Tuesday, December 3, 2019
Hillary and Chuck Todd.....What a combo. Todd makes me SICK..!!.....Tim Russert probably turning over in his grave......."Meet The Press"
Hillary Lectures GOP Sen. John Kennedy On Ukraine Election Interference…Sets Off A Twitter Landmine! by Doyle Alexander about 21 hours ago
Sen. John Kennedy (R-LA) has been making the media rounds over the last few weeks to discuss all things impeachment, but one thing he’s alleged that has gotten the most attention from the mainstream media and their Democratic allies is that Ukraine also interfered in the 2016 election.
The most recent interview he did where he repeated the allegation was during an exchange with NBC’s Chuck Todd on Sunday where Todd claimed Kennedy had been “duped”:
NBC host Chuck Todd pushed back at the Louisiana Republican by saying that the US intelligence community had concluded that Russia was behind the interference and that Russian President Vladimir Putin was pushing the Ukraine angle to get the Kremlin off the hook.
“I think both Russia and Ukraine meddled in the 2016 election. I think it’s been well documented in the Financial Times, in Politico, in The Economist, in the Washington Examiner, even on CBS,” Kennedy said.
Kennedy also pointed to a report in the New York Times that said a Ukrainian court had ruled in December 2018 that some of the country’s officials violated Ukraine law by interfering in the election.
“You have done exactly what the Russian operation is trying to get American politicians to do. Are you at all concerned that you’ve been duped?” Todd asked.
read more
The mathematical case for an AR-15
This is the (link)> best article I have read on the logic of prepping and the very sensible Congressman from Kentucky,Tom Massie agrees. It’s called “The Surprisingly Solid Mathematical Case of the Tin Foil Hat Gun Prepper”
or, “Who Needs an AR-15 Anyway?”The author is a scientist and used to running probability statistics, in his field it’s for flooding, but he looked as civil unrest and deduced there’s currently a 37% chance of revolution in the USA based on known stats like the Revolutionary War and the Civil War. Despite the complex nature of the math, he writes it so even a dummy like me can understand and follow it – and now, if you’ll forgive me, I’m headed straight out to buy some ammo!
or, “Who Needs an AR-15 Anyway?”The author is a scientist and used to running probability statistics, in his field it’s for flooding, but he looked as civil unrest and deduced there’s currently a 37% chance of revolution in the USA based on known stats like the Revolutionary War and the Civil War. Despite the complex nature of the math, he writes it so even a dummy like me can understand and follow it – and now, if you’ll forgive me, I’m headed straight out to buy some ammo!
As he says, prepping is just disaster planning. You’d be mad not to prepare – just as the billionaires mentioned in this article are doing. And a firearm is very important part of that planning.
Related
I guess this proves it...."All white people are RACIST"
Trump Supporters No Longer Called ‘Deplorables’ – Now Referred To As ‘Radical Racist Cult’ en-volve.com
WHICH ARE WE ??
EPIC: Republicans Refute EVERY BOGUS Impeachment Accusation With 110 Page Report! by Doyle Alexander about 18 hours ago
After 12 witnesses brought before the House Intelligence Committee NOT ONE was able to find presidential misconduct.
This was despite a committee where Chairman Schiff was judge and jury and refused Republicans their witnesses and cross examination.
It was correctly called a Schiff Sham.
Democrats were unable to find a single witness who corroborated their conspiracy against the US president.
The Democrats launched their impeachment inquiry after President Trump’s call to Ukrainian President Zelensky in July. The Ukrainian president again today said there was not quid pro quo and he was not even aware the US had delayed aid to Ukraine. President Trump provided military aid to the country something Obama would never do.
On Monday the House Intelligence Committee Republicans released their 123 page report exonerating President Trump from all criminal or questionable behavior.
From the report:
On November 8, 2016, nearly 63 million Americans from around the country chose Donald J. Trump to be the 45th President of the United States. Now, less than a year before the next presidential election, 231 House Democrats in Washington, D.C., are trying to undo the will of the American people. As one Democrat admitted, the pursuit of this extreme course of action is because they want to stop President Trump’s re-election.
Democrats in the House of Representatives have been working to impeach President Trump since his election. Democrats introduced four separate resolutions in 2017 and 2018 seeking to impeach President Trump. In January 2019, on their first day in power, House emocrats again introduced articles of impeachment. That same day, a newly elected Congresswoman promised to an audience of her supporters, “we’re going to go in there and we’re going to impeach the [expletive deleted].” Her comments are not isolated. Speaker Nancy Pelosi called President Trump “an impostor” and said it is “dangerous” to allow American voters to evaluate his performance in 2020.
After 12 witnesses brought before the House Intelligence Committee NOT ONE was able to find presidential misconduct.
