If as it says, that the constitution is the "ultimate rule of law", then he laws in the constitution cannot be changed without actually changing the constitution, (a consitutional ammendment), which has not been done...SO, the 2nd ammendment stands as written "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED."
The current constitution was adopted in 1788, with the first ten amendments, collectively named the Bill of Rights, being ratified in 1791 to guarantee many fundamental civil liberties. For 233 years.
The United States Constitution is one of the most important legal documents in modern history. It has allowed each state to remain equal when discussing matters on the floor of Congress and has allowed for people throughout these United States to be heard in the matters of government. The US falls under governmental classifications for both Indirect Democracy and Constitutional Republic, but could be more accurately classified as the latter. The true power of the United States Federal Government derives from the populace that it protects and governs but ultimately its rule of law comes from the Constitution. Therefore, since the US government is representative in nature and derives its laws from the Constitution, it should be classified as a Constitutional Republic rather than a Democracy. When Benjamin Franklin was asked about what form of government he had helped to create, he responded, “a Republic, if you can keep it”.
IF ALL OF THIS ABOUT THE CONSTITUTION IS TRUE, THEN ANY RESTRICTIONS BIDEN TRIES TO IMPOSE ON THE 2ND AMMENDMENT IS ILLEGAL...!!.....OTHERWISE, SEE BELOW