Who is really in charge?” wrote YouTuber Benny Johnson on the X network formerly known as Twitter.

“Who Is in Charge?” Biden Abruptly Cut Off During Press Conference: Staff Rush to Conclude Amid Rambling Remarks  Story by William Furney •4h ©Provided by Princess Free Zone

President Biden’s catastrophe of a press conference while on a recent trip to Vietnam has left many wondering if the 80-year-old is up to the job — and if he should seek re-election at all.
Media Appearance Blunder©Editorial credit: Paris Malone / Shutterstock.

The president was in Vietnam at the end of a tour of Asia in September that started at a G20 Summit in India when he appeared before reporters to talk about national security and trade deals. But it quickly went south.
Mumbling and Incoherent©Image Credit: Shutterstock.

President Biden was answering a reporter’s question when he seemed to lose his train of thought and trailed off. “We talked about stability; we talked about making sure the third world… excuse me… the southern hemisphere has access to change. It wasn’t confrontational at all,” he said, leaving many at the press conference scratching their heads and trying to figure out what Biden was talking about.

READ ON

“We Will Not Let You Lay a Finger on President Trump. Now Is the Time To Cling to Our Guns and Our Religion.” Lake’s Chilling Message to Joe Biden ©Provided by Princess Free Zone   Story by Jo Shaw •8h

Kari Lake, a TV news anchor turned far-right politician, hit back over Trump’s indictment for retaining classified records and sent a chilling message to President Biden, the US Attorney General, and “…the guys back there in the fake news media…”

“…you should listen up as well. This one’s for you,” she stated as she vowed an armed resistance.

READ HERE

nn

In case you don't know or have forgotten

 

“US 2020 Presidential Election Was Stolen”: Amazon Alexa Unexpectedly Calls 2020 Presidential Election “Massive Fraud”   

Story by William Furney •8h©Providedby Princess Free Zone

Donald Trump would be pleased. The former president has long insisted that his re-election attempt in 2020 was a “rigged” vote that was “stolen” from him — and Amazon’s Alexa assistant agrees.Reporters at The Washington Post newspaper asked an Alexa-enabled device about the 2020 vote and if it was in fact rigged. The device answered that it was “stolen by a massive amount of election fraud,” leaving the journalists scratching their heads.

The virtual assistant was also able to tell the probing reporters that the election was “notorious for many incidents of irregularities and indications pointing to electoral fraud taking place in major metro centers.”

The Post informed Alexa about the actual events that took place during the vote and that no voting issues had been found by multiple courts. It then said the election had not been stolen at all.

Amazon executives were reportedly aghast at the Post story and raced to fix the issue with their technology and assure Alexa users that they were constantly updating the software to ensure accuracy.

Amazon spokeswoman Lauren Raemhild said: “These responses were errors that were delivered a small number of times, and quickly fixed when brought to our attention. We continually audit and improve the systems we have in place for detecting and blocking inaccurate content.”

The 2020 election that Trump lost to Joe Biden continues to be a contentious issue that divides people in the United States. Almost 70% of Republicans believe the election was rigged and that Trump really won, according to a poll by CNN in August.

READ ON

'One-Term, Twice-Impeached Conman' - Trump's 2024 Eligibility Challenge Denied by Supreme Court Story by Alec Donaldson •2h

©Zach Gibson - Pool/Getty Image

In a surprising legal turn, the U.S. Supreme Court has dismissed a case brought by Republican presidential nominee hopeful John Anthony Castro, challenging Donald Trump's eligibility for the 2024 presidential election.

Rendered Ineligible©Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images
Castro contended that because of Trump's alleged role in the January 6, 2021, Capitol riot, he should be rendered ineligible under the provisions of the 14th Amendment.
14th Amendment Clause ©Scott Olson/Getty Images The 14th Amendment explicitly states that officials cannot hold office if they have "engaged in insurrection or rebellion" or provided "aid" to insurrectionists.
Turning To The Supreme Court ©Souce: nathaphat/Getty Images/iStockphoto The Department of Justice filed four charges against Trump in connection with the riot, though none of them pertained to insurrection.
Following the dismissal of his case by a lower court due to a lack of legal standing, Castro turned to the Supreme Court for intervention

READ MORE HERE

AP poll: Plurality says Biden acted 

illegally

A poll by The Associated Press shows a majority of Americans say Joe Biden acted at least unethically, but a plurality say he acted illegally and only a minority of 30% disagree and say he did nothing wrong. NEWSMAX - 2 hours

This paragraph caught my eye

Interviews with poll respondents tapped into a deeper sense of rot within the federal government. Several said the political class as a whole was beset by greed and corruption, causing politicians to selfishly neglect the country's needs. That perspective is at odds with Biden's message of optimism about a government that is spurring investments in infrastructure, new factories and renewable energy sources.

