Candace Owens DEMOLISH Nancy Pelosi With An OUTSTANDING Speech, Gets A Standing Ovation Real Patriots 2/13/2022
Watch candace owens go off on nancy pelosi and the entire Democrats
Sunday, February 13, 2022
Take Congress, Fix The Nation, Jail The Criminals
Kevin McCullough Posted: Feb 13, 2022
Maintaining focus and seeing it through will be the most difficult part of the process, but the solution is simple.
This November take back Congress. January 2023 fix the nation. And from this point forward jail the criminals.
By doing so you will decimate the campaign of the group that’s in the White House now. And you simultaneously shatter the bitter-clinger hopes of any semblance of their last three candidates—or their proxies—from coming back.
The thanks will in part at least belong to Special Counsel John Durham.
I know that the former President was supremely frustrated that he went at the meticulous pace that he worked at, but this weekend’s indictment of top Hillary lawyer Michael Sussman showed that from the beginning Durham has focused on the law breaking and documenting what is necessary to send people to jail.
In summary Durham indicted the top lawyer for Hillary Clinton for committing crimes worse than Watergate and potentially add up to treason.
In short Team Hillary—the team that paid for the fake Russian dossier—hired technical experts to hack the servers of then candidate Trump at the Trump tower in New York, and continued through his election attempting to penetrate and corrupt White House servers to frame the sitting President.
In order for it to work you needed the cooperation of the sitting President Barack Obama, his Vice President Joe Biden, and various staff like Dr. Sudan Rice. (Usually seen most often now with her hand fully inserted into the hollow back of the dummy puppet who confuses ordering ice cream with standing down Putin.)
In order to pull off this plan you also needed the cooperation of the woman who was then seeking to take over the office of President.
All of this cooperation had to be fluid, and above all else had to remain secret.
The evil serpent rears it's ugly head once again
BOMBSHELL: Clinton Campaign Lawyers Paid Tech Company to Infiltrate Trump White House Servers Matt Vespa @mvespa1 Posted: Feb 12, 202
Remember the Durham probe? It’s a criminal investigation that was launched by then-Attorney General William Barr. It was supposed to get to the origins of the Russian collusion probe. As with any government investigation, it takes time, a lot of time. It also splinters into various off-shoots—which again increases the length of time of the probe. The amount of time has outlasted the Trump administration. To protect the effort and to ensure it would continue after the Trump White House, AG Barr gave former U.S Attorney John Durham special counsel status. It’s been under the radar for months. Now, we have a bombshell discovery which if true, means that someone could be going to jail. We now know why this is a criminal investigation after all. Durham’s efforts have unearthed a plot by Clinton campaign lawyers to infiltrate Trump tower and the servers of the Trump White House to tie the former president to the Russian collusion myth (via Fox News):
Lawyers for the Clinton campaign paid a technology company to "infiltrate" servers belonging to Trump Tower, and later the White House, in order to establish an "inference" and "narrative" to bring to government agencies linking Donald Trump to Russia, a filing from Special Counsel John Durham says.Durham filed a motion on Feb. 11 focused on potential conflicts of interest related to the representation of former Clinton campaign lawyer Michael Sussman, who has been charged with making a false statement to a federal agent. Sussman has pleaded not guilty.
The indictment against Sussman says he told then-FBI General Counsel James Baker in September 2016, less than two months before the 2016 presidential election, that he was not doing work "for any client" when he requested and held a meeting in which he presented "purported data and 'white papers' that allegedly demonstrated a covert communications channel" between the Trump Organization and Alfa Bank, which has ties to the Kremlin.
But Durham's filing on Feb. 11, in a section titled "Factual Background," reveals that Sussman "had assembled and conveyed the allegations to the FBI on behalf of at least two specific clients, including a technology executive (Tech Executive 1) at a U.S.-based internet company (Internet Company 1) and the Clinton campaign."
Durham’s filing said Sussman’s "billing records reflect" that he "repeatedly billed the Clinton Campaign for his work on the Russian Bank-1 allegations."
Durham states that the internet company that Tech Executive-1 worked for "had come to access and maintain dedicated servers" for the Executive Office of the President as "part of a sensitive arrangement whereby it provided DNS resolution services to the EOP."
"Tech Executive-1 and his associates exploited this arrangement by mining the EOP's DNS traffic and other data for the purpose of gathering derogatory information about Donald Trump," Durham states.
hOW THE VAXXERS ARE TABULATING COVID DEATHS BETWEEN UNVAXXED, VAXXED AND BOOSTED.
Will the 'Unvaxxed' Have the Last Laugh? Rob Jenkins Posted: Feb 13, 2022
That talking point was reiterated by President Biden* just a few weeks ago when he warned the “unvaxxed” would face “a winter of severe disease and death.” And that was before New Jersey’s resident rodent meteorologist, Milltown Mel, shuffled off this mortal coil just prior to Groundhog Day. So I guess that means, in New Jersey at least, another six weeks of severe disease and death.
