Tuesday, March 21, 2023

Tina Griego is a Free-Lance reporter for the Denver Post. She writes some really good stuff and she is a strong advocate for LEGAL Immigration.Not Democrat, not Republican, not Liberal, and not Conservative. Just the facts by a good reporter!

What if they left?

What if 20 Million Illegal Aliens Vacated America? I, Tina Griego, journalist for the Denver Rocky Mountain News have written a column titled, "Mexican Visitors' Lament.”

I interviewed Mexican journalist Evangelina Hernandez while visiting Denver last week. Hernandez said, "Illegal aliens pay rent, buy groceries, buy clothes. What happens to your country's economy if 20 million people go away?”

Hmmm, I thought, what would happen?

So I did my due diligence, buried my nose as a reporter into the FACTS I found below It's a good question...it deserves an honest answer.

Over 80% of Americans demand secured borders. What would happen if all 20 million or more vacated America? This may surprise you!

In California, if 3.5 million illegal aliens moved back to Mexico, it would leave an extra $10.2 billion to spend on overloaded school systems, bankrupt hospitals and overrun prisons. It would leave highways cleaner, safer and less congested. Everyone could understand one another as English became the dominant language again.

It means 12,000 gang members would vanish out of Denver alone. Colorado would save more than $20 million in prison costs, and the terror that those 7,300 alien criminals set upon local citizens. Denver Officer Don Young and hundreds of Colorado victims would not have suffered death, accidents, rapes and other crimes by illegals.

Denver Public Schools would not suffer a 67% dropout/flunk rate because of thousands of illegal alien students speaking 41 different languages. Denver's 4% unemployment rate would vanish as our working poor would gain jobs at a living wage.

In Chicago, Illinois, 21 million illegals would free up hospitals, schools, prisons and highways for a safer, cleaner and more crime-free experience.

If 20 million illegal aliens returned 'home,' the U.S. economy would return to the Rule of Law. Employers would hire legal American citizens at a living wage.

Everyone would pay their fair share of taxes because they wouldn't be working off the books. That would result in an additional $401 billion in IRS income taxes collected annually, and an equal amount for local, state and city coffers.

No more confusion in American schools that now must contend with over 100 languages that degrade the educational system for American kids.

Our overcrowded schools would lose more than two million illegal alien kids at a cost of billions in ESL and free breakfasts and lunches.

We would lose 500,000 illegal criminal alien inmates at a cost of more than $1.6 billion annually. That includes 15,000 MS-13 gang members who distribute $130 billion in drugs annually and would vacate our country.

In cities like L.A., 20,000 members of the '18th StreetGang' would vanish from our nation. No more Mexican forgery gangs for ID theft from Americans! No more foreign rapists and child molesters!

America's economy is drained. Taxpayers are harmed. Employers get rich. Over $80 billion annually wouldn't return to the aliens' home countries by cash transfers. Illegal migrants earned half that money untaxed, which further drains America's economy which currently suffers a $30 trillion debt.

More then $30 TRILLION !!!

At least 400,000 anchor babies would not be born in our country, costing us $109 billion per year per cycle. At least 86 hospitals in California, Georgia and Florida would still be operating instead of being bankrupt out of existence because illegals pay nothing via the EMTOLA Act.

Americans wouldn't suffer thousands of TB and hepatitis cases rampant in our country - brought in by illegals unscreened at our borders. Our cities would see 20 million less people driving, polluting and grid locking our cities' greenhouse gasses.

Over one million of Mexico's poorest citizens now live inside and along our border from Brownsville, Texas, to San Diego, California, in what the New York Times called, 'colonias' or new neighborhoods. Trouble is, those living areas resemble Bombay and Calcutta where grinding poverty, filth, diseases, drugs, crimes, no sanitation and worse. They live without sewage, clean water, streets, roads, electricity, or any kind of sanitation.

