Friday, February 18, 2022

Posting this at the risk of being considered RACIST. After reading this article remember ONE thing...Black people aren't the ones doing this. It's the HEAD of the TV network or show, maybe the casting director, certainly NOT the actors, they just want a job. It's the HONCHOs, the head men/women in charge...TRYING TO DESTROY THE WHITE RACE, ESPECIALLY OLD, WHITE, MEN..!!

BEEN NOTICING THIS FOR A WHILE NOW

Brainwashing is best accomplished when you have no idea that it is being done but simply occurs as part of the fabric of your life. While you may "feel" that something is wrong, you are being programmed, nonetheless. Think about TV Commercials and shows with these facts in mind.

Verified Facts: I got this from a friend. Interesting statistics. Glad I didn't need to sort them out though.

US population 334 million consisting of 57.8% white, 18.7% Latino, 12.1% Black and 11.4% Asian or other.

Then break that down to about 10% of all existing marriages that are interracial including those of all races, and only 5.6% of the population that identifies as LGBT. You would expect the same ratio's in TV commercials if they represented America but here's what you see instead, taken from a log of TV commercials over a 4 month period, which is quite different.

For TV, white men as the majority of Americans have all but disappeared. When they are in commercials, they are either old, ugly and sick or they are the partner of a black woman and have no speaking part. In 3 of the commercials the white men are doing laundry and always paired with a little girl to whom they are delivering the clean clothes. In other words, less than 10% of the population is driving 90% of the narrative.

There were zero commercials of White fathers and sons. None! So, while 75% of white children live with both their parents, including their fathers, we choose instead not to model that that in favor of the 62% of black children that do not live in a two-parent household? This is our new normal in their eyes? As acceptable? Is this the healthy "normal" image we want to model to our population?


Equally disturbing, young white boys and teens have also disappeared, unless they were flagrantly new age gay, as though that represents the "majority" instead of the pitifully small minority. What distorted perception of reality does that serve? The study found a majority of the children were white girls with a black "brother" even though this represents the smallest percentage of any reality discussed thus far! The MAJORITY of TV commercial couples consist of a white woman with a black man, when in reality these make up about 6% of the 30% of blacks that are married or about 2% of our population. Are you starting to see how ridiculous, yet pervasive this extraordinary brainwashing is? Exactly what are they trying to program into us with this relentless deluge of non-reality?

Surprisingly, in the month of December there was an uptick (but not a majority) in good looking white male models, but research determined that in each and every case it was a cologne commercial and every one of those commercials were made in Europe where they still use white men in their commercials. Here, on the other hand, they prefer to portray young white males as so mind-numbingly stupid as being incapable of delivering their lines and couldn't even say "Liberty Mutual", the insurance company featured in the commercial.

Over a period of 4 months, it concluded that while the African American population in America is only 12%, they were in 94.3% of the commercials. Black males are only 5% of our population yet were in 89.7% of the ads. Then you have to ask, where are the Asians and Latino's that make up nearly THREE TIMES the black population? Are they in THREE TIMES the number of ads or is something severely skewed here in the minds of Hollywood and Madison Avenue?

The fact is that while white males make up the largest segment of our population, they were in only in 4% of the TV commercials! In most of those cases they are in their 60's to 80's and were pushing medication for debilitating diseases, reverse mortgages (Tom Selleck) or Medicare plans. While the study had many, many more alarming facts, one that really stands out is that virtually every ad campaign for new cars featured a woman driver except for Lincoln. In the commercials for automobiles there were more black women drivers than white women. Again, Europe was the exception here where Mercedes and BMW had NO VISIBLE DRIVERS!! They showed the cars cruising highways but never allowed a view where the driver was visible. I found that very interesting. Are they more interested in selling the product while we appear to be more interested in selling the political/racial message?

And it is not just our commercials that offer this skewed media driven unreality. It is also nearly impossible to turn on a show that doesn't have a gay couple or LGBT component, yet in reality only one in eighteen should, if they want to accurately represent the less than 5.6% of the population that fall in this group. The results of this brainwashing are dramatic and very successful. Despite the low percentage in real life, when polled, Americans have been brainwashed to believe that 24% of all Americans are LGBT! Based on commercials, they must also believe that the "average" American family is biracial, that white men barely exist, and Latinos/Asians do not exist at all.