Read the article at the link below

 READ ON 

New Impeachment Evidence! 

Whistleblowers and Ways and Means Committee Uncover Biden Family’s Global Influence-Peddling Operation 

 Story by Ashleigh Nicole •16h

New Impeachment Evidence! IRS Whistleblowers and Ways and Means Committee Uncover Biden Family’s Global Influence-Peddling Operation
©Provided by Wealthy Living

New evidence from IRS whistleblowers and the Ways and Means Committee links the Biden Family’s global influence-peddling operation to over twenty-three countries across four continents.

READ STORY HERE

Let’s finally recognize the slavery, 

conquest, and genocide of Native 

Americans by Native Americans

Opinion by Christopher Tremoglie•4h Washington Examiner

Let’s finally recognize the slavery, conquest, and genocide of Native Americans by Native Americans© Provided by Washington Examiner

Pre-Columbian Native American culture on the American continents was one of war, massacres, genocide, and slavery. It doesn’t make Native Americans unique in any way but rather, just like every other culture, society, and civilization that has existed in history.

However, these facts are typically excluded from today’s public education system. Instead, a radical left-wing revision of history is taught that portrayed Native Americans living in peaceful and docile societies that fell victim to the greed and brutality of European invaders. It is and always has been a fictitious historical narrative.

History did not begin in 1492. The truth is Native American tribes were brutally killing each other in the Western Hemisphere for centuries before the first European settlers ever appeared. Left-wing scholars from the Howard Zinn school of thought have valiantly tried to hide these facts; nevertheless, they’re true.

Native American tribes were empire builders no different than the ancient Romans, Greeks, and Germanic tribes of Europe. Indigenous people were no better than Genghis Khan and the Golden Horde of the Mongol Empire. The tribes lusted to conquer, enslave, and pillage for power, resources, and land, just as the Ashanti, Mali, Ghana, and Egyptian empires of Africa.  {No one likes to say it but the African tribes would war against one another and then SELL their captives into slavery as well} at least, that's what I was always taught..

READ HERE

Massive Gun Manufacturer Ditches Blue State, Moves South

Story by Carver Malone •15h American Insider

Smith & Wesson has taken its headquarters out of Massachusetts and is officially residing in Tennessee.

Smith & Wesson was established in 1852 in Connecticut before it soon moved its headquarters to Springfield, Massachusetts.

The NRA has praised the major gun manufacturer’s move, saying, “Congratulations to Smith & Wesson on their grand opening in Tennessee.”

READ ON

Undeniable Proof: Judge In Trump Trial Must Recuse Himself

Story by David Rufful •15h

Trump Judge: "If juries get it wrong, I can overrule them based on my emotions about the case"

The judge presiding over Donald Trump’s civil trial, Judge Arthur Engoron, should recuse himself from the case due to his deeply held biases and personal conflict of interests.
The left-wing judge argued that makes decisions based on his emotions and overrides juries when they “get it wrong.”

Engoron holds particularly great power over Trump’s case, as the trial is without a jury.

Engoron has also been caught quietly contributing thousands of dollars to Democrats for years.

Records show Engoron has donated over $5,000 to Democrats. He has supported candidates such as former New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman, former Governor David Paterson, and other state lawmakers.

If lost, Trump would be facing a loss of no less than $250 million.

Behind closed doors, Engoron has donated over $5,000 to Democrats over the years.

A video currently circulating online also reveals Engoron admitting his use of his own “opinion” when judging cases.

“Now, I’m going to say something controversial even though I’m being taped,” he begins.

“Juries get it wrong a lot — that’s my own opinion. I do only civil trials — personal injury cases, contract disputes — but I’ve had situations where, like, ‘Oh, my — heaven’s sake. How could they have thought that?'”

“Well, I have a tool that I can deal with that. It’s called judgment not withstanding the verdict,” he stated.

“I can say there is no possible way that a reasonable jury would have reached that conclusion. Alright, am I following the law, or am I making the law? OK, I’m following the law.

“I’m an impartial referee, but it’s hard to factor out my own emotions. I have tools,” he argued.

Trump recently came after Engoron, calling the Judge a “democrat” “operative” who is running “a rigged court.”