Originally, of course, we were told the mRNA injections would prevent people from contracting the disease. “If you get vaccinated, you won’t get covid” was the mantra recited for months, in various forms and multiple forums, by Drs. Fauci, Walensky, and Murthy, President Biden*, and many others. We were also assured that sufficiently jabbed people don’t spread the virus, with Fauci claiming the injections constitute a “dead end for covid.”
It's important not to forget those statements, as the same people now insist they never promised any such thing. Perhaps that’s because, in the face of overwhelming evidence, they’ve been forced to admit jabbed people can and do get covid and can and do give it to others. Said Walensky just a few weeks ago, “what [the vaccines] can’t do anymore is prevent transmission.” Even Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla was forced to acknowledge that his products now offer “limited, in any, protection.”
But what about the vaunted “death benefit” from the mRNA injections? They still protect against serious illness and death, right? Well, yes, that does seem to be the case—but the effect is waning fast. Moreover, the claim itself comes with several asterisks.
There have always been questions about how we count “covid deaths,” as both the CDC and the UK’s National Health Service have recently acknowledged. But if anything, those problems have been amplified in the way we differentiate between “vaccinated” and “unvaccinated” deaths.
For one thing, the most commonly cited number to prove “vaccine efficacy”—“90 percent of covid deaths are among the unvaccinated”—is fundamentally flawed because it goes back to the earliest days of the injections when almost no one had gotten them. Obviously, nearly all who died of (or with) covid in January and February of 2021 were “unvaccinated.”
Moreover, our health officials have been engaged for over a year in a kind of statistical sleight of hand, categorizing people who have taken the injections as “unvaccinated” up until 14 days after their second shot, which means at least five or six weeks have passed since their first shot. In doing so, they ignore evidence that the shots actually make people more susceptible to the virus in the short term. So if you contract covid after getting both shots, but prior to the closing of the 14-day window, and then die, you are considered an “unvaccinated” death. (They’re playing this same trick with the booster shots, too.)
I've always been taught and told that "No one is above the law".! Evidently, that's NOT true. Whether Byrd had reason to shoot Babbitt or not, the fact that he WOULD NOT cooperate with the investigators or even make a statement is enough to put him in jail. He just kept his mouth shut and THEY LET HIM GO...WITH NO CHARGES WHATSOEVER... I hear a lot of talk about white privilege, is this BLACK PRIVILEGE.??
Cop Who Killed Ashli Babbitt Was Cleared of Criminal Wrongdoing Without Interview By Paul Sperry, RealClearInvestigationsJanuary 11, 2022
When U.S. Capitol Police Lt. Michael Byrd went on “NBC Nightly News” to tell his side of shooting and killing unarmed Jan. 6 rioter Ashli Babbitt, he made a point to note he’d been investigated by several agencies and exonerated for his actions that day.
“There’s an investigative process [and] I was cleared by the DOJ [Department of Justice], and FBI and [the D.C.] Metropolitan Police,” he told NBC News anchor Lester Holt in August, adding that the Capitol Police also cleared him of wrongdoing and decided not to discipline or demote him for the shooting.
Byrd then answered a series of questions by Holt about the shooting, but what he told the friendly journalist, he likely never told investigators. That’s because he refused to answer their questions, according to several sources and documents reviewed by RealClearInvestigations.
In fact, investigators cleared Byrd of wrongdoing in the shooting without actually interviewing him about the shooting or threatening him with punishment if he did not cooperate with their criminal investigation.
“He didn’t provide any statement to [criminal] investigators and they didn’t push him to make a statement,” Babbitt family attorney Terry Roberts said in an RCI interview. “It’s astonishing how skimpy his investigative file is."
Roberts, who has spoken with the D.C. MPD detective assigned to the case, said the kid-glove treatment of Byrd raises suspicions the investigation was a “whitewash.”
The lawyer's account appears to be backed up by a January 2021 internal affairs report, which notes Byrd "declined to provide a statement,” D.C. MPD documents show.
Asked about it, a D.C. MPD spokeswoman confirmed that Byrd did not cooperate with internal affairs agents or FBI agents, who jointly investigated what was one of the most high-profile officer-involved shooting cases in U.S. history.
“MPD did not formally interview Lt. Byrd,” deputy D.C. MPD communications director Kristen Metzger said. And, “He didn’t give a statement while under the U.S. Attorney’s Office investigation.”
“There’s an investigative process [and] I was cleared by the DOJ [Department of Justice], and FBI and [the D.C.] Metropolitan Police,” he told NBC News anchor Lester Holt in August, adding that the Capitol Police also cleared him of wrongdoing and decided not to discipline or demote him for the shooting.
Byrd then answered a series of questions by Holt about the shooting, but what he told the friendly journalist, he likely never told investigators. That’s because he refused to answer their questions, according to several sources and documents reviewed by RealClearInvestigations.
In fact, investigators cleared Byrd of wrongdoing in the shooting without actually interviewing him about the shooting or threatening him with punishment if he did not cooperate with their criminal investigation.
“He didn’t provide any statement to [criminal] investigators and they didn’t push him to make a statement,” Babbitt family attorney Terry Roberts said in an RCI interview. “It’s astonishing how skimpy his investigative file is."
