Friday, December 16, 2016

Some people think...."She's rich, she's famous so she must be SMART,,,,WRONG !!! and Whoopi proved it with these remarks

Whoopi Goldberg Compares Right to Celebrate Christmas to Getting an Abortion  Leah Barkoukis  Posted: Dec 16, 2016

Whoopi Goldberg thinks the right to observe Christmas is the same thing as a woman’s right to have an abortion.

Goldberg made the unusual comparison earlier this week during an exchange with her co-hosts on “The View” about the separation of church and state when it comes to the public display of nativity scenes.

Seemingly out of nowhere, Goldberg then claimed the celebration of Christmas is “the same conversation with a woman’s right to choose.”

“What I do with my body is my right. It is not your right to tell me,” she said. “The same thing is it’s – if you believe in Christmas, it’s not my right – you know, I grew up and – and, you know, kids who didn’t go to Catholic school had Christmas and they – we never knew what their religions were, but we hung ‘cause it was Christmas holiday.”

Viewers were quick to take to social media to point out just how crazy that comparison is.

read tweets

This guy...a real piece of CRAP

Podesta's Scathing Message for the FBI   Cortney O'Brien Posted: Dec 16, 2016

Podesta's Scathing Message for the FBI
The FBI is broken, former Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta concludes in his Washington Post op-ed, published on Thursday night. In his analysis, Podesta demands to know why the agency responded disproportionately to Clinton's email scandal and the reports of Russian hacking in the 2016 election. While they were overzealous in their investigation of Clinton's emails, they now seem to be "lackadaisical" in their probe on Russia, Podesta notes.
But the FBI’s role is particularly troubling because of its power and responsibility — and because this is part of a trend. The Justice Department’s Inspector General issued a damning report this summer about the FBI’s failure to prioritize cyberthreats more broadly.
The election is over and the damage is done, but the threat from Russia and other potential aggressors remains urgent and demands a serious and sustained response.

Podesta had a few suggestions for the Obama administration going forward. The White House should declassify any intel they have on the hack and honor presidential electors' request to be briefed on the intelligence before the final vote deadline on December 19. He also wants Congress to launch its own investigation. 
Podesta is probably so impassioned about the hacking claims because his email account was one of WikiLeaks' prime targets during the 2016 election. Thousands of emails he sent and received to his staffers were publicized, exposing some of Clinton's "problematic" Wall Street speeches and pay-to-play schemes between the Clinton Foundation and the State Department.
Clinton and the Obama White House are under the impression Russia intervened in the election to undermine her campaign.

George Monaghan
I am not as stupid as the Obama Administration think's I am. I get it ! Russia hacked our election process. Ok..They can't tell or show us how or where ?? We have to kinda trust them. Kinda like "Let's Pass It. So we can see what's in it " But I got it. Even with the International reputations, the Clinton's have. Of selling America out for CASH !!, over the last quarter of a century ! To China and Russia and only God, knows who else ?? I got it !!!..I mean they got 25% or more of our Uranium supply, from Hilary so far. Why wouldn't they want Trump in there ?? I got it !!...The question is: Does America get it ??

