Tuesday, April 25, 2023
Tucker Carlson’s ‘stunning, bewildering’ exit from Fox News explained Sky News Aust
TC
Apr 25, 2023Tucker Carlson delivers an address and sits down for a Q&A session with Heritage president Kevin Roberts — his last public address of the sort before his departure from Fox News.
Sunday, April 23, 2023
Texas Cattle Found Dead, But
What Happened to Their
Tongues Is Even More
Disturbing
By April 23, 2023
Texas authorities are investigating the mysterious death of six cattle in a region northeast of Austin along State Highway OSR.The Madison County Sheriff’s Office posted about the deaths on Facebook, saying that the investigation began when a rancher reported that a “6-year-old longhorn-cross cow had been found lying on her side, deceased, and mutilated.”
The grisly description of the scene made it clear there was nothing accidental about the condition of the dead animal.
“A straight, clean cut, with apparent precision, had been made to remove the hide around the cow’s mouth on one side, leaving the meat under the removed hide untouched. The tongue was also completely removed from the body with no blood spill,” the post said.
Adding to the mystery was that “there were no signs of struggle and the grass around the cow was undisturbed. No footprints or tire tracks were noted in the area,” the post said.
Even stranger, nothing ate the remains of the animal, “leaving it to decay untouched for several weeks.”
As the investigation continued, the department said that five other cattle deaths were reported along the highway in Brazos County and Robertson County.
Noting the separate herds were victimized, the post said there was a commonality among the dead animals.
“The other cows were found in the same condition, lying on one side with the exposed side of their face cut along the jaw line and the tongue, once again, completely removed,” the post said.
“On two of the five cows, a circular cut was made removing the anus and the external genitalia. This circular cut was made with the same precision as the cuts noted around the jaw lines of each cow,” the post said.
The post said that once again, there were no tracks near the animals and that the carcasses were left alone by scavengers.
The post said that the animals’ cause of death is not known.
Mysterious attacks on animals have taken place before.
In October, according to the New York Post, dozens of cattle in Colorado were killed by what appeared to be a predator, although no tracks of one were found.
In 2019, five bulls were killed in eastern Oregon, according to the Associated Press.
A report in The New York Times noted that in the 1970s, nearly 200 dead cows in multiple states were reported in a series of deaths in which the sex organs and tongues of the animals were taken.
The report said that no conclusion was ever reached as to how the animals were killed or who did the killing.
Merrick Garland revealed to be senior
The White House has dismissed the claims.
Biden official named by IRS
whistleblower in Hunter Biden tax cover
-up: report
Roberto Wakerell-Cruz Montreal QC Apr 21, 2023
The White House has dismissed the claims.
OF COURSE THEY DID!
Attorney General Merrick Garland has been identified as the "senior" Biden administration official at the center of a new IRS whistleblower claim, a source familiar with the situation told the Daily Mail.
The whistleblower, a career IRS Criminal Supervisor Special Agent, claims that politics are "improperly infecting decisions" in a high-profile criminal tax probe, which is reportedly related to President Biden's son, Hunter Biden.
The allegations contradict sworn testimony to Congress by a "senior political appointee," who has now been identified as Garland.
The whistleblower's claims also involve "failure to mitigate clear conflicts of interest in the ultimate disposition of the case," as well as "preferential treatment and politics improperly infecting decisions and protocols that would normally be followed by career law enforcement professionals in similar circumstances if the subject were not politically connected," according to a letter from attorney Mark Lytle.
The letter was sent to senior members of the House and Senate, and the whistleblower has already shared information with the Treasury Department's inspector general for tax administration and the Department of Justice's inspector general.
The revelation has shaken Capitol Hill and both political parties. Sen. Dick Durbin, (D-IL), who is the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, said, "We take all whistleblower statements seriously, as we should. Some turn out to be very important and some not. But we take them all seriously at the outset and look at them closely."
Chairman of the House Oversight Committee James Comer, (R-KY) claimed that Hunter Biden has been involved in "deceptive, shady business schemes" that have seen the president's relatives rake in "millions from foreign adversaries like China."
The White House has dismissed the claims, referencing the independence of the Department of Justice. "The president respects the rule of law and the independence of the Department of Justice," press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre said when asked about the claims.
Attorney General Merrick Garland has been identified as the "senior" Biden administration official at the center of a new IRS whistleblower claim, a source familiar with the situation told the Daily Mail.
The whistleblower, a career IRS Criminal Supervisor Special Agent, claims that politics are "improperly infecting decisions" in a high-profile criminal tax probe, which is reportedly related to President Biden's son, Hunter Biden.
The allegations contradict sworn testimony to Congress by a "senior political appointee," who has now been identified as Garland.
The whistleblower's claims also involve "failure to mitigate clear conflicts of interest in the ultimate disposition of the case," as well as "preferential treatment and politics improperly infecting decisions and protocols that would normally be followed by career law enforcement professionals in similar circumstances if the subject were not politically connected," according to a letter from attorney Mark Lytle.
The letter was sent to senior members of the House and Senate, and the whistleblower has already shared information with the Treasury Department's inspector general for tax administration and the Department of Justice's inspector general.
The revelation has shaken Capitol Hill and both political parties. Sen. Dick Durbin, (D-IL), who is the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, said, "We take all whistleblower statements seriously, as we should. Some turn out to be very important and some not. But we take them all seriously at the outset and look at them closely."
