Adam Schiff Is Scrambling To Cover Up Military Involvement On January 6th

(NewsGlobal.com)- The National Defense Authorization Act for the Fiscal Year 2022 is under HR 4350.

Rep. Adam Schiff included these words in House Resolution 4350 not too long ago. The sentence was placed towards the middle of the lengthy bill, which consists of hundreds of pages.

This is the mode of operation utilized by Shifty Schiff. This is the proposal that Schiff made. This was discovered in the main body of the text.

“CHAPTER 89–COUNTERING EXTREMISM

“1801. Office of Countering Extremism.
“1802. Training and education.
“1803. Data collection and analysis.
“1804. Reporting requirements.
“1805. Definitions.
SEC. 529F. EXCLUSION OF EVIDENCE OBTAINED WITHOUT PRIOR AUTHORIZATION.
Section 271 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:

“(d) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any information obtained by or with the assistance of a member of the Armed Forces in violation of section 1385 of title 18 shall not be received in evidence in any trial, hearing, or other proceeding in or before any court, grand jury, department, officer, agency, regulatory body, legislative committee, or other authority of the United States, a State, or a political subdivision thereof.”

Naturally, this worries conservatives and Trump supporters since they are looking for the facts regarding the riots that occurred on January 6, 2021, not Liz Cheney’s absurd show trial version.

Earlier afternoon, investigative reporter Julie Kelly tweeted the following information-

NEWS BREAKING: Representative Schiff has introduced an amendment to the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) that would keep secret any information gathered by the United States military for use in congressional investigations or legal actions. Consider this: Defense Sec Austin can decline any request for materials related to the deadly Afghanistan withdrawal, woke policies, vaccine mandates/injuries, and January 6, among other issues.

“Massive attempted coverup of enormous proportions and preemptive power grab to prevent GOP oversight next year.”

Consider the following: Any request for materials relating to other topics, such as the fatal Afghanistan drawdown, woke policies, vaccination mandates/injuries, or January 6, can be turned down by Defense Secretary Jim Mattis’s office.

For instance, Republican committees wouldn’t be able to investigate how the military played a part in the events that took place on January 6, including how they used their resources leading up to and on that day, as well as how they made use of intelligence services like NCIS, which we already know were a part of the investigation process.

The Acting Director of the United States National Intelligence, Richard Grenell, tweeted,
“Adam Schiff starts the coverup before Republicans take over.”

It's 100 Seconds of Joe's Worst Gaffes Ever

Republicans Release Concerning Biden Video – It’s 100 Seconds of Joe’s Greatest Stumbles and Bumbles   By Ben Dutka|  July 19, 2022

As time goes on, President Joe Biden’s age becomes more and more of an issue. Even a former Obama adviser said Biden is simply too old.

On top of that, an increasing percentage of Americans believe Biden shouldn’t run again in 2024. Even many Democrats are calling for a new face.

Now, Republicans are driving home the opinion that this President isn’t capable.

Since Biden was elected, there has been plenty of footage and videos of POTUS bumbling over words during public speeches.

He tends to lose his train of thought without aides or a teleprompter, and Biden occasionally appears confused and disoriented.

Democrats continue to claim it’s just a smear campaign on the part of the GOP, and the President is in fine working condition. Many politicos do appear concerned, however.

And this new montage is definitely turning heads:

TWEET

RNC Research

@RNCResearch

100 seconds of Joe Biden showing he's totally fit to be president.

9:31 AM · Jul 18, 2022·Twitter Media Studio

It’s about 100 seconds of Biden stammering, stuttering, and just plain forgetting what he was saying.

Perhaps the most painful flub happens right at the start of the video, where at a press conference Biden simply falls apart:

‘The best way to get something done, if you, if you hold it near and dear to you, that you, uh, um, [would] like to be able to…’

Biden stops abruptly. ‘Anyway,’ he says, lowering his eyes…

There are other examples of Biden stopping in his speech or in replying to reporters, and staring down at the floor — seemingly lost in space.

Biden also seems prone to forgetting names and numbers, and mispronouncing certain words: he couldn’t pronounce “kleptocracy,” for example.

As 2024 inches ever closer, the vast majority of right-wing politicians and voters say Joe Biden definitely can’t go through another term. Many say he isn’t fit right now.

An increasing number of Democrats want other candidates to throw their hats into the ring as well.

But in the meantime, many are taking a closer look at the President’s mental fitness — and the evidence is starting to pile up.

BB

So..the Washington Post and the New York Times got Pulitzer Prizes for writing FICTION..!

