Wednesday, February 13, 2019
We all know the answer to this question....it's a power play from the demo-rats... pelosi & schumer led...!!!
California just wasted 5.4 billion on their canceled bullet train. Is 5.7 billion for national security really at issue here?
Younger people may not even know the name "Johnny Carson" but older people will probably remember that he NEVER talked poiltics on his show. Unlike the "late nite hosts" of todays T.V....None of them know when to SHUT THE HELL UP...!! Don't they know WE don't care about thier opinion of OUR President..???
Some people are blaming Trump for "not fulfilling his campagn promises to build the wall". The President seems to be the only one involved that REALLY cares about the shutdown, cares about the federal workers who won't be paid again. President Trump has his plate OVERFULL, investigations, roadblocks at every turn by the dems and some blocks from his own party. The Senate committee has declared "NO COLLUSION", but the investigations go on...and on.
If you think the demo-rats aren't EQUALLY the cause of the first shutdown ( dems & reps were SUPPOSED to negotiate but dems WOULDN'T) and the workers NOT being paid (the Natl. guard) then you need to watch this video of Ted Cruz speaking to congress, it may open your eyes....WATCH VIDEO
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Trump intends to sign border deal to avoid another shutdown
By Dana Bash and Betsy Klein, CNN February 13th 2019
President Donald Trump intends to sign the border security deal to avoid another partial government shutdown, according to two sources who have spoken directly with the President.
Trump said Tuesday that he was "not happy" with the tentative deal reached by congressional negotiators late Monday night that falls far short of his original demands.
Congress faces a deadline to get a deal passed and signed by Trump before Friday.
Follow this story to get email or text alerts from ABC7 when there is a future article following this storyline.
The agreement, which includes $1.375 billion for a border barrier, falls well short of the $5.7 billion Trump originally demanded for a wall. It even falls short of the $1.6 billion included in a Senate package last year.
Still, the measure would avert another government shutdown. Polls showed Trump was largely blamed for the previous 35-day impasse.
Even as lawmakers haggled over details of their agreement, the White House had been planning behind the scenes to secure the funds for the wall unilaterally.
The White House says Trump is continuing to weigh his options to fund a border wall, which still include taking executive action to secure funding for a wall. It's not clear which combination of actions the President might use, and the topic has been under debate for weeks.
Not all would require declaring a national emergency, and they are likely to be rolled out piece by piece, not necessarily all at once, once Trump signs off.
read on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Trump intends to sign border deal to avoid another shutdown
By Dana Bash and Betsy Klein, CNN February 13th 2019
President Donald Trump intends to sign the border security deal to avoid another partial government shutdown, according to two sources who have spoken directly with the President.
Trump said Tuesday that he was "not happy" with the tentative deal reached by congressional negotiators late Monday night that falls far short of his original demands.
Congress faces a deadline to get a deal passed and signed by Trump before Friday.
Follow this story to get email or text alerts from ABC7 when there is a future article following this storyline.
The agreement, which includes $1.375 billion for a border barrier, falls well short of the $5.7 billion Trump originally demanded for a wall. It even falls short of the $1.6 billion included in a Senate package last year.
Still, the measure would avert another government shutdown. Polls showed Trump was largely blamed for the previous 35-day impasse.
Even as lawmakers haggled over details of their agreement, the White House had been planning behind the scenes to secure the funds for the wall unilaterally.
The White House says Trump is continuing to weigh his options to fund a border wall, which still include taking executive action to secure funding for a wall. It's not clear which combination of actions the President might use, and the topic has been under debate for weeks.
Not all would require declaring a national emergency, and they are likely to be rolled out piece by piece, not necessarily all at once, once Trump signs off.
read on
Tuesday, February 12, 2019
Former Obama Officials Turn On Each Other February 12, 2019
Former Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe shredded his former bosses, AG Loretta Lynch and her deputy Sally Yates, for bias in the Clinton investigation. The Washington Examiner reports:
Fired FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe shares some harsh words for former Attorney General Loretta Lynch in his new memoir.