The New York Times reported them to be America's new ' Third World ' inside our own country. Within 20 years, at their current growth rate, they expect 20 million residents of those colonias. (I've seen them personally in Texas and Arizona; it's sickening beyond anything you can imagine.)

We already invite a million people into our country legally/annually, more than all other countries combined- with growing anarchy at our borders.

It's time to stand up for our country, our culture, our civilization and our way of life. Interesting statistics below!

Here are 13 reasons illegal aliens should vacate America, and I hope they are forwarded over and over again until they are read so many times that the reader gets sick of reading them:

1. $14 billion to $22 billion dollars are spent each year on welfare to illegal aliens (that's Billion with a 'B’)

2. $7.5 billion dollars are spent each year on Medicaid for illegal aliens.

3. $12 billion dollars are spent each year on primary and secondary school education for children here illegally and they still cannot speak a word of English. $27 billion dollars are spent each year for education for the American-born children of illegal aliens, known as anchor babies.

4. $3 Million Dollars 'PER DAY' is spent to incarcerate illegal aliens. That's $1.2 Billion a year.

5. 28% percent of all federal prison inmates are illegal aliens.

6. $190 billion dollars are spent each year on illegal aliens for welfare & social services by the American taxpayers.

7 . 200 billion dollars per year in suppressed American wages are caused by the illegal aliens.

8. The illegal aliens in the United States have a crime rate that's two and a half times that of white non-illegal aliens. In particular, their children are going to make a huge additional crime problem in the US.

9 . During the year 2005, there were 8 to 10 MILLION illegal aliens that crossed our southern border with as many as 19,500 illegal aliens from other terrorist countries. Over 10,000 of those were middle-eastern terrorists. Millions of pounds of drugs, cocaine, meth, heroin, crack, guns, and marijuana crossed into the U.S. from the southern border.

10. The National Policy Institute, estimates that the total cost of mass deportation would be between $206 and $230 billion, or an average cost of between $41 and $46 billion annually over a five year period.

11. In 2006, illegal aliens sent home $65 BILLION in remittances back to their countries of origin, to their families and friends.

12. The dark side of illegal immigration: Nearly one million sex crimes are committed by illegal immigrants in the United States!

Total cost - a whopping $538.3 BILLION DOLLARS A YEAR !

And we don't need a wall?


If this doesn't bother YOU, then just delete the message.

THOSE WHO WOULD DISREPECT OUR FLAG, HAVE NEVER BEEN HANDED A FOLDED ONE!.

Thursday, March 16, 2023

First, we were "undesirables". then "uneducated, stupid etc. etc." NOW we are "FASCIST PSYCOs"


Here's what to expect if Trump is indicted in New York: report
Story by Gideon Rubin • Yesterday 

Most legal experts believe it’s a matter of if, not when, a New York grand jury returns an indictment against former Donald Trump over alleged hush money payments to adult film Stormy Daniels.


Donald Trump, Alvin Bragg© 

But how Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg would handle the surrender of the first former American president to be indicted remains an open question.

Business Insider’s Laura Italiano mapped out multiple likely scenarios Wednesday in a report that includes interviews with multiple current and former Manhattan DA prosecutors.

Trump would likely be treated as most defendants are, but with some notable exceptions, the report said.

Trump’s indictment under New York law would go into effect immediately after the jury foreperson signs the document listing formal charges.

The foreperson could sign it immediately should the grand jury vote to convict, but the process could be delayed by weeks if prosecutors need to revise to the document should the jury return indictments on select charges but decline to indict on other charges.

The documents wouldn’t be made public until a judge unseals it.

Once that happens, Business Insider reports that “Bragg will likely release PDF copies to the press and post it on the district attorney's website. At which point the historic document will blow up Twitter feeds worldwide.”

Trump wouldn't learn about an indictment until prosecutors contact his lawyers and both sides agree on a date for the former president to surrender to authorities.

Trump wouldn’t know the specific charges until they are unsealed.