Pro-Trump Historian Tells Tucker Carlson America Is In 'The Middle Of A Revolution' Amid Ex-President's Civil Fraud Trial 

  Story by Navdeep Yadav •16h

Pro-Trump Historian Tells Tucker Carlson America Is In 'The Middle Of A Revolution' Amid Ex-President's Civil Fraud Trial© Provided by Benzinga
Historian Victor Davis Hanson told former Fox News anchor Tucker Carlson that America is "in the middle of a revolution."

What Happened: In a recent episode of “Tucker on X,” the duo discussed the ongoing fraud trial against former President Donald Trump.

Hanson highlighted that the Democrats see Trump as a significant threat to their power retention. He mentioned that the trial was part of a broader effort to eliminate this "existential threat."

"I think they've come to the conclusion that Trump is an existential threat and by association, half the country is to their vision of what they want to transform us into, and so they feel that whatever means necessary are justified," Davis said.

The recent episode also delved into the New York City civil fraud trial. Judge Arthur Engoron ruled that Trump had misled financial institutions by overstating the value of his properties, which led to the revocation of his business license.

READ HERE)

bbbb

Bill Clinton Breaks With Democrat Party

Sory by Carver Malone •22 hrs ago 

Former Democrat President Bill Clinton says immigration is “broken” under Joe Biden and “we need to fix it.”

After reversing the border policies of Donald Trump, Biden triggered an unprecedented and historic surge of illegal immigration at the southern border.

Clinton says it’s time to end asylum and sanctuary city laws that Democrats have been supporting.

Referring to New York City’s “Right to Shelter Law,” Clinton argues “it should be modified.”

“It’s broken. We need to fix it,” Clinton said, adding that the law “doesn’t make any sense.”

As an asylum city, NYC has required shelter for illegal immigrants and the homeless for 40 years.

With thousands of illegals in the city, they are being fed, sheltered, and vaccinated at local hotels. This puts an enormous strain on taxpayers and causes significant debt.

READ MORE)

bbbb

Biden's DOJ wants public to think they dealt with Hunter Biden situation: Chris Swecker 
   Fox Business
Former FBI Assistant Director Chris Swecker discusses Hunter Biden's legal woes, Biden's Department of Justice and day two of Trump's NYC civil fraud trial. nnnn

Timeline: What Did the Feds Not Do About Alleged Biden Family Corruption and When Did They Not Do It?

By Ben Weingarten, RealClearInvestigationsSeptember 27, 2023

A timeline of events focusing on federal authorities’ pursuit of alleged Biden family corruption. This resource will be updated as warranted.

Summary

(Click links just below to jump to desired section.)

Nov. 2018-June 2020: Hunter Biden Probe Begins; President Trump Impeached While Pursuing Biden-Ukraine Information; Alleged Justice Department Undermining of Probe Begins
June 2020-Dec. 2021: Evidence of Influence-Peddling With Nexus to Joe Biden Grows; Alleged Sabotage of Hunter Biden Probe Intensifies
Jan. 2022-Jan. 2023: Prosecution Sought and Denied; IRS Whistleblowers Blindsided by What They Characterize as U.S. Attorney David Weiss’ Apparent Lack of Authority
Feb. 2023-May 2023: Hunter’s Counsel Pleads Case Over Weiss’ Head; IRS Whistleblowers Emerge – and Face a Chill; Plea Deal DevelopsJune 2023: FBI Stonewalls Congress Over Alleged Burisma-Biden Bribes; Trump Indictments Grow; Plea Deal Emerges; Weiss Strains To Harmonize His Story With Attorney General Merrick Garland About His Claimed Ultimate Authority
July 2023: Burisma-Biden Bribes Document Released; Whistleblowers Testify About Obstructed Case Publicly; Hunter Biden’s Plea Deal Collapses in Court
Aug. 2023-Present: Another Trump Indictment; Weiss Gets Special Counsel Authority He Wasn’t Supposed To Need; Biden Impeachment Inquiry Opens; Hunter Hit With Gun Indictment

Timeline in Detail

The IRS whistleblowers prepare to testify under penalty of perjury.

AP

Nov. 2018-June 2020:

Hunter Biden Probe Begins;

President Trump Impeached While Pursuing Biden-Ukraine Information;

Alleged Justice Department Undermining of Probe Begins

Nov. 2018: The Internal Revenue Service’s Washington D.C. office opens investigation into Hunter Biden, code name “Sportsman,” as an offshoot of a probe into a foreign-based amateur online pornography platform.