Roberts, who has spoken with the D.C. MPD detective assigned to the case, said the kid-glove treatment of Byrd raises suspicions the investigation was a “whitewash.”
The lawyer's account appears to be backed up by a January 2021 internal affairs report, which notes Byrd "declined to provide a statement,” D.C. MPD documents show.
Asked about it, a D.C. MPD spokeswoman confirmed that Byrd did not cooperate with internal affairs agents or FBI agents, who jointly investigated what was one of the most high-profile officer-involved shooting cases in U.S. history.
“MPD did not formally interview Lt. Byrd,” deputy D.C. MPD communications director Kristen Metzger said. And, “He didn’t give a statement while under the U.S. Attorney’s Office investigation.”
Saturday, February 12, 2022
If I had to guess, I'd say we can probably expect more of these acts, because they have NO scruples..!
This Congressman Caught the Deep State in the Act
The secrets of the Deep State have been brought to light.
They tried to dig for dirt on a Republican Congressman to destroy him.
But he caught them in the act, and now the whole world sees them for what they are.
It has been previously reported that ever since January 6th, the Capitol Police have effectively turned into a Deep State intelligence agency, acting as a sort of shadow FBI.
They have opened field offices across the country, and begun secretly collecting data on members of Congress, as well as members of the general public.
According to Politico, “After the Jan. 6 insurrection, the Capitol Police’s intelligence unit quietly started scrutinizing the backgrounds of people who meet with lawmakers, according to three people familiar with the matter. POLITICO also viewed written communications describing the new approach, part of a host of changes that the department implemented after the Capitol attack. Examining the social media feeds of people who aren’t suspected of crimes, however, is a controversial move for law enforcement and intelligence officials given the civil liberties concerns it raises.”
Now, a grievous example of these types of civil liberties abuses has arisen, and it is targeted at a sitting member of Congress with the intention of blackmailing him.
Troy Nehls is a Republican Congressman from Texas. He’s serving his first term, representing part of the Houston area.
On Tuesday, Nehls posted a thread on Twitter about some shocking abuses of power he discovered by the Capitol Police, directed at him.
His thread stated: “BREAKING: The Capitol Police Intelligence Division investigated my office illegally and one of my staffers caught them in the act. On November 20th, 2021, Capitol Police entered my office without my knowledge and photographed confidential legislative products protected by the Speech and Debate clause enshrined in the Constitution, Article 1 Section 6. Two days later on Monday November 22, 2021 (Thanksgiving week), three intelligence officers attempted to enter my office while the House was in recess.”
“Upon discovering a member of my staff, special agents dressed like construction workers began to question him as to the contents of a photograph taken illegally two days earlier. Capitol Police never informed myself or senior level staff of their investigation and the reasons are clear. They had no authority to photograph my office, let alone investigate myself or members of my staff.”
“So, why is the Capitol Police Leadership maliciously investigating me in an attempt to destroy me and my character? Maybe it is because I have been a vocal critic of Speaker Pelosi, the January 6th Committee, and Capitol Police leadership about their handling of January 6th, the death of Ashli Babbitt and the subsequent SHAM investigation.”
Rep. Nehl’s story speaks for itself. Capitol Police has begun functioning as a Deep State agency on par with the FBI, CIA, and NSA.
The difference is, while the FBI and NSA target ordinary Americans, and the CIA blackmails the media, the Capitol Police seems focused on blackmailing members of Congress.
This will continue until Americans finally decide to push back against these tyrannical abuses of power.
3 DAYS AGO
They tried to dig for dirt on a Republican Congressman to destroy him.
But he caught them in the act, and now the whole world sees them for what they are.
It has been previously reported that ever since January 6th, the Capitol Police have effectively turned into a Deep State intelligence agency, acting as a sort of shadow FBI.
They have opened field offices across the country, and begun secretly collecting data on members of Congress, as well as members of the general public.
According to Politico, “After the Jan. 6 insurrection, the Capitol Police’s intelligence unit quietly started scrutinizing the backgrounds of people who meet with lawmakers, according to three people familiar with the matter. POLITICO also viewed written communications describing the new approach, part of a host of changes that the department implemented after the Capitol attack. Examining the social media feeds of people who aren’t suspected of crimes, however, is a controversial move for law enforcement and intelligence officials given the civil liberties concerns it raises.”
Now, a grievous example of these types of civil liberties abuses has arisen, and it is targeted at a sitting member of Congress with the intention of blackmailing him.
Troy Nehls is a Republican Congressman from Texas. He’s serving his first term, representing part of the Houston area.
On Tuesday, Nehls posted a thread on Twitter about some shocking abuses of power he discovered by the Capitol Police, directed at him.
His thread stated: “BREAKING: The Capitol Police Intelligence Division investigated my office illegally and one of my staffers caught them in the act. On November 20th, 2021, Capitol Police entered my office without my knowledge and photographed confidential legislative products protected by the Speech and Debate clause enshrined in the Constitution, Article 1 Section 6. Two days later on Monday November 22, 2021 (Thanksgiving week), three intelligence officers attempted to enter my office while the House was in recess.”