You Won’t Believe Who May Have Been Behind The Election Hacking

Many jumped to the conclusion that a foreign power was behind the attack.
But chilling details reveal just who may have been behind the attempted attack.
In frightening developments, Georgia’s Secretary of State says they have traced the IP address to the Department of Homeland Security.
The letter informed Homeland Security that the attempted breach occurred on November 15th.
PC World reports:
“Georgia’s secretary of state says the state was hit with an attempted hack of its voter registration database from an IP address linked to the federal Department of Homeland Security.
The allegation by Georgia Secretary of State Brian Kemp is one of the more bizarre charges to come up in the recent spate of alarms about voting-system hacks. He said in a Facebook post on Thursday that he had been made aware of the failed attempt to breach the firewall protecting Georgia’s voter registration database. The attack was traced to an Internet Protocol address associated with DHS, he said.
“This morning I sent a letter to DHS Secretary Jeh Johnson demanding to know why,” he said in the post.
The DHS said it had received the letter. “We are looking into the matter. DHS takes the trust of our public and private sector partners seriously, and we will respond to Secretary Kemp directly,” the department said in a statement.”
“Hacking” the election has become a major left-wing talking point.
After recounts failed to swing the election results, leftists have tried several strategies to undermine Donald Trump’s victory.
First they blamed it on “fake news”.
But many Americans saw it as an attempt to silence any point of view the Democrats disagree with.
Now they have settled on Russian “hackers” as the cause for Hillary’s defeat.
Some Democrats have even called for the Electoral College to block Donald Trump’s victory after the Washington Post published a poorly sourced and evidence-free story that the CIA had reached an “assessment” that the Russians “hacked” the election to favor Donald Trump.
Obama’s own Office of the Director of National Intelligence and the FBI both disagree and believe the evidence does not support the conclusion.
There has also been much confusion about how the media throws around the phrase “hacking the election.”
What WikiLeaks published were emails obtained from the Democrat National Committee and Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta.
These emails – all of which were true – simply gave the public more information to base their votes on, and were not part of the election.
“Hacking” the election would amount to tampering with vote tallies.
And there is zero evidence to support that conspiracy theory.
President-elect Donald Trump's vow to "drain the swamp" in Washington could and possibly should begin with the Agriculture Department. 

I get that it's in the industry's best interests to portray every farm as a small family-run affair and get all sentimental over farm subsidies that keep them in business when times are hard. But are these subsidies fair to us, the average American tax payer?
While we like to think that farm "subsidies" go to small family businesses, the facts differ and in many instances these payouts are just a huge transfer of wealth from the poor to the rich. 
Don't believe me? Check this out. 

Click here to learn more

DEMS,REPS OR INDEPENDANTS....REALLY ??? Bullying a 16 yo GIRL, because she wants to SING ?.....Really brave, tough guys...

Jackie Evancho Opens Up About the Online Backlash Her Family and Transgender Sister Have Received  

© Provided by TIME Inc.
Opera prodigy Jackie Evancho made headlines yesterday when it was revealed that she would be singing the national anthem at Donald Trump‘s presidential inauguration next month. Though honored by the prestigious invite, the 16-year-old soon became the target of vicious Twitter bullying by Trump’s detractors.
Many celebrities have their share of haters, but trolls attack the singing sensation’s family for a very personal reason as well.
“My family is kind of a big target. I have a transgender sister and so a lot of hate goes towards us,” Evancho tells PEOPLE Now.
Juliet, 18, revealed that she was transgender at the Global Lyme Alliance’s inaugural gala in New York last year. Although her family was accepting, some members of the public shared their negative opinions on social media.
Evancho, who rose to fame in 2010 when she came in second place on America’s Got Talent at the age of ten, admits that although there are times when the family gets frustrated with the hateful comments, they do their best to ignore it.
“I also get a lot of love. We pay most attention to that,” she says.
Whether her haters like it or not, Evancho’s performance at Trump’s inauguration will be a major milestone in her already impressive career. 
She explained that after performing for the 70-year-old business mogul in the past, but on a significantly smaller scale—not the millions of viewers that are anticipated to tune in.
“I feel like it’s going to be a big audience, and I love big audiences,” she says.
Although she admits she’s nervous, she’s no stranger to performing for very important folks. In fact, Evancho sang “O Holy Night” at the National Christmas Tree Lighting hosted by President Barack Obama in 2010, and again performed for him at the National Prayer Breakfast two years later.
She says, “I remember that I got a lot of applause and that everyone was really impressed, so
I’m hoping the same thing happens.”