Related video: Hear George Conway's prediction about possible Trump indictments (CNN)

CNN
Hear George Conway's prediction about possible Trump indictments

View on Watch

But once the surrender date is agreed upon, word will likely get out fast, Manhattan defense lawyer Ron Kuby told the news outlet.

"Half the DA's office and their husbands and wives will know once they set a surrender date. All of Trumpville will know, Kuby said. "Between the two, it'll be out in two hours."

Trump would then surrender to the at the DA’s Lower Manhattan headquarters at an agreed-upon time and be taken into custody by NYPD officers, who would arrest the former president and take him to the seventh or ninth floor for booking.

Trump would then have his fingerprints and mugshot taken along with a DNA sample that would be entered into a database.

But Bragg could choose not to arrest Trump.

"Instead, the court could issue him a criminal summons," which would order Trump to appear for arraignment, a former prosecutor who spoke on the condition of anonymity because they weren’t authorized to discuss the case.

Trump wouldn’t necessarily be required to appear in court should the proceedings be held virtually.

A "perp walk" is an unlikely scenario in this case, former special agent Bill Pickle told Business Insider.

"That walk is not going to happen," Pickle said.

"You're not going to expose him to people who could cause him harm. He would appear in court and then get printed before or after. No cuffs."

Trump is unlikely to be seen in handcuffs, if for no other reason that optics would likely be a consideration.

"I mean the man is beloved by 20 percent of the American population. Admittedly they're fascist psychos," Kuby said.

"But still. Why contribute to a perception of unfairness?"

Trump would likely remain free without bail under New York's newly implemented bail laws requiring defendants to be held on bail if the judge believes them to be a flight risk.


Wednesday, March 15, 2023

Got this this morning and thought it was entertaining.

I think all sports fans and most everybody else will get a kick out of this letter written to the Chicago Tribune. No matter which side you are on in the matter of renaming the Washington Redskins, this is funny. This guy is hilarious. This is an e-mail sent to Clarence Page of the Chicago Tribune after an article he published concerning a name change for the Washington Redskins.

Dear Mr. Page:

I agree with our Native American population. I am highly jilted by the racially charged name of the Washington Redskins. One might argue that to name a professional football team after Native Americans would exalt them as fine warriors, but nay, nay. We must be careful not to offend, and in the spirit of political correctness and courtesy, we must move forward. Let's ditch the Kansas City Chiefs, the Atlanta Braves and the Cleveland Indians. If your shorts are in a wad because of the reference the name Redskins makes to skin color, then we need to get rid of the Cleveland Browns.

The Carolina Panthers obviously were named to keep the memory of militant Blacks from the 60's alive. Gone. It's offensive to us white folk.

The New York Yankees offend the Southern population. Do you see a team named for the Confederacy? No! There is no room for any reference to that tragic war that cost this country so many young men's lives. I am also offended by the blatant references to the Catholic religion among our sports team names. Totally inappropriate to have the New Orleans Saints, the Los Angeles Angels or the San Diego Padres.

Then there are the team names that glorify criminals who raped and pillaged. We are talking about the horrible Oakland Raiders, the Minnesota Vikings, the Tampa Bay Buccaneers and the Pittsburgh Pirates!

Now, let us address those teams that clearly send the wrong message to our children. The San Diego Chargers promote irresponsible fighting or even spending habits. Wrong message to our children.

The New York Giants and the San Francisco Giants promote obesity, a growing childhood epidemic. Wrong message to our children. The Cincinnati Reds promote downers/barbiturates. Wrong message to our children.

The Milwaukee Brewers. Well that goes without saying. Wrong message to our children.

So, there you go. We need to support any legislation that comes out to rectify this travesty, because the government will likely become involved with this issue, as they should. Just the kind of thing the do-nothing Congress loves.

As a die-hard Oregon State fan, my wife and I, with all of this in mind, suggest it might also make some sense to change the name of the Oregon State women's athletic teams to something other than "the Beavers (especially when they play Southern California. Do we really want the Trojans sticking it to the Beavers???