That is the magic and the tragedy of the fake, dishonest and unrealistic "woke" TV that we watch and are affected by 24/7, even though it is far afield from our reality. Ditto for the "woke" minority that follow mindlessly in its wake, thinking that this bizarre narrative is in fact real or justified, when it is merely an illusion and fabrication. They truly do control our entire thought process and will distort our perception of reality, if we allow them to.

While it is one thing to erase the stigma of single parenthood, bi-racialism, or unusual sexual preferences, it is another thing completely to portray them as the "Role Model" or "Norm", as representative of our entire society, especially at the expense of true normality or realism. In this case, it looks like White, Latino, Asian and straight lives don’t matter according to them, and Black privilege with a side of LGBT has taken us over! Keep your head and don't fall for it.

Thursday, February 17, 2022

Tucker: The media played a starring role in the death of Canadian democracy   Fox News Feb. 16, 2022

‘Tucker Carlson Tonight’ host argues Canadian prime minister is combatting trucker protests through ‘tyranny.’ #FoxNews #Tucker

The Media Desperately Wants a Republican Civil War        Kurt Schlichter  Posted: Feb 17, 2022

Regime media flagship CNN recently rolled out Governor Larry Hogan of the State of Who Cares to proclaim that he is thinking of running for president in 2024. It’s not kind to laugh at the mentally ill, but then our kindness is kind of used up, so consider this my laughter at the idea that this insufferable dork – who bears a striking resemblance to Brian Stelter (who is a potato) – is ever going to be president of anything.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

He announced on CNN that he’s going to occupy the sane lane of the 2024 Republican primary. The idea of a potentially viable GOP candidate whose strategy is to go on the Sex Pest Channel and announce that everyone else in the party he aspires to lead is nuts seems, well…

Let me repeat myself.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

That toobinesque media fantasy that some mask-loving doofus governor of a third-tier state is going to win the heart, minds, or anything else of the Republicans is so ludicrous you kind of suspect they invited him onto their shows to share his delusions and then to laugh at him – as we do. What other explanation is there” He’s about as popular among Republicans as the Lincoln Project is at a middle school, which is ironic because the Lincoln Project is about the only group that might support him. And even that’s unlikely – Evan McMuffin is out there making noises about running for something and he’s got the edge on Hogan with the LP crew because he looks much younger.

Again…

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

But the efforts of Hogan’s Zeroes trying to push this goof down the throats of an unwilling GOP base is just a symptom of what we have been seeing from an increasingly panicked establishment that is watching as Grandpa Badfinger continues to put the “fail” in “failure” as pseudo-president. The regime media is desperate to try to make “fetch” happen, with this “fetch” being the notion that Republican voters have somehow decided that they want to return to the legacy of curated defeat that defined Conservative, Inc.’s cruise ship era. We are, they tell us, tired of that uppity Trump and all his successes and insults. We are ready to once again go along, get along, and lose along.

Oh, okay…


HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!


They want to divide the party in two, except the party is not divided in two in any real sense. There is the 99% of the GOP that wants to crush the Dems, and the 1% that wants to ogle the Liz Cheney centerfold in this month’s edition of Swamp Creature.

But since our enemies can’t find a rift they will try to manufacture one. According to unreliable sources in the media – are there any other kind? – Donald Trump is losing his touch and losing his base. Leave it to our much worse betters to fail to understand the dynamic of its enemies – one huge advantage we have is that, because the left owns all the institutions, we know them every well while they don’t bother to understand us at all. Obviously, what they hope for is to sow the seeds of conflict within the elephant party and get us chasing our tail instead of pinning inflation, CRT, and international humiliation on the donkey party.


HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

It's not happening, folks. The base has not abandoned Donald Trump, nor will it. But it is also not slavishly devoted to him as our enemies imagine. Trump was the avatar of this movement, not the movement itself. The vast majority of the party appreciates the President for what he did and what he endured. That does not mean the base is going to simply nod and obey whenever Trump says something – look at the hostile reaction in the crowd at a recent rally when he started talking about vaccines. Moreover, they are not dead set on Trump in 2024. Many want a primary not because they hate but because they want the best candidate and a coronation would leave Trump heading into 2024 soft and out-of-shape. They like Trump. But they are not owned by Trump. And they want to win more than anything.

Trump is still the most powerful voice in the party, and his word does carry weight. Yet the regime media is inadvertently correct that Donald Trump’s kingmaking is not going without a hitch. He has blown it occasionally – for example, passing over party outsider Robby Starbuck for party favorite Morgan Ortagus in Tennessee-5 drew huge and proper pushback from the base. But the media wishcasts that there is some sort of groundswell of “unTrumpy” candidates out there likely to be nominated for that reason. Nonsense. There is not. There are few significant candidates who are “unTrumpy” for the simple fact that the collection of attitudes and principles that now forms the Republican Party baseline is shared by the base and by Trump. And if you think that there’s a lane for hating Trump, and therefore his voters, well…

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

The media is eager to try to get the GOP to embrace the old hawkishness n’ corporate tax cut vibe of the old school GOP precisely because it was so unpopular. One of Trump’s many huge contributions was driving a stake through the withered heart of that lame paradigm. Sure, some pols can still get by on pushing it, but most are timeservers who built up enough familiarity and goodwill over the years to keep getting reelected. The guys and gals who are coming in fresh and who have a shot are almost all fully based. They understand that the biggest priority for a modern Republican politician is not shrimping the toes of corporate donors but fighting the leftist politico-cultural battle.

And that’s what the left’s media fears, so that is why it is trying to create a false choice between Trumpian candidates and non-Trumpian ones. But there is no choice. The GOP is effectively all populist/conservative. This does rub some of the establishment figures the wrong way. After all, their job is to make things run smoothly and the base is lighting pitchforks to burn it all down. But no one who stands against what Trump came to embody is going anywhere in any primary. And there’s only one thing to say to anyone dumb enough to believe differently

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

Saw Killary on TV today, her response to Durhams report, almost gleefully said something about "Trump still coming after her"...she thinks she's still relevant because her name is in the news again...I'm still hoping she'll go to JAIL !!

John Durham, Almost the Media’s Invisible Man BY THE DAILY SIGNAL FEBRUARY 16, 2022    By Tim Graham for The Daily Signal  

To the media elite, Durham’s probe is only useful to the “right-wing media wormhole.” Facts don’t come first. The truth isn’t more important than ever.

So, just imagine we turned the Justice Department dockets around. Can you imagine what the “news” would sound like if we took all the enormous and incessant coverage of the DOJ prosecutions and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi investigations of the Jan. 6 riot and awarded that to the Durham probe? And turned the Jan. 6 probes into obscurity?

The facts on media coverage (and noncoverage) demonstrate how our media elite today is a Democratic machine. That’s why most Americans don’t trust the “news.” Like Clinton’s shady lawyers, they are all about creating a partisan narrative, not reporting events “without fear or favor” as they unfold.

Syndicated with permission from The Daily Signal.

No one can ever claim that the notion of Trump-Russia collusion and the Mueller investigation were downplayed or ignored by the press. It was the opposite. The story was enormous and incessant.

Rich Noyes of the Media Research Center found that from Jan. 20, 2017, through July 20, 2019, the evening newscasts at ABC, CBS, and NBC alone devoted an astounding 2,634 minutes to the Trump-Russia narrative.

On Feb. 12, the conservative media reported a “bombshell.” Well, the term “bombshell” is almost copyrighted as a journalism term for “Republican scandal deepener.”

Special counsel John Durham, tasked with investigating the origins of the FBI’s probe into Donald Trump and Russia, reported a client for Hillary Clinton’s law firm, Perkins Coie, was monitoring internet traffic at Trump Tower, Trump’s Central Park West apartment building, and the Executive Office of the President. They wanted information to sell a “narrative” of Trump-Russia collusion.

ABC, CBS, and NBC coverage? None. Other networks and major newspapers balked. Then they tiptoed in to deny it meant anything.

