Philthy-Delphia

Saturday, November 8, 2025

The left wants to save democracy by destroying it By Kevin Finn

When was the last time a prominent Democrat politician (other than John Fetterman) said anything remotely factual, or proposed any legislation to make America safer, stronger, more prosperous, or more united? All they have are lies, psychological projection, and logical fallacies. In the last case, they’re especially fond of proof by assertion — unfounded claims stated as if they were true.
Democrats have a new mantra: “We must save democracy from Trump.” This noble-sounding imperative has become a blank check, justifying every excess, every norm-shattering tactic, in a relentless war against one man. Peel back the veneer of moral urgency, and what emerges is not salvation, but sabotage — a calculated demolition of democratic guardrails, all in the name of vengeance. What began as partisan combat has metastasized into a vendetta that now threatens to consume its architects.

Consider the raw hypocrisy in electoral engineering. Democrats decry Republican gerrymandering as an assault on fair representation, yet they’ve carved their own states into grotesque jigsaw puzzles, erasing GOP voices with surgical precision. Massachusetts, where 36% voted for Trump; Connecticut (42%); Maine (46%); New Mexico (46%); New Hampshire (48%); Rhode Island (42%); and Hawaii (38%) boast zero Republican congressional seats. Nationally, Republicans are short 6–10 House seats relative to the popular vote — a disparity Democrats dismiss with a weary sigh: “We’ve already gerrymandered; don’t emulate us.” When slogans like “protect our democracy” echo endlessly from politicians and media, it’s not inspiration; it’s a cover-up for failure.

This erosion seeps into every arena. Democrat leaders now embrace outrage as strategy. Cory Booker erupts in congressional tirades about twice a month; Hakeem Jeffries brandishes a baseball bat; Jasmine Crockett hurls obscenities at Trump. Their new refrain? “We haven’t been tough enough.”

James Carville urges demographic tricks — making states of Puerto Rico and D.C. for four Senate seats — and floats packing the Supreme Court. Had Hillary Clinton won in 2016, they’d have torched the Electoral College via the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact. These aren’t hypotheticals; they’re blueprints for a one-party fortress, defended as “necessary” against Trump’s phantom threat.

The playbook is battle-tested. Recall the Russian collusion hoax, orchestrated by Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama, which nearly derailed Trump’s 2016 campaign, sabotaged his transition, and hobbled his first two years. It spawned two sham impeachments, a Mar-a-Lago raid on a private citizen, ballot purges in 25 states, debanking schemes, and — most chillingly — two assassination attempts during his latest bid. The FBI, CIA, and DOJ, institutions meant to safeguard democracy, morphed into a political inquisition. On the eve of the 2020 debate, 51 ex–intel officials perjured themselves, branding Hunter Biden’s laptop “Russian

disinformation” to swing the election. And when Biden’s senescence became undeniable, Democrats and their media allies buried it until the debate exposed the fraud.

This normalization of depravity is the true peril — not just corruption, but enervation. Profanity, lies, logical fallacies, and projection now form the left’s playbook, trapping us in an endless doom loop. Decency is now a quaint relic, sacrificed on the altar of a “moral imperative.” Each escalation begets a new normal:

censorship, selective prosecution, media manipulation — all tools Democrats forged, now blowing up in their faces.

Today, they’re the impotent ones: no White House, Congress, or Supreme Court. Their media and academic allies reel under scrutiny. They played God with institutions, and now they cry foul as the machine turns on them. Revolutions tend to devour their children. They state their goals clearly — imprison Trump, abolish the Electoral College, stack the Supreme Court, ban voter ID, censor free speech, and re-open the border. That’s their plan to save “our democracy.” They can’t see the irony of projecting their own sins onto Trump, accusing him of the very democratic arson they’ve perfected.

Thanks to Elon Musk reforming Twitter/X, their accusations and agenda are now immediately incinerated, and their posts are ratioed into oblivion. They are daily reduced to objects of ridicule and scorn.