According to IRS Special Agent Joseph Ziegler, the case agent who will later turn whistleblower, evidence will emerge Biden paid prostitutes to cross state lines – potential Mann Act violations. It is not clear whether the Justice Department pursues.

READ MORE HERE

Jordan responds to Fulton County's Fani Willis regarding Trump prosecution: 'Your position is wrong' 

  Story by Rachel Schilke •1h

Jordan responds to Fulton County's Fani Willis regarding Trump prosecution: 'Your position is wrong'© Provided by Washington Examiner

House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan (R-OH) hit back at Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis's response to the committee's investigation into her criminal case against former President Donald Trump, saying her "position is wrong."

Willis blasted Jordan in a letter at the beginning of September, arguing that he was interfering with her prosecution through his records requests. However, Jordan's latest response sent on Wednesday argued that her judgment on congressional authority was incorrect.

"Your letter contends that the Committee, by conducting oversight into apparently politicized local prosecutions, is 'obstruct[ing] a Georgia criminal proceeding' and 'advanc[ing] outrageous partisan misrepresentations.' Your position is wrong," Jordan wrote in the letter obtained by the Washington Examiner.

He said the committee can "only conclude" from her response to the committee's records requests to investigate whether her case against Trump is politically motivated that she is "actively and aggressively engaged in such a scheme."

Willis had argued that her case was a local and state matter and, therefore, Congress did not have grounds to investigate. However, Jordan argued that the prosecution of a former president "implicates substantial federal interests."

"If state or local prosecutors can engage in politically motivated prosecutions of senior federal officers for acts they performed while in federal office, this could have a profound impact on how federal officers choose to exercise their powers," Jordan wrote.

He added that the special grand jury report showed she "contemplated an even more extensive intrusion into federal interests" after jurors recommended charges against senators — including Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC).

Wednesday's letter is the latest step in the House Judiciary Committee's investigation into Willis's office and the case against Trump, which was launched on Aug. 24. A grand jury indicted Trump and 18 co-defendants on Aug. 14 for racketeering charges related to efforts to overturn Georgia's 2020 election, marking the fifth indictment and fourth criminal case for the former president.

Jordan and House Republicans on the committee have accused Willis of using the 41-count indictment to interfere with the 2024 presidential election, of which Trump is the GOP front-runner. The Ohio congressman's first request for records came hours before Trump turned himself in to Fulton County officials to be arraigned and have his mug shot taken.

The committee has raised concerns about the indictment's legitimacy, with records requests aiming at discovering whether Willis had "coordinated" with the Justice Department — particularly special counsel Jack Smith, who delivered an indictment against Trump for similar reasons to the Georgia case.

"The information that we seek will allow us to assess the extent to which your indictment is politically motivated and whether Congress should therefore draft legislative reforms to, among other things, protect former and current Presidents from politically motivated prosecutions," Jordan added in Wednesday's letter.

Jordan said Willis's decision to indict Trump also raises conflict of interest concerns between federal and local law enforcement.

"Federal law requires the United States Secret Service to protect a former President," Jordan wrote. "Therefore, your indictment raises the potential for conflict between the federal law-enforcement officials required to protect President Trump and local law-enforcement officials required to enforce your indictment and exercise control of him throughout his presence in the local criminal justice system."

A judge ruled in mid-September that Willis could not try all 19 defendants together, meaning Trump will not be tried on Oct. 23 and defendants Sidney Powell and Kenneth Chesebro are the only two heading to trial next month.

Trump is also facing several legal cases at the state and federal level across the country. A New York judge ruled on Tuesday that the former president committed fraud for several years while growing the Trump Organization empire.

Republican takes Jan. 6 and Justice Dept. claims to new places    Story by Aaron Blake •1d

Spartz compares Justice Department to KGB

Conservative efforts to downplay the events of Jan. 6, 2021, and allege the political “weaponization” of the government seem to ratchet up with each passing week.

But rarely have they reached such a fever pitch, at least at the official level, as they did Wednesday with Rep. Victoria Spartz (R-Ind.).

During a House Judiciary Committee hearing featuring Attorney General Merrick Garland, Spartz both suggested that the scene at the Capitol on Jan. 6 was actually something of an innocent family affair and also seemed to compare the U.S. government to the Soviet KGB.

“There probably were some people that came on January 6th here, you know, that had bad intent,” Spartz allowed. “But a lot of good Americans from my district came here because they are sick and tired of this government not serving them. They came with strollers and the kids, and there was [a] chaotic situation because the proper security wasn’t provided.”