This was despite a committee where Chairman Schiff was judge and jury and refused Republicans their witnesses and cross examination.
It was correctly called a Schiff Sham.
Democrats were unable to find a single witness who corroborated their conspiracy against the US president.
The Democrats launched their impeachment inquiry after President Trump’s call to Ukrainian President Zelensky in July. The Ukrainian president again today said there was not quid pro quo and he was not even aware the US had delayed aid to Ukraine. President Trump provided military aid to the country something Obama would never do.
On Monday the House Intelligence Committee Republicans released their 123 page report exonerating President Trump from all criminal or questionable behavior.
From the report:
On November 8, 2016, nearly 63 million Americans from around the country chose Donald J. Trump to be the 45th President of the United States. Now, less than a year before the next presidential election, 231 House Democrats in Washington, D.C., are trying to undo the will of the American people. As one Democrat admitted, the pursuit of this extreme course of action is because they want to stop President Trump’s re-election.
Democrats in the House of Representatives have been working to impeach President Trump since his election. Democrats introduced four separate resolutions in 2017 and 2018 seeking to impeach President Trump. In January 2019, on their first day in power, House emocrats again introduced articles of impeachment. That same day, a newly elected Congresswoman promised to an audience of her supporters, “we’re going to go in there and we’re going to impeach the [expletive deleted].” Her comments are not isolated. Speaker Nancy Pelosi called President Trump “an impostor” and said it is “dangerous” to allow American voters to evaluate his performance in 2020.
The Democrats’ impeachment inquiry is not the organic outgrowth of serious misconduct; it is an orchestrated campaign to upend our political system. The Democrats are trying to impeach a duly elected President based on the accusations and assumptions of unelected bureaucrats who disagreed with President Trump’s policy initiatives and processes. They are trying to impeach President Trump because some unelected bureaucrats were discomforted by an elected President’s telephone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. They are trying to impeach President Trump because some unelected bureaucrats chafed at an elected President’s “outside the beltway” approach to diplomacy.
Here is the report
Via GatewayPundit
Lisa Page Saves Her Own Skin, Tosses McCabe, Strzok, And FBI Under Bus In Tell-All Plea Deal by Doyle Alexander
Amid the fire-and-brimstone legal rants and threats of court-room Armageddon, lawyer Amy Jeffress might have slipped.
Jeffress is a fine attorney, no doubt. And according to other FBI agents she has represented, she does not pull punches or posture. I spoke to FBI agents who have previously been represented by Jeffress and they attest that is not her style.
I reached out to Jeffress at her request but she doesn’t want to talk.
But what she did say in the letter I believe is quite telling. And a slip.
“She (Lisa Page) is not a target of the Durham investigation,” Jeffress confidently penned in the letter.
To me this means three possible things:
1. Jeffress is posturing. I don’t think that is likely.
2. Page has struck a deal with DOJ to rat out her FBI colleagues, cohorts. In exchange, she gets immunity or the DOJ’s assurances she won’t be a target, indicted.
3. Durham’s investigation is a sham.
Page went public on Sunday in the Daily Beast, professing her innocence and “speaking out” about how unfairly she has been treated in the media, especially by Donald Trump.
Cute interview. And quite staged to get out in front of the upcoming IG report.
The question I had and have for Jeffress and Page is what kind of deal did she strike with DOJ for her client. She can still contact me to answer that.
Because there is no way in hell a thorough investigation into the tainted and corrupt FBI’s trampling and manipulation of the legal code in an attempt to dismantle Trump’s presidency WOULD NOT treat Page as a target.
I love it when attorneys write me letters. They say the darndest things. I have been reading correspondences to and from attorneys spanning four decades. I recognize a slip when I see one.
If Page is not a target, like her attorney professes, either Page has turned rat and cut herself a nice deal or Durham’s probe is a sham.
Via TruePundit
FBI Lisa Page’s attorney, in a letter threatening to sue True Pundit, may have said too much.
Amid the fire-and-brimstone legal rants and threats of court-room Armageddon, lawyer Amy Jeffress might have slipped.
Jeffress is a fine attorney, no doubt. And according to other FBI agents she has represented, she does not pull punches or posture. I spoke to FBI agents who have previously been represented by Jeffress and they attest that is not her style.
I reached out to Jeffress at her request but she doesn’t want to talk.
But what she did say in the letter I believe is quite telling. And a slip.
“She (Lisa Page) is not a target of the Durham investigation,” Jeffress confidently penned in the letter.
To me this means three possible things:
1. Jeffress is posturing. I don’t think that is likely.
2. Page has struck a deal with DOJ to rat out her FBI colleagues, cohorts. In exchange, she gets immunity or the DOJ’s assurances she won’t be a target, indicted.