In “The Threat: How the FBI Protects America in the Age of Terror and Trump,” McCabe gripes about Lynch’s refusal to recuse herself from the investigation into former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s unauthorized email server and her infamous tarmac meeting with former President Bill Clinton.
Excerpts from the book, due out Feb. 19, were reported Tuesday in a review by The Guardian, which obtained an early copy.
McCabe writes Lynch and her deputy, Sally Yates, saw “the investigation of Hillary Clinton … likely nominee of the Democratic party, who was being supported by the president of the United States, to whom they owed their jobs … as a case they could handle without prejudice.”
While McCabe has his own political baggage to deal with, his and Comey’s testimony shows just how corrupt Obama’s DOJ was and how the deep state rigged the investigation away from Hillary Clinton and towards Donald Trump.
Former Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe shredded his former bosses, AG Loretta Lynch and her deputy Sally Yates, for bias in the Clinton investigation. The Washington Examiner reports:
Fired FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe shares some harsh words for former Attorney General Loretta Lynch in his new memoir.
In “The Threat: How the FBI Protects America in the Age of Terror and Trump,” McCabe gripes about Lynch’s refusal to recuse herself from the investigation into former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s unauthorized email server and her infamous tarmac meeting with former President Bill Clinton.
Excerpts from the book, due out Feb. 19, were reported Tuesday in a review by The Guardian, which obtained an early copy.
McCabe writes Lynch and her deputy, Sally Yates, saw “the investigation of Hillary Clinton … likely nominee of the Democratic party, who was being supported by the president of the United States, to whom they owed their jobs … as a case they could handle without prejudice.”
While McCabe has his own political baggage to deal with, his and Comey’s testimony shows just how corrupt Obama’s DOJ was and how the deep state rigged the investigation away from Hillary Clinton and towards Donald Trump.
I've seen Dan Crenshaw but never heard of the other two, Jim Baird,and Brian Mast. What a disgrace, our wonderful, unbiased, MEDIA
Pretty sad commentary.
Subject:Freshmen CongressmenCheck out the photo below of these 3 new congressmen, Jim Baird, Republican from Indiana, lost his left arm in Vietnam . Brian Mast, Republican from Florida , lost both legs in Afghanistan . Dan Crenshaw, Republican from Texas , lost his right eye in Afghanistan . All three of these men are Purple Heart recipients. How often have you seen them on the evening news? How often have we seen the two Muslim women and the communist from NY all blabbering vulgarities and spouting out anti-Israel/anti-American insults. Such appreciation for real service to our nation!!
The map above was created by matching the economic output (Gross Domestic Product) for each US state (and the District of Columbia) in 2017 to a foreign country with a comparable nominal GDP last year, using data from the BEA for GDP by US state and data for GDP by country from the International Monetary Fund.
For each US state (and the District of Columbia), we identified the country closest in economic size in 2017 (measured by nominal GDP) and those matching countries are displayed in the map above and in the table below. Obviously, in some cases, the closest match was a country that produced slightly more, or slightly less, economic output in 2017 than a given US state.
It’s pretty difficult to even comprehend how ridiculously large the US economy is, and the map above helps put America’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP) of $19.4 trillion ($19,400,000,000,000) in 2017 into perspective by comparing the economic size (GDP) of individual US states to other country’s entire national output.
Overall, the US produced 24.3% of world GDP in 2017, with only about 4.3% of the world’s population. Three of America’s states (California, Texas and New York) – as separate countries – would have ranked in the world’s top 11 largest economies last year. Together, those three US states produced nearly $6.0 trillion in economic output last year, and as a separate country would have ranked as the world’s third-largest economy and ahead of No. 4 Japan ($4.8 trillion) by more than $1 trillion. And one of those states – California – produced more than $2.7 trillion in economic output in 2017 – and the other two (Texas and New York) produced $1.7 trillion and $1.5 trillion of GDP in 2017 respectively. Adjusted for the size of the workforce, there might not be any country in the world that produces as much output per worker as the US, thanks to the world-class productivity of the American workforce.