Democrats built this inferno to immolate one man. Now, watching it surge back on them, they rage at not their hypocrisy, but their powerlessness. Saving democracy? Just as their bungled response turned smoldering brushfires in L.A. and Hawaii into apocalyptic blazes, they’ve fanned a petty grudge into an inferno that is engulfing their own party.

Wednesday, November 5, 2025

Monday, November 3, 2025

'It's Patently False': Steve Scalise Accuses Chuck Schumer Of

'Misleading' People On The Shutdown

Nov 3, 2025 At a press briefing on Monday, Rep. Steve Scalise (R-LA) spoke about comments made by Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY) on the government shutdown.

Thursday, September 25, 2025

I took this post from someone else's site. I won't publish the authors name because....Todays world !

FOOD FOR THOUGHT

Something I'm seeing since the tragic passing of Charlie Kirk that I'd like to share my thoughts on....

A constant question being asked in my "interweb feeds".... "Where was the outrage for Melissa Hortman and her husband? Where was the outrage for children killed at school? Where was the outrage for (insert any other life lost in tragic, preventable scenerios)?"

The implication? That the grief people feel now is somehow unjustified because it isn’t equal to grief for others.
Here’s the truth: outrage is human, not mathematical.
We don’t measure grief on a scoreboard.
It’s shaped by MANY things, and in this case it's being shaped by proximity, connection, visibility, and what we witness.

I still think those are valid questions that are being asked, however - because EVERYONE'S questions in times like this are valid... So, if I could give an answer it would be simply in the form of a request to consider these things:

1) CONNECTION changes EMOTION.
We always grieve harder when we feel connected.
I didn’t mourn my grandfather when he passed (we weren’t close). But my grandmother’s passing still breaks me 15 years later.
Just as an example, most of America had never heard of the Hortmans until tragedy struck. But Charlie Kirk - love him or hate him - was in our feeds daily. That presence makes his loss feel more personal, even if you never met him.
It’s the same reason we mourn a close friend differently than a stranger. Both lives matter equally, but one hits our hearts differently. It’s absolutely NOT that one life is worth more, it’s just that our CONNECTION to people shapes our emotions.

2) We WITNESSED IT.
This wasn’t just news.
Millions literally saw it happen.
The violent death of a public figure, in front of his family, replayed everywhere. That kind of trauma doesn’t just land in your head, it lands in your body. That absolutely changes everything about how it effects us.
Imagine getting a CALL that your loved one has passed, and compare that to WATCHING it happen. You would undoubtedly have a different reaction, process things differently, experience a set of emotions more viscerally. Your grief still exists in both situations, but very likely amplified in the one that leaves an image in your brain for forever.

3) IT'S BEING CELEBRATED.
I don’t recall people celebrating the deaths of Melissa Hortman and her husband, or schoolchildren who were supposed to be in a safe space.

But there are millions of comments celebrating Charlie’s. That alone fuels a heightened response. Social feeds are flooded with mockery and cheers. That intensifies the outrage.

No one grieving Charlie is saying his life was worth more than anyone else’s. But millions online are saying...even celebrating...that his life was worth less.

People aren’t “hypocrites” for reacting differently. Different circumstances create different emotions. That doesn’t mean one life is more valuable. It just means we’re human.

The real sickness is in the voices that cheer death, that devalue life, that call evil “justice.”
Grief isn’t math. We feel it differently depending on connection, visibility, and how tragedy unfolds.

But what should unite us all is this: violence is never ok, and celebrating it is poison to our humanity.

Pray for our nation.
Pray for the victims and families of ALL of these crimes.
Pray that hearts are softened and humanity restored.