Chairman of the House Oversight Committee James Comer, (R-KY) claimed that Hunter Biden has been involved in "deceptive, shady business schemes" that have seen the president's relatives rake in "millions from foreign adversaries like China."
The White House has dismissed the claims, referencing the independence of the Department of Justice. "The president respects the rule of law and the independence of the Department of Justice," press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre said when asked about the claims.
MONEY TALKS...Who was holding the gun,? ....Who pulled the hammer back?....Who disregarded the BASIC RULES of handling a firearm?..."TREAT ALL FIREARMS AS IF THEY ARE LOADED" !
ALERT: Shocking News in Alec Baldwin
Manslaughter Case
(TheRedAlertNews.com) – BREAKING NEWS ALERT: Just moments ago, the criminal charges against Alec Baldwin for the accidental shooting on the set of his movie “Rust” were dropped, according to his lawyers.
Baldwin, 65, faced involuntary manslaughter charges for the October 21, 2021, shooting of 42-year-old cinematographer Halyna Hutchins on the New Mexico set of the Western film. A prop pistol he used in a scene mistakenly fired a live round.Baldwin pleaded not guilty to the charges brought by the Santa Fe district attorney. His lawyers, Luke Nikas and Alex Spiro, said in a statement, “We are pleased with the decision to dismiss the case against Alec Baldwin, and we encourage a proper investigation into the facts and circumstances of this tragic accident.”
During the incident, “Rust” director Joel Souza was behind Hutchins, looking at a camera angle as Baldwin rehearsed a scene where he was to draw his revolver and point it at the camera. Souza was also injured in the shooting, with the bullet hitting his shoulder.
Filming for the movie will continue in Montana this week. Hannah Gutierrez-Reed, the film’s former armorer and a second person charged with involuntary manslaughter, still faces charges related to the shooting.
Assistant director David Halls, a third person involved in the on-set tragedy, pleaded no contest to a single count of petty misdemeanor negligent use of a deadly weapon. He gave the gun to Baldwin but failed to check for live rounds.
Hutchins was treated at the scene and then transported to the University of New Mexico Hospital, where she died. The Santa Fe District Attorney’s Office did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Even though Baldwin claimed he never pulled the trigger, FBI investigators found no other way the shot could have been fired. They discovered a mix of live rounds and dummy bullets on the set, a serious safety violation.
According to previous police documents, the ammunition was left unsecured on a cart during a lunch break on the day of the shooting. The agency reported that the gun could not fire without the trigger being pulled.
In January, a special prosecutor claimed that Hutchins would be alive if proper steps were taken. Andrea Reeb said, “If any one of these three people — Alec Baldwin, Hannah Gutierrez-Reed, or David Halls — had done their job, Halyna Hutchins would be alive today. It’s that simple.” Reeb later stepped down from the case after Baldwin’s lawyers challenged her role as a New Mexico lawmaker.
Hutchins’ family sued Baldwin in February, arguing that he was responsible for her death because he held the weapon. Their attorney, Brian Panish, stated, “He had the gun, he says he pulled the hammer back, it fired, and she was killed. … The experts will look at it and make any determinations, but we don’t think this was caused by any defect in the weapon.” Baldwin is seeking to have the lawsuit dismissed.
During the incident, “Rust” director Joel Souza was behind Hutchins, looking at a camera angle as Baldwin rehearsed a scene where he was to draw his revolver and point it at the camera. Souza was also injured in the shooting, with the bullet hitting his shoulder.
Filming for the movie will continue in Montana this week. Hannah Gutierrez-Reed, the film’s former armorer and a second person charged with involuntary manslaughter, still faces charges related to the shooting.
Assistant director David Halls, a third person involved in the on-set tragedy, pleaded no contest to a single count of petty misdemeanor negligent use of a deadly weapon. He gave the gun to Baldwin but failed to check for live rounds.
Hutchins was treated at the scene and then transported to the University of New Mexico Hospital, where she died. The Santa Fe District Attorney’s Office did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Even though Baldwin claimed he never pulled the trigger, FBI investigators found no other way the shot could have been fired. They discovered a mix of live rounds and dummy bullets on the set, a serious safety violation.
According to previous police documents, the ammunition was left unsecured on a cart during a lunch break on the day of the shooting. The agency reported that the gun could not fire without the trigger being pulled.
In January, a special prosecutor claimed that Hutchins would be alive if proper steps were taken. Andrea Reeb said, “If any one of these three people — Alec Baldwin, Hannah Gutierrez-Reed, or David Halls — had done their job, Halyna Hutchins would be alive today. It’s that simple.” Reeb later stepped down from the case after Baldwin’s lawyers challenged her role as a New Mexico lawmaker.
Hutchins’ family sued Baldwin in February, arguing that he was responsible for her death because he held the weapon. Their attorney, Brian Panish, stated, “He had the gun, he says he pulled the hammer back, it fired, and she was killed. … The experts will look at it and make any determinations, but we don’t think this was caused by any defect in the weapon.” Baldwin is seeking to have the lawsuit dismissed.
“Not as cute as ‘kids in cages’ is it??” CHIP ROY is
an American HERO! 
Saturday, April 22, 2023
I truly believe that shootings won't stop until harsher punishment for MURDER is doled out. These young people today aren't afraid of prison. Some look at it as a badge of honor, how BRAVE they are. Others kill to join a gang, it's an initiation. BRING BACK THE DEATH PENALTY, preferably a firing squad. See if that makes a difference. It would probably bring out the crybaby in a lot of these "KILLERS" I saw a report today of a shooting here in Philly, a young man (16yo I think) was shot in the back, not even facing the shooter so he probably didn't know WHO he was killing..