“Upon discovering a member of my staff, special agents dressed like construction workers began to question him as to the contents of a photograph taken illegally two days earlier. Capitol Police never informed myself or senior level staff of their investigation and the reasons are clear. They had no authority to photograph my office, let alone investigate myself or members of my staff.”
“So, why is the Capitol Police Leadership maliciously investigating me in an attempt to destroy me and my character? Maybe it is because I have been a vocal critic of Speaker Pelosi, the January 6th Committee, and Capitol Police leadership about their handling of January 6th, the death of Ashli Babbitt and the subsequent SHAM investigation.”
Rep. Nehl’s story speaks for itself. Capitol Police has begun functioning as a Deep State agency on par with the FBI, CIA, and NSA.
The difference is, while the FBI and NSA target ordinary Americans, and the CIA blackmails the media, the Capitol Police seems focused on blackmailing members of Congress.
This will continue until Americans finally decide to push back against these tyrannical abuses of power.
Tucker...Tells it like it is...WHETHER YOU LIKE IT OR NOT !
Tucker: Lawmakers are panicking over this Fox News
Friday, February 11, 2022
Pelosi's Congress claims sovereign immunity prevents Capitol Police from sharing January 6 emails and videos By Updated: February 2, 2022
Judicial Watch continues its fight for access in court
Judicial Watch is challenging an attempt by the U.S Capitol Police to block the watchdog organization's federal lawsuit to gain access to videos and emails related to the Jan. 6 Capitol riot.
Congress, via the police department, is arguing that the videos and emails being sought are not matters of public record and that there is no public interest in their release. Furthermore, the body is claiming that sovereign immunity prevents citizens from suing for their release.
The suit was filed by Judicial Watch under the common law right of access after the Capitol Police refused to provide requested records in response to the group's initial request dating back to January 2021.
The initial request was for emails between the USCP executive team and the Capitol Police board pertaining to the security of the Capitol complex on the day of the riot and emails among the USCP and the FBI, Justice Department and Department of Homeland Security.
The group additionally asked for all video footage from within the Capitol from noon to 9 p.m. on the day of the riot.
The suit was filed under the common law right of access to public records because Congress exempts itself from the Freedom of Information Act.
"In 'the courts of this country' – including the federal courts – the common law bestows upon the public a right of access to public records and documents ... the Supreme Court was unequivocal in stating that there is a federal common law right of access 'to inspect and copy public records and documents.' ... [T]he general rule is that all three branches of government, legislative, executive, and judicial, are subject to the common law right." The right of access is a precious "common law right ... that predates the Constitution itself," writes Judicial Watch, citing Supreme Court precedent that upholds the public's right to understand what "their government is up to."
Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton said of the issue, "The Pelosi Congress (and its police department) is telling a federal court it is immune from all transparency under law and is trying to hide every second of its January 6 videos and countless emails. The hypocrisy is rich, as this is the same Congress that is trying to jail witnesses who, citing privileges, object to providing documents to the Pelosi rump January 6 committee."
Thursday, February 10, 2022
HISTORY LESSON,..TRUST YOUR GOVERNMENT ! This was 25 Years ago, then during the Obama regime we had "Fast and Furious". thats just 2 instances. THESE ARE THE PEOPLE MAKING THE RULES THAT WE HAVE TO LIVE BY...Gives you a lot of confidence in your country doesn't it.....
Either I never saw this or I had forgotten...
Fast and Furious Scandal < link 2006 --2011
The CIA Cocaine-Filled Plane Tht Crashed in Yucatan Mexico GabriellePickardview more articles 30 November 2017
In 2007 an aircraft known as Gulfstream II crashed in a jungle in Yucatan, Mexico. The plane had four tons of cocaine onboard. The Gulfstream II, tail number N987SA, was allegedly transporting CIA rendition prisons from Europe to Guantanamo Bay. On September 24th, the plane crash-landed when, it is believed, it ran out of fuel.
CIA Planes and Drugs
The Gulfstream II was used by the CIA for several flights between the East coast of the United States and Guantanamo Bay from 2003 to 2005. According to reports, records from the Federal Aviation Association list the aircraft as being owned by Atef Hanna of Tarpon Springs Florida.
“To be honest with relation to the crew of the Gulfstream II N987SA the Mexican government is being pretty damn silent,” writes the Daily Kos.
However, at the time of the crash, the plane is believed to have been registered with Donna Blue Aircraft Inc. According to (2) Top Conspiracies, Donna Blue Aircraft was a front for Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Claims have also been made that the ICE sold the plane to Drug Enforcement Agency suspected drug smugglers as part of an undercover operation prior to the crash.
An undercover agent from the ICE, Don Whittington, is currently under investigation for allegedly laundering profits from the sale of the aircraft and other likes it, which were apparently used in drug smuggling raids, from a Colorado Springs resort and spa.
Other evidence of the CIA’s involvement in allowing cocaine trafficking in support of intelligence efforts can be found on the CIA’s online library.
A (3) report of Investigation Concerning Allegations of Connections Between CIA and the Contras in Cocaine Trafficking to the United States, dates to January 29, 1998.