From the beginning, liberal partisans like Rep. Adam Schiff have trashed Durham’s probe as “tainted” by Trump’s desires for an investigation. On ABC in 2019, Schiff denounced it as automatically “illegitimate” because “when you win an election, you don’t seek to just prosecute the losing side, but this is what Bill Barr is seeking to do.”

Schiff spent four years prosecuting the winning side of the 2016 election. Saying a probe is “tainted” by partisan desire displays an incredible lack of introspection.

While the networks spent more than 2,600-plus minutes on the Trump-Russia narrative, they’ve done next to nothing on Durham. Let’s review just how much coverage Durham has received from the Big Three networks since Attorney General William Barr put him on the case in the spring of 2019.

ABC gave Durham’s probe nine mentions over the last two years and nine months. CBS had five. NBC had six.

Many of these were brief mentions. On ABC, they came from Republican panelists on the Sunday show “This Week.” On CBS, two came in questions as Trump-hating FBI employee Peter Strzok sold his liberal-hack book on two CBS morning shows. (Has Durham contacted you? No.) On NBC, there was one question to Barr and one mention in 2021 that in his confirmation process, Attorney General Merrick Garland saw no reason to dismiss Durham.

Durham is the anti-Mueller. Nothing he finds is considered newsworthy. The media treats him as “tainted,” like he’s a news leper. “Unclean! Unclean!” Durham’s team isn’t loaded with liberal Democrats who leak juicy details to other liberal Democrats in “objective” media.

The media used the Mueller probe to constantly paint a black cloud over Trump’s presidency and present it in real time as perpetually doomed—even when it wasn’t. The walls were always “closing in” because that was the song they couldn’t stop singing.

To the media elite, Durham’s probe is only useful to the “right-wing media wormhole.” Facts don’t come first. The truth isn’t more important than ever.

So, just imagine we turned the Justice Department dockets around. Can you imagine what the “news” would sound like if we took all the enormous and incessant coverage of the DOJ prosecutions and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi investigations of the Jan. 6 riot and awarded that to the Durham probe? And turned the Jan. 6 probes into obscurity?

The facts on media coverage (and noncoverage) demonstrate how our media elite today is a Democratic machine. That’s why most Americans don’t trust the “news.” Like Clinton’s shady lawyers, they are all about creating a partisan narrative, not reporting events “without fear or favor” as they unfold.

Syndicated with permission from The Daily Signal.
It's Black History month, and like always the Democrats are putting on a pageant to show us all how "woke and anti-racist" they are, while telling everyone to educate themselves on Black History.
Maybe it's time for the Democrats to get a little education too.

You see, Fellow Conservative, Democrats want you to learn their history, and ignore the real Black History in America, like how Abraham Lincoln was a Republican, or how the first Black Americans in the Senate and Congress were Republicans named Hiram Revels and Joseph Rainey.




What's worse is how Democrats always forget to tell anyone that the first 23 Black Americans in Congress were all Republican, or how Factions in the Democratic Party founded the Ku Klux Klan.

The real Black History shows us that Democrats were the ones that suppressed Black Americans and used violence to stop them from voting or running for office. The only thing that's changed is how Democrats just lie to the Black Community about "free things" while doing nothing to actually help them



 


 DIAGNOSIS OF A LIBERAL


Wednesday, February 16, 2022

We all KNOW this but it always feels good when you hear someone else say it as well...ESPECIALLY a newsperson

Laura Ingraham: This was never about the virus  FOX NEWS


Laura Ingraham says Democrats always feel justified when they take away your freedom or when they skirt the rules. #FoxNews #TheIngrahamAngle


Trudeau is accused of bringing 'martial law' to Canada  by invoking emergency powers to crack  down on Freedom Convoy and freeze protesters' bank accounts: Mounties arrest 11 and find cache of weapons at border