I always love your articles and I generally agree with them. As for the Redskins name I would suggest they change the name to the "Foreskins" to better represent their community, paying tribute to the dick heads in Washington DC.

Monday, March 13, 2023

Tucker Carlson: Here is the truth   Fox News  Mar 9, 2023

WARNING-GRAPHIC FOOTAGE: Fox News host Tucker Carlson fires back at critics who are outraged over his airing previously hidden footage of the January 6 Capitol breach on 'Tucker Carlson Tonight.'


Sunday, March 12, 2023

Author tells Tucker Jan. 6 defendants are languishing in a ‘DC gulag’


Mar 12, 2023 #foxnews #fox #tucker
Author Julie Kelly shares how many January 6 'insurrectionists' are still in jail awaiting trial on 'Tucker Carlson Tonight.'


 Congress Erupts As Smart Man Slams Entire 

Democrat Party


This speech should be broadcast by every news outlet in the country, over and over again, until every citizen has those 18 Senators names memorized! This bill is a hard slap in the face to every American citizen who has even one brain cell still working!


 WELCOME TO OUR "JUSTICE" SYSTEM


Tuesday, March 7, 2023

Tucker: “We Got All The January 6th Footage - You Have Been LIED To!”

                         

Tucker Carlson was given access to 41,000 hours of surveillance footage from the Capitol on January 6th by Speaker Kevin McCarthy and says he will start to release the TRUTH next week. Stay tuned!

Tucker Carlson: No honest person can deny this about Jan. 6


17 hours ago  Fox News
Fox News host Tucker Carlson says Capitol videotape not released to the public shows that Jan. 6 committee members lied about the alleged 'insurrection.'

Tucker: This video tells a different story of Jan 6   Fox News

Mar 6, 2023
Fox News host Tucker Carlson unveils Jan. 6 video that shows Capitol police escorting protesters through building, including 'QAnon Shaman,' on 'Tucker Carlson Tonight.'

Saturday, March 4, 2023

 MYSTERY OF THE CENTURY:  —WHO THE HELL IS HE?

His 8 years of living in the White House is over. He’s (mostly) gone ... but questions remain. This came from a union guy in Chicago who didn't vote for Obama.

It will be interesting to see what they put in his "Library" about his early years now that he is out of office. In a country where we take notice of many facets of our public figures' lives, doesn't it seem odd that there's so little we know about Barack Obama?

As Americans, we enjoy knowing details about our news makers, but none of us know one single humanizing fact about the history of our own ex-president. We are all aware of the lack of incontestable birth records for Obama; that “document managing“ has been spectacularly successful. There are, however, several additional oddities in Obama's history that appear to be as well managed as the birthing issue.

One other interesting thing...There are no birth certificates of his daughters that can be found.

It's interesting that no one who ever dated him has shown up. The charisma that caused women to be drawn to him so strongly during his campaign, certainly would in the normal a course of events, lead some lady to come forward, if only to garner some attention for herself.

We all know about JFK's magnetism, that McCain was no monk and quite a few details about Palin's courtship and even her athletic prowess, Joe Biden's aneurysms are no secret; look at Cheney and Clinton, we all know about their heart problems. Certainly, Wild Bill Clinton's exploits before and during his White House years were well known. That's why it's so odd that not one lady has stepped up and said, "He was so shy..." or "What a great dancer."

It's virtually impossible to know anything about this fellow. Who was best man at his wedding? Start there, then check groomsmen.

To get the footage of the graduation ceremony. Has anyone talked to the professors? It is odd that no one is bragging that they knew him or taught him or lived with him.

When did he meet Michelle, and how? Are there photos there? Every president gives to the public all their photos, etc. for their library, etc. What has he released? And who voted for him to be the most popular man in 2010? Doesn't this make you wonder?