Pulitzer Board Refuses Donald Trump’s Request To Rescind Prizes To Washington Post, New York Times For Russian Interference Coverage    Ted Johnson - Yesterday 

© AP Photo/Mark Humphrey

Pulitzer Board Refuses Donald Trump’s Request To Rescind Prizes To Washington Post, New York Times For Russian Interference Coverage

The board that awards Pulitzer Prizes released a statement on Monday declining Donald Trump’s request that they strip The New York Times and The Washington Post of a joint prize for their reporting on Russian interference in the 2016 election.

The board said in a statement that they commissioned two independent reviews that “converged in their conclusions: that no passages or headlines, contentions or assertions in any of the winning submissions were discredited by facts that emerged subsequent to the conferral of the prizes.”

Can someone with a criminal record become president of the United States?

Nothing in the Constitution prevents it and it would be unconstitutional for states to prohibit a convicted criminal from running for President. It is a matter for voters to decide. M*** P****t J.D. in Constitutional Law & Civil Rights, University of San Diego School of Law (Graduated 1986)

OPINION

REMEMBER, THIS IS ADAM SCHITTS 3rd or 4th ATTEMPT TO GET TRUMP. IT'S LIKE IT'S HIS ONLY GOAL IN LIFE IS TO BRING TRUMP DOWN BY ANY MEANS POSSIBLE, NO MATTER HOW MANY LIVES ARE DESTROYED IN THE PROCESS. 

WHY DON'T THEY JUST ASK SOMEONE ELSE ABOUT WHAT BANNON DID OR DIDN'T DO. SO FAR THEY'VE HAD NO PROBLEM ACCEPTING TESTIMONY FROM 2nd, 3rd OR EVEN 4th HAND "WITNESSES" AND WHAT COULDN'T BE TESTIFIED TO, THEY MAKE IT UP. THIS KKKANGAROO KKKOURT HAS ME STYMIED, WHAT ARE THEY TRYING TO PROVE THAT TRUMP DID? ...i HAVE YET TO HEAR TRUMP SAY "GO BREAK INTO THE CAPITOL"

AND WHEN ALL IS DONE, WHAT IF THE PEOPLE STILL WANT TRUMP AS THEIR PRESIDENT? IT DOESN'T SAY ANYWHERE THAT HE CAN'T BE ELECTED ANYHOW?

MSNBC's take

He's going down: Bannon's 'Tough guy' talk melts down as DOJ vet predicts conviction  MSNBC CopiedToday

 Steve Bannon’s trial begins for criminal contempt of Congress. Day one consisted of the selection of jurors, and Bannon himself spoke after, saying in part that it would have been “more productive if we’d been on Capitol Hill addressing the nation,” and saying that the Jan. 6 committee “has been nothing but a show trial.” Former Federal prosecutor John Flannery joins Ari Melber on what to expect in this trial, saying “[Bannon’s] at risk to be the first of the inner circle to go down,” and he expects the jury to pierce “that veil of these powerful, omnipotent people who thought they could do anything in their arrogance. His defenses aren’t going to hold up.”   July 18, 2022

I CAN ONLY HOPE THAT CHINA IS PAYING A LOT MORE THAN $5.00 A GALLON

Why Is The U.S. Sending Its Emergency Oil Reserves To China?  July 8, 2022 Editor OilPrice.com

U.S. SPR release were exported to Europe and Asia last month, including top US geopolitical nemesis in the global arena, China, even as U.S. gasoline and diesel prices hit record highs.



The export of crude and fuel is blunting the impact of the moves by U.S. President Joe Biden to lower record pump prices. In a call, Biden on Saturday renewed a call for gasoline suppliers to cut their prices, drawing rightful criticism from Amazon founder Jeff Bezos, because going after mom and pop gas stores merely demonstrates just how clueless the handlers of the senile presidential puppet truly are.

About 1 million barrels per day have been drained from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve through October, at an unprecedented pace. The drain means SPR inventories fell to the lowest since 1986. US crude futures are above $100 per barrel and gasoline and diesel prices above $5 a gallon in one-fifth of the nation. US officials have said oil prices could be higher if the SPR had not been tapped, and for once they are right. Still, the question looms of what happens to oil prices when the US can no longer sell the SPR amid concerns of a real emergency: we know the answer and the Biden admin won't like it.

"The SPR remains a critical energy security tool to address global crude oil supply disruptions," a Department of Energy spokesperson said, adding that the emergency releases helped ensure stable supply of crude oil.