Most newspapers have put themsels on the same level as THE NATIONAL INQUIRER

"NEWS" people have "CAST IRON BALLS" !! To even think of writing this "story"....Isn't this the proverbial "Pot Calling The Kettle Black" ?Whether it's the Washington post, New York Times, Phila. Inquirer or any of the other news agencies in the U S, whether newspaper, TV or any other media, they are collectively nothing but a bunch of HYPOCRITES and LIARS. More LIES have come out of the media than from ANY of the Presidential candidates (probably all combined) So many that I don't know who or what to believe when any reports come from the MSM.

I didn't read this article, the headline was enough to make me sick

These people have "The biggest Pinocchios of 2016" Washington Post · 7 hours ago

It’s time for our annual roundup of the biggest Pinocchios of the year ... This is our favorite example of why it is often boring to fact-check Trump’s

Thursday, December 15, 2016

So the whole crux of the whining over the Russians is that the Russians released information. GASP! That's because the Democrats know the less informed you are, the more likely you are to vote Democrat.

If the Russians can hack into the DNC to steal emails, maybe that's why it's illegal to use an unsecured private server to communicate classified information. Hmmm.

Apparently the White House referred to Christmas Trees as Holiday Trees. Which prompted CBS presenter, Ben Stein, to present a piece which I would like to share... with you.
The following was mostly written by Ben Stein, while other parts have been added from anonymous sources.

My confession:
I am a Jew, and every single one of my ancestors was Jewish. And it does not bother me even a little bit when people call those beautiful lit up, bejewelled trees, Christmas trees. I don't feel threatened. I don't feel discriminated against. That's what they are, Christmas trees.

It doesn't bother me a bit when people say, 'Merry Christmas' to me. I don't think they are slighting me or getting ready to put me in a ghetto. In fact, I kind of like it. It shows that we are all brothers and sisters celebrating this happy time of year. It doesn't bother me at all that there is a manger scene on display at a key intersection near my beach house in Malibu. If people want a nativity scene, it's just as fine with me as is the Menorah a few hundred yards away.
I don't like getting pushed around for being a Jew, and I don't think Christians like getting pushed around for being Christians. I think people who believe in God are sick and tired of getting pushed around, period. I have no idea where the concept came from, that America is an explicitly atheist country. I can't find it in the Constitution and I don't like it being shoved down my throat.
Or maybe I can put it another way: where did the idea come from that we should worship celebrities and we aren't allowed to worship God? I guess that's a sign that I'm getting old, too. But there are a lot of us who are wondering where these celebrities came from and where the America we knew went to.
In light of the many jokes we send to one another for a laugh, this is a little different: This is not intended to be a joke; it's not funny, it's intended to get you thinking.
Billy Graham's daughter was interviewed on the Early Show and Jane Clayson asked her 'How could God let something like this happen?' (regarding Hurricane Katrina). Anne Graham gave an extremely profound and insightful response. She said, 'I believe God is deeply saddened by this, just as we are, but for years we've been telling God to get out of our schools, to get out of our government and to get out of our lives.And being the gentleman He is, I believe He has calmly backed out. How can we expect God to give us His blessing and His protection if we demand He leave us alone?'
In light of recent events... terrorist attacks, school shootings, etc. I think it started when Madeleine Murray O'Hare (she was murdered, her body found a few years ago) complained she didn't want prayer in our schools, and we said OK. Then someone said you better not read the Bible in school. The Bible says thou shalt not kill; thou shalt not steal, and love your neighbor as yourself. And we said OK.
Then Dr. Benjamin Spock said we shouldn't spank our children when they misbehave, because their little personalities would be warped and we might damage their self-esteem (Dr. Spock's son committed suicide). We said an expert should know what he's talking about. And we said okay.
Now we're asking ourselves why our children have no conscience, why they don't know right from wrong, and why it doesn't bother them to kill strangers, their classmates, and themselves.
Probably, if we think about it long and hard enough, we can figure it out. I think it has a great deal to do with 'WE REAP WHAT WE SOW.'
Funny how simple it is for people to trash God and then wonder why the world's going to hell.
Funny how we believe what the newspapers say, but question what the Bible says.