Wednesday, September 24, 2025

Voice for the Silent (Official Lyric Video) - Country Tribute Song

Friday, September 19, 2025

Here's an interesting fact

After the Japanese decimated our fleet in Pearl Harbor Dec 7, 1941, they could have sent their troop ships and carriers directly to California to finish what they started. The prediction from our Chief of Staff was we would not be able to stop a massive invasion until they reached the Mississippi River. Remember, we had a 2 million man army and war ships in other localities, so why did they not invade?

After the war, the remaining Japanese generals and admirals were asked that question. Their answer....they know that almost every home had guns and the Americans knew how to use them.

1. The world's largest army ... America 's hunters! I had never thought about this....
2. A blogger added up the deer license sales in just a handful of states and arrived at a striking conclusion:
3.There were over 600,000 hunters this season in the state of Wisconsin
4. Allow me to restate that number.
5. Over the last several months, Wisconsin ’s hunters became the eighth largest army in the world.
6. More men under arms than in Iran .
7. More than in France and Germany combined.
8. These men deployed to the woods of a single American state to hunt with firearms, and no one was killed.
9. That number pales in comparison to the 750,000 who hunted the woods of Pennsylvania and Michigan 's 700,000 hunters
10. All of whom have now returned home.
11. Toss in a quarter million hunters in West Virginia and it literally establishes the fact that
12. The hunters of those four states alone would comprise the largest army in the world. The number of Hunters in the state of Texas would be the largest standing army in the world by it's self.
13. The point?
14. America
15. Hunting -- it's not just a way to fill the freezer. It's a matter of national security.
16. That's why all enemies, foreign and domestic, want to see us disarmed.
17. Food for thought when next we consider gun control.

Ryan Azzopardi June 23, 2024

Borrowed from someone elses page

Tuesday, September 16, 2025

IT'S NOT HATE SPEECH, IT'S SPEECH THEY HATE

Tuesday, September 9, 2025

copied from a friend

TREASONOUS !! Ron Farina

By Ken Blackwell

Sept. 6th 2025

Project Veritas has blown the lid off of what looks like one of the most disturbing scandals in American history. Their whistleblower, Patrícia Lélis, says former Attorney General Bill Barr and media insider Armstrong Williams were running a dirty operation that touched everything from visa fraud to foreign bribes to backroom DOJ meetings. At the center of it all, according to Project Veritas, is Barr’s long shadowy relationship with the intelligence community — the very heart of the Deep State.

To understand the allegations, you have to look at Barr’s history. His own father, Donald Barr, had deep ties to intelligence circles and even gave Jeffrey Epstein one of his first jobs at the Dalton School in New York despite Epstein lacking a college degree. Years later, Bill Barr himself became Attorney General.

And it was during Barr’s tenure at DOJ that Jeffrey Epstein mysteriously died in a federal jail under “suicide watch” — with the cameras turned off and the guards asleep.

Many Americans have never believed the official story, and it is no accident that Barr’s name is forever tied to it.

Now, Project Veritas is reporting that Barr’s CIA ties stretch into an illegal visa fraud operation. Lélis claims that fake companies were created to funnel wealthy foreigners into the U.S. under the E-2 visa program. Barr allegedly knew the companies were not real but supported the scheme anyway. According to her, Armstrong Williams instructed her to handle $700,000 in fraudulent funds and threatened her green card when she asked questions.

But the bigger picture is what came next. Lélis says Barr and Williams sat in secret meetings after 2020 where they openly discussed how to stop Trump from ever coming back to power. Barr, the same man who once ran the Justice Department, allegedly suggested using RICO charges because they are nearly impossible to fight. The meetings included names like Steve Bannon, Rudy Giuliani, the Proud Boys, and Oath Keepers. According to Project Veritas, this was not speculation — there are notes, texts, and documents showing Barr’s involvement in plotting raids, subpoenas, and coordination with prosecutors like Jack Smith and Fani Willis.