Citing customs data, Reuters traced that the fourth-largest U.S. oil refiner, Phillips 66 shipped about 470,000 barrels of sour crude from the Big Hill SPR storage site in Texas to Trieste, Italy. Trieste is home to a pipeline that sends oil to refineries in central Europe. Meanwhile, Atlantic Trading & Marketing (ATMI), an arm of French oil major TotalEnergies, exported 2 cargoes of 560,000 barrels each. Cargoes of SPR crude were also headed to the Netherlands and to a Reliance refinery in India, an industry source said.

What is most notable is that a third cargo headed to US arch-enemy, China, which is now directly benefiting at the expense of US consumers as a result of Biden's escalating panic to undo the consequences of his catastrophic green policies by selling the most valuable US assets directly to Beijing!

But what is even scarier is the following exchange, in which the White House simply had no response when asked if the US is selling its emergency reserve oil to China.

Pointing out the obvious, Matt Smith, lead oil analyst at Kpler. said that "crude and fuel prices would likely be higher if (the SPR releases) hadn't happened, but at the same time, it isn't really having the effect that was assumed."

And while the midterms will come and go, and Democrats will suffer a historic loss, the U.S. energy picture is getting more dire by the minute thanks to the sheer incompetence and/or corruption of the executive branch: crude inventories are the lowest since 2004 as refineries run near peak levels. Refineries in the U.S. Gulf coast were at 97.9% utilization, the most in three and a half years. This means even the smallest accident can and will sell oil prices to the moon

By Zerohedge.com

Related: Is Biden Really Responsible For High Oil Prices?

 Is this the REAL reason gasoline prices are so high? Trying forcing everyone to buy electric cars? Bidens goal is to "go green" entirely.

Pete Buttigieg  "secretary of transportation".slammed over promoting electric cars to combat surging gas prices

AMID HIGH GAS PRICES, PETE BUTTIGIEG SLAMMED FOR TELLING AMERICANS TO SWITCH TO ELECTRIC CARS

 

Personal finance expert Dan Roccato joined 'Fox & Friends First' to discuss Buttigieg's remarks as Americans battle rising gas prices and rampant inflation. #FoxNews

The Coming Civil War Part 2 – The Left Preempts The Battlefield    ConservativeHQ   By George Rasley, CHQ Editor 

Our much-admired fellow conservative Kurt Schlichter recently posted an article on Townhall asking a question we’ve been mulling for quite some time: Are We Looking At Another Civil War?

Mr. Schlichter observes that, “…while the chance of civil conflict is low, violence is not only possible but it has been used by the left as a means of making political change in America in the past. And the evidence is that the left remains ideologically open to using violence in the future to achieve its goals.”

We would like to agree with Kurt Schlichter that the “chance of civil conflict is low,” but as we review the reaction of the Democrats and their Far Left allies to the candidacy and election of Donald Trump we are more inclined to ask, how can we not have a civil war, than to accept that the chance of civil conflict is low.

In Part 1 we looked at some of the potential triggers to a civil war, today we will look at some of the potential combatants.

Whenever conservatives warn that Democrats are escalating the potential for civil war, Democrats respond with derision and comments like Joe Biden made in a June 2021 speech during which he joked that people who think they needed guns to take on the US government would actually need nuclear weapons.

In a speech that outlined one of his many plans to “combat gun violence,” Biden said, "If you wanted or if you think you need to have weapons to take on the government, you need F-15s and maybe some nuclear weapons."

Two months later, the Taliban, armed only with light weapons, defeated the United States and drove us from Afghanistan confirming once again former Secretary of Defense Robert Gates’s observation that Biden has been wrong about every national security issue for the past 50 years.

But if Joe Biden lacks the brains to visualize how an insurgency might develop in response to his oppressive policies, his allies on the Left can visualize it all too well and are moving with alacrity to rearrange the battlefield in their own favor.

And, while the Supreme Court dealt a serious blow to their plans to disarm the law-abiding Americans who might finally be provoked to defend their liberty the Left has been doing a great job of whittling down the number and effectiveness of the forces that might oppose their revolution.

READ MORE

Read Part 1 through this link

The Coming Civil War Part 3 on Monday

 

 Funny how this works

Thanx to "90 Miles From Tyranny"

Ray Epps’ Pro-Democrat Past Resurfaces As New York Times Comes To His Rescue Epps claims to support Trump, but promoted Hilary Clinton during the 2016 election.  by PAUL AUBERT July 14, 2022

Last Updated on July 14, 2022

Ray Epps, an alleged Trump supporter who was accused by many to be a federal agent guilty of encouraging Trump supporters to commit illegal acts on January 6th, 2021, was covered by the New York Times on Wednesday.

As National File previously reported, the Times piece attempted to clear Epps of any wrongdoing.

