Tuesday, September 25, 2018


Deep State Unmasked: Leaks at HHS; DOJ Official Resists "From Inside" and "Can't Get Fired"  Published on Sep 19, 2018....Project Veritas


LINK TO VIDEO #2----https://youtu.be/S9qugiX6uYY

LINK TO VIDEO #3----https://youtu.be/SYvQPKskqSU

Project Veritas has released the second installment in an undercover video series unmasking the deep state. This video features a Department of Justice paralegal Allison Hrabar reportedly using government owned software and computers to push a socialist agenda. Also featured is Jessica Schubel, the former Chief of Staff for the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services  during the last Obama administration.

Both Schubel and Hrabar make admissions revealing that federal employees are using their positions in the government to resist or slow the Trump administration's policies, some breaking laws in the process.
See the full report:https://www.projectveritas.com/2018/0...
SEE MORE

Liberal Democrats acting like "LIBERAL DEMOCRATS"....SOONER OR LATER SOMEONE IS GOING TO GET HURT.....


Alert: Ted Cruz, Wife Attacked — Escape After Staff Struggle With Door   By Cillian Zeal

In an act of “protest” that appeared to verge on a violent attack, a group of liberals drove Texas Sen. Ted Cruz and his wife out of a Washington, D.C., restaurant Monday, the New York Post reports.

The protest was ostensibly about federal Judge Brett Kavanaugh’s Supreme Court nomination, and most of the verbal attacks seemed to be directed toward that. Footage of the attack, posted by a group calling itself Smash Racism DC, shows the protesters chanting “We believe survivors” as they chased Cruz and his wife Heidi from the unidentified eatery.

“I know that you’re very close friends with Mr. Kavanaugh,” one of the activists says to Cruz.

“But do you believe survivors, sir? We believe survivors!”

One protester, describing herself as a constituent and “survivor of sexual assault” followed the Cruzes throughout the restaurant and said, “Senator, I have a right to know what your position is on Brett Kavanaugh.”

FULL STORY + VIDEO

You can give a law-abiding man a rocket launcher, and he’ll never be a problem. The violent criminal will murder with their bare hands.


Police Say Seattle Man Stole Dozens Of Guns, But Did He Get His Background Check


Firearm thefts are a serious problem. No one wants to see guns in the hands of bad people, and regardless of who ends up with them, stolen guns are stolen property. They belong with their rightful owners no matter what.
Not only that, but stolen firearms are often used in such a way that anti-gun proponents can point to the misuse as justification for more gun control. The fact that stolen guns, by definition, mean they will never be subject to gun control seems completely irrelevant to them.
However, Seattle Police say one man has stolen dozens of guns and thousands of rounds of ammo.
READ ON

BUT...It OK for Kavanaugh's accuser to accuse (w/out proof) and try to RUIN Kavanaughs reputation, possibly his marriage and for her to suffer no repercussions when it is determined she is LYING .....


Cartoon depicting Kavanaugh's accuser demanding roses, M&Ms for her testimony draws outrage, apology 
Business Insider    
 · 
Cartoon depicting Kavanaugh's accuser demanding roses, for her testimony draws outrage, apology

"Here are my demands," she is depicted telling the panel. "No questions from lawyers, dim the lights, I want roses, sparkling water, a bowl of green M&Ms." 


Ever wondered? What Makes Someone Decide to Be a Conservative or Liberal, a Statist or Libertarian?
Politically aware people generally understand the policy differences between conservative and liberals (as they are currently defined, not classical liberals).

For those who don’t follow politics, there’s an
accurateand amusingguide from Playboy that explains the difference between Republicans and Democrats. Warning- strong language.

And it includes libertarians and greens as well, which is a nice touch for those of us with unconventional views


But what actually causes someone to pick an ideology?
In February, I
shared a bunch of research that looked at how various personal characteristics are associated with – and may even cause – political differences.

This is interesting research. Though I suspect it irks many of us, regardless of our philosophical orientation, since it implies that our views aren’t necessarily the result of reason.

According to
an article in Business Insider, this type of research even shows that differences extend beyond politics.

…what in the brains of conservative and liberal voters actually drive their belief systems? Scientists have been researching the psychological differences between people with different stances, and there are a few key ways that people on opposite ends of the political spectrum see the world.

About time "someone" put Michael in his place...


Tomi Lahren to former first lady: 'Sit down, Michelle' Joe Concha 

Tomi Lahren taking a selfie
Fox News commentator Tomi Lahren is telling Michelle Obama to "sit down" after taking issue with the former first lady calling her husband Barack Obama a great president.
"Michelle Obama said we 'had' a great president. By what measure? Not in economic growth. Not in border enforcement. Not in strength on the world stage. Sit down, Michelle," Lahren wrote to her 1.18 million followers in a tweet.


Michelle Obama said we “had” a great president. By what measure? Not in economic growth. Not in border enforcement. Not in strength on the world stage. Sit down, Michelle.

Lahren, who will be hosting a show on Fox's soon-to-launch subscription service called "Fox Nation," was responding to remarks Michelle Obama made at a rally in Las Vegas.

"Here's what we have to do," she said at the "When We All Vote" rally. "If we want qualified people that we trust, then people have to vote. Because you can't vote some of the time and then sit out."

"You know, we saw that happen. We experienced that. But we had a great president," she said, referring to former President Obama.

"But every couple years folks sat out and said 'well, I did my part, I voted once, I'm done, I'm out,' " she added. "And I'm just telling you that democracy doesn't work that way."