Six now in custody
for Dadeville shooting
By Tom Knighton | 2:30 PM on April 21, 2023
6 people face murder charges for the Sweet 16 party massacre that left 4 dead and 32 injured
What happened over the weekend in Dadeville, Alabama ws, in fact, awful. We all know it. It shouldn’t have happened, but it did.
For many, that was all the evidence they needed to call for gun control.
However, I figured that when things shook out and we learned a lot more, we’d find that the problem wasn’t the lack of gun control but the fact that gun control is ill-equipped to prevent such things.
Now, six people are in custody for the shootings, and guess what? It wasn’t a lack of gun control.
For many, that was all the evidence they needed to call for gun control.
However, I figured that when things shook out and we learned a lot more, we’d find that the problem wasn’t the lack of gun control but the fact that gun control is ill-equipped to prevent such things.
Now, six people are in custody for the shootings, and guess what? It wasn’t a lack of gun control.
The Alabama Law Enforcement Agency and Tallapoosa County District Attorney Mike Segrest have confirmed a sixth arrest in the Dadeville mass shooting that left four dead and dozens injured.
A 15-year-old male from Tuskegee is also facing four counts of reckless murder. The teen’s name was not released due to his age.
Two other suspects were announced by the Alabama Law Enforcement Agency hours earlier Thursday. Johnny Letron Brown, 20, of Tuskegee, and Willie George Brown, 19, of Auburn, were arrested Thursday. ALEA confirmed these two are cousins. Like the other suspects charged, they also face four counts of reckless murder.
The arrests of Wilson LaMar Hill Jr., 20, Tyreese “Ty Reik” McCullough, 17, and Travis McCullough, 16, were announced Wednesday.
After announcing the first three arrests on Wednesday, ALEA Sgt. Jeremy Burkett said more arrests were to be expected.
“We very much have a plan, and we’re trying to execute it in a way that’s gonna work for what we’re trying to accomplish,” Burkett said. “We’ve been very strategic.”
That’s for the best.
Now, let’s remember that the shooters used handguns. Judging by the ages of the accused, though, there’s absolutely no way any of these three obtained a firearm lawfully. Yes, even in Alabama.
Federal law itself mandates that handguns cannot be sold to anyone under the age of 21 and yet, here we are.
What a lot of people don’t get is that criminals will violate laws. It’s kind of in the definition of “criminal.”
So, when they make a big to-do about how we need gun control to prevent them from being armed, it’s beyond ridiculous to take the arguments seriously.
In Dadeville, it looks like six people under the age of 21 had handguns, at least two of whom carried the guns illegally (Alabama’s law has constitutional carry for ages 20 and up), then used them in an illegal manner.
Just what would have suddenly stopped them from breaking the laws they already broke?
Universal background checks wouldn’t have. No one mistakes a 16-year-old for 21, so it’s unlikely some unsuspecting but law-abiding person sold the gun to him in good faith.
No, these were likely obtained on the black market or via theft, both of which are already illegal.
Friday, April 21, 2023
What's really hard to believe is that most of what is happening has been proven, and yet none of our reps and senators have done anything except talk. If we have proof as they claim, then bring up the charges, Or can only the demoRats bring up charges? AND... for Gods sake, somebody find and subpena RAY EPPS
Tucker Carlson: It is hard to believe this is happening Fox news Apr 19, 2023
Fox News host Tucker Carlson gives his take on Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s censorship for his views on COVID and the Ukraine war on 'Tucker Carlson Tonight.'
Bombshell: Ex-CIA Chief Confessed He
Got 50 Colleagues To Co-Sign False
Hunter Biden Laptop Letter In Bed To
‘Help Biden’ BY DAVID WETZEL 5 HOURS AGO
Joe Biden's presidential campaign allegedly urged a top United States officialto "help Biden" by getting signatures stating that the investigation on Hunter Biden's laptop was Russian disinformation.
The Biden camp reportedly asked former acting CIA Director Mike Morell to "help Biden" get 50 colleagues to sign a letter in October 2020 stating that the allegations about Hunter Biden's laptop having damning information was merely a ploy by the Russians to
undermine the United States
Joe Biden's presidential campaign allegedly urged a top United States officialto "help Biden" by getting signatures stating that the investigation on Hunter Biden's laptop was Russian disinformation.
The Biden camp reportedly asked former acting CIA Director Mike Morell to "help Biden" get 50 colleagues to sign a letter in October 2020 stating that the allegations about Hunter Biden's laptop having damning information was merely a ploy by the Russians to
undermine the United States
Antony Blinken. By: MEGA
Morell told the House Judiciary Committee during a private sworn testimony that Antony Blinken, now the secretary of state, was the Biden camp official who asked him "on or before" Oct. 17, 2020, to organize signatures to say the allegations against Hunter Biden were Russian misinformation.
That came three days after the New York Post published an email from the laptop that suggested Hunter Biden introduced a Ukrainian business partner to his father, who at the time was the vice president of the United States.
Morell told the House Judiciary Committee during a private sworn testimony that Antony Blinken, now the secretary of state, was the Biden camp official who asked him "on or before" Oct. 17, 2020, to organize signatures to say the allegations against Hunter Biden were Russian misinformation.