Funny how you can send 'jokes' through e-mail and they spread like wildfire, but when you start sending messages regarding the Lord, people think twice about sharing.
Funny how lewd, crude, vulgar and obscene articles pass freely through cyberspace, but public discussion of God is suppressed in the school and workplace.
Are you laughing yet?
Funny how when you forward this message, you will not send it to many on your address list because you're not sure what they believe, or what they will think of you for sending it.
Funny how we can be more worried about what other people think of us than what God thinks of us.
Pass it on if you think it has merit.
If not, then just discard it.... no one will know you did. But, if you discard this thought process, don't sit back and complain about what a bad shape the world is in.
My Best Regards, Honestly and respectfully,
                                                         Ben Stein

Comey to Trump: The Russians Didn’t Influence the Election  Ed Klein Posted: Dec 14, 2016

Comey to Trump: The Russians Didn’t Influence the Election

In telephone conversations with Donald Trump, FBI Director James Comey assured the president-elect there was no credible evidence that Russia influenced the outcome of the recent U.S. presidential election by hacking the Democratic National Committee and the e-mails of John Podesta, the chairman of Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign.
What’s more, Comey told Trump that James Clapper, the director of National Intelligence, agreed with this FBI assessment.

The only member of the U.S. intelligence community who was ready to assert that the Russians sanctioned the hacking was John Brennan, the director of the CIA, according to sources who were briefed on Comey’s conversations with Trump.
“And Brennan takes his marching orders from President Obama,” the sources quoted Comey as saying.

In Comey’s view, the leaks to the New York Times and the Washington Post alleging that the Russians tried—and perhaps even succeeded—in tilting the election to Trump were a Democratic Party effort to delegitimize Trump’s victory.
During their phone conversations, Comey informed Trump that the FBI had been alert for the past year to the danger that the Russians would try to cause mischief during the U.S. presidential election.
However, whether the Russians did so remains an open question, Comey said, adding that it was just as likely that the hacking was done by people who had no direct connection to the Russian government.
“It’s also unclear,” the sources pointed out, “why Putin would have preferred dealing with Donald Trump, who has promised a major military buildup, over Hillary Clinton, who would have continued Barack Obama’s cautious policies toward the Kremlin.”

Wednesday, December 14, 2016

Alex Jones: There's "No Evidence" Of A Russian Hacking Conspiracy  Christine Rousselle  Posted: Dec 14, 2016

Alex Jones: There's "No Evidence" Of A Russian Hacking Conspiracy

Whitewashing the Black President's Legacy 
Brent Bozell Posted: Dec 14, 2016

As President Barack Obama's White House days run out, it's time for his obsequious courtiers in the liberal media to announce his glorious "legacy." On Dec. 7, CNN devoted a two-hour prime-time special to the Obama legacy. It was hosted by Fareed Zakaria, a journalist whom Obama had invited to the White House so he could soak in Zakaria's wisdom and expertise -- in
other words, so he could flatter a journalist into giving him softball coverage.Mission accomplished.
Just as it began nine years ago, Zakaria started by celebrating the president's race, the gauzy references to Kenya and Kansas fusing into one glorious body. Forget what Obama did . The
first legacy was simply who he represented.
And for that he'd been victimized. In CNN's eyes, Obama's central crisis was the "fierce, unrelenting opposition" of Republicans and their latent racism. Obama's former senior adviser David Axelrod claimed, "It's indisputable that there was a ferocity to the opposition and a lack of respect to him that was a function of race." CNN pundit Van Jones agreed, saying, "I can't name one thing that this Congress supported this president on in eight years!" The left never had the intellectual nuance (or the political decency) to acknowledge that one could oppose Obama because he's a socialist. Period.
At the show's end, Zakaria concluded: "Presidential legacies also exist above and beyond laws and policies. We remember John F. Kennedy for energy, vitality, elegance and intelligence that he brought to the White House. And in that sense, Obama has left an indelible mark.