Michelle Obama is a co-chairwoman of When We All Vote, a nonprofit initiative to register voters.


So,...Stephanopoulos asks Sanders if Trump will fire Rosenstein. She shouldn't be the one to answer that question, she doesn't need to GUESS what is in Trumps mind. BUT... if I were Trump, I would fire Rosenstein immediately ! This is the "man" who questiond if he should wear a wire and tape conversations with Trump and use the 25th ammendment to remove Trump from office


Sarah Sanders Refuses to Say Trump Won’t Fire Rod Rosenstein 
Aidan McLaughlin , 

Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein is still scheduled to meet with President Trump on Thursday.

White House Press Secretary Sarah Sanders appeared on Good Morning America Tuesday with little answers in the wake of mass confusion over whether Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein still has a job.

It was alternately reported on Monday that Rosenstein — in the wake of reporting he once floated removing Donald Trump from office — would resign or be fired, until the White House announced he would meet with the president on Thursday.

GMA host George Stephanopoulos asked Sanders: “Does the president have confidence in Mr. Rosenstein?”

“The president has confidence in the system,” Sanders replied.
“That’s not what I asked,” Stephanopoulos shot back.

“Uh well — again, I’m not get ahead of the conversation that’s gonna take place,” Sanders said. “Certainly he wants things to take place. There have been a number of incidents that have caused a great deal of concern, not just to the president, but to Americans all over the country. People like Bruce Ohr, (Andrew) McCabe and a number of others who have been dishonest and not played the role that they were meant to play through the FBI and through the Department of Justice and the president wants to have a conversation with Rod Rosenstein and that will take place Thursday.”

“He wants to know if Rod Rosenstein said ‘should I wear a wire on the president?'” Stephanopoulos followed up, referring to reports the deputy attorney general proposed doing so in 2017.

“I think he wants to have a conversation with him,”
Sanders said. “They had a very long and good conversation yesterday, and they want to continue that in a couple of days.”

“If Rosenstein refuses to resign will the president fire him?” Stephanopoulos asked.

“I won’t get ahead of the president’s decision-making,” she reiterated.

Stephanopoulos also asked Sanders if she could promise that Special Counsel Robert Mueller‘s investigation will “continue and conclude” regardless of Rosenstein’s fate.

“Look, I’m not going to get ahead of where the president is but he has been very clear he wants this to come to a conclusion,” she said.

Monday, September 24, 2018

Judge Jeanine Pirro Risks It All To Expose Bob Mueller’s Dirtiest Secrets, Including His Role In Benghazi Cover-Up


Fox News Channel’s Judge Jeanine Pirro has INSISTED that Justice Department Special Counsel Robert Mueller had been acting as a “cleaner” for the Democrats. Here is the proof! She lays him OUT!

Judge Jeanine Pirro has Fans

Image may contain: 1 person, sitting and text

Of course the 2nd accuser came out.... it was beginning to look like Christine Blasey Ford, wasn't too believable. So... the second round begins and if this doesn't work, they'll pull a third woman into the fray. All is an attempt to delay Kavanaughs appointment to the Supreme Court


Second Kavanaugh Accuser from Yale and Avenatti claims 'evidence' of 'targeting' women for gang rape


Senate Democrats Investigate a New Allegation of Sexual Misconduct, from the Supreme Court Nominee Brett Kavanaugh College Years, by His Yale Classmate Deborah Ramirez
READ MORE
Scrubbed Social Media Accounts: What is Christine Blasey Ford trying to hide?
  


Scrubbed Her Social Media Accounts: What is Christine Blasey Ford trying to hide?

Christine Blasey Ford’s accusations towards Kavanaugh are completely off the wall.

Before she came forward, out of the shadows, her social media accounts were scrubbed.

Nothing adds up about this story and many holes are popping up all throughout her accusations.

The letter started in the hands of Dianne Feinstein who mentioned the anonymous letter from an alleged incident that happened 30+ years ago from an anonymous person who didn’t want to step forward.

I gather this bought democrats enough time to get their story straight and to scrub

Blasey Ford’s social media accounts. Why scrub them, what are they hiding?

I have a heart for sexually abused women, I really do. But I do not believe that this is a true or honest accusation. This looks like a play out of the democrat’s playbook to keep Kavanaugh, a pro-life Judge out of the Supreme Court.


This woman has no recollection of where she was when the “incident” happened or how she got home. She also never told anyone because she “didn’t want to get in trouble.”

And answer this for me, why are all of these “sexually abused” women who are stepping forward supporters of the Democratic party?

Blasey Ford also participated in the Women’s March with pink p***y hats that she helped make.

Obviously her social media accounts were scrubbed of her leftist activities and comments so that her political agenda wouldn’t be known and thus, would make a stronger case.


Via American Thinker:

Turns out her present politics has a lot to do with what we are seeing. She’s a fanatic Bay Area far-left activist. She donated cash to ShareBlue, a generic Democratic front for cash-raising of the Obama-hipster variety. On Twitter, there was some talk (unverified) that she gave $5,000 to Hillary Clinton, and a more reliable report from reporter Ryan Saavedra that she gave money to Bernie Sanders, the Democratic National Committee and the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee.

Image may contain: 1 person, smiling, text

It’s Time To Get Rid of Supreme Court Nominee Hearings | The Daily Signal


The Constitution doesn't require a hearing. All it says is that the Senate must give, advise and consent. You can do that with a simple up or down vote. And let's be real, do we really think one senator's vote is going to be changed after these four day of hearings?