The allegations go back to 1996 when the San Jose Mercury published a series of reports alleging that the CIA was involved with cocaine smuggling. Known as the “Dark Alliance” series, the articles claimed that cocaine was:
"…virtually unobtainable in black neighborhoods before members of the CIA’s army – the Nicaraguan Contras – started bringing it into South Central Los Angeles in the 1980s.”
Watchdog says NSA failed to follow procedures to protect Americans' privacy BY BRAD DRESS - 02/01/22 THE HILL
The National Security Agency (NSA) failed to follow its own policies when accessing sensitive data and communications on American citizens, according to an audit made available in a Monday report to Congress.
The audit from the Office of the Inspector General (OIG) criticized the NSA's use of one section of the Foreign Intelligence and Surveillance Act (FISA), which lays out the procedures for surveillance and collection of foreign intelligence information.
Section 702 of FISA allows federal agents to surveil suspicious, non-American actors on foreign soil without the approval of a court or a warrant.
But the section also allows agents to access sensitive information and communications of U.S. citizens if there is probable cause that they are agents of a foreign power or in contact with one.
In Monday's report, the OIG said NSA failed to follow its own "procedural and policy requirements" on Section 702. The "evaluation revealed a number of concerns" related to queries for information from government databases on U.S. citizens suspected of being in contact with a foreign target. The queries can include names, email addresses or phone numbers.
The OIG made 13 recommendations to the NSA based on concerns including an inconsistent use of the query model, according to the report.
An NSA spokesperson said the agency "remains fully committed to the rigorous and independent oversight provided by the NSA Inspector General’s office."
"NSA continues to employ measures to assist analysts in conducting their work compliantly with civil liberties and privacy protections," the spokesperson told The Hill in a statement. "As the OIG included in its report, the Agency has in place multiple processes to aid in ensuring query compliance.”
Congress enacted FISA in 1978 to create guidelines for the government's collection of foreign intelligence information following the Watergate scandal. In 2008, after 9/11, more amendments were made to FISA, including Section 702.
FISA came under increased scrutiny following the wiretapping of former Trump campaign aide Carter Page. Agents reportedly spied on Page while investigating Trump's potential ties to the Russian government in lead-up to the 2016 election. The Justice Department’s inspector general in 2019 found multiple issues with the warrant application used to spy on Page.
The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, put in place to monitor the use of FISA, also found concerns with the FBI's use of querying practices and released an opinion last year detailing the agency's misuse of Section 702 as a violation of American's Fourth Amendment rights.
CNN HATES THE ONE THING TUCKER CARLSON CHANGED ABOUT THE GOP LPESITE 1 DAY AGO
Now CNN has a new target.
And CNN hates the one thing Tucker Carlson changed about the GOP.
As Black Eye Politics reports:
One of the big fault lines in American politics right now is the corporate media banging the drums for war with Russia.
Just like in 2003 when the Washington Post and The New York Times helped lead America into the Iraq War, corporate press outlets demand that Joe Biden draw a tough line with Russia over the territorial integrity of Ukraine’s border.
Every weeknight at 8 p.m. Tucker Carlson pushes back on the media’s pro-war narrative questioning why it is any of America’s business to wage war with nuclear-armed Russia over Ukraine.
Republican elected officials and candidates took notice of the success of Donald Trump and Tucker Carlson’s message and echo Carlson and Trump’s America First foreign policy.
In an interview with Axios, Carlson pushed back on the corporate media lies and smears that anyone who opposes war with Russia is a stooge for Russian President Vladimir Putin.
“I just want to go on the record and say I could care less if they call me a pawn of Putin,” Carlson stated. “It’s too stupid. I don’t speak Russian. I’ve never been to Russia. I’m not that interested in Russia. All I care about is the fortunes of the United States because I have four children who live here.”
Carlson applauded Republican officials and candidates ignoring the neocons and D.C. establishment demanding an aggressive war footing with Russia.
“I really hope that Republican primary voters are ruthless about this,” Carlson added, saying that conservatives should vote out any Republican “who believes Ukraine’s borders are more important than our borders.”
Carlson’s opposition to war with Russia enraged CNN.
During one broadcast Carlson asked why it was considered “loyal” to side with Ukraine.
“Why is it disloyal to side with Russia but loyal to side with Ukraine? They’re both foreign countries that don’t care anything about the United States. Kind of strange,” Carlson wondered.
This upset former morning zoo radio host and current CNN entertainer Brianna Keilar.
Keilar demanded Fox News founder Rupert Murdoch fire Carlson for questioning the foreign policy establishment’s push for conflict with Russia.
“Easy answer there, one is a democracy, the other is a brutal autocracy,” Keilar replied. “The real question is why is Rupert Murdoch allowing this anti-democratic BS on the air?”
The architects of the endless wars in Afghanistan, Iraq and Syria are now demanding all sorts of aggressive moves towards Russia that could escalate into nuclear war.
Biden just brought up Trump's obsession with windmills Analysis by Chris Cillizza, CNN Editor-at-large - 3h ago
What, exactly, was Biden talking about? Well, he seemed to be referencing former President Donald Trump's obsession with windmills -- and his predecessor's false claims that they are shown to cause cancer.