  • Under the Emergencies Act, the government introduced measures intended to cut off protesters' funding 
  • PM Justin Trudeau invoked the country's Emergencies Act on Monday afternoon
  • The Canadian Civil Liberties Association said the government had not met the standard for invoking the Emergencies Act
  • Tucker Carlson also blasted its invocation, saying Trudeau had vastly overstepped the mark  
  • The act is intended to deal with threats to 'sovereignty, security and territorial integrity,' the group said
  • Premiers of Alberta, Manitoba, Quebec, and Saskatchewan spoke out opposing Trudeau's extraordinary plan  
  • The officials, who are the Canadian equivalent of state governors, called the plan a dangerous overreach  
  • The 1988 Emergencies Act allows the federal government to override the provinces with special measures
  • Previously known as the the War Measures Act, has been used only once before in peacetime 
Tucker: The media played a starring role in the death of Canadian democracy  Fox News


‘Tucker Carlson Tonight’ host argues Canadian prime minister is combatting trucker protests through ‘tyranny.’ #FoxNews #Tucker


 Spygate Erupts! -  The Dan Bongino Show  Published February 14, 2022  Ep. 1705


In this episode I address the explosion of new information that came out in the Spygate case.

TRUMP and the SUPPOSED "RUSSIAN COLLUSION'

The media’s silence is very revealing: Sen. Ron Johnson

Wisconsin senator discusses the revelations in the Durham probe on ‘The Story.’

VIDEO>>>HERE

Monday, February 14, 2022

 Jim Jordan Blasts Durham Probe's Bombshell Revelation   Leah Barkoukis  @LeahBarkoukis  Posted: Feb 14, 2022

Ohio Rep. Jim Jordan blasted the bombshell revelation from special counsel John Durham’s investigation that Clinton campaign lawyers paid to have Trump Tower servers, and later the White House, “infiltrated.”

Jordan called the plot, which was meant to support the narrative that President Trump had ties to Russia, “as wrong as it gets.”

“They were creating the very news they were then tweeting about and trying to get the media to write about,” the Ohio Republican told Fox News. “This is, frankly, it's no different. It's the template that the left uses, that the Democrats use. It's the same thing that happened four months ago when we found out the Department of Education went out and solicited the letter from the National School Board Association so they could do what they wanted to do, namely spy on parents.”

He continued: “They spied on apresidential campaign. That's as wrong as it gets. But then we found out from this filing that they actually spied on a sitting president, which is even worse. So, this is just simply as wrong as it can possibly be.”

TWEET
A tech company hacked the White House and spied on a sitting President. This should concern everyone. But the mainstream media refuses to cover it.

TWEET

RNC Researc @RNCResearch

WATCH: @Jim_Jordan says the illegal spying on President Trump "was worse than we thought." "President Trump was right!"


TWEET
Think the media will go back and correct all their stories on Russian collusion?

Jordan vowed that if Republicans retake control of the House of Representatives after the midterm elections, they will launch an investigation.


Sunday, February 13, 2022

Candace Owens DEMOLISH Nancy Pelosi With An OUTSTANDING Speech, Gets A Standing Ovation  Real Patriots  2/13/2022

Watch candace owens go off on nancy pelosi and the entire Democrats

Take Congress, Fix The Nation, Jail The Criminals 
Kevin McCullough Posted: Feb 13, 2022

Good hearted Americans hear this clearly, getting our America back is not hard.

Maintaining focus and seeing it through will be the most difficult part of the process, but the solution is simple.

This November take back Congress. January 2023 fix the nation. And from this point forward jail the criminals.

By doing so you will decimate the campaign of the group that’s in the White House now. And you simultaneously shatter the bitter-clinger hopes of any semblance of their last three candidates—or their proxies—from coming back.

The thanks will in part at least belong to Special Counsel John Durham.

I know that the former President was supremely frustrated that he went at the meticulous pace that he worked at, but this weekend’s indictment of top Hillary lawyer Michael Sussman showed that from the beginning Durham has focused on the law breaking and documenting what is necessary to send people to jail.

In summary Durham indicted the top lawyer for Hillary Clinton for committing crimes worse than Watergate and potentially add up to treason.

In short Team Hillary—the team that paid for the fake Russian dossier—hired technical experts to hack the servers of then candidate Trump at the Trump tower in New York, and continued through his election attempting to penetrate and corrupt White House servers to frame the sitting President.