3. Durham’s investigation is a sham.
Page went public on Sunday in the Daily Beast, professing her innocence and “speaking out” about how unfairly she has been treated in the media, especially by Donald Trump.
Cute interview. And quite staged to get out in front of the upcoming IG report.
The question I had and have for Jeffress and Page is what kind of deal did she strike with DOJ for her client. She can still contact me to answer that.
Because there is no way in hell a thorough investigation into the tainted and corrupt FBI’s trampling and manipulation of the legal code in an attempt to dismantle Trump’s presidency WOULD NOT treat Page as a target.
I love it when attorneys write me letters. They say the darndest things. I have been reading correspondences to and from attorneys spanning four decades. I recognize a slip when I see one.
If Page is not a target, like her attorney professes, either Page has turned rat and cut herself a nice deal or Durham’s probe is a sham.
Via TruePundit
Monday, December 2, 2019
House GOP Report: No Evidence for Impeachment, Warns of 'Dangerous Precedent' 2019-12-02 Source: TTN by: TTN Staff
Gage Skidmore Via Flickr
The House GOP released their impeachment report on Monday ahead of the Democrats report that is expected to come to the opposite conclusions.
The House GOP also warned that the Democrats are creating "dangerous precedent" by turning the impeachment process into a political tool.
According to Fox News:
“The evidence presented does not prove any of these Democrat allegations, and none of the Democrats’ witnesses testified to having evidence of bribery, extortion, or any high crime or misdemeanor,” Republicans said in a 123-page report, timed to be made public ahead of the majority Democrats’ impeachment report.House Intelligence Committee Ranking Member Devin Nunes, R-Calif.; Oversight Committee Ranking Member Jim Jordan, R-Ohio; and Foreign Affairs Committee Ranking Member Michael McCaul, R-Texas, penned the minority report, which has been reviewed by Fox News. In it, they broadly defend the president’s actions in the face of accusations he withheld military aid and a White House meeting as leverage to pressure Ukraine to launch a probe involving the Bidens.“The Democrats’ impeachment inquiry is not the organic outgrowth of serious misconduct; it is an orchestrated campaign to upend our political system,” the Republicans wrote.They added: “This impeachment inquiry and the manner in which the Democrats are pursuing it sets a dangerous precedent.”
The Republicans also refuted the claim that President Trump conditioned a meeting with Zelensky on an investigation of the Bidens. In fact, President Trump extended an invitation to Zelensky three times.
LINK.....
Read more at https://trumptrainnews.com/articles/house-gop-report-no-evidence-for-impeachment-warns-of-dangerous-precedent#LWt0QeXTsoIFfMYG.99
Over 300 Trump Campaign Ads Taken Down By Google and Youtube Posted Dec 2, 2019 Collin Rugg
According to a recently released report by 60 Minutes, over 300 President Trump 2020 campaign ads were taken down by Google and Youtube for "violating" their terms of service.
The reporters couldn't find any apparent reason why the ads were taken down. “We found very little transparency in the transparency report,” 60 Minutes said.
Check out what CBS News reported:
60 Minutes correspondent Lesley Stahl asked Wojcicki, “Have you taken down any of President Trump’s ads at all?” YouTube’s CEO responded, “There are ads of President Trump that were not approved to run on Google or YouTube.” When pressed for an example, Wojcicki added, “Well, they’re available in our transparency report.”
In response to concerns raised after the 2016 election cycle, Google and YouTube, like Facebook, keep a searchable archive of political ads that have run on the site.
60 Minutes reviewed the archive to learn more about President Trump’s problematic political ads. We found that over 300 video ads were taken down by Google and YouTube, mostly over the summer, for violating company policy. But the archive doesn’t detail what policy was violated. Was it copyright violation? A lie or extreme inaccuracy? Faulty grammar? Bad punctuation? It’s unclear. The ads determined to be offending are not available to be screened. We found very little transparency in the transparency report.
The Trump campaign has strongly condemned the social media platforms for their constant censorship ahead of the 2020 election.
In late November, Google announced that they would stop allowing advertisers to use voting data to make their ads.
“We’re limiting election ads audience targeting to the following general categories: age, gender, and general location (postal code level),” said a Google spokesman. “Political advertisers can, of course, continue to do contextual targeting, such as serving ads to people reading or watching a story about, say, the economy.”
President Trump's campaign manager Brad Parscale made sure to shred Google in a tweet, noting how the rule change with "lead directly to suppressing voter turnout."
According to a recently released report by 60 Minutes, over 300 President Trump 2020 campaign ads were taken down by Google and Youtube for "violating" their terms of service.
The reporters couldn't find any apparent reason why the ads were taken down. “We found very little transparency in the transparency report,” 60 Minutes said.