The history of Trump's animosity toward windmills is long -- and deeply personal.
Back in the mid-2000s, Trump bought land in Aberdeen, Scotland, on which he planned to build a luxury golf course and resort. Shortly thereafter, he became aware of -- and opposed -- a plan to build 11 wind turbines off the Scottish coast.
"I am not thrilled," Trump said in 2006, according to the BBC. "I want to see the ocean, I do not want to see windmills."
And he didn't stop there. Not by a long shot.
"This is a very, very serious problem that we are addressing. In my opinion, it is one of the most serious problems that Scotland will have or has had," Trump told the Scottish Parliament in 2012 as he sought to keep the wind farm from being built.
BELOW IS WHY TRUMP IS AGAINST "WIND FARMS"
When wind and solar came onto the picture, the Renewable Energy Aficionados thought this “CLEAN GREEN ENERGY” was going to get rid of the dirty fossil fuel power plants. Unfortunately, the more wind and solar that are added, the more BASELOAD energy has to be removed. Why is that unfortunate? Because when the wind stops blowing and the sun stops shining, then the Electric Utility Industry is forced to TURN ON the Natural Gas Power Plants to make up the difference.
THE BLADES ARE TOXIC + CAN'T EASILY BE RECYCLED
Wednesday, February 9, 2022
Report: George W. Bush Donating To Republicans Who Voted To Impeach Trump BY RUSTY WEISS FEBRUARY 1, 2022
George W. Bush made donations to two Republican congresswomen who voted to impeach Donald Trump over the January 6 riot at the Capitol.The revelation comes via Politico, which reports that maximum allowable amounts were donated by Bush to Representative Liz Cheney (R-WY) and Senator Lisa Murkowski’s (R-AK) re-election campaigns late last year.
The outlet reports that while Bush has donated in the past to numerous Republican candidates, the $5,800 to Cheney and $2,900 to Murkowski appear to be his “first donations of 2021” and “are significant in their symbolism.”
Cheney and Murkowski are both facing primary challengers endorsed by former President Trump after they voted in favor of a second impeachment for his alleged role in inciting. the Capitol riot
George W. Bush's Only 2021 Campaign Donations Were to Anti-Trump Republicans
Thank you to whoever wrote this.
What is the end game with the ‘rona? Anyone?
What is the magic formula that is going to allow us to sound the “all clear?” Is it zero cases? For a while, the goal was to simply “flatten the curve,” but now that we are disconnecting utilities for gatherings in California, setting up check points in New York, and recommending goggles (what’s next?), it seems as if there is, in fact, no end game. And, truthfully, the only way that we will see numbers drop is if we cease testing and stop reporting. Keep in mind that hundreds of thousands have shown up to be tested, registered, left due to long waits, and still come up positive when they received their results.
Is it a vaccine
? It took 25 years for a chicken pox vaccine to be developed. The smallpox inoculation was discovered in 1776 and the last known natural case was in 1977. We have a flu vaccine that is only 40 to 60% effective (that’s generous- the last two years it was more like 20-25%), less than half of the US population chooses to get one, and roughly 20,000 Americans still die annually due to flu or flu complications.Oh, you'll mandate it in order to attend school, travel to some foreign countries, etc.? We already have a growing number of vaccine researchers refusing proven, tested, well-known vaccines that have been administered for decades! Do you really believe the majority of people will flock to get a fast-tracked vaccine, whose long-term side effects and overall efficacy rates are anyone's best guess? How long are we going to cancel? Postpone? Reconsider?
Now we are advised against in-person school until second quarter? What if October's numbers are the same as August's? Then what?
Move football to spring? What if next March is worse than this March?
When do we decide quality of life outweighs risk?
We understand this virus can be deadly for SOME, but so are shellfish, peanut butter, and bee stings. We take risks every day without a second thought.
We know driving a car can be dangerous, but we don't leave it parked in the garage for months on end. We know the dangers of smoking, drinking, and eating fried foods, but we do it, none-the-less. We speed on highways, some idiots still don't buckle their seatbelts, we take medications more than “as directed,” and a good number of individuals don't think twice about unprotected sex.
Is hugging Grandma really more dangerous than rush hour on the freeway? Is going to a bar with friends more risky than four day old gas station sushi? Or operating a chainsaw?
When and how did we so quickly lose our free will?
I want a waiver that says, "I understand the risks, but I choose a life with hugs, smiles, college athletics, the state fair, concerts, and school dances."
I understand that there is a minuscule possibility I could die but, more probable, I will end up feeling like junk for a few days.
I understand I could possibly pass this virus onto someone else, but I can pass ANY virus onto someone else at any time until the end of time.
Are we busy living or busy dying?
It’s hard to tell these days.
U.S. Continues To Send Taxpayer Dollars To The Taliban In Afghanistan BY REALCLEARWIRE FEBRUARY 9, 2022 By Adam Andrzejewski for RealClearPolicy
A letter from Ernst and 14 of her Senate colleagues to Secretary of State Anthony Blinken and Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen stated, “We write to express significant concerns over the recent announcement from the Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Asset Control’s (OFAC) on the issuance of General Licenses (GLs) authorizing the flow of U.S. taxpayer dollars through the Taliban and the Haqqani network.”