The article alleged he was just an average Trump supporter who has “suffered enormously in the past 10 months as right-wing media figures and Republican politicians have baselessly described him as a covert government agent who helped to instigate the attack on the Capitol last year.”

Darren Beattie’s Revolver News first covered Epps’ involvement in the Jan. 6 protest. Revolver posted a multitude of videos recorded on January 5th and 6th which showed Epps encouraging bystanders to trespass into the Capitol.

READ ON

READ MORE: Meet Ray Epps: The Fedrotected Provocateur Who Appears To Have Led The Very First 1/6 Attack On The U.S. Capitol – Revolver News

AOC Claims ‘Inside’ Government Actors Helped January 6 Protesters, Building Is Still Unsafe  By Tim Meads• Jul 14, 2022 DailyWire.com

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) claimed Wednesday evening that U.S. Capitol Police officers or other actors working inside the Capitol building assisted protesters during the January 6 riot as they breached the facility in an effort to stop the certification of the Electoral College vote.

The congresswoman also said that, because the issue is unresolved, she has “never felt safe” at the Capitol. Ocasio-Cortez’s remarks came just hours after a comedian crudely trolled her while she was entering the building.

In a video posted by Pablo Manríquez, a correspondent for Latino Rebels, AOC is heard sounding off to the camera, “…And that there were actual officers working with this? And we never got to the bottom of that, and we never got any answers about that? And to this day, we’re just supposed to pretend that that never happened? I have no idea what happened to the people on the inside, who were very clearly sympathetic with what was going on and opening doors wide open for that, and I’m supposed to sit here and pretend like none of that ever happened?”

Since January 6, 2021, reports have surfaced claiming that officers, in some instances, stood by as Trump-supporting protesters entered the Capitol — though the context for the reports is often unclear. At least one law enforcement officer allegedly posed for a selfie with a protester inside the Capitol.

AOC went on to argue that officers who allegedly helped the protesters must be held “accountable” and that simply throwing taxpayer dollars at the issue would not improve the situation — thus continuing to place employees in the Capitol building at risk.

“And then right afterward, you have a massive, you know, you just have this idea that throwing money at that problem is going to make it go away without any accountability,” she said to the camera. “And so this is, this is where these things are breaking down. We’re not safe. And it’s not just about members of Congress not being safe. The food staff workers aren’t safe. the janitors aren’t safe — like we need to get to the bottom of this.”

The congresswoman also tweeted, “Remember how there was tons of footage and evidence of officers & others inside on 1/6 supporting insurrectionists, but then everyone decided it was too politically risky to investigate thoroughly so they brushed under the rug and now we still have no idea who or what is safe?”

READ MORE

There is NO defense for harassment, It's a form of BULLYING and he's not man enough to do it himself, he urges OTHERS to do it for him...!!

Buttigieg defends harassment of Justice Kavanaugh
Fox News

'The Big Sunday Show' guests discuss Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg defending the harassment of public officials, saying they should 'never be free from criticism.' #foxnews

The Trump/Secret Service Scandal That Wasn’t
The Dan Bongino Show June 29, 2022 

`This show is brought to you by Exprs VPN' https://www.expressvpn.com/bongino

It doesn’t appear she’s telling the truth! In this episode, I address why the latest “scandal” surfacing at the January 6th star chamber hearing can’t possibly be true.

Tucker Carlson: This may have been the greatest crime in history Fox News  3 days ago 

Fox News host Tucker Carlson argues no one benefited more from the COVID pandemic than China on 'Tucker Carlson Tonight.' #FoxNews #tucker

I'd like to know...WHO or WHAT is she so angry about ??

Tucker: Who is Liz Cheney and what does she stand for?
Fox News  One Year Ago

Tucker Carlson says Democrats don't "parrot the slurs of their enemies." #FoxNews #Tucker

GOOD..!! U'ts unconstitutional anyhow

Supreme Court Ruling Overturns "Assault Weapons" Ban!Copper Jacket TV

The recent decision by the Supreme Court in NYSRPA V. Bruen lays out clearly the details and requirements needed to uphold a law which may infringe on rights. Modern arms are expressly protected says Justice Thomas in his opinion. — USCCA - https://www.uscca.com/copperjacket

Biden Gets Frozen in His Tracks: "No Constitutional Authority" For His Latest Ridiculous Move

After Retired 3-Star General Jokes on Jill Biden – TheArmy Quickly Reacts by Suspending His Mentor Position  By Adam Casalino|July 11, 2022

What’s Happening:

Democrats have infested every corner of our government. Even in the Armed Forces, their anti-Free Speech agenda is cutting people down left and right.

A retired 3-Star general took to Twitter to criticize Jill Biden’s recent claims about women. For that evil crime, the man was suspended from a “mentor” post and is under investigation.