Then what comes next....selective BREEDING ...? Where's HITLERS playbook when you need it (or do the dems. already have it) ? Your kid misbehaves...KILL HIM/HER/IT.....Just go to the catalogue and select a newer updated model that BEHAVES.......?????
Dems Targeting Old, Sick for Death Now The Western Journal Published on Feb 12, 2019
Less than a month after New York state passed legislation to increase access to abortion, the battleground has shifted to assisted suicide, with Catholic leaders trying to stem to the tide against legislation that would make physician-assisted suicide legal in New York. Dennis Poust, a spokesman for the state Catholic Conference headed by Cardinal Timothy Dolan, told the New York Daily News that physician-assisted suicide “is not a Catholic issue.” Although blocking the legislation is a priority for Catholic leaders, the group Compassion and Choices is marshaling support for the legislation, seeking to capitalize on the swing represented by having all three parts of the Empire State’s government — governor, state Assembly and state Senate — under Democratic control. New York’s Medical Aid in Dying Act was reintroduced last month.
LINK >>> https://www.westernjournal.com/aborti...
SO FAMOUS.....I never heard of "Chris Evans"...who or what is it ...??
Actor Chris Evans went after President Trump and his base over a tweet President Trump sent out to Senator Amy Klobuchar. Trump called out Klobuchar for pushing climate change while speaking in a snowstorm.
Article from Fox News:
Evans is known to use his high profile to trash the president and those who support him, especially when he disagrees.As previously reported, Klobuchar announced her candidacy, which included tackling climate change, while standing in the midst of a hearty midwestern snow storm. Donald Trump made hay out of the situation with a tweet questioning how real global warming can be given the harsh cold she was standing in.
“Well, it happened again. Amy Klobuchar announced that she is running for President, talking proudly of fighting global warming while standing in a virtual blizzard of snow, ice and freezing temperatures. Bad timing. By the end of her speech she looked like a Snowman(woman)!” Trump tweeted Sunday.
The “Avengers: Endgame” star took to the social media platform to slam Trump and his lack of understanding of how climate change works before directly skewering the president’s supporters.
“Either you STILL don’t understand that weather is not climate despite literally everyone explaining it to you every time you tweet this ignorance, or you just don’t care, and you’re deliberately misleading your base,” Evans wrote. “Which is it?”
Some people are BORN idiots.....some get to be idiots after being around for a while. It didn't say what kind of bear, but I'm guessing grizzly. Did she really think she was a potato ? Only questions for people like this, ...I have no answers. I guess she did prove her point.....He didn't EAT her...!!!
Woman Who Used Potato Diet to Keep Bear From Eating Her Decapitated by Bear February 11, 2019 Ethan Nicolle
Kristi Shmyr (Above, Human) consumed a diet of only potatoes because she believed bears found them unappetizing. The theory worked, but the bear she encountered still killed her by swatting her head off of her neck and into the Canadian mountains.
FAIRVIEW, AB — An Edmonton woman who wanted to test her theory that bears don’t want to eat people if they taste like potatoes went into the Alberta wilderness on Tuesday and never returned. Kristi Shmyr, a social justice activist and nature lover, had eaten only potatoes for seven years and was convinced that her entire essence had become 100% potatoey
But Rangers found the woman’s head about thirteen kilometers from the area where she had gone into the forest to test her theory. Experts say it looked as if it had been swatted off like a tennis ball and traveled a great distance.
The Forest Service later found the rest of Kristi’s body unscathed, not far from the trail head where she entered the forest.
Bear expert and ranger, Morris VonSpinkler told the press that the evidence showed that Shmyr had gone into the forest to prove her theory that she could walk up to a bear and not be eaten if the bear perceived her to be a walking, bipedal potato. “It was a sound theory. Bears hate potatoes,” VonSpinkler said. “But nobody had ever considered what a bear might do to a sentient, moving potato with a soul. We now have our answer.”
Forensics teams said that the amount of force the bear used to swat the head off of the woman’s neck was godlike. “Imagine if Thor layed played tee-ball with his hammer,” VonSpinkler said.