“While we agree widespread famine and denial of rights to Afghan women and girls are immediate problems to address with humanitarian aid and assistance, OFAC’s sweeping authorization risks too much U.S. taxpayer money flowing through the Taliban or the Haqqani network to fund an excessive, ill-fated, or wasteful list of services such as activities to support the rule of law by the Taliban, education exchanges in a country that now devalues education for women and girls, and endangered species research.”
It is unclear exactly how much money is flowing into Afghanistan. According to Sen. Ernst, the majority of the money is for humanitarian aid, however, money has also been sent for other purposes, like “endangered species research.”
The Biden Administration is continuing to issue General Licenses that give “broad authorizations” to non-governmental organizations, international organizations, and the U.S. government to export various materials and funding to the Taliban controlled Afghani government.
While reasonable people can debate the amount of humanitarian aid the U.S. should send abroad, giving broad authorizations to send free stuff to a terrorist state seems like a bad idea.
“While we agree widespread famine and denial of rights to Afghan women and girls are immediate problems to address with humanitarian aid and assistance, OFAC’s sweeping authorization risks too much U.S. taxpayer money flowing through the Taliban or the Haqqani network to fund an excessive, ill-fated, or wasteful list of services such as activities to support the rule of law by the Taliban, education exchanges in a country that now devalues education for women and girls, and endangered species research.”
It is unclear exactly how much money is flowing into Afghanistan. According to Sen. Ernst, the majority of the money is for humanitarian aid, however, money has also been sent for other purposes, like “endangered species research.”
The Biden Administration is continuing to issue General Licenses that give “broad authorizations” to non-governmental organizations, international organizations, and the U.S. government to export various materials and funding to the Taliban controlled Afghani government.
While reasonable people can debate the amount of humanitarian aid the U.S. should send abroad, giving broad authorizations to send free stuff to a terrorist state seems like a bad idea.
The "DEEP STATE"..Everyone has their own idea as to WHO IN WASHINGTON is actually running things..Like for instance, I think it's OBAMA. Why else would he decide to live in Washington DC ?
What Is America’s Needs Is an End to the Deep State
Loyd Pettegrew Posted: Feb 09, 2022 
We must eliminate America’s Deep State (DS). The Term “DS” was arguably first coined by Peter Dale Scott, a leftist bent on deflating the Bush II administration, in his 2007 book, The Road to 9/11. He suggests the DS is a hybrid association of elements of government and parts of top-level finance and industry, effectively able to govern the United States without reference to the consent of the people through the formal political process.” The DS is deeper and more insidious than Scott’s surmise.
A 2018 Monmouth poll found that 84% of Americans of all stripes believe the DS exists and nearly 80% characterize it as “a group of unelected government and military officials secretly manipulating or directing national policy by spying on American citizens.”
Harbingers of the DS
Since the assassination of President Kennedy on November 22, 1963, there has been convincing evidence based on President Trump’s file declassification showing there were two gunman involved, but the FBI wanted the public to believe there was only one shooter. Additional evidence revealed that “A wound of entry in the head, near the temple, presented to the press that day, and a wound of entry in the throat. Neither of those could have been caused by a shooter in the Texas School Book Depository.” It has been surmised that the CIA, involved with organized crime syndicates, angry over Kennedy’s role in the failed Bay of Pig’s invasion, wanted JFK gone.
Although not officially part of the DS, the MSM abets them in prosecuting conservatives and overthrowing President Trump. David Brooks of The New York Times, wrote on November 11, 2016 that Trump will “probably resign or be impeached within a year”, signifying the depths to which that coterie would go to undo his election. Recently, an interview with Mika Brzezinski and White House Communications Director Kate Bedingfield confirmed it was the intention of the Biden Administration to coerce Facebook and other social media platforms to stop the spread of ‘misinformation’ (conservative news the White House doesn't like) about Covid. Project Veritas director, James O’Keefe states, “The FBI and the New York Times work in concert to defame conservative organizations and actors.” Another example was when Trump lawyer, Rudy Giuliani’s Manhattan home and office were searched by the Justice Department, seizing computers and cellphones in their investigation into his dealings in Ukraine. No illegality was found, but the DOJ never reprised this with Hunter Biden and his family’s dealings with Burisma and China.
Despite our Constitution’s Second Amendment, Biden’s ATF is now investigating Americans who have legally purchased fire arms--a clear federal law violation forbidding any type of national firearm registry because the database demonstrates that such records have negligible efficacy in preventing or prosecuting crime.
The DS Uncovered
Homeland Security is emblematic of the DS, composed of entrenched administrative departments with appointed not elected leaders, to whom elected officials must genuflect to get things done. As Jeffrey A. Tucker posits, “The belief that people have the right to rule themselves and even replace a government that has gone too far, is wishful thinking…it is an administrative dictatorship.”