Check out what CBS News reported:
60 Minutes correspondent Lesley Stahl asked Wojcicki, “Have you taken down any of President Trump’s ads at all?” YouTube’s CEO responded, “There are ads of President Trump that were not approved to run on Google or YouTube.” When pressed for an example, Wojcicki added, “Well, they’re available in our transparency report.”
In response to concerns raised after the 2016 election cycle, Google and YouTube, like Facebook, keep a searchable archive of political ads that have run on the site.
60 Minutes reviewed the archive to learn more about President Trump’s problematic political ads. We found that over 300 video ads were taken down by Google and YouTube, mostly over the summer, for violating company policy. But the archive doesn’t detail what policy was violated. Was it copyright violation? A lie or extreme inaccuracy? Faulty grammar? Bad punctuation? It’s unclear. The ads determined to be offending are not available to be screened. We found very little transparency in the transparency report.
The Trump campaign has strongly condemned the social media platforms for their constant censorship ahead of the 2020 election.
In late November, Google announced that they would stop allowing advertisers to use voting data to make their ads.
“We’re limiting election ads audience targeting to the following general categories: age, gender, and general location (postal code level),” said a Google spokesman. “Political advertisers can, of course, continue to do contextual targeting, such as serving ads to people reading or watching a story about, say, the economy.”
President Trump's campaign manager Brad Parscale made sure to shred Google in a tweet, noting how the rule change with "lead directly to suppressing voter turnout."
Sunday, December 1, 2019
Schiff to House Dems: You Have 24 Hours To Sign My Impeachment Report Follow CollinRugg Dec. 1, 2019 in Politics , Source: breitbart,
According to Breitbart, House Intelligence Committee chairman Rep. Adam Schiff is giving members of his committee only 24 hours to sign off on his bogus report where he recommends impeaching President Donald Trump.
The far-left representative announced that he will provide his report on Monday and members of the committee only have till Tuesday to read and sign off on the report.
Evidence is not on the Democrats' side in the ongoing impeachment inquiry but that doesn't seem to be stopping them. Schiff held multiple impeachment hearings in late November and although no impeachable offenses were found, Schiff has made it clear that he will impeach the President anyways.
In a recent letter, House Judiciary Committee chairman Jerry Nadler said that the House Intelligence Committee plans to submit their report, recommending impeachment against the President, stating that there was “a months-long effort in which President Trump again sought foreign interference in our elections for his personal and political benefit at the expense of our national interest”; and that the president conducted “an unprecedented campaign of obstruction in an effort to prevent the Committees from obtaining documentary evidence and testimony.”
On Tuesday. Nadler announced that he would be holding his own impeachment hearings next week and invited President Trump to testify.
Nadler's hearings are called the “the constitutional grounds for presidential impeachment,” and the structure will be different than Rep. Adam Schiff's hearings considering they will include legal experts who will give their opinions on whether or not the president committed an impeachable offense.
Breitbart reports: "In a whistleblower complaint, a partisan CIA officer mischaracterized President Trump’s conversation with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, alleging the president pressured the European leader to investigate allegations of corruption against former Vice President Joe Biden and his son, Hunter Biden, in exchange for U.S. military aid. The White House countered this framing of the call with a transcript of the conversation showing neither Trump nor Zelensky tying the potential investigation to the aid money."
Nadler's announcement comes after Schiff's impeachment hearings turned out to be a total flop. They were so bad that Schiff has since announced that he may hold more hearings.
Check out what the Daily Wire reported:
Vulnerable and moderate Democrats say the hearings, which produced little in the way of first-person testimony of President Donald Trump’s alleged “high crimes and misdemeanors,” and featured few big-name witnesses, are costing them support and could cost them key races. Independents are fleeing from the impeachment inquiry in droves and, for the first time since the hearings started, fewer than 50% of Americans believe the President should be impeached.
Furthermore, Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), who has been suspiciously absent these last two weeks, has refused to provide air support in toss-up races, and the Democratic National Committee isn’t matching the millions of dollars in advertising that Republicans plan to air over Thanksgiving and the holiday season, pushing against the Democrats’ message of presidential malfeasance.
Vulnerable and moderate Democrats say the hearings, which produced little in the way of first-person testimony of President Donald Trump’s alleged “high crimes and misdemeanors,” and featured few big-name witnesses, are costing them support and could cost them key races. Independents are fleeing from the impeachment inquiry in droves and, for the first time since the hearings started, fewer than 50% of Americans believe the President should be impeached.
Furthermore, Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), who has been suspiciously absent these last two weeks, has refused to provide air support in toss-up races, and the Democratic National Committee isn’t matching the millions of dollars in advertising that Republicans plan to air over Thanksgiving and the holiday season, pushing against the Democrats’ message of presidential malfeasance.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