Doesn't obama realize that once Trump is inaugurated, that he (obama) can't use his PEN AND PHONE to get his WAY anymore ???

Barack Obama Is About To Stab Donald Trump In The Back

As a matter of protocol, former President’s try to remain silent on how their successor conducts his affairs.
American can only have on President at a time.
But Barack Obama announced he may undermine President-elect Trump, and it could have dire consequences for America.
Liberals are shell-shocked over the results of November 8th.
They thought Hillary Clinton had the election in the bag.
But Trump won the Presidency by running his campaign on the complete repudiation of the legislative and cultural priorities of Obama and the Democrats.
Now that the party is out of the White House and in the minority in Congress, liberals are looking for someone to lead their fight to sabotage the Trump administration.
In a press conference in Germany, Obama announced he was game for the task.

Image may contain: 5 people, people standing and suit

With all the talk of "fake news" NBC is now reporting as if a positive fact, that Putin was DIRECTLY involved in hacking the DNC. And look who is reporting it, NBC, everyone knows THEY only report the truth. If NBC reported that the earth is ROUND, I wouldn't believe it. These days, I believe nothing I read and maybe 1/2 of what I actually see......

Another media ploy to shine  a bad light on Donald Trump
U.S. Officials: Putin Personally Involved in U.S. Election Hack

Russian President Vladimir Putin during duties, Moscow, Russia - 07 Dec 2016
Russian president Vladimir Putin prior to a meeting with newly appointed senior military staff in the Kremlin. Via…
U.S. intelligence officials now believe with "a high level of confidence" that Russian President Vladimir Putin became personally involved in the covert Russian campaign to interfere in the U.S. presidential election, senior U.S. intelligence officials told NBC News.
Two senior officials with direct access to the information say new intelligence shows that Putin personally directed how hacked material from Democrats was leaked and otherwise used. The intelligence came from diplomatic sources and spies working for U.S. allies, the officials said.
Putin's objectives were multifaceted, a high-level intelligence source told NBC News. What began as a "vendetta" against Hillary Clinton morphed into an effort to show corruption in American politics and to "split off key American allies by creating the image that [other countries] couldn't depend on the U.S. to be a credible global leader anymore," the official said.

Image may contain: meme and text
No automatic alt text available.
Tomi Lahren - The Rex of it All | Final Thoughts

Published on Dec 13, 2016
Before you freak out over Rex Tillerson, remember who Obama picked in 2008...but what difference does it make?
Image may contain: one or more people and text

Tuesday, December 13, 2016


Monday, December 12, 2016

how can we believe anything reorted by the MASS MEDIA or the CIA or barack obama or anyone from his administration ? (including our current congress)

Bolton: Russian Hacking Could've Been 'False Flag' Operation  Leah Barkoukis  Posted: Dec 12, 2016

Bolton: Russian Hacking Could've Been 'False Flag' Operation

Former ambassador to the UN John Bolton suggested on Sunday that reports of Russian interference in the presidential election could be a “false flag.”

“It is not at all clear to me, just viewing this from the outside, that this hacking into the DNC and the RNC computers was not a false flag operation,” he told Fox News’ Eric Shawn.
“The question that has to be asked is, why did the Russians run their smart intelligence service against Hillary’s server but their dumb intelligence services against the election?”

When pressed as to what he meant by a false flag operation, a term used to describe a covert action by the government that makes it look as though it was carried out by another entity, Bolton said “we just don’t know.”

In the Obama administration, intelligence has been politicized “to a very significant degree,” he said.

Bolton’s suggestion comes on the heels of a report released Friday showing that the CIA concluded Russia intervened to help get Trump elected.