It wasn’t initially clear whether Spartz was talking about the rally on the Ellipse that preceded the Jan. 6 insurrection or the crowd near the Capitol whose participants ultimately violently forced their way in. But it was soon evident she was referring to the latter.

“They were throwing smoke bombs into the crowd with strollers with kids,” she said. “People showed up, you know, FBI agents, to people’s houses. You had, in my district, in my town, FBI phone numbers all over the district. … People are truly afraid.”

There do not appear to be many publicly available images of small children and strollers in the most contested areas near the Capitol on Jan. 6. Nor have many Republicans previously raised this as a complaint. A Wall Street Journal timeline states that smoke and tear gas were wafting through the crowd as of 1:13 p.m. By that point, scuffles between law enforcement and angry protesters had broken out.

Spartz’s comments build on increasing suggestions about supposed persecution of the hundreds who were convicted or pleaded guilty to taking part in the insurrection. Many times, GOP leaders have pushed back on these efforts, but that hasn’t stopped the claims, the minimizing of the events and even suggestions that the crowd was goaded.

More than two years ago, it was Rep. Andrew S. Clyde (R-Ga.) suggesting at another hearing that the day’s events were akin to a “normal tourist visit” rather than an insurrection. House GOP leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) responded at the time by saying, “What happened on the 6th was atrocious.”

In early 2022, the Republican National Committee cited the “legitimate political discourse” of Jan. 6 in a resolution censuring two members who served on the House Jan. 6 committee. Again, some leaders pushed back.

After McCarthy this year provided security tapes of the insurrection to then-Fox News host Tucker Carlson, Carlson predictably used the tapes to whitewash the events. Numerous Republicans again spoke out against it.

Despite the occasional pushback, these views have flourished within the conservative movement, spurred recently by severe sentences for members of extremist groups who were convicted of seditious conspiracy for their roles. GOP presidential candidates have joined former president Donald Trump in floating pardons for some figures.

A poll last year showed more Republicans regarded Jan. 6 as a “legitimate protest” (61 percent) even than a “riot” (45 percent) — a reversal from the months after the insurrection.

But Spartz didn’t stop there. She also broke ground over related GOP claims about the supposed “weaponization” of the government. She referenced the report by special counsel John Durham, which reflected poorly on the FBI but largely failed to live up to the Republican hype about what it would lay bare regarding those who had investigated Trump’s ties to Russia.

“I look at [the] Durham report and the … [Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act] violations,” Spartz said. Spartz’s comments weren’t entirely clear, but ultimately the congresswoman, who was born in what was then the Soviet republic of Ukraine, added, “It’s like KGB.”

While Republicans have often put forth speculative theories about the Justice Department’s supposed weaponization, comparing it to one of the most notorious spy agencies in recent world history is taking things to another level. The KGB routinely cracked down on dissent with invasive and heavy-handed tactics, including assassination. The KGB and its predecessors have been accused of playing a role in millions of deaths.

Garland wasn’t given much of a chance to weigh in on what Spartz was saying. But early on, she asked him whether he was aware of how many Americans feared persecution from the U.S. government.

Garland responded, “I think that constant attacks on the department and saying —.” But Spartz quickly interrupted him, and then lit into the kind of presentation that may well perpetuate that fear of persecution.

I could be wrong, but....I seem to remember a video with Epps using a bullhorn, directing people...???

Ray Epps Charged With Jan. 6 Crime—

After Conspiracy Theory Claimed He 

Worked For FBI

Forbes Breaking News   Sep 19, 2023

Sep 19, 2023
Ray Epps—a supporter of former President Donald Trump who was spotted at the January 6 Capitol riot—was charged with disorderly conduct for his alleged involvement in the attack, after the lack of charges against Epps led personalities like Tucker Carlson to baselessly claim Epps was a government provocateur.

Only saw a half hour on TV. This is the full interview

Full Trump Interview: ‘I don’t consider us to have much of a democracy right now’   NBC News

   

Sep 17, 2023 Meet The Press NOW | NBC News NOW
In this full, unedited interview with Meet the Press, former President Trump discusses his views on the 2020 election, abortion rights, foreign policy and more.

In Case You Missed It...!

3 Min Ago: Supreme Court JUST ANNOUNCED To Eliminate Concealed Carry Laws 

Best Guns 

Aug 24, 2023 UNITED STATES 3 Min Ago: Supreme Court JUST ANNOUNCED To Eliminate Concealed Carry Laws