That came three days after the New York Post published an email from the laptop that suggested Hunter Biden introduced a Ukrainian business partner to his father, who at the time was the vice president of the United States.
Hunter Biden. Twitter/ @TheWakeninq
Morell told House members that he had no intention of exonerating Biden until after Blinken's call.
However, he did admit that the conversation "triggered … that intent."
Morell received an email containing a USA Today report that claimed the FBI was looking into whether the probe into Hunter Biden's laptop was part of a "disinformation campaign."
Morell told House members that he had no intention of exonerating Biden until after Blinken's call.
However, he did admit that the conversation "triggered … that intent."
Morell received an email containing a USA Today report that claimed the FBI was looking into whether the probe into Hunter Biden's laptop was part of a "disinformation campaign."
Joe Biden. By: MEGA
The email was signed by Andrew Bates, then-director of Biden's rapid-response team.
Morell told lawmakers that he did "a little bit of my own research" before speaking with CIA senior operations officer Marc Polymeropoulos for advice on putting together a letter that would discredit the New York Post's reporting.
Morell then collected signatures from 51 former intelligence personnel, including his own and four other former CIA directors such as John Brennan and Leon Panetta.
The email was signed by Andrew Bates, then-director of Biden's rapid-response team.
Morell told lawmakers that he did "a little bit of my own research" before speaking with CIA senior operations officer Marc Polymeropoulos for advice on putting together a letter that would discredit the New York Post's reporting.
Morell then collected signatures from 51 former intelligence personnel, including his own and four other former CIA directors such as John Brennan and Leon Panetta.
Donald Trump. By: MEGA
According to Morell, he sent an email to Nick Shapiro, former deputy chief of staff to Brennan, saying that the Biden campaign wanted the letter to go to one particular reporter with the Washington Post.
However, Morell said he didn't know why the Biden camp wanted the letter to go to that particular reporter.
It turned out that Shapiro took the letter to POLITICO, which published it on Oct. 19 with a headline saying "Hunter Biden story is Russian disinfo, dozens of former officials say."
According to Morell, he sent an email to Nick Shapiro, former deputy chief of staff to Brennan, saying that the Biden campaign wanted the letter to go to one particular reporter with the Washington Post.
However, Morell said he didn't know why the Biden camp wanted the letter to go to that particular reporter.
It turned out that Shapiro took the letter to POLITICO, which published it on Oct. 19 with a headline saying "Hunter Biden story is Russian disinfo, dozens of former officials say."
White House. By: MEGA
The letter claimed that the New York Post's story had all the signs of Russian disinformation.
Biden then used that information during a debate against Donald Trump.
Morell told House lawmakers that he then received a call from Steve Ricchetti, chairman of the Biden campaign, thanking him for preparing the letter.
“He was the head of the Biden campaign at the time … Steve thanked me for putting the statement out. And that was the extent of the conversation," according to the New York Post
The letter claimed that the New York Post's story had all the signs of Russian disinformation.
Biden then used that information during a debate against Donald Trump.
Morell told House lawmakers that he then received a call from Steve Ricchetti, chairman of the Biden campaign, thanking him for preparing the letter.
“He was the head of the Biden campaign at the time … Steve thanked me for putting the statement out. And that was the extent of the conversation," according to the New York Post
Thursday, April 20, 2023
Trump Dishes on the Closed-Door Courtroom – Donald Compares It to Disgraceful ‘Old Soviet Union’ Tactics
By Adam Casalino|April 18, 2023
You’ll be hard-pressed not to find someone who believes this Trump indictment is nothing but a scam. A Democrat DA is leading the effort, a man who long accused Trump of crimes–before any investigation was open. Most Americans believe this is one of many attempts by the left to discourage Trump’s election chances.
But now, Trump is revealing what went on during his arraignment.
The former president is facing numerous charges. Many legal experts believe these charges are not felony offenses. A reasonable judge would throw this case out. But the liberal-leaning populace of New York might not see it that way. And Trump is exposing what’s really going on.
From Breitbart:
Wow. Trump has most likely been encouraged by his legal team to refrain from discussing much of what is going on in the trial. But he revealed what it was like in the closed courtroom arrangement. He described the DA’s efforts to take him down as “old Soviet Union” style tactics.
In the Soviet era, government officials in Russia would use the power of the government to oppose and crush their political rivals. And Trump believes Democrats are doing that to him, today. And he even revealed he believes Biden himself is behind it.
Bragg employed a former senior DOJ official last year, someone who worked for Biden and has openly targeted Trump. It’s hard to ignore the fact that Democrats are running this case, during the election. How could Biden not be involved?
Remember, Democrats accused Trump of trying to take down his political rival in 2019, over a phone call. Yet today, Democrats are going after Biden’s top rival with a sham trial that most experts say isn’t valid. And we’re not supposed to think Biden is pulling a Soviet-era stunt to protect his regime?
Key Takeaways:Trump called the trial against him “old Soviet Union” style tactics.
He accused Joe Biden of being behind the Democrat-led case against him.
Most Americans believe the trial is politically motivated.
By Adam Casalino|April 18, 2023
What’s Happening:
You’ll be hard-pressed not to find someone who believes this Trump indictment is nothing but a scam. A Democrat DA is leading the effort, a man who long accused Trump of crimes–before any investigation was open. Most Americans believe this is one of many attempts by the left to discourage Trump’s election chances.