In order for it to work you needed the cooperation of the sitting President Barack Obama, his Vice President Joe Biden, and various staff like Dr. Sudan Rice. (Usually seen most often now with her hand fully inserted into the hollow back of the dummy puppet who confuses ordering ice cream with standing down Putin.)

In order to pull off this plan you also needed the cooperation of the woman who was then seeking to take over the office of President.

All of this cooperation had to be fluid, and above all else had to remain secret.

The evil serpent rears it's ugly head once again

BOMBSHELL: Clinton Campaign Lawyers Paid Tech Company to Infiltrate Trump White House Servers   Matt Vespa @mvespa1 Posted: Feb 12, 202

Remember the Durham probe? It’s a criminal investigation that was launched by then-Attorney General William Barr. It was supposed to get to the origins of the Russian collusion probe. As with any government investigation, it takes time, a lot of time. It also splinters into various off-shoots—which again increases the length of time of the probe. The amount of time has outlasted the Trump administration. To protect the effort and to ensure it would continue after the Trump White House, AG Barr gave former U.S Attorney John Durham special counsel status. It’s been under the radar for months. Now, we have a bombshell discovery which if true, means that someone could be going to jail. We now know why this is a criminal investigation after all. Durham’s efforts have unearthed a plot by Clinton campaign lawyers to infiltrate Trump tower and the servers of the Trump White House to tie the former president to the Russian collusion myth (via Fox News):

Lawyers for the Clinton campaign paid a technology company to "infiltrate" servers belonging to Trump Tower, and later the White House, in order to establish an "inference" and "narrative" to bring to government agencies linking Donald Trump to Russia, a filing from Special Counsel John Durham says.

Durham filed a motion on Feb. 11 focused on potential conflicts of interest related to the representation of former Clinton campaign lawyer Michael Sussman, who has been charged with making a false statement to a federal agent. Sussman has pleaded not guilty.

The indictment against Sussman says he told then-FBI General Counsel James Baker in September 2016, less than two months before the 2016 presidential election, that he was not doing work "for any client" when he requested and held a meeting in which he presented "purported data and 'white papers' that allegedly demonstrated a covert communications channel" between the Trump Organization and Alfa Bank, which has ties to the Kremlin.

But Durham's filing on Feb. 11, in a section titled "Factual Background," reveals that Sussman "had assembled and conveyed the allegations to the FBI on behalf of at least two specific clients, including a technology executive (Tech Executive 1) at a U.S.-based internet company (Internet Company 1) and the Clinton campaign."

Durham’s filing said Sussman’s "billing records reflect" that he "repeatedly billed the Clinton Campaign for his work on the Russian Bank-1 allegations."

Durham states that the internet company that Tech Executive-1 worked for "had come to access and maintain dedicated servers" for the Executive Office of the President as "part of a sensitive arrangement whereby it provided DNS resolution services to the EOP."

"Tech Executive-1 and his associates exploited this arrangement by mining the EOP's DNS traffic and other data for the purpose of gathering derogatory information about Donald Trump," Durham states.


hOW THE VAXXERS ARE TABULATING COVID DEATHS BETWEEN UNVAXXED, VAXXED AND BOOSTED.

Will the 'Unvaxxed' Have the Last Laugh?   Rob Jenkins  Posted: Feb 13, 2022

For over a year now, the messaging from our “health experts” and government leaders has been as dreary as it has been monotonal: Take the covid “vaccine” or die.

That talking point was reiterated by President Biden* just a few weeks ago when he warned the “unvaxxed” would face “a winter of severe disease and death.” And that was before New Jersey’s resident rodent meteorologist, Milltown Mel, shuffled off this mortal coil just prior to Groundhog Day. So I guess that means, in New Jersey at least, another six weeks of severe disease and death.

Originally, of course, we were told the mRNA injections would prevent people from contracting the disease. “If you get vaccinated, you won’t get covid” was the mantra recited for months, in various forms and multiple forums, by Drs. Fauci, Walensky, and Murthy, President Biden*, and many others. We were also assured that sufficiently jabbed people don’t spread the virus, with Fauci claiming the injections constitute a “dead end for covid.”