Ever wonder why no one ever came forward from Obama's past saying they knew him, attended school with him, was his friend, etc? Not one person has ever come forward from his past. It certainly is very, very strange
This should be a cause for great concern. To those who voted for him, you may have elected an unqualified, inexperienced shadow man. Have you seen a movie named "The Manchurian Candidate"?

As insignificant as each of us might be, someone with whom we went to school will remember our name or face; someone will remember we were the clown or the dork or the brain or the quiet one or the bully or something about us.

George Stephanopoulos of ABC News said the same thing during the 2008 campaign. He questions why no one has acknowledged he was in their classroom or ate in the same cafeteria or made impromptu speeches on campus. Stephanopoulos also was a classmate of Obama at Columbia--the class of 1984. He says he never had a single class with him.

He is such a great orator; why doesn't anyone in Obama's college class remember him? Why won't he allow Columbia to release his records? Nobody remembers Obama at Columbia University. Looking for evidence of Obama's past, Fox News contacted 400 Columbia University students from the period when Obama claims to have been there, but none remembered him.

Wayne Allyn Root was, like Obama, a political science major at Columbia who also graduated in 1983. In 2008, Root says of Obama, "I don't know a single person at Columbia that knew him, and they all know me. I don't have a classmate who ever knew Barack Obama at Columbia, ever."

Nobody recalls him. Root adds that he was also, like Obama, Class of '83 Political Science, and says, "You don't get more exact or closer than that. Never met him in my life, don't know anyone who ever met him. At class reunion, our 20th reunion five years ago, who was asked to be the speaker of the class? Me. No one ever heard of Barack!

And five years ago, nobody even knew who he was. The guy who writes the class notes, who's kind of the, as we say in New York, 'the macha' who knows everybody, has yet to find a person, a human who ever met him."

Obama's photograph does not appear in the school's yearbooks and Obama consistently declines requests to talk about his years at Columbia, provide school records, or provide the name of any former classmates or friends while at Columbia.

Some other interesting questions:

1.Why was Obama's law license inactivated in 2002? It is said there is no record of him ever taking the Bar exam.

2.Why was Michelle's law license inactivated by court order? We understand that it was forced to avoid fraud

3 How did he receive aid as a foreign exchange student if he’s actually an American citizen?

It is circulating that according to the U.S Census, there is only one Barack Obama but 27 Social Security numbers and over 80 aliases are connected to him.

The Social Security number he uses now originated in Connecticut where he is reported to have never lived. And was originally registered to another man (Thomas Louis Wood) from Connecticut, who died in Hawaii while on vacation there.

As we all know Social Security Numbers are only issued 'once, they are not reused. No wonder all his records are sealed...

Please continue sending this out. Somewhere, someone has to know SOMETHING, before he reorganized Chicago. SOMETHING! He just seemed to burst upon the scene at the 2004 Democratic Convention. ANYONE? ANYWHERE? ANYTHING?

I think soon much is going to come to light about this highly unqualified person who was President of the United States for 8 years. Soon, we will know how badly we were all doped and duped by this impostor who has basically, with much help from his minions, almost brought the greatest nation in history to its knees in ruins. That will be his legacy.

He totally destroyed the Integrity, morals and Christian heritage of our once great country.

But WHO THE HECK IS HE?


Tuesday, February 28, 2023

I copied this from"90 Miles From Tyranny". This is what should be posted on EVERY blog, message. tweet etc. etc. until EVERY political figure in an elected OR appointed position in our country has seen it and is made to understand the TRUTH in this message. Let it be known that THEY will be held accountable. From the POTUS down to the neighborhood committeeperson.



Monday, February 27, 2023

Tucker: This is an outrage 

Fox News 2/27/2023


Fox News host Tucker Carlson reacts to report that the Energy Department has concluded COVID-19 most likely came from a Chinese lab on 'Tucker Carlson Tonight.'