“This was definitely a crime of passion,” the chief examiner told the press.
Kristi Shmyr’s Facebook profile was left with a final post that read, “If what I am about to do works, humanity may never again experience the horror of having one of their own devoured by bears. Wish me luck.” The post had a photograph of Shmyr’s hand holding a potato against a radiant sunset with the sun beaming out from behind it.
“I’m so proud of her,” said Shmyr’s partner, Deja. “She set out to prove something and she proved it. Nobody else ever again has to die by being eaten by bears. All they have to do is eat potatoes for seven straight years. That knowledge is out there now because of Kristi. She’s a hero.
Kristi Shmyr was born 18 July, 1978 and was forty years old at the time of her death. She is survived by her dog Lua, her partner Deja, and her We, Corey.
A memorial service will be held at Gin N’ Taters Potato Farm in Fairview on Sunday. Shmyr will be buried under a pile of potatoes, as was her dying wish.
SHE SHOULD BE OUSTED...!!
Monday, February 11, 2019
Video from the shutdown....Ted Cruz giving the senate HELL....!!!
PEOPLE Calling For Nancy Pelosi To RESIGN After Sen Ted Cruz EXPOSED THIS(VIDEO)!!! GLOBAL News Published on Jan 25, 2019
If you needed more proof that Democrats were responsible for the government shutdown this is it.
I certainly hope he gives a final report...after more than 2 years and unknown $, the citizens have a right to know, out in the open, so EVERYONE can see just how much federal funding (our tax money) was used, (wasted) and for WHAT...???...A DEMOCRAT ploy trying to remove our duly elected, PRESIDENT TRUMP
Robert Mueller has spent two years investigating Trump and he hasn't said a word. It's possible he never will.
WASHINGTON – Occasionally, his signature appears on court documents. But on the most consequential days of the nearly two-year investigation into Russia’s interference in the 2016 election, the man leading it – Robert Mueller – has been conspicuously absent.
When President Donald Trump's senior aides and confidants paraded through federal courtrooms to face criminal charges his office had filed, the former FBI director was nowhere to be seen. When some of them came back to court to be convicted, he said nothing.
It's possible he never will.
Mueller's investigation has cast a shadow over nearly all of the first two years of Trump's presidency. Prosecutors working to determine whether Trump's campaign coordinated with Russian efforts to sway the election that put him in office have brought charges against some of his top aides and revealed extensive Moscow ties. But as the inquiry grinds closer to its conclusion, there are signs that the public might never learn the full extent of what Mueller has – or hasn't – found.
Justice Department rules require that Mueller submit a confidential report when his work is done. William Barr, the man likely to be confirmed as his next boss, has cast doubt on whether he would permit that document to be revealed. And those who know him say Mueller, reluctant to speak publicly even when the circumstances seem to require it, is unlikely to do it on his own.
"A public narrative has built an expectation that the special counsel will explain his conclusions, but I think that expectation may be seriously misplaced," said John Pistole, who served as Mueller's longtime top deputy at the FBI. "That's not what the rules provide, and I really don't see him straying from the mission. That's not who he is."
The Justice Department's special counsel rules don't call for Mueller to make any public statements about his work, let alone deliver a report of what he has found. Instead, his confidential report must explain why he filed the charges he did, and why he might have declined to bring charges against others. It would be up to the attorney general to decide whether that becomes public.
Trump-Russia Investigation Cost?
Bruce Byers, former Retired Navy Chaplain 1977-97 at United States Navy (1977-1997)
Answered Nov. 20 2017
Answered Nov. 20 2017
No accounting of costs has been posted. It can be estimated based on the number of investigators and the activity; in past cases, similar investigations cost about a million dollars every 10 days. The money is rarely totalled, as it is in separate pots: FBI, Special Counsel, Senate and House. If you were to total the amount to date, a rough guess could be between $50 and 100 million. Certainly not less than $30 million, and the cost should include what it is costing in legislative impasse.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