Trump called the report “ridiculous” and said “it’s just another excuse” for Clinton’s loss.

Bolton questioned why, if the Russians did interfere, they left fingerprints.

“We would want to know who else might want to influence the election and why they would leave fingerprints that point to the Russians. That’s why I say, until we know more about how the intelligence community came to this conclusion, we don’t know whether it’s Russian inspired or a false flag,” he said. 
WORD: 5 Examples of Total Hypocrites Calling for the Shut Down of Fake News

Published on Dec 9, 2016

You can really see how coordinated the effort is for political leaders and their lapdog mainstream media to call for the shutting down of free speech under the label "fake news," which is really just another way of them saying, "Things that go against our agenda" or "The only fake news you get to watch or read is *our* fake news!" *whine*

The most sadly hilarious part, even more ridiculous than Obama essentially calling for a ministry of "truthiness," was when Brian Williams actually sat in front of a camera and referred to himself as "the real news".

America is clearly inching one step closer to George Orwell's 1984... Where do you think they'll build the Ministry of Truth?

talk about FAKE news....Previous ambassador THINKS Putin tried to help Trump.....And it's a SECRET CIA assessment, SECRET ? then why do we know about it ? and remember the CIA said IRAQ had weapons of mass destruction.....

Former ambassador to Russia: Putin wanted 'revenge' against Clinton 
Secret CIA assesment: Russia was attempting to assist Trump© Provided by The Hill

Secret CIA assessment: Russia was attempting to assist Trump
Russia interfered in the U.S. elections to get revenge against Hillary Clinton, a former U.S. ambassador to the Kremlin said Sunday.
Michael McFaul, who served as the U.S. ambassador to Russia from 2012 to 2014, said he thinks Russian President Vladimir Putin wanted to help Donald Trump win the presidency to hurt Clinton.
"Let's remember that Vladimir Putin thinks [Clinton] interfered in his election - the parliamentary election in December 2011 - and has said as much publicly, and I've heard him talk about it privately," McFaul said on NBC's "Meet the Press."
The New York Times reported last week that American intelligence agencies concluded that Russia acted covertly to harm Clinton's campaign and promote Trump.
Putin would also be motivated to help Trump because the two support many of the same policies, McFaul said.
"It's very rational in my view that [Putin] would rather see President-elect Trump be the next president of the United States instead of Secretary Clinton," he said.
"We really do need this bipartisan, independent investigation that others are calling for."

Sunday, December 11, 2016

Even any truth to this, it's Trumps fault because.....................?

Trump's transition team, in a statement Friday night, dismissed the Post's report, noting that the CIA "are the same people that said Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction."
U.S. intelligence officials have accused Russia of hacking into Democratic officials' email accounts in an attempt to interfere with the presidential campaign. The Washington Post reported Friday that the CIA has concluded that Russia aimed specifically to help Donald Trump win the presidency.
Congressional officials briefed on the hack confirmed the Post's report to NBC News Saturday. 
According to the Post, by mid-September, White House officials mulled over its approach to publicly blame Moscow without being accused of bolstering Clinton's campaign. Officials decided to seek bipartisan support and set up a secret meeting with the so-called Gang of 12 — a group of ranking members from the House and Senate — on intelligence and homeland security, the Post reported.

Read more:
I guess they forgot about these links below.....check many more

Obama Is Releasing Gitmo Prisoner Who Vowed To ‘Kill As Many Americans As He Could’ When Released  By  |