Saturday, February 25, 2023

Tucker's warning if Ukraine war continues

  Fox News 2/23/2023

Fox News host Tucker Carlson dives deep into the propaganda campaign that began years before Russia's invasion of Ukraine on 'Tucker Carlson Tonight.'


 SORRY IF MY POSTS LOOK STRANGE BUT I CAN'T MANAGE THE FONT SIZE. i HAD TO GET A NEW LAPTOP AND IT'S NOT AN HP, SO NOTHING IS WORKING LIKE WHAT I AM USED TO. i BOUGHT AN acer, BECAUSE MY LAST TWO HPs HAD HINGE PROBLEMS   (THEY BROKE)

I agree 100% The press can publish anything, even a pack of lies, then they print a retraction hidden in some obscure place and then go on as if they did nothing wrong


DeSantis wants to roll back press freedoms — with an eye toward overturning Supreme Court ruling            
By Matt Dixon 02/23/2023 POLITICO
Florida Republicans are seeking to weaken laws protecting journalists.

The proposal pushing to weaken state laws protecting journalists is part of Gov. Ron DeSantis’ feud with media outlets that he claims are biased against Republicans. | James Gilbert/Getty Images

TALLAHASSEE, Fla. — Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis’ broken relationship with the mainstream media could get even worse.

At the governor’s urging, Florida’s Republican-dominated Legislature is pushing to weaken state laws that have long protected journalists against defamation suits and frivolous lawsuits. The proposal is part DeSantis’ ongoing feud with media outlets like The New York Times, Miami Herald, CNN and The Washington Post — media companies he claims are biased against Republicans — as he prepares for a likely 2024 presidential bid.

Beyond making it easier to sue journalists, the proposal is also being positioned to spark a larger legal battle with the goal of eventually overturning New York Times v. Sullivan, the landmark 1964 U.S. Supreme Court ruling that limits public officials’ ability to sue publishers for defamation, according to state Rep. Alex Andrade, the Florida Republican sponsoring the bill.

“There is a strong argument to be made that the Supreme Court overreached,” Andrade said in an interview. “This is not the government shutting down free speech. This is a private cause of action.”

Andrade said he is working with DeSantis’ office on the bill: “I would say I am accepting their input.”


GOP needs to speak out, unafraid, like the Dems did when they controlled the house...BLAST IT FROM THE ROOFTOPS..!

The dems wanted to pack the SCOTUS 

with dem leaning judges

Biden Supreme Court commission under investigation by Jordan, Grassley, and Graham     by Kaelan Deese • Yesterday Washington Examiner

House Judiciary Chairman Jim Jordan (R-OH) and former Senate Judiciary chairmen Lindsey Graham (R-SC) and Chuck Grassley (R-IA) sent letters to former leaders of President Joe Biden's Supreme Court reform commission, requesting documents and communications from the now-defunct judiciary focus group.

Biden formed the commission in April 2021 and was tasked to provide analysis for and against reforming the Supreme Court after the administration faced months of pressure by liberal lawmakers and advocates calling to consider expanding the size of the nine-member high court. The commission ultimately concluded with recommendations for ethics and greater transparency but said there was "profound disagreement" about court expansions or term limits.

Although the commission has since disbanded, "questions remain about the Commission’s work, deliberations, and true purpose,” the three Republican lawmakers wrote in the letters to Robert Bauer and Cristina Rodriguez, former co-chairpeople of Biden's commission.

IS GRAHAM AFRAID SOMEONE WILL KNOW WHAT HE IS SAYING?

Sen. Lindsey Graham, right, speaks with Sen. Chuck Grassley. (AP Photo/Carolyn Kaster)© Provided by Washington Examiner


Thursday, February 23, 2023

'Why Would We Subsidize Non-US Citizens?': DeSantis Defends Ending Tuition Help For Undocumented   
2/23/2023


Gov. Ron DeSantis (R-FL) defends prohibiting undocumented immigrants from getting out-of-state tuition waivers.