From Fox News:

A retired three-star general of the U.S. Army has been suspended from a “mentor” position after sarcastically congratulating first lady Jill Biden for learning “what a woman is.”

The Army confirmed the suspension to Fox News Saturday and confirmed speculation that the veteran was under internal investigation for mocking Biden.

Really? Is the Biden administration so insecure that they have to punish a retired general for making a joke?

This man isn’t currently serving. He was retired, with only a “mentor” position. Yet the Army thought it had the right to cut this man down.

All for what? Mocking someone. That’s it. Last time I checked, jokes are protected speech.

But not to the left. They have long ago abandoned the First Amendment since it got in their way.

Democrats demand complete conformity to their views and agenda (even when those views constantly change). To defy them means you will be canceled, shadow banned, or even attacked.

This general had the “gall” to call out Jill Biden over her defense of Roe. Like other Democrats, who just a few weeks ago refused to define the word “woman,” suddenly she is “standing up” for women’s rights.

That’s worth mocking if anything ever was. So, why should a retired general be scourged for pointing out the obvious?

This is merely another sign that “wokeism” has infested our Armed Forces. Joe Biden appointed leftists to lead the Pentagon.

And they spend more time complaining about gender pronouns than they do defending the country.

The news they are going after a retired general over a tweet? This won’t go well for any of them.

Key Takeaways:

1. The Army suspended a retired general over a tweet mocking Jill Biden.
2. They confirmed the man is also under “investigation” over the tweet.
3. Gen. Gary Volesky mocked Biden over a tweet about women.

The US is now officially in a recession. BIDENS RECESSION

So what does that mean for the country, why is a recession happening now, and what exactly can we do about it?

In this episode of Making the Argument, Nick Freitas explains how Washington D.C. just plunged America into the worst financial crisis since 2008.

MTA: Making the Argment with Nick Freitas 27: What Is A Recession, Why Is It Happening, And What You Can Do About it?

02:05

59:07

Use Up/Down Arrow keys to increase or decrease volume.

Podcast:  Click HERE To play in new window

Are We Looking At Another Civil War?   Kurt Schlichter  Posted: Jul 11, 2022

Consider the logic of the left and it’s no wonder that many people are considering the unspeakable – whether America will devolve into actual violent conflict. But I dare speak about it at length in my brand-new book We’ll Be Back: The Fall and Rise of America, which confronts this issue of systematic political violence head-on. The most important question related to the long decline of America at the hands of a corrupt, incompetent, and terminally foolish ruling caste that controls our major institutions is whether we can pull out of this tailspin without bloodshed.

I sure hope so, but the risk is real and we need to confront it.

The logic of the left accepts political violence. A few years ago, one of its acolytes tried to wipe out the congressional Republican caucus on a softball field; last month, another member of the MSNBCNN target demo tried to off Justice Kavanaugh for somewhat limiting the ability of progressives to conveniently kill babies. Even the reaction to the recent molestation of the famously beer-ophilic jurist as he nibbled on a rib-eye at Morton’s in DC was indicative – this personal confrontation was celebrated by the left instead of decried. What’s the logical limit when you sign onto the idea that one can legitimately influence politics via the personal intimidation of officials placed in office by our agreed constitutional procedures? If you can get in his face, why can’t you slap it? Or put a bullet in it? If there is a boundary, the left is not setting it. Keep in mind that civil conflict is not unknown in America, Our revolution was also a civil war – one sparked by tyrants seeking to enforce gun control. The Civil War that followed four score and change years later was sparked by Democrats angry over the Republican demand that they stopped treating human beings inhumanly – a theme that continues to this day. Prior to the War Between the States was a war between the pro- and anti-slavery militias along the Missouri-Kansas borders. In the late-sixties/early-seventies, there was an urban leftist insurgency by groups like the Weather Underground and the Black Panthers that resulted in hundreds of bombings and many killings. It was dealt with as a law enforcement matter, but in a distinctly militaristic way. The Los Angeles Police Department famously annihilated most of the Symbionese Liberation Army – whose battle cry was “DEATH TO THE FASCIST INSECT!” – in a blazing firefight in South Central that was broadcast on national TV.

But don’t insult our intelligence by referencing the minor fracas that was J6. If that was an insurrection, you would have seen some armed insurrecting instead of selfie-snapping. If red America wanted to start something, they would have brought along their ARs like progressive James Hodgkinson did.

So, while the chance of civil conflict is low, violence is not only possible but it has been used by the left as a means of making political change in America in the past. And the evidence is that the left remains ideologically open to using violence in the future to achieve its goals.

READ HERE