brian Mast (R-FL)."

    Background checks are nothing more than a firearms registration system, which has historically been a precursor to full-fledged firearms confiscation. Many point to Nazi Germany as one of the best examples of what comes of gun registration. Most people probably do not know that it was not the Nazis nor Hitler who initiated gun registration. It actually was the preexisting Weimar government's initiative put into law because of their fears of the Communists and Nazis. The Weimar government implemented laws that the Nazis would later use to oppress the German people, namely, German Jews. 

Although Hitler rapidly expanded upon what the Weimar government had instituted, this historical event reminds us that well-intentional laws passed by good people can be used by the next round of political operatives to devastating effect. This is why it is so important to stop any hint of universal background checks: such a measure could open the door to a disastrous future..

Immediately after Pelosi, along with Rep. Mike Thompson (D-CA) and former Rep. Gabby Giffords, unveiled their universal background check bill (H.R. 8), the National Association for Gun Rights (NAGR) said in a release the law would:

*** OUTRIGHT BAN all private firearms sales --         requiring every gun purchase to be pre-        approved by the federal government at YOUR         expense. *** MAKE IT ILLEGAL to let your friend or even        family member borrow your firearm on a         hunting trip. *** FORCE all firearm purchases to be registered         through the Brady-NICS registration system.

read more

   

Didn't take long, I'm guessing they had it all ready to bring up, more important to them than fixing the SHUTDOWN....!!

Feinstein’s Scattershot Anti-Gun Bill Badly Misses the Mark    By Kelly- Jan 20, 2019

Democrats promised that if they retook control of the House, gun control would be a top priority. They have wasted little time in seeking to restrict the rights of law-abiding citizens to keep and bear arms.

Sens. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif.; Chris Murphy, D-Conn.; and Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., introduced the latest version of the so-called assault weapons ban with 26 other Democrats as co-sponsors.

The firearms banned under Sen. Dianne Feinstein’s bill are not military-grade at all, even if they mimic military appearances.

The bill would prohibit the future sale, transfer, manufacture, and importation of “military-style assault weapons” and “high-capacity” magazines—in other words, it would keep law-abiding Americans from buying many of the most popular firearms used for hunting, shooting sports, and self-defense.

The bill appears to be similar to ineffective legislation passed in 1994, in California and in Canada. If passed, it would have the same ineffective results.

The bill’s text is not yet available to the public, but the senators’ press release indicates that the bill would prohibit, among other things, the purchase or transfer of:

• 205 firearms by name.
• Any firearm that has a detachable magazine, plus one or more “military” characteristic, like a pistol grip, barrel shroud, or telescoping stock.
• Magazines capable of holding more than 10 rounds.
• Bump stocks.
• Pistols that weigh more than 50 ounces (per the 1994 ban).
• Pistol-stabilizing braces.

READ ON

Charlie Kirk: Trump has Pelosi, Schumer on the defensive. He must keep up the fight for the border wall     By Charlie Kirk | Fox News

Conway: Trump sees the issues at the border as a humanitarian crisis

Tuesday night President Donald Trump made his first national prime-time address from the Oval Office. It was a direct message to the American people about the urgent need for $5.7 billion in funding for a barrier on our southern border. He had to face the nation because Democrats have refused to provide the funding, and thereby have partially shut down the government.

The confrontation has spawned a full-frontal assault of propaganda from the mainstream media, and a continuous flow of lies and disingenuous claims from Democratic politicians.

As has been the case since his election, it seems as though our president is all alone out there fighting this fight. But he must not forget that this wall was the original and driving force behind his supporters’ loyalty to him in the first place. And he must keep fighting for it.

There are a couple of different ways to look at this epic clash. The first is through a political lens; the second is through the lens of leadership.

Regarding the political, President Trump has the Democrats in a position they are not accustomed to – the defensive.

Tuesday night’s Democratic response to the president, delivered by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, was a classic example of Democrats trying to explain how they are for border security, but simultaneously against securing the border. It also showed how anxious they are to spend our taxpayer money on all their favorite programs, but unwilling to spend $5 billion on border security.

Consider these select tidbits from Speaker Pelosi’s remarks:

“The president has chosen fear. We want to start with the facts. The fact is, on the very first day of this Congress, House Democrats passed Senate Republican legislation to reopen government and fund smart, effective border security solutions … The fact is, President Trump has chosen to hold hostage critical services for the health, safety and well-being of the American people and withhold the paychecks of 800,000 innocent workers across the nation — many of them veterans … The fact is, we all agree that we need to secure our borders, while honoring our values.”

Interesting to note Speaker Pelosi’s concern for “facts” when just last week she interrupted Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen during a report to Congress by saying “I reject your facts.”

CONTINUE READING