Yet Another Prisoner Swap


Yet another Islamic extremist has been transferred out of Guantanamo Bay in an effort for the Obama administration to deliver on their campaign promise to close the detention center that was designed to house enemy combatants caught on the battlefield.
Americans are still frustrated at the president’s illegal prisoner swap that involved five high-ranking Taliban generals in exchange for one U.S. prisoner of war who was suspected of desertion. Each of the ‘Taliban Five’ were deemed, by the Obama administration itself, to be too dangerous to transfer, and yet were transferred anyway. They are believed to have re-continued their efforts against American forces.
Mohammad al Rahman al Shumrani is yet another detainee that has been transfered from Guantanamo Bay. According to an assessment obtained by the New York Times, al Shumrani was believed to be an extremist recruiter for al-Qaeda, and possibly a former body guard for Osama Bin Laden.
The assessment suggested that a strong possibility existed that al Shumrani would rejoin the terrorist network unless he was completely rehabilitated and closely monitored.
“If released without rehabilitation, close supervision, and means to successfully reintegrate into his society as a law-abiding citizen, it is assessed detainee would immediately seek out prior associates and reengage in hostilities and extremist support activities at home and abroad.”
So far, he is not sounding like a moderate Muslim, and the assessment continues to show why:
“Since transfer to JTF-GTMO, detainee has threatened the guard staff, has preached extremist ideology to other detainees, and has indicated his intent to kill Americans in Iraq and Afghanistan if released.”
In other words, Obama has just released a man from Guantanamo Bay, who has preached extremist ideology, and who has pledged to continue to kill Americans if he is released. Other than to fulfill a campaign promise to close down the detention facility and inexplicable optimism that al Shumrani will be rehabilitated, what possible reason could the president have for unleashing a person like that on the world?

TOTAL BULL......They are doing this because the "school" is allowing it.....A chance for the BLACKS to get soething over on the WHITES.......healng time..HA! HA!

Missouri Univ. ‘Blacks Only Zone’: Whites Kicked Out For Healing Time

Missouri Univ. ‘Blacks Only Zone’: Whites Kicked Out For Healing Time
Black healing zones, where no white are allowed, are the newest development toward ‘progress’ at the University of Missouri.  The white students who stood with the  “concerned student organization” are now being kicked to the curb for their support and being told they have to leave, as they are apparently not part of this so-called healing process.
Healing from what? Somehow this self made segregation, where the black students are sending the supportive white students off to their own room is counter productive.  Certainly is goes against Martin Luther King Jr. who was not concerned about skin color, but rather character content.  And these students lack character if this is how they behave, recreating segregation to benefit their “need for healing”.
Will this new organization demand black only water fountains?  Black only bathrooms?  Will the white allies not see the contradiction in the movement, that should address race issues, but instead it is perpetrating the norm in a topsy turvy fashion? It appears this students movement is heading back to  pre-civil rights days by sending the whites to the back of the bus.
More information can be found on page two regarding the segregation put in place by this concerned student organization.

Obama’s Terrorism Claim Hides an Inconvenient Truth   David Inserra / /

On Tuesday, President Barack Obama stated that “Over [the] last eight years, no foreign terrorist organization has successfully planned and executed an attack on our homeland.”
Talk about something actually deserving of being labeled as “fake news.”
Obama’s statement obscures the reality that the U.S. has faced 66 Islamist terrorist plots against the U.S. homeland during Obama’s time in office, 13 of which were successful.
When President George W. Bush left office, the U.S. had faced 28 Islamist plots after 9/11, only one of which was successful. Now there have been 93 Islamist plots since 9/11, and 14 successful attacks.

Obama’s statement is technically accurate since none of these attacks were planned and directed from abroad. Instead, the vast majority of the terror plots and all of the successful attacks since 9/11 have involved homegrown terrorists—that is, terrorists who radicalized and plotted here in the U.S.
While preventing such foreign orchestrated plots is vital, it is no longer enough. The threat has morphed and the U.S. must now do more to counter homegrown and lone wolf Islamist terrorists.
Obama’s comment obscures the truth that in his eight years in office, as shown by the sharp increase in the number of Islamist plots and successful attacks, the homeland has been less safe.
Claiming victory while the U.S. is in the most active period of terrorist activity since 9/11 is not only pushing a false narrative, but it risks diverting our attention from what needs to be done to defend the U.S. homeland.