The DS Uncovered
Homeland Security is emblematic of the DS, composed of entrenched administrative departments with appointed not elected leaders, to whom elected officials must genuflect to get things done. As Jeffrey A. Tucker posits, “The belief that people have the right to rule themselves and even replace a government that has gone too far, is wishful thinking…it is an administrative dictatorship.”
Peter Schweizer, formerly of the Hoover Institution, revealed Congressfolk’s’ use of inside government policy information to enable family members to make millions during the Obama years. More recently he reported that America is traveling down a losing path in its battle against China because the communist regime has co-opted many American elites in Washington, Wall Street, U.S. tech sector and our government agencies. “The Biden family, while he was vice president and continuing when he became president, received some $31M from Chinese individuals who were linked to the highest levels of Chinese intelligence.”
The IRS DS. Perhaps the most extensive use of the DS was President Barack Obama’s efforts to silence dissenting voices and perceived enemies with unprecedented new regulations to curtail political speech by nonprofit organizations, by having the IRS prosecute them. His efforts stymied conservative organizations like Citizen’s United and other Obama critics while wealthy donors, corporations, and special interest groups continued their outsized influence in elections and other policy matters.
One appealing solution might be to have politicians carefully audited by the IRS, before taking office, every year they remained, and for five years after they leave. Twenty years of auditing Speaker Pelosi would clearly show that her husband and she directly benefitted from information that would affect the stock market and their personal investments, particularly during the Great Recession. Sadly, the IRS is part of the DS and can’t be trusted. It didn’t audit Biden’s tax returns but did Trump’s. The Big 5 accounting firm audits would work better, providing their audits were open to public scrutiny.
The National Health DS. The SARS CoV-2 Pandemic was abetted, if not created by Dr. Anthony Fauci, through his NIAID funding of the research that would birth the high-affinity binding of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein to human ACE2. An article in Nature Medicine concluding that “Our analyses clearly show that SARS-CoV-2 is not a laboratory construct or a purposefully manipulated virus” was published online on March 17, 2020 as the Covid-19 pandemic spread around the world. Joe Wang, former lead scientist for Sanofi Pasteur’s SARS 2002 vaccine project said recently, “Interestingly, after the publication of the paper—used by Fauci to silence all other voices—the main authors, Andersen and Garry, received an $8.9 million grant from Fauci’s NIAID on Aug. 17, 2020”—our DS in action!
The FBI and DOJ DS. We know that the CIA is the most clandestine and perhaps lawless federal agency loosely linked to the Executive branch. It was once reasonable to believe that these agencies were in the business of protecting all Americans, but RussiaGate proved they protect only Democrat interests.
James O’Keefe confirmed that Project Veritas was targeted by the FBI and DOJ acting on Pfizer’s complaints about him interfering with their Covid vaccination market, despite both entities’ enjoinment to uphold the Constitution’s First Amendment rights. O’Keefe concludes, “There is a lot of injustice in the Department of Justice.” Corporate America has been doing the U.S. government’s bidding for some time while protecting their business interests even if it’s antithetical to personal health beliefs. Shockingly, the DOJ is creating a new domestic terrorism unit in response to the January 6, 2021 conservative demonstration at the U.S. Capital where the only person killed was U.S. Air Force senior airman Ashli Babbitt, by a Capital police officer. Evidence suggests the F.B.I. placed agents within the demonstrators’ ranks urging more aggressive and violent behavior.
Conservative America is imperiled by the DS and its unlawful actions despite their requirement to follow the laws of this land and protect us all. With this kind of protection, conservatives are at risk. As Alexander Solzhenitsyn wrote before his death, “The permanent lie becomes the only safe form of existence, in the same way as betrayal.”
Romney thinks he has an IN..?
Mitt Romney says he 'exchanged texts' with his niece and RNC chairwoman Ronna McDaniel after RNC censure …
- Ronna McDaniel, chairwoman of the Republican National Committee, is a granddaughter of George W. Romney.
- Last week the RNC censured two Republicans for participating in the January 6 committee's investigation.
Sen. Mitt Romney, of Utah, is accusing the Republican National Committee of sending an "inappropriate message" about the legitimacy of violence on January 6, 2021, telling reporters on Monday that he had "exchanged some texts" over the issue with his niece, RNC chairwoman Ronna McDaniel.
Last week, the Republican National Committee voted to censure Reps. Liz Cheney of Wyoming and Adam Kinzinger of Michigan for agreeing to help the congressional investigation into January 6, accusing the lawmakers of taking part in a "Democrat-led persecution of ordinary citizens engaged in legitimate political discourse."
Speaking at the US Capitol, Romney said the resolution condemning his fellow Republicans "could not have been a more inappropriate message."
"One, to sanction two people of character as they did. But number two, to suggest that a violent attack on the seat of democracy is legitimate political discourse is so far from accurate as to shock and make people wonder what we're thinking," Romney said.
Romney, his party's standard-bearer in the 2012 presidential election, said he had shared his concerns with McDaniel to "express my point of view," adding that he thinks "she's terrific" and "a wonderful person, and doing her very best."
Nevertheless, he said he was worried the RNC's actions could hurt Republicans in the 2022 midterm elections.
"Anything that my party does that comes across as being stupid is not going to help us," he said.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