It's important not to forget those statements, as the same people now insist they never promised any such thing. Perhaps that’s because, in the face of overwhelming evidence, they’ve been forced to admit jabbed people can and do get covid and can and do give it to others. Said Walensky just a few weeks ago, “what [the vaccines] can’t do anymore is prevent transmission.” Even Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla was forced to acknowledge that his products now offer “limited, in any, protection.”

But what about the vaunted “death benefit” from the mRNA injections? They still protect against serious illness and death, right? Well, yes, that does seem to be the case—but the effect is waning fast. Moreover, the claim itself comes with several asterisks.

There have always been questions about how we count “covid deaths,” as both the CDC and the UK’s National Health Service have recently acknowledged. But if anything, those problems have been amplified in the way we differentiate between “vaccinated” and “unvaccinated” deaths.

For one thing, the most commonly cited number to prove “vaccine efficacy”—“90 percent of covid deaths are among the unvaccinated”—is fundamentally flawed because it goes back to the earliest days of the injections when almost no one had gotten them. Obviously, nearly all who died of (or with) covid in January and February of 2021 were “unvaccinated.”

Moreover, our health officials have been engaged for over a year in a kind of statistical sleight of hand, categorizing people who have taken the injections as “unvaccinated” up until 14 days after their second shot, which means at least five or six weeks have passed since their first shot. In doing so, they ignore evidence that the shots actually make people more susceptible to the virus in the short term. So if you contract covid after getting both shots, but prior to the closing of the 14-day window, and then die, you are considered an “unvaccinated” death. (They’re playing this same trick with the booster shots, too.)

I've always been taught and told that "No one is above the law".! Evidently, that's NOT true. Whether Byrd had reason to shoot Babbitt or not, the fact that he WOULD NOT cooperate with the investigators or even make a statement is enough to put him in jail. He just kept his mouth shut and THEY LET HIM GO...WITH NO CHARGES WHATSOEVER... I hear a lot of talk about white privilege, is this BLACK PRIVILEGE.??

Cop Who Killed Ashli Babbitt Was Cleared of Criminal Wrongdoing Without Interview   By Paul Sperry, RealClearInvestigationsJanuary 11, 2022

When U.S. Capitol Police Lt. Michael Byrd went on “NBC Nightly News” to tell his side of shooting and killing unarmed Jan. 6 rioter Ashli Babbitt, he made a point to note he’d been investigated by several agencies and exonerated for his actions that day.

“There’s an investigative process [and] I was cleared by the DOJ [Department of Justice], and FBI and [the D.C.] Metropolitan Police,” he told NBC News anchor Lester Holt in August, adding that the Capitol Police also cleared him of wrongdoing and decided not to discipline or demote him for the shooting.

Byrd then answered a series of questions by Holt about the shooting, but what he told the friendly journalist, he likely never told investigators. That’s because he refused to answer their questions, according to several sources and documents reviewed by RealClearInvestigations.

In fact, investigators cleared Byrd of wrongdoing in the shooting without actually interviewing him about the shooting or threatening him with punishment if he did not cooperate with their criminal investigation.

“He didn’t provide any statement to [criminal] investigators and they didn’t push him to make a statement,” Babbitt family attorney Terry Roberts said in an RCI interview. “It’s astonishing how skimpy his investigative file is."

Roberts, who has spoken with the D.C. MPD detective assigned to the case, said the kid-glove treatment of Byrd raises suspicions the investigation was a “whitewash.”

The lawyer's account appears to be backed up by a January 2021 internal affairs report, which notes Byrd "declined to provide a statement,” D.C. MPD documents show.

Asked about it, a D.C. MPD spokeswoman confirmed that Byrd did not cooperate with internal affairs agents or FBI agents, who jointly investigated what was one of the most high-profile officer-involved shooting cases in U.S. history.

“MPD did not formally interview Lt. Byrd,” deputy D.C. MPD communications director Kristen Metzger said. And, “He didn’t give a statement while under the U.S. Attorney’s Office investigation.”

 READ STORY