Media Attempts To Redefine “Mass Shooting” In Order To Inflate Number Of Attacks Bob Owens on December 3, 2015
The long-accepted definition of a mass shooting is, “four people or more people killed in a single event.” Others have further refined the definition to exclude gang-related activity, familicide, or terrorist attacks. Like the famous Supreme Court definition of pornography, it’s tough to create a catch-all to describe every possible kind of mass shooting, “but you know it when you see it.”
As Tamara Keel dryly noted this morning, propaganda outlets are attempting to radically change that definition.
The media has to resort to citing propaganda outfits that lie and change definitions, because violent crime and crime with firearms is actually on a dramatic long-term decline.
READ MORE
As Tamara Keel dryly noted this morning, propaganda outlets are attempting to radically change that definition.
Remember: New definition of “mass shooting” is “four or more people hit by bullets”. Remember that when they trot the totals out. If JJ shoots Pookie, Ice Dog, and Ray-Ray, and one of them manages to wing him back with return fire, that’s a “mass shooting”.The left wing media is using grotesquely manipulated data from a site called ShootingTracker.com in order grossly inflate the number of mass shootings in the country, at least doubling them, in an effort to create the false impression that the number of shootings is going up in order to create a political environment to call for more gun control laws.
The media has to resort to citing propaganda outfits that lie and change definitions, because violent crime and crime with firearms is actually on a dramatic long-term decline.
READ MORE
No comments:
Post a Comment