At the same time, Williams is accused of serving as the money man. Project Veritas reports claims that Turkish and Qatari officials funneled cash, perks, and even gold bars into America through Williams’ projects. The whistleblower says Mayor Eric Adams benefited from these payoffs and that a suitcase of gold ended up in the circle of Senator Bob Menendez, who was later convicted for corruption. Burner phones were allegedly used to keep all of these communications off the record, with Barr himself in the loop.

The retaliation against Lélis has been brutal. After she went to the FBI, she says prosecutors threatened her, slapped her with 19 charges, and even hinted at framing her as tied to cartels.

She survived a shooting at her apartment and later received a message that read, “A Shame the Shot Missed.” Instead of Barr or Williams facing justice, the whistleblower has been targeted, which is exactly how the Deep State protects its own.

So let’s connect the dots.

Bill Barr’s father had intelligence ties and personally opened the door for Epstein.

Bill Barr was Attorney General when Epstein conveniently died behind bars. Now a whistleblower claims Barr’s CIA connections are tied to visa fraud, bribes, and plots to stop Trump.

Whether it is protecting Epstein, silencing whistleblowers, or using RICO charges to crush political opponents, Barr’s name keeps showing up where corruption and cover-ups thrive.

According to Project Veritas and their whistleblower, here is the case against Barr and Williams:

• Fake companies used to run an E-2 visa fraud scheme

• Secret meetings to plot RICO charges and FBI raids against Trump allies

• Coordination with Jack Smith, Fani Willis, and others to weaponize the law

• Foreign bribes and payoffs, including a suitcase of gold bars

• Burner phones to conceal high-level communications

• Retaliation and threats against the whistleblower, including a shooting

• Barr’s undisclosed CIA ties connected to the scheme

• Barr’s family history tied to intelligence networks and Epstein, and his role as AG when Epstein died under suspicious circumstances

If these allegations are true, they paint a picture of Bill Barr not as a public servant, but as a Deep State operator whose loyalties lie with the intelligence agencies, the corrupt elite, and anyone who will pay to keep Trump out of power.

America deserves answers. ???

Thursday, September 4, 2025

“FAFO Moment”: Trump Calls Out Xi, Putin, and Kim in Viral Statement on U.S. Enemies By Sharmeen Kaif

Trump’s Blistering Message to Xi, Putin, and Kim Sends Shockwaves

In a move that has rattled capitals across the globe, former President Donald Trump unleashed a blistering statement aimed at three of the world’s most formidable leaders — China’s Xi Jinping, Russia’s Vladimir Putin, and North Korea’s Kim Jong Un.

Packed with sarcasm, historical references, and thinly veiled threats, the message has set off a storm of speculation: is Trump sounding the alarm on escalating global tensions, or simply flexing his political muscle ahead of 2025’s pivotal power contests?

Trump began by invoking history, reminding Xi of the “massive support and blood” the United States sacrificed during World War II to protect China from foreign invaders. He emphasized the American lives lost in that struggle, pointedly suggesting their sacrifice should never be forgotten.

But the tone quickly hardened. In a biting remark, Trump told Xi to extend his “warmest regards” to Putin and Kim “as you conspire against the United States of America.” The sarcastic phrasing carried the unmistakable edge of a warning — one that analysts say could either be brushed off as rhetoric or interpreted as a shot across the bow of America’s rivals.

The statement, already viral online, has split opinion. Supporters hail it as a long-overdue show of strength against adversaries who have grown bolder on the world stage. Critics, however, warn that Trump’s fiery rhetoric risks inflaming already delicate relationships at a moment when global stability hangs by a thread.

Conclusion

Trump’s message to Xi, Putin, and Kim is as much about the future as it is about the past. To his backers, it’s proof that he won’t hesitate to call out America’s adversaries; to detractors, it’s reckless posturing that could destabilize fragile geopolitical balances. What no one disputes is the impact: once again, Trump has thrust foreign policy to center stage — and the world is now waiting to see how Beijing, Moscow, and Pyongyang will respond.

bbb

nnn