But now, Trump is revealing what went on during his arraignment.
The former president is facing numerous charges. Many legal experts believe these charges are not felony offenses. A reasonable judge would throw this case out. But the liberal-leaning populace of New York might not see it that way. And Trump is exposing what’s really going on.
From Breitbart:
“I think people see it for what it is: It’s a scam. They’re willing to do that. That’s destroying our country, that kind of stuff. That’s old Soviet Union kind of tactics what they would do. I think it’s a disgrace they are allowed to do it.” […]
Trump added, too, that it is his belief that Democrat President Joe Biden is behind the entire thing—and that the White House is running everything. Trump pointed to the fact that Bragg’s office onboarded former senior Department of Justice (DOJ) official Matthew Colangelo late last year—someone who has spent years targeting Trump in his role at the DOJ and previously in his role in the New York Attorney General’s office.
Wow. Trump has most likely been encouraged by his legal team to refrain from discussing much of what is going on in the trial. But he revealed what it was like in the closed courtroom arrangement. He described the DA’s efforts to take him down as “old Soviet Union” style tactics.
In the Soviet era, government officials in Russia would use the power of the government to oppose and crush their political rivals. And Trump believes Democrats are doing that to him, today. And he even revealed he believes Biden himself is behind it.
Bragg employed a former senior DOJ official last year, someone who worked for Biden and has openly targeted Trump. It’s hard to ignore the fact that Democrats are running this case, during the election. How could Biden not be involved?
Remember, Democrats accused Trump of trying to take down his political rival in 2019, over a phone call. Yet today, Democrats are going after Biden’s top rival with a sham trial that most experts say isn’t valid. And we’re not supposed to think Biden is pulling a Soviet-era stunt to protect his regime?
Key Takeaways:Trump called the trial against him “old Soviet Union” style tactics.
He accused Joe Biden of being behind the Democrat-led case against him.
Most Americans believe the trial is politically motivated.
Tuesday, April 18, 2023
Wednesday, April 12, 2023
‘This Is Bad’: Progressive Legal Expert
Calls Bragg Lawsuit Against Jim
Jordan ‘More Destructive Than
Dumb Hearings’ Story by Isaac Schorr • 2h ago
Georgetown Law professor Josh Chafetz is sounding the alarm on Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg’s lawsuit against House Judiciary Chairman Jim Jordan (R-OH), insisting that a ruling in Bragg’s favor would be “destructive.”
‘ThisIs Bad’: Progressive Legal Expert Calls Bragg Lawsuit Against Jim Jordan ‘More Destructive Than Dumb Hearings’© Provided by Mediaite
Bragg filed his lawsuit against Jordan on Tuesday, alleging that Jordan was engaged in a “brazen and unconstitutional attack” on his office’s work on its ongoing prosecution of former president Donald Trump. Jordan has issued a subpoena of Mark Pomerantz, an attorney who resigned from Bragg’s team last year after the DA initially decided not to pursue charges against Trump. Pomerantz went on to write a book about the case against Trump.
While Bragg is arguing that the subpoena is an “abuse of power” and part of a larger “transparent campaign to intimidate and attack” Bragg, Chafetz believes that the greater danger would stem from the success of Bragg’s lawsuit.
“This is bad, and I hope the court throws it out quickly,” opined Chafetz. “Jordan’s investigation is dumb, but congressional committees have the right to do dumb things, and running to the courts to try to get them to stop is more destructive than dumb hearings.”
Later, Chafetz compared Bragg’s argument to those of past court rulings that President Richard Nixon did not have to submit to requests for information from Congress during the Watergate scandal.
“The idea that Congress must never be allowed to interfere in a sacred criminal investigation is the same reason that courts gave for telling Nixon that he didn’t have to turn material over to the Senate Watergate Committee,” said Chafetz.
On Thursday morning, Politico senior legal affairs correspondent Josh Gerstein suggested that Chafetz would likely get his wish, asserting that Bragg faced an “uphill battle” to stop Pomerantz from testifying.
“Given that Pomeranz wrote the book, it’s hard for him to sort of take the position that ‘I can’t say one word to you now, I need to zip my lip because of this current prosecution that’s going on,'” argued Gerstein.
‘ThisIs Bad’: Progressive Legal Expert Calls Bragg Lawsuit Against Jim Jordan ‘More Destructive Than Dumb Hearings’© Provided by Mediaite
Bragg filed his lawsuit against Jordan on Tuesday, alleging that Jordan was engaged in a “brazen and unconstitutional attack” on his office’s work on its ongoing prosecution of former president Donald Trump. Jordan has issued a subpoena of Mark Pomerantz, an attorney who resigned from Bragg’s team last year after the DA initially decided not to pursue charges against Trump. Pomerantz went on to write a book about the case against Trump.
While Bragg is arguing that the subpoena is an “abuse of power” and part of a larger “transparent campaign to intimidate and attack” Bragg, Chafetz believes that the greater danger would stem from the success of Bragg’s lawsuit.
“This is bad, and I hope the court throws it out quickly,” opined Chafetz. “Jordan’s investigation is dumb, but congressional committees have the right to do dumb things, and running to the courts to try to get them to stop is more destructive than dumb hearings.”
Later, Chafetz compared Bragg’s argument to those of past court rulings that President Richard Nixon did not have to submit to requests for information from Congress during the Watergate scandal.
“The idea that Congress must never be allowed to interfere in a sacred criminal investigation is the same reason that courts gave for telling Nixon that he didn’t have to turn material over to the Senate Watergate Committee,” said Chafetz.
On Thursday morning, Politico senior legal affairs correspondent Josh Gerstein suggested that Chafetz would likely get his wish, asserting that Bragg faced an “uphill battle” to stop Pomerantz from testifying.
“Given that Pomeranz wrote the book, it’s hard for him to sort of take the position that ‘I can’t say one word to you now, I need to zip my lip because of this current prosecution that’s going on,'” argued Gerstein.
Does Joe know something he's not telling us ??
Joe Biden's 'doomsday plane' — which
the president would use in the event of a
nuclear war — was spotted flying over Wales
Story by kniemeyer@insider.com (Kenneth Niemeyer) • 47m ago
US Department of Defense© Provided by INSIDER
Story by kniemeyer@insider.com (Kenneth Niemeyer) • 47m ago
- Joe Biden's "doomsday plane" was spotted flying over Wales on Tuesday night.
The E-4B "Nightwatch" is designed to withstand a nuclear blast.
The plane can fly for days straight and costs $159,529 per hours to fly.
President Biden's "doomsday" E-4B plane was spotted flying over Wales on Tuesday night ahead of his commemoration of the Good Friday Agreement in Northern Ireland.
The president's "doomsday plane" is a $223 million E-4B called "Nightwatch," which is capable of surviving a nuclear blast. Following a nuclear attack, the president, secretary of defense, and joint chiefs of staff would board E-4B. From there, they would be able to order nuclear strikes or execute emergency war orders from the "flying war room," Insider previously reported.
The E-4B plane was spotted on Tuesday night flying over Wales, according to NorthWalesLive. According to the outlet, it is typical of the plane to follow closely behind the president's Air Force One in the skies when he travels.
The majority of the E-4B's capabilities are classified, but the plane can carry 112 people, can fly for 12 hours straight without refueling, and can refuel in the sky, allowing it to fly for several days in a row, the United States Air Force previously told Insider. Flying the E-4B "Nightwatch" costs $159,529 per hour, which is the most expensive plane that the Air Force operates, according to the Air Force.
The plane's windows are equipped with a wired mesh similar to those on the inside of a microwave oven door that prevents radiation from entering the plane, according to the Air Force. The crew of the E-4B works 24-hour, 7-day shifts and sleep in a cabin above the conference room that chiefs of staff and the president would use to give war orders.
The back of the plane holds its communication center, where operators can communicate with almost anyone in the world, according to the Air Force.
"It's designed that, in the most austere environments, during or after a nuclear war, it survives and can communicate, from the most cutting-edge communications technology to old, antiquated communications technology," Scott McCandless, the plane's former director of operations previously told Insider.
After AOC Demands Supreme Court Justice’s Impeachment – The Democrat’s Closet Swings Wide Open
Today, radical “socialist” Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is echoing the same mindless attacks against Thomas as the rest of the left. She has even gone as far as to call for impeaching the justice, an obvious attempt by Democrats to intimidate and manipulate the highest court in the land. But now, she is getting exposed for the very same thing.
From Western Journal:
AOC’s attack is interesting in light of the mounting accusations that she, herself, has a concerning habit of taking lavish gifts without disclosing them.
In one of the more blatant examples, AOC took great criticism for attending the $35,000-per-ticket Met Gala in 2021 at which she absurdly wore a white dress with the words “Tax The Rich” emblazoned in red across the back.
AOC, along with other progressives, is accusing Justice Thomas of taking improper “gifts.” And because of this, he needs to be impeached and removed from the Supreme Court. What were these “improper” gifts? Flights he took for vacations that he didn’t pay for.
As it turns out, he went on a few vacations with a GOP donor Harlan Crow. Thomas and Crow’s families are close friends. And it should come as no surprise that they would vacation together, with one of them paying. From Thomas’s own statements, these trips in no way interfered with his work on the Court.
Plus, even liberal outlets had to admit there are “few restrictions on what gifts justices can accept.”
That’s not the case with members of Congress. And AOC has seemingly violated the very strict rules that prevent Congress members from accepting gifts from people. She has even been investigated for receiving lavish gifts from the MET and other places.
So… AOC is willing to impeach a Supreme Court justice for receiving gifts. Yet she herself has done much worse? AOC thinks she has the right to go after Thomas, even though what he did wasn’t against any rules.
What she’s done, numerous times, is in fact against House ethics rules. They could even be violations of federal law. Perhaps AOC is trying to distract from her misdeeds by attacking the respected justice?
Nevertheless, I doubt this attack will deter Thomas in the slightest. The conservative justice has continued to uphold the law and protect Americans from the bench. Which is much more than we can say for AOC.
By Adam Casalino|April 10, 2023
Another day, another attempt by Democrats to cancel Supreme Court Justice, Clarence Thomas. The left has always hated this conservative leader. From the very day he was nominated for the bench, liberals have fired all kinds of slander against him. Despite all this, Thomas continues to uphold our Constitution and American values.
Today, radical “socialist” Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is echoing the same mindless attacks against Thomas as the rest of the left. She has even gone as far as to call for impeaching the justice, an obvious attempt by Democrats to intimidate and manipulate the highest court in the land. But now, she is getting exposed for the very same thing.
From Western Journal:
AOC’s attack is interesting in light of the mounting accusations that she, herself, has a concerning habit of taking lavish gifts without disclosing them.
In one of the more blatant examples, AOC took great criticism for attending the $35,000-per-ticket Met Gala in 2021 at which she absurdly wore a white dress with the words “Tax The Rich” emblazoned in red across the back.
AOC, along with other progressives, is accusing Justice Thomas of taking improper “gifts.” And because of this, he needs to be impeached and removed from the Supreme Court. What were these “improper” gifts? Flights he took for vacations that he didn’t pay for.
As it turns out, he went on a few vacations with a GOP donor Harlan Crow. Thomas and Crow’s families are close friends. And it should come as no surprise that they would vacation together, with one of them paying. From Thomas’s own statements, these trips in no way interfered with his work on the Court.
Plus, even liberal outlets had to admit there are “few restrictions on what gifts justices can accept.”
That’s not the case with members of Congress. And AOC has seemingly violated the very strict rules that prevent Congress members from accepting gifts from people. She has even been investigated for receiving lavish gifts from the MET and other places.
So… AOC is willing to impeach a Supreme Court justice for receiving gifts. Yet she herself has done much worse? AOC thinks she has the right to go after Thomas, even though what he did wasn’t against any rules.
What she’s done, numerous times, is in fact against House ethics rules. They could even be violations of federal law. Perhaps AOC is trying to distract from her misdeeds by attacking the respected justice?
Nevertheless, I doubt this attack will deter Thomas in the slightest. The conservative justice has continued to uphold the law and protect Americans from the bench. Which is much more than we can say for AOC.
Monday, April 10, 2023
PANDORAS' BOX
The Dems have opened up Pandora's box. The gloves are off now and we can see what life will be like under continued one-party Democrat rule, one where local DAs and the federal DOJ are weaponized against conservatives.To put it plainly, they want total authoritarian power over us all. If President Trump can be charged for "falsifying business records" and hiding relevant information from voters in the 2016 election, then 51 people from the intel community, who signed a letter stating the Hunter Biden laptop is fake, can be charged for hiding relevant information from voters in the 2020 election!
Or how about everyone else who suppressed and lied about the Hunter laptop story which withheld information from voters in the 2020 election!
Or what about charging Hillary Clinton, who paid for the fake Steele Dossier with her campaign funds, that the Deep State and MSM used to create the Russia Collusion Witch Hunt!
What about Bill Clinton, who paid several women he had sex with to keep quiet?
Or how about this story, that is getting insta-memory-holed, about how $21 million was funneled into Barack Obama's 2012 re-election campaign from a Malaysian financier fronting for the CCP through straw donors in the US, because foreigners are not allowed to contribute to US campaigns.
Or how about the investigations coming out of James O'Keefe's new venture O.M.G., that have uncovered hundreds of thousands of dollars of donations to the Democrats being laundered through peoples' names and addresses. James O'Keefe had discovered a slew of cases in Maryland and now a new team of citizens in Southern California, empowered by OMG have discovered many more. This is just the tip of the iceberg.
And if Donald Trump broke the law, why didn't they mention what law he broke in the indictment?
READ ON
VVV
Thursday, April 6, 2023
Pompeo torches Kirby after White House shifts blame to Trump for deadly Afghanistan withdrawal Published April 6, 2023 By Charles Creitz | Fox News
Rear Adm. John Kirby defended the Biden team's withdrawal tact in Afghanistan
Mike Pompeo: The Biden admin has consistently tried to blame everyone else for their
failures
Former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo joins 'The Story' to reject Adm. Kirby's claims Trump admin left them no cohesive plan for Afghanistan withdrawal.
Former secretary of state under President Trump Mike Pompeo fired back at claims from the Biden administration that Trump constrained the conditions of the U.S. pullout from Afghanistan, during which 13 American soldiers died in a suicide bombing while protecting the Kabul airport, and untold numbers of Americans and Afghans eligible for evacuation were stranded.
The White House on Thursday released its review of President Biden's fumbled 2021 withdrawal from Afghanistan while Trump's indictment continues to dominate the headlines. The 12-page outline called the overall decision to end the 20-year war the right thing for America, but declined to acknowledge any mistakes made by Biden while instead repeatedly criticizing Trump's administration.
Rear Adm. John Kirby, the National Security Council spokesman, said Thursday it was always Biden's intent to end the war, but at the same time "undeniable that decisions made and the lack of planning done by the previous administration significantly limited options available to him."
Sunday, April 2, 2023
K I L L B O X – Todd Callender & Katherine Watt
Legal analyst and researcher, Katherine Watt joins attorney Todd Callender with Sean on the SGT Report to discuss what they refer to as the Department of Defense's Vaxx "Killbox" and the legal framework that enabled the militarization of public health and the rollout of a bioweapon being marketed as a "vaccine" – which is not what it is.
Katherine says she discovered that the WHO's International Health Regulations (IHR) are what are stopping the US legal system from stopping these crimes against humanity. The IHR are the wedge that is preventing people from accessing the courts and which is preventing the courts from hearing those cases.
The IHR have been the key to waging this world war in a covert manner, via the militarization of public health and the merger of the public health apparatus with the military apparatus that made the COVID vaxxine into a military operation.
Katherine says the IHR serve, "On the surface, the public health mission of allegedly helping people live healthier lives but on the other side, it serves this military purpose, which is actually to control and injure and kill people. And the reason that they did it is because it enables it to be not obvious to people.
"If it had just come out as wars prior to the biomedical police state...if they had done it the ordinary way, they'd have to do an invasion, they'd have to mark out who's border is where and say that you're invading a country or defending your country from an invasion.
"By doing it in this covert way and getting people to falsely think that it is medicine and falsely think that there is a public health threat or emergency and falsely think that the Government is authorized in some way to legitimately manage the response to whatever this crisis is, they make it all hidden and that's how it can keep going on so long.
"And that's why, as more and more people figure out that it's just a lie, it's just an attack, it's just a biowarfare program...once more people see it as a lie, it is no longer as covert as they intended it to be and that's the main value of it."
Katherine predicts that going forward, the Deep State will double down on these lies and promote the idea that everybody should obey the Government but that we can also expect to see this war go increasingly kinetic, deploying more of the aggressive, 2nd Generation Warfare tactics and weaponry that we traditionally associate with war.
Todd Callender adds that when you study the Law of War and the 4th Hague Conventions, it says that when an enemy occupies substantial government functions, the war is won and he says, "You look at our military, itself, that was subverted, a grand suicide, where 1.4 million people were told to take a deadly, experimental shot...for purposes of the Law of War, it sure looks to me as though our government has already been captured and our nation is already lost."
Sean chimes in and says, that at the top of this pyramid is the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) and that, "All wars are Bankster wars and war is being waged against us by the Banksters...and we are an enemy-occupied state by the Banksters...We've got the WHO, the BIS, we've got the DoD all of these aligned against the American People."
Katherine agrees and says that the early legal framework for this attack began in 1918 with the Spanish Flu outbreak, which was not what we have been told and also, the 1913 Federal Reserve Act. She says this was the turning point and it has since escalated into this most advanced form of the kind of warfare that they want to deploy, starting in January of 2020, with the Public Health Emergency Declaration by Department of Health and Human Services Secretary, Alex Azar at the end of January that coincided and was responsive to the World Health Organization Director General's declaration of a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC).
She says, "Those two terms, the PHEIC and Public Health Emergency, you can trace backwards in the United States' statutes and regulations and guidance documents and legal opinions...to the late 1990s, early 2000s and that is also a point at which it converges with the 9/11 attacks and the Patriot Act and the Homeland Security Act and the [2001] Anthrax Attacks.
Legal analyst and researcher, Katherine Watt joins attorney Todd Callender with Sean on the SGT Report to discuss what they refer to as the Department of Defense's Vaxx "Killbox" and the legal framework that enabled the militarization of public health and the rollout of a bioweapon being marketed as a "vaccine" – which is not what it is.
Katherine says she discovered that the WHO's International Health Regulations (IHR) are what are stopping the US legal system from stopping these crimes against humanity. The IHR are the wedge that is preventing people from accessing the courts and which is preventing the courts from hearing those cases.
The IHR have been the key to waging this world war in a covert manner, via the militarization of public health and the merger of the public health apparatus with the military apparatus that made the COVID vaxxine into a military operation.
Katherine says the IHR serve, "On the surface, the public health mission of allegedly helping people live healthier lives but on the other side, it serves this military purpose, which is actually to control and injure and kill people. And the reason that they did it is because it enables it to be not obvious to people.
"If it had just come out as wars prior to the biomedical police state...if they had done it the ordinary way, they'd have to do an invasion, they'd have to mark out who's border is where and say that you're invading a country or defending your country from an invasion.
"By doing it in this covert way and getting people to falsely think that it is medicine and falsely think that there is a public health threat or emergency and falsely think that the Government is authorized in some way to legitimately manage the response to whatever this crisis is, they make it all hidden and that's how it can keep going on so long.
"And that's why, as more and more people figure out that it's just a lie, it's just an attack, it's just a biowarfare program...once more people see it as a lie, it is no longer as covert as they intended it to be and that's the main value of it."
Katherine predicts that going forward, the Deep State will double down on these lies and promote the idea that everybody should obey the Government but that we can also expect to see this war go increasingly kinetic, deploying more of the aggressive, 2nd Generation Warfare tactics and weaponry that we traditionally associate with war.
Todd Callender adds that when you study the Law of War and the 4th Hague Conventions, it says that when an enemy occupies substantial government functions, the war is won and he says, "You look at our military, itself, that was subverted, a grand suicide, where 1.4 million people were told to take a deadly, experimental shot...for purposes of the Law of War, it sure looks to me as though our government has already been captured and our nation is already lost."
Sean chimes in and says, that at the top of this pyramid is the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) and that, "All wars are Bankster wars and war is being waged against us by the Banksters...and we are an enemy-occupied state by the Banksters...We've got the WHO, the BIS, we've got the DoD all of these aligned against the American People."
Katherine agrees and says that the early legal framework for this attack began in 1918 with the Spanish Flu outbreak, which was not what we have been told and also, the 1913 Federal Reserve Act. She says this was the turning point and it has since escalated into this most advanced form of the kind of warfare that they want to deploy, starting in January of 2020, with the Public Health Emergency Declaration by Department of Health and Human Services Secretary, Alex Azar at the end of January that coincided and was responsive to the World Health Organization Director General's declaration of a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC).
She says, "Those two terms, the PHEIC and Public Health Emergency, you can trace backwards in the United States' statutes and regulations and guidance documents and legal opinions...to the late 1990s, early 2000s and that is also a point at which it converges with the 9/11 attacks and the Patriot Act and the Homeland Security Act and the [2001] Anthrax